Tephraderm
Played in 173 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
173 decks
1130+1941+1+4+1+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (11)
- Slinza, the Spiked Stampede relevance 2.90 · 1.7% (52 of 3,118 decks)
- Casey Jones, Jury-Rig Justiciar relevance 1.25 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Donna Noble // The War Doctor relevance 0.91 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Jiwari, the Earth Aflame relevance 0.87 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Tahngarth, Talruum Hero relevance 0.77 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Tsabo Tavoc relevance 0.72 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
- Kamahl, Pit Fighter relevance 0.69 · 2.2% (1 of 45 decks)
- Jeska, Warrior Adept relevance 0.68 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
- Yuan Shao, the Indecisive relevance 0.66 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Sunastian Falconer relevance 0.52 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Stangg relevance 0.51 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All parallel cards (19)
All most relevant (30)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 2.97 · 41.0% (71 of 173 decks)
- Aether Charge relevance 2.48 · 29.5% (51 of 173 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 2.20 · 30.1% (52 of 173 decks)
- Shaleskin Bruiser relevance 1.78 · 19.1% (33 of 173 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 1.77 · 24.3% (42 of 173 decks)
- Ravenous Baloth relevance 1.73 · 20.8% (36 of 173 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.45 · 28.9% (50 of 173 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.45 · 20.2% (35 of 173 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 1.42 · 28.9% (50 of 173 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.40 · 28.3% (49 of 173 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 1.39 · 18.5% (32 of 173 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.35 · 20.8% (36 of 173 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.32 · 26.6% (46 of 173 decks)
- Feral Throwback relevance 1.25 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.18 · 22.5% (39 of 173 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 1.17 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.15 · 31.8% (55 of 173 decks)
- Giant Cindermaw relevance 1.10 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 1.10 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 1.09 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 1.09 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 1.08 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.06 · 20.2% (35 of 173 decks)
- Laccolith Titan relevance 1.02 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.00 · 14.5% (25 of 173 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.97 · 14.5% (25 of 173 decks)
- Indrik Stomphowler relevance 0.96 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Spitemare relevance 0.95 · 13.3% (23 of 173 decks)
- Blazing Sunsteel relevance 0.95 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.93 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 2.97 · 41.0% (71 of 173 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 2.20 · 30.1% (52 of 173 decks)
- Shaleskin Bruiser relevance 1.78 · 19.1% (33 of 173 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 1.77 · 24.3% (42 of 173 decks)
- Ravenous Baloth relevance 1.73 · 20.8% (36 of 173 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.45 · 28.9% (50 of 173 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.45 · 20.2% (35 of 173 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 1.42 · 28.9% (50 of 173 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.40 · 28.3% (49 of 173 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 1.39 · 18.5% (32 of 173 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.35 · 20.8% (36 of 173 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.32 · 26.6% (46 of 173 decks)
- Feral Throwback relevance 1.25 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.18 · 22.5% (39 of 173 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 1.17 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.15 · 31.8% (55 of 173 decks)
- Giant Cindermaw relevance 1.10 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 1.10 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 1.09 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 1.09 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 1.08 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.06 · 20.2% (35 of 173 decks)
- Laccolith Titan relevance 1.02 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.00 · 14.5% (25 of 173 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.97 · 14.5% (25 of 173 decks)
- Indrik Stomphowler relevance 0.96 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Spitemare relevance 0.95 · 13.3% (23 of 173 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.93 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Stuffy Doll relevance 0.91 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.90 · 14.5% (25 of 173 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.90 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Mogg Maniac relevance 0.86 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Krosan Groundshaker relevance 0.86 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.85 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Coalhauler Swine relevance 0.85 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Boros Reckoner relevance 0.85 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Gurzigost relevance 0.84 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.79 · 19.1% (33 of 173 decks)
- Garruk's Harbinger relevance 0.79 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Brontotherium relevance 0.79 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Snapping Thragg relevance 0.78 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Blazing Sunsteel relevance 0.95 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Aether Charge relevance 2.48 · 29.5% (51 of 173 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.86 · 26.6% (46 of 173 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.80 · 31.2% (54 of 173 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 0.80 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
All instants (1)
- Arcbond relevance 0.86 · 14.5% (25 of 173 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.87 · 19.7% (34 of 173 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Contested Cliffs relevance 2.12 · 30.1% (52 of 173 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.81 · 22.0% (38 of 173 decks)
EDH data for Tephraderm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 173 real decks.




























































