Gelatinous Cube

Played in 4,433 decks

Gelatinous Cube
$0.33 €0.15

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Uugguu, the Omniplasm relevance 5.36 · 54.2% (2,544 of 4,694 decks)
  2. Umori, the Collector relevance 5.20 · 28.7% (153 of 534 decks)
  3. Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 4.44 · 26.4% (78 of 295 decks)
  4. The Falcon, Airship Restored relevance 2.61 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
  5. The Mimeoplasm relevance 2.49 · 11.6% (423 of 3,640 decks)
  6. Acererak the Archlich relevance 2.33 · 2.6% (29 of 1,100 decks)
  7. Orcus, Prince of Undeath relevance 2.32 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
  8. Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Noble Heritage relevance 2.11 · 3.1% (12 of 391 decks)
  9. Xanathar, Guild Kingpin relevance 1.90 · 1.5% (19 of 1,287 decks)
  10. Vial Smasher the Fierce // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.87 · 30.0% (3 of 10 decks)
  11. Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 1.76 · 100.0% (3 of 3 decks)
  12. Ravos, Soultender // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.66 · 13.6% (3 of 22 decks)
  13. Dungeon Delver // Safana, Calimport Cutthroat relevance 1.62 · 1.8% (10 of 544 decks)
  14. Barrowin of Clan Undurr relevance 1.59 · 4.3% (5 of 115 decks)
  15. Viconia, Drow Apostate // Flaming Fist relevance 1.54 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
  16. Mimeoplasm, Revered One relevance 1.47 · 6.9% (87 of 1,252 decks)
  17. Agent of the Iron Throne // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 1.46 · 14.3% (3 of 21 decks)
  18. Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.40 · 25.0% (3 of 12 decks)
  19. Dungeon Delver // Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar relevance 1.26 · 6.5% (3 of 46 decks)
  20. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.23 · 55.6% (5 of 9 decks)
  21. Scion of Halaster // Viconia, Drow Apostate relevance 1.23 · 4.0% (4 of 101 decks)
  22. Karlach, Fury of Avernus // Criminal Past relevance 1.22 · 8.0% (2 of 25 decks)
  23. Krydle of Baldur's Gate relevance 1.20 · 1.8% (5 of 277 decks)
  24. Vislor Turlough // The War Doctor relevance 1.17 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
  25. Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.99 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
  26. Triad of Fates relevance 0.91 · 1.3% (3 of 237 decks)
  27. Criminal Past // Lae'zel, Vlaakith's Champion relevance 0.84 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
  28. Viconia, Drow Apostate // Master Chef relevance 0.67 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
  29. Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.60 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
  30. Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.59 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)

Parallel Cards

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
All parallel cards (7)
  1. Fairgrounds Warden
  2. Banisher Priest
  3. Faceless Butcher
  4. Skullcap Snail
  5. Unscrupulous Agent
  6. Henchbots
  7. Bronzebeak Foragers

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Biowaste Blob
    4.60 75.2%
    $0.46 €0.56
  • Biogenic Ooze
    4.32 73.2%
    $0.28 €0.20
  • Aeve, Progenitor Ooze
    4.11 61.5%
    $0.35 €0.22
  • Mitotic Slime
    4.09 63.9%
    $0.41 €0.30
  • Ravenous Slime
    3.95 57.8%
    $2.24 €1.06
  • Predator Ooze
    3.72 60.4%
    $0.27 €0.21
  • Uchuulon
    3.69 64.4%
    $3.34 €4.96
  • Oran-Rief Ooze
    3.61 56.0%
    $0.28 €0.11
  • Umori, the Collector
    3.51 51.2%
    $0.30 €0.26
  • Green Slime
    3.50 58.4%
    $1.93 €1.63
All most relevant (30)
  1. Biowaste Blob relevance 4.60 · 75.2% (3,335 of 4,433 decks)
  2. Biogenic Ooze relevance 4.32 · 73.2% (3,247 of 4,433 decks)
  3. Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 4.11 · 61.5% (2,728 of 4,433 decks)
  4. Mitotic Slime relevance 4.09 · 63.9% (2,832 of 4,433 decks)
  5. Ravenous Slime relevance 3.95 · 57.8% (2,562 of 4,433 decks)
  6. Predator Ooze relevance 3.72 · 60.4% (2,678 of 4,433 decks)
  7. Uchuulon relevance 3.69 · 64.4% (2,854 of 4,433 decks)
  8. Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 3.61 · 56.0% (2,483 of 4,433 decks)
  9. Umori, the Collector relevance 3.51 · 51.2% (2,271 of 4,433 decks)
  10. Green Slime relevance 3.50 · 58.4% (2,588 of 4,433 decks)
  11. Acidic Slime relevance 3.27 · 70.0% (3,104 of 4,433 decks)
  12. Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 3.24 · 47.8% (2,119 of 4,433 decks)
  13. Consuming Blob relevance 2.99 · 41.3% (1,833 of 4,433 decks)
  14. March of the World Ooze relevance 2.94 · 52.2% (2,312 of 4,433 decks)
  15. Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 2.94 · 47.9% (2,123 of 4,433 decks)
  16. Ochre Jelly relevance 2.77 · 44.6% (1,978 of 4,433 decks)
  17. Necrotic Ooze relevance 2.68 · 47.3% (2,095 of 4,433 decks)
  18. The Mimeoplasm relevance 2.54 · 37.9% (1,681 of 4,433 decks)
  19. Scavenging Ooze relevance 2.47 · 52.1% (2,308 of 4,433 decks)
  20. Experiment One relevance 2.38 · 34.3% (1,522 of 4,433 decks)
  21. Gutter Grime relevance 2.36 · 32.4% (1,435 of 4,433 decks)
  22. Hecteyes relevance 2.35 · 39.6% (1,754 of 4,433 decks)
  23. Experiment Kraj relevance 2.24 · 32.2% (1,427 of 4,433 decks)
  24. Inexorable Blob relevance 2.01 · 25.9% (1,146 of 4,433 decks)
  25. Gluttonous Slime relevance 2.01 · 25.4% (1,125 of 4,433 decks)
  26. Expanding Ooze relevance 2.00 · 25.2% (1,119 of 4,433 decks)
  27. Corrosive Ooze relevance 1.82 · 23.6% (1,044 of 4,433 decks)
  28. Convert to Slime relevance 1.75 · 26.0% (1,152 of 4,433 decks)
  29. Splitting Slime relevance 1.66 · 21.1% (937 of 4,433 decks)
  30. Omni-Changeling relevance 1.66 · 31.7% (1,407 of 4,433 decks)

Creatures

40

Showing 1-10 of 40

Page size
  • Biowaste Blob
    4.60 75.2%
    $0.46 €0.56
  • Biogenic Ooze
    4.32 73.2%
    $0.28 €0.20
  • Aeve, Progenitor Ooze
    4.11 61.5%
    $0.35 €0.22
  • Mitotic Slime
    4.09 63.9%
    $0.41 €0.30
  • Ravenous Slime
    3.95 57.8%
    $2.24 €1.06
  • Predator Ooze
    3.72 60.4%
    $0.27 €0.21
  • Uchuulon
    3.69 64.4%
    $3.34 €4.96
  • Oran-Rief Ooze
    3.61 56.0%
    $0.28 €0.11
  • Umori, the Collector
    3.51 51.2%
    $0.30 €0.26
  • Green Slime
    3.50 58.4%
    $1.93 €1.63
All creatures (40)
  1. Biowaste Blob relevance 4.60 · 75.2% (3,335 of 4,433 decks)
  2. Biogenic Ooze relevance 4.32 · 73.2% (3,247 of 4,433 decks)
  3. Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 4.11 · 61.5% (2,728 of 4,433 decks)
  4. Mitotic Slime relevance 4.09 · 63.9% (2,832 of 4,433 decks)
  5. Ravenous Slime relevance 3.95 · 57.8% (2,562 of 4,433 decks)
  6. Predator Ooze relevance 3.72 · 60.4% (2,678 of 4,433 decks)
  7. Uchuulon relevance 3.69 · 64.4% (2,854 of 4,433 decks)
  8. Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 3.61 · 56.0% (2,483 of 4,433 decks)
  9. Umori, the Collector relevance 3.51 · 51.2% (2,271 of 4,433 decks)
  10. Green Slime relevance 3.50 · 58.4% (2,588 of 4,433 decks)
  11. Acidic Slime relevance 3.27 · 70.0% (3,104 of 4,433 decks)
  12. Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 3.24 · 47.8% (2,119 of 4,433 decks)
  13. Consuming Blob relevance 2.99 · 41.3% (1,833 of 4,433 decks)
  14. Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 2.94 · 47.9% (2,123 of 4,433 decks)
  15. Ochre Jelly relevance 2.77 · 44.6% (1,978 of 4,433 decks)
  16. Necrotic Ooze relevance 2.68 · 47.3% (2,095 of 4,433 decks)
  17. The Mimeoplasm relevance 2.54 · 37.9% (1,681 of 4,433 decks)
  18. Scavenging Ooze relevance 2.47 · 52.1% (2,308 of 4,433 decks)
  19. Experiment One relevance 2.38 · 34.3% (1,522 of 4,433 decks)
  20. Hecteyes relevance 2.35 · 39.6% (1,754 of 4,433 decks)
  21. Experiment Kraj relevance 2.24 · 32.2% (1,427 of 4,433 decks)
  22. Inexorable Blob relevance 2.01 · 25.9% (1,146 of 4,433 decks)
  23. Gluttonous Slime relevance 2.01 · 25.4% (1,125 of 4,433 decks)
  24. Expanding Ooze relevance 2.00 · 25.2% (1,119 of 4,433 decks)
  25. Corrosive Ooze relevance 1.82 · 23.6% (1,044 of 4,433 decks)
  26. Splitting Slime relevance 1.66 · 21.1% (937 of 4,433 decks)
  27. Omni-Changeling relevance 1.66 · 31.7% (1,407 of 4,433 decks)
  28. Temperamental Oozewagg relevance 1.62 · 23.3% (1,034 of 4,433 decks)
  29. Manaplasm relevance 1.62 · 20.3% (902 of 4,433 decks)
  30. Mutable Explorer relevance 1.57 · 32.0% (1,419 of 4,433 decks)
  31. Ancient Ooze relevance 1.56 · 20.2% (894 of 4,433 decks)
  32. Mimeoplasm, Revered One relevance 1.40 · 17.4% (773 of 4,433 decks)
  33. Chomping Changeling relevance 1.33 · 29.8% (1,319 of 4,433 decks)
  34. Mirror Image relevance 1.30 · 22.3% (989 of 4,433 decks)
  35. Gobbling Ooze relevance 1.27 · 15.0% (665 of 4,433 decks)
  36. Necroplasm relevance 1.25 · 16.4% (726 of 4,433 decks)
  37. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.22 · 17.0% (754 of 4,433 decks)
  38. Phantasmal Image relevance 1.21 · 26.2% (1,160 of 4,433 decks)
  39. Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 1.21 · 25.7% (1,141 of 4,433 decks)
  40. Slick Imitator relevance 1.17 · 15.3% (680 of 4,433 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Cauldron of Essence
    1.44 33.5%
    $2.51 €3.08
All artifacts (1)
  1. Cauldron of Essence relevance 1.44 · 33.5% (1,483 of 4,433 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • March of the World Ooze
    2.94 52.2%
    $2.33 €1.62
  • Gutter Grime
    2.36 32.4%
    $0.39 €0.36
  • Corrupted Zendikon
    1.28 15.6%
    $0.21 €0.18
All enchantments (3)
  1. March of the World Ooze relevance 2.94 · 52.2% (2,312 of 4,433 decks)
  2. Gutter Grime relevance 2.36 · 32.4% (1,435 of 4,433 decks)
  3. Corrupted Zendikon relevance 1.28 · 15.6% (691 of 4,433 decks)

Instants

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Voidslime
    1.62 27.8%
    $0.60 €0.33
  • Mystic Genesis
    1.26 15.2%
    $0.18 €0.14
All instants (2)
  1. Voidslime relevance 1.62 · 27.8% (1,234 of 4,433 decks)
  2. Mystic Genesis relevance 1.26 · 15.2% (675 of 4,433 decks)

Sorceries

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Convert to Slime
    1.75 26.0%
    $0.33 €0.24
  • Gelatinous Genesis
    1.08 17.3%
    $0.62 €0.31
All sorceries (2)
  1. Convert to Slime relevance 1.75 · 26.0% (1,152 of 4,433 decks)
  2. Gelatinous Genesis relevance 1.08 · 17.3% (767 of 4,433 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Zagoth Triome
    1.28 34.9%
    $22.11 €16.75
All utility lands (1)
  1. Zagoth Triome relevance 1.28 · 34.9% (1,546 of 4,433 decks)

Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Opulent Palace
    1.24 35.2%
    $0.36 €0.25
All lands (1)
  1. Opulent Palace relevance 1.24 · 35.2% (1,561 of 4,433 decks)

EDH data for Gelatinous Cube: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,433 real decks.