Lidless Gaze
Played in 6,039 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
6K decks
-
Grixis 5,013 · 83.0%
-
Rakdos 743 · 12.3%
-
Mardu 151 · 2.5%
- Other (9) 132 · 2.2%
3030+324+2+2+3+11+3+5+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Sauron, Lord of the Rings relevance 4.67 · 46.4% (1,682 of 3,622 decks)
- Karolina Dean, Runaway relevance 2.98 · 2.1% (21 of 977 decks)
- Saruman, the White Hand relevance 2.68 · 12.2% (899 of 7,358 decks)
- Sauron, the Dark Lord relevance 2.39 · 7.4% (2,032 of 27,508 decks)
- Prosper, Tome-Bound relevance 2.29 · 2.5% (215 of 8,503 decks)
- Witch-king, Sky Scourge relevance 2.18 · 7.2% (35 of 486 decks)
- Valki, God of Lies // Tibalt, Cosmic Impostor relevance 1.74 · 4.0% (30 of 741 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Breeches, Brazen Plunderer relevance 1.49 · 6.1% (12 of 197 decks)
- Sauron, the Lidless Eye relevance 1.34 · 4.4% (12 of 274 decks)
- Locke, Treasure Hunter relevance 1.21 · 2.3% (18 of 772 decks)
- Don Andres, the Renegade relevance 1.12 · 4.0% (134 of 3,319 decks)
- Laughing Jasper Flint relevance 1.12 · 1.1% (41 of 3,585 decks)
- The Fugitive Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 0.83 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- The Twelfth Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 0.73 · 5.1% (16 of 316 decks)
- Nathan Drake, Treasure Hunter relevance 0.64 · 2.2% (60 of 2,749 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.63 · 1.6% (1 of 63 decks)
- Passionate Archaeologist // Sivriss, Nightmare Speaker relevance 0.62 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Bolg, Erebor's Reckoning relevance 0.60 · 1.5% (5 of 342 decks)
- Mauhúr, Uruk-hai Captain relevance 0.59 · 1.4% (5 of 361 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Popular Entertainer relevance 0.53 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.50 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Vislor Turlough // The War Doctor relevance 0.48 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Viconia, Drow Apostate // Passionate Archaeologist relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Uglúk of the White Hand relevance 0.45 · 1.0% (4 of 397 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.41 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Haunted One // Amber Gristle O'Maul relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Passionate Archaeologist // Burakos, Party Leader relevance 0.34 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- The Balrog of Moria relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Agent of the Shadow Thieves // Amber Gristle O'Maul relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
- Tsabo Tavoc relevance 0.20 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All parallel cards (3)
All most relevant (30)
- Too Greedily, Too Deep relevance 4.03 · 65.2% (3,936 of 6,039 decks)
- Summons of Saruman relevance 3.81 · 65.7% (3,970 of 6,039 decks)
- In the Darkness Bind Them relevance 3.63 · 65.8% (3,974 of 6,039 decks)
- Wake the Dragon relevance 3.61 · 56.3% (3,401 of 6,039 decks)
- Moria Scavenger relevance 3.57 · 61.9% (3,741 of 6,039 decks)
- The Mouth of Sauron relevance 3.55 · 59.1% (3,572 of 6,039 decks)
- The Balrog of Moria relevance 3.55 · 62.1% (3,748 of 6,039 decks)
- Orcish Siegemaster relevance 3.54 · 64.2% (3,875 of 6,039 decks)
- Lord of the Nazgûl relevance 3.53 · 62.5% (3,774 of 6,039 decks)
- Relic of Sauron relevance 3.44 · 72.9% (4,402 of 6,039 decks)
- Gríma, Saruman's Footman relevance 3.39 · 63.1% (3,813 of 6,039 decks)
- Treason of Isengard relevance 3.36 · 57.1% (3,447 of 6,039 decks)
- Corsairs of Umbar relevance 3.32 · 56.0% (3,381 of 6,039 decks)
- Extract from Darkness relevance 3.22 · 59.9% (3,618 of 6,039 decks)
- Grishnákh, Brash Instigator relevance 3.13 · 54.6% (3,299 of 6,039 decks)
- Saruman, the White Hand relevance 3.09 · 55.2% (3,332 of 6,039 decks)
- Languish relevance 3.08 · 51.6% (3,115 of 6,039 decks)
- Subjugate the Hobbits relevance 2.99 · 46.8% (2,826 of 6,039 decks)
- Bitter Downfall relevance 2.96 · 44.0% (2,658 of 6,039 decks)
- Goblin Dark-Dwellers relevance 2.89 · 46.6% (2,813 of 6,039 decks)
- Shelob, Dread Weaver relevance 2.84 · 47.3% (2,855 of 6,039 decks)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 2.78 · 48.6% (2,935 of 6,039 decks)
- Rampaging War Mammoth relevance 2.69 · 40.7% (2,456 of 6,039 decks)
- Hostage Taker relevance 2.68 · 54.8% (3,308 of 6,039 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 2.65 · 42.1% (2,542 of 6,039 decks)
- Treasure Nabber relevance 2.63 · 56.6% (3,418 of 6,039 decks)
- Decree of Pain relevance 2.61 · 55.9% (3,378 of 6,039 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 2.48 · 41.1% (2,484 of 6,039 decks)
- Voracious Fell Beast relevance 2.47 · 40.1% (2,422 of 6,039 decks)
- Cavern-Hoard Dragon relevance 2.47 · 54.8% (3,311 of 6,039 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Moria Scavenger relevance 3.57 · 61.9% (3,741 of 6,039 decks)
- The Mouth of Sauron relevance 3.55 · 59.1% (3,572 of 6,039 decks)
- The Balrog of Moria relevance 3.55 · 62.1% (3,748 of 6,039 decks)
- Orcish Siegemaster relevance 3.54 · 64.2% (3,875 of 6,039 decks)
- Lord of the Nazgûl relevance 3.53 · 62.5% (3,774 of 6,039 decks)
- Gríma, Saruman's Footman relevance 3.39 · 63.1% (3,813 of 6,039 decks)
- Corsairs of Umbar relevance 3.32 · 56.0% (3,381 of 6,039 decks)
- Grishnákh, Brash Instigator relevance 3.13 · 54.6% (3,299 of 6,039 decks)
- Saruman, the White Hand relevance 3.09 · 55.2% (3,332 of 6,039 decks)
- Goblin Dark-Dwellers relevance 2.89 · 46.6% (2,813 of 6,039 decks)
- Shelob, Dread Weaver relevance 2.84 · 47.3% (2,855 of 6,039 decks)
- Rampaging War Mammoth relevance 2.69 · 40.7% (2,456 of 6,039 decks)
- Hostage Taker relevance 2.68 · 54.8% (3,308 of 6,039 decks)
- Treasure Nabber relevance 2.63 · 56.6% (3,418 of 6,039 decks)
- Monstrosity of the Lake relevance 2.48 · 41.1% (2,484 of 6,039 decks)
- Voracious Fell Beast relevance 2.47 · 40.1% (2,422 of 6,039 decks)
- Cavern-Hoard Dragon relevance 2.47 · 54.8% (3,311 of 6,039 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 2.42 · 54.7% (3,306 of 6,039 decks)
- Troll of Khazad-dûm relevance 2.37 · 45.9% (2,774 of 6,039 decks)
- Scourge of the Throne relevance 2.30 · 52.4% (3,167 of 6,039 decks)
- Knollspine Dragon relevance 2.26 · 39.4% (2,379 of 6,039 decks)
- Merciless Executioner relevance 2.22 · 45.0% (2,719 of 6,039 decks)
- Goblin Cratermaker relevance 2.20 · 36.1% (2,178 of 6,039 decks)
- Anger relevance 2.12 · 61.6% (3,722 of 6,039 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Relic of Sauron relevance 3.44 · 72.9% (4,402 of 6,039 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 2.24 · 58.3% (3,518 of 6,039 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- In the Darkness Bind Them relevance 3.63 · 65.8% (3,974 of 6,039 decks)
- Fiery Inscription relevance 2.43 · 55.2% (3,332 of 6,039 decks)
All instants (3)
- Bitter Downfall relevance 2.96 · 44.0% (2,658 of 6,039 decks)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 2.78 · 48.6% (2,935 of 6,039 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 2.11 · 52.0% (3,142 of 6,039 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Too Greedily, Too Deep relevance 4.03 · 65.2% (3,936 of 6,039 decks)
- Summons of Saruman relevance 3.81 · 65.7% (3,970 of 6,039 decks)
- Wake the Dragon relevance 3.61 · 56.3% (3,401 of 6,039 decks)
- Treason of Isengard relevance 3.36 · 57.1% (3,447 of 6,039 decks)
- Extract from Darkness relevance 3.22 · 59.9% (3,618 of 6,039 decks)
- Languish relevance 3.08 · 51.6% (3,115 of 6,039 decks)
- Subjugate the Hobbits relevance 2.99 · 46.8% (2,826 of 6,039 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 2.65 · 42.1% (2,542 of 6,039 decks)
- Decree of Pain relevance 2.61 · 55.9% (3,378 of 6,039 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 2.45 · 54.0% (3,264 of 6,039 decks)
- Living Death relevance 2.19 · 61.1% (3,691 of 6,039 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- The Black Gate relevance 2.99 · 68.6% (4,141 of 6,039 decks)
- Desolate Lighthouse relevance 2.80 · 56.2% (3,393 of 6,039 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 2.20 · 51.9% (3,137 of 6,039 decks)
All lands (5)
- Crumbling Necropolis relevance 2.62 · 73.2% (4,422 of 6,039 decks)
- Foreboding Ruins relevance 2.52 · 74.4% (4,494 of 6,039 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 2.24 · 67.2% (4,056 of 6,039 decks)
- Frostboil Snarl relevance 2.24 · 65.9% (3,979 of 6,039 decks)
- Smoldering Marsh relevance 2.07 · 81.7% (4,932 of 6,039 decks)
EDH data for Lidless Gaze: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,039 real decks.





















































































