Battle of Frost and Fire
Played in 2,007 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
2K decks
- Izzet 1,030 · 51.3%
- Five-Color 505 · 25.2%
- Jeskai 304 · 15.1%
- Temur 92 · 4.6%
- Ink-Treader 43 · 2.1%
- Other (7) 33 · 1.6%
Commanders
26
Commanders
26All commanders (26)
- Aegar, the Freezing Flame relevance 6.22 · 53.5% (868 of 1,622 decks)
- Ruhan of the Fomori relevance 5.03 · 17.9% (251 of 1,404 decks)
- Tom Bombadil relevance 3.32 · 2.5% (277 of 10,899 decks)
- Beluna Grandsquall // Seek Thrills relevance 1.81 · 1.3% (19 of 1,517 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 1.00 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.89 · 1.2% (5 of 409 decks)
- Ian Chesterton // The Ninth Doctor relevance 0.76 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.72 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.72 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.70 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.67 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Keranos, God of Storms relevance 0.67 · 1.7% (8 of 482 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.63 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.63 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Donna Noble // The Seventh Doctor relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Jo Grant // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Barbara Wright // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.57 · 2.2% (2 of 92 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.50 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.48 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.47 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Alexander Clamilton relevance 0.45 · 1.4% (4 of 283 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.42 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.31 · 1.4% (1 of 70 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Ganax, Astral Hunter relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
Parallel Cards
2
Parallel Cards
All parallel cards (2)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Invasion of the Giants relevance 4.49 · 53.7% (1,078 of 2,007 decks)
- Calamity Bearer relevance 4.35 · 64.5% (1,294 of 2,007 decks)
- Sunrise Sovereign relevance 4.13 · 56.1% (1,126 of 2,007 decks)
- Thundercloud Shaman relevance 4.09 · 53.9% (1,081 of 2,007 decks)
- Squash relevance 4.06 · 52.1% (1,045 of 2,007 decks)
- Glimpse the Cosmos relevance 4.04 · 52.1% (1,046 of 2,007 decks)
- Stinkdrinker Daredevil relevance 4.03 · 54.6% (1,096 of 2,007 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.96 · 62.1% (1,246 of 2,007 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 3.83 · 57.4% (1,152 of 2,007 decks)
- Borderland Behemoth relevance 3.73 · 50.5% (1,014 of 2,007 decks)
- Crush Underfoot relevance 3.51 · 45.5% (914 of 2,007 decks)
- Surtland Flinger relevance 3.34 · 44.7% (898 of 2,007 decks)
- Boldwyr Aggressor relevance 3.26 · 44.9% (902 of 2,007 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 3.23 · 58.9% (1,183 of 2,007 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 3.20 · 39.6% (795 of 2,007 decks)
- Fire Giant's Fury relevance 2.99 · 37.0% (743 of 2,007 decks)
- Giant Harbinger relevance 2.97 · 38.4% (771 of 2,007 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 2.91 · 41.4% (830 of 2,007 decks)
- Bonecrusher Giant // Stomp relevance 2.89 · 47.0% (943 of 2,007 decks)
- Frost Titan relevance 2.72 · 39.1% (784 of 2,007 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 2.60 · 48.3% (969 of 2,007 decks)
- Giant's Grasp relevance 2.60 · 30.3% (608 of 2,007 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 2.59 · 48.0% (963 of 2,007 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 2.53 · 37.9% (760 of 2,007 decks)
- Prophetic Titan relevance 2.52 · 29.7% (596 of 2,007 decks)
- Galvanic Giant // Storm Reading relevance 2.14 · 29.0% (583 of 2,007 decks)
- Goliath Daydreamer relevance 1.84 · 30.6% (615 of 2,007 decks)
- Warchief Giant relevance 1.83 · 26.4% (530 of 2,007 decks)
- Aegar, the Freezing Flame relevance 1.69 · 22.1% (444 of 2,007 decks)
- Fall of the Hammer relevance 1.68 · 23.9% (479 of 2,007 decks)
Creatures
29
Creatures
29 All creatures (29)
- Calamity Bearer relevance 4.35 · 64.5% (1,294 of 2,007 decks)
- Sunrise Sovereign relevance 4.13 · 56.1% (1,126 of 2,007 decks)
- Thundercloud Shaman relevance 4.09 · 53.9% (1,081 of 2,007 decks)
- Stinkdrinker Daredevil relevance 4.03 · 54.6% (1,096 of 2,007 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.96 · 62.1% (1,246 of 2,007 decks)
- Quakebringer relevance 3.83 · 57.4% (1,152 of 2,007 decks)
- Borderland Behemoth relevance 3.73 · 50.5% (1,014 of 2,007 decks)
- Surtland Flinger relevance 3.34 · 44.7% (898 of 2,007 decks)
- Boldwyr Aggressor relevance 3.26 · 44.9% (902 of 2,007 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 3.23 · 58.9% (1,183 of 2,007 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 3.20 · 39.6% (795 of 2,007 decks)
- Giant Harbinger relevance 2.97 · 38.4% (771 of 2,007 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 2.91 · 41.4% (830 of 2,007 decks)
- Bonecrusher Giant // Stomp relevance 2.89 · 47.0% (943 of 2,007 decks)
- Frost Titan relevance 2.72 · 39.1% (784 of 2,007 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 2.60 · 48.3% (969 of 2,007 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 2.59 · 48.0% (963 of 2,007 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 2.53 · 37.9% (760 of 2,007 decks)
- Prophetic Titan relevance 2.52 · 29.7% (596 of 2,007 decks)
- Galvanic Giant // Storm Reading relevance 2.14 · 29.0% (583 of 2,007 decks)
- Goliath Daydreamer relevance 1.84 · 30.6% (615 of 2,007 decks)
- Warchief Giant relevance 1.83 · 26.4% (530 of 2,007 decks)
- Aegar, the Freezing Flame relevance 1.69 · 22.1% (444 of 2,007 decks)
- Crystalline Giant relevance 1.49 · 23.9% (479 of 2,007 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 1.48 · 35.2% (706 of 2,007 decks)
- Realm-Cloaked Giant // Cast Off relevance 1.16 · 18.8% (377 of 2,007 decks)
- Toralf, God of Fury // Toralf's Hammer relevance 1.09 · 18.4% (370 of 2,007 decks)
- Cinderheart Giant relevance 1.04 · 12.3% (246 of 2,007 decks)
- Shatterskull Charger relevance 1.00 · 12.1% (242 of 2,007 decks)
Artifacts
2
Artifacts
2 All artifacts (2)
- Giant's Amulet relevance 1.64 · 21.8% (438 of 2,007 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 1.26 · 41.2% (826 of 2,007 decks)
Enchantments
4
Enchantments
4 All enchantments (4)
- Invasion of the Giants relevance 4.49 · 53.7% (1,078 of 2,007 decks)
- Giant's Grasp relevance 2.60 · 30.3% (608 of 2,007 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 1.28 · 31.7% (636 of 2,007 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 1.13 · 27.5% (551 of 2,007 decks)
Instants
7
Instants
7 All instants (7)
- Squash relevance 4.06 · 52.1% (1,045 of 2,007 decks)
- Crush Underfoot relevance 3.51 · 45.5% (914 of 2,007 decks)
- Fall of the Hammer relevance 1.68 · 23.9% (479 of 2,007 decks)
- Giantfall relevance 1.47 · 22.7% (456 of 2,007 decks)
- Flame of Anor relevance 1.13 · 24.0% (482 of 2,007 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 1.13 · 19.6% (394 of 2,007 decks)
- Wizard's Lightning relevance 1.07 · 16.6% (333 of 2,007 decks)
Sorceries
4
Sorceries
4 All sorceries (4)
- Glimpse the Cosmos relevance 4.04 · 52.1% (1,046 of 2,007 decks)
- Fire Giant's Fury relevance 2.99 · 37.0% (743 of 2,007 decks)
- Mizzium Mortars relevance 1.49 · 27.5% (551 of 2,007 decks)
- Giant's Ire relevance 1.37 · 15.5% (311 of 2,007 decks)
Utility Lands
2
Utility Lands
2 All utility lands (2)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 2.03 · 33.5% (673 of 2,007 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 1.10 · 31.8% (639 of 2,007 decks)
Lands
2
Lands
2 All lands (2)
- Sulfur Falls relevance 1.09 · 44.3% (889 of 2,007 decks)
- Ancient Amphitheater relevance 1.02 · 14.4% (289 of 2,007 decks)
EDH data for Battle of Frost and Fire: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,007 real decks.














































































