Champion Lancer
Played in 121 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
121 decks
All commanders (9)
- Sidar Jabari relevance 1.92 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Syr Cadian, Knight Owl relevance 1.49 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Oriss, Samite Guardian relevance 1.27 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.84 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
- Veteran Soldier // Abdel Adrian, Gorion's Ward relevance 0.82 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel // Keleth, Sunmane Familiar relevance 0.78 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 0.70 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Avacyn, Guardian Angel relevance 0.66 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
- Cho-Manno, Revolutionary relevance 0.59 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Crusading Knight relevance 3.77 · 41.3% (50 of 121 decks)
- Alaborn Cavalier relevance 3.56 · 38.0% (46 of 121 decks)
- Charging Paladin relevance 3.49 · 32.2% (39 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Knight relevance 3.40 · 35.5% (43 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Lancer relevance 3.20 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Alaborn Veteran relevance 3.15 · 30.6% (37 of 121 decks)
- Capashen Templar relevance 3.08 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Marshal relevance 3.01 · 45.5% (55 of 121 decks)
- Ardent Militia relevance 2.97 · 28.1% (34 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Heralds relevance 2.96 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Cavalry Master relevance 2.94 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Caravan Escort relevance 2.85 · 31.4% (38 of 121 decks)
- Angel of Fury relevance 2.82 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Chieftain en-Dal relevance 2.82 · 28.9% (35 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Cavalry relevance 2.81 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Cho-Arrim Bruiser relevance 2.81 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Aysen Crusader relevance 2.79 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Brine Hag relevance 2.77 · 24.8% (30 of 121 decks)
- Ardenvale Paladin relevance 2.76 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Angelic Voices relevance 2.76 · 28.9% (35 of 121 decks)
- Border Guard relevance 2.75 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Defender of Law relevance 2.74 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Call to Arms relevance 2.74 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Castle Raptors relevance 2.74 · 24.8% (30 of 121 decks)
- Cho-Manno, Revolutionary relevance 2.71 · 32.2% (39 of 121 decks)
- Calciderm relevance 2.71 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Battle Hurda relevance 2.71 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Capashen Knight relevance 2.70 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Cerulean Wyvern relevance 2.69 · 24.8% (30 of 121 decks)
- Caregiver relevance 2.66 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Crusading Knight relevance 3.77 · 41.3% (50 of 121 decks)
- Alaborn Cavalier relevance 3.56 · 38.0% (46 of 121 decks)
- Charging Paladin relevance 3.49 · 32.2% (39 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Knight relevance 3.40 · 35.5% (43 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Lancer relevance 3.20 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Alaborn Veteran relevance 3.15 · 30.6% (37 of 121 decks)
- Capashen Templar relevance 3.08 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Marshal relevance 3.01 · 45.5% (55 of 121 decks)
- Ardent Militia relevance 2.97 · 28.1% (34 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Heralds relevance 2.96 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Cavalry Master relevance 2.94 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Caravan Escort relevance 2.85 · 31.4% (38 of 121 decks)
- Angel of Fury relevance 2.82 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Chieftain en-Dal relevance 2.82 · 28.9% (35 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Cavalry relevance 2.81 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Cho-Arrim Bruiser relevance 2.81 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Aysen Crusader relevance 2.79 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Brine Hag relevance 2.77 · 24.8% (30 of 121 decks)
- Ardenvale Paladin relevance 2.76 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Border Guard relevance 2.75 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Defender of Law relevance 2.74 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Castle Raptors relevance 2.74 · 24.8% (30 of 121 decks)
- Cho-Manno, Revolutionary relevance 2.71 · 32.2% (39 of 121 decks)
- Calciderm relevance 2.71 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Battle Hurda relevance 2.71 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Capashen Knight relevance 2.70 · 27.3% (33 of 121 decks)
- Cerulean Wyvern relevance 2.69 · 24.8% (30 of 121 decks)
- Caregiver relevance 2.66 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Battalion Foot Soldier relevance 2.66 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Alaborn Grenadier relevance 2.65 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Blizzard Elemental relevance 2.64 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Carrier Pigeons relevance 2.64 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Burrenton Shield-Bearers relevance 2.63 · 24.8% (30 of 121 decks)
- Azorius Knight-Arbiter relevance 2.63 · 29.8% (36 of 121 decks)
- Battlewise Aven relevance 2.62 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Charmed Griffin relevance 2.62 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Aven Trooper relevance 2.62 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Battleflight Eagle relevance 2.61 · 24.8% (30 of 121 decks)
- Celestial Messenger relevance 2.60 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Alaborn Musketeer relevance 2.60 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Cavalry Drillmaster relevance 2.60 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Auspicious Ancestor relevance 2.59 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Charm Peddler relevance 2.59 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
- Benalish Veteran relevance 2.57 · 23.1% (28 of 121 decks)
- Bazaar Krovod relevance 2.56 · 24.8% (30 of 121 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Angelic Voices relevance 2.76 · 28.9% (35 of 121 decks)
- Call to Arms relevance 2.74 · 26.4% (32 of 121 decks)
- Cephalid Shrine relevance 2.59 · 24.0% (29 of 121 decks)
- Caribou Range relevance 2.58 · 25.6% (31 of 121 decks)
All instants (1)
- Champion's Victory relevance 2.57 · 24.8% (30 of 121 decks)
EDH data for Champion Lancer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 121 real decks.