Blind Phantasm
Played in 158 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
158 decks
- Ink-Treader 52 · 32.9%
- Azorius 44 · 27.8%
- Blue 33 · 20.9%
- Five-Color 13 · 8.2%
- Izzet 4 · 2.5%
- Other (7) 12 · 7.6%
All commanders (8)
- Pol Jamaar, Illusionist relevance 1.66 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Sivitri Scarzam relevance 0.98 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.95 · 2.0% (2 of 101 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.76 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Kasimir the Lone Wolf relevance 0.72 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 0.61 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.58 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Tobias Andrion relevance 0.57 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
All parallel cards (30)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride
- Plated Seastrider
- Moriok Reaver
- Fomori Nomad
- Nessian Courser
- Loxodon Wayfarer
- Scoria Elemental
- River Kaijin
- Armored Whirl Turtle
- Jwari Scuttler
- Tolarian Scholar
- Mass of Ghouls
- Coral Commando
- Ancient Crab
- Curio Vendor
- Lumengrid Warden
- Coral Merfolk
- Wetland Sambar
- Jhessian Lookout
- Maritime Guard
- Fortress Crab
- Wishcoin Crab
- Headwater Sentries
- Water Elemental
- Aegis Turtle
- Wandering Ones
- Kraken Hatchling
- Triton Shorethief
- Vodalian Soldiers
- Talas Merchant
All most relevant (30)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 5.08 · 63.3% (100 of 158 decks)
- Celestial Purge relevance 4.44 · 51.3% (81 of 158 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 4.36 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Fomori Nomad relevance 4.17 · 38.6% (61 of 158 decks)
- Psionic Blast relevance 3.28 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Hinder relevance 3.26 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Reciprocate relevance 3.24 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Tidings relevance 3.15 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 3.08 · 33.5% (53 of 158 decks)
- Remove Soul relevance 2.93 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Cancel relevance 2.82 · 56.3% (89 of 158 decks)
- Brave the Elements relevance 2.78 · 50.0% (79 of 158 decks)
- Amphin Cutthroat relevance 2.78 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Condemn relevance 2.71 · 46.8% (74 of 158 decks)
- Treasure Hunt relevance 2.67 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 2.63 · 43.7% (69 of 158 decks)
- Blizzard Elemental relevance 2.58 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Breezekeeper relevance 2.56 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Flame Javelin relevance 2.54 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Oxidize relevance 2.54 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Blinding Spray relevance 2.50 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Aven Augur relevance 2.49 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Benthic Giant relevance 2.49 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Ancient Carp relevance 2.48 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Brine Hag relevance 2.47 · 22.2% (35 of 158 decks)
- Searing Blaze relevance 2.47 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Balshan Griffin relevance 2.46 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Aetherplasm relevance 2.46 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Border Guard relevance 2.44 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Chameleon Spirit relevance 2.44 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
All creatures (28)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 5.08 · 63.3% (100 of 158 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen relevance 4.36 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Fomori Nomad relevance 4.17 · 38.6% (61 of 158 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 3.08 · 33.5% (53 of 158 decks)
- Amphin Cutthroat relevance 2.78 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 2.63 · 43.7% (69 of 158 decks)
- Blizzard Elemental relevance 2.58 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Breezekeeper relevance 2.56 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Aven Augur relevance 2.49 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Benthic Giant relevance 2.49 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Ancient Carp relevance 2.48 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Brine Hag relevance 2.47 · 22.2% (35 of 158 decks)
- Balshan Griffin relevance 2.46 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Aetherplasm relevance 2.46 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Border Guard relevance 2.44 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Chameleon Spirit relevance 2.44 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Bastion Inventor relevance 2.44 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Boreal Elemental relevance 2.44 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Blockade Runner relevance 2.40 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Armored Cancrix relevance 2.39 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Brackwater Elemental relevance 2.39 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Battalion Foot Soldier relevance 2.38 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Vengevine relevance 2.38 · 29.7% (47 of 158 decks)
- Bouncing Beebles relevance 2.38 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Benthic Explorers relevance 2.36 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Balduvian Shaman relevance 2.36 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Bastion Enforcer relevance 2.35 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Callous Deceiver relevance 2.34 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Binding Grasp relevance 2.39 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Breath of Dreams relevance 2.36 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
All instants (16)
- Celestial Purge relevance 4.44 · 51.3% (81 of 158 decks)
- Psionic Blast relevance 3.28 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Hinder relevance 3.26 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Reciprocate relevance 3.24 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Remove Soul relevance 2.93 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Cancel relevance 2.82 · 56.3% (89 of 158 decks)
- Brave the Elements relevance 2.78 · 50.0% (79 of 158 decks)
- Condemn relevance 2.71 · 46.8% (74 of 158 decks)
- Flame Javelin relevance 2.54 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Oxidize relevance 2.54 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Blinding Spray relevance 2.50 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Searing Blaze relevance 2.47 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Bewilder relevance 2.44 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Barrin's Unmaking relevance 2.43 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Incinerate relevance 2.38 · 31.6% (50 of 158 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 2.36 · 50.6% (80 of 158 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Tidings relevance 3.15 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Treasure Hunt relevance 2.67 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Baki's Curse relevance 2.40 · 22.2% (35 of 158 decks)
- Recollect relevance 2.36 · 32.3% (51 of 158 decks)
EDH data for Blind Phantasm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 158 real decks.