Consuming Ferocity
Played in 150 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (5)
- Kaima, the Fractured Calm relevance 4.13 · 6.4% (59 of 915 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 1.46 · 2.2% (2 of 92 decks)
- Balefang the Unslayable relevance 1.34 · 1.3% (3 of 230 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Ninth Doctor relevance 0.89 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Boris Devilboon relevance 0.82 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
All parallel cards (2)
All most relevant (30)
- Sluggishness relevance 2.81 · 32.0% (48 of 150 decks)
- Laccolith Rig relevance 2.47 · 28.0% (42 of 150 decks)
- Smoke Spirits' Aid relevance 2.30 · 33.3% (50 of 150 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 2.25 · 30.0% (45 of 150 decks)
- Consuming Fervor relevance 2.18 · 24.7% (37 of 150 decks)
- Fiery Mantle relevance 2.16 · 25.3% (38 of 150 decks)
- Infectious Rage relevance 2.10 · 22.7% (34 of 150 decks)
- Undying Rage relevance 2.07 · 25.3% (38 of 150 decks)
- Custody Battle relevance 1.87 · 26.0% (39 of 150 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 1.86 · 40.7% (61 of 150 decks)
- Unquenchable Fury relevance 1.86 · 27.3% (41 of 150 decks)
- Fractured Loyalty relevance 1.76 · 19.3% (29 of 150 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 1.69 · 26.7% (40 of 150 decks)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 1.68 · 26.7% (40 of 150 decks)
- Latulla's Orders relevance 1.67 · 19.3% (29 of 150 decks)
- Convenient Target relevance 1.66 · 21.3% (32 of 150 decks)
- Crown of Flames relevance 1.65 · 22.0% (33 of 150 decks)
- Mortal Wound relevance 1.65 · 16.7% (25 of 150 decks)
- Aspect of Mongoose relevance 1.53 · 22.0% (33 of 150 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 1.49 · 21.3% (32 of 150 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 1.48 · 28.0% (42 of 150 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 1.46 · 32.7% (49 of 150 decks)
- Bothersome Quasit relevance 1.41 · 26.0% (39 of 150 decks)
- Rancor relevance 1.38 · 32.0% (48 of 150 decks)
- Dragon Mantle relevance 1.38 · 22.0% (33 of 150 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 1.37 · 26.0% (39 of 150 decks)
- Vow of Lightning relevance 1.36 · 20.7% (31 of 150 decks)
- Vengeful Ancestor relevance 1.33 · 26.7% (40 of 150 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 1.33 · 31.3% (47 of 150 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 1.31 · 29.3% (44 of 150 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 1.68 · 26.7% (40 of 150 decks)
- Bothersome Quasit relevance 1.41 · 26.0% (39 of 150 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 1.37 · 26.0% (39 of 150 decks)
- Vengeful Ancestor relevance 1.33 · 26.7% (40 of 150 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 1.31 · 29.3% (44 of 150 decks)
- Kami of Transience relevance 1.30 · 18.0% (27 of 150 decks)
- Aura Gnarlid relevance 1.20 · 16.7% (25 of 150 decks)
- Chishiro, the Shattered Blade relevance 1.15 · 17.3% (26 of 150 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 1.14 · 26.0% (39 of 150 decks)
- Knickknack Ouphe relevance 1.09 · 14.0% (21 of 150 decks)
- Convulsing Licid relevance 1.04 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
All enchantments (38)
- Sluggishness relevance 2.81 · 32.0% (48 of 150 decks)
- Laccolith Rig relevance 2.47 · 28.0% (42 of 150 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 2.25 · 30.0% (45 of 150 decks)
- Consuming Fervor relevance 2.18 · 24.7% (37 of 150 decks)
- Fiery Mantle relevance 2.16 · 25.3% (38 of 150 decks)
- Infectious Rage relevance 2.10 · 22.7% (34 of 150 decks)
- Undying Rage relevance 2.07 · 25.3% (38 of 150 decks)
- Custody Battle relevance 1.87 · 26.0% (39 of 150 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 1.86 · 40.7% (61 of 150 decks)
- Unquenchable Fury relevance 1.86 · 27.3% (41 of 150 decks)
- Fractured Loyalty relevance 1.76 · 19.3% (29 of 150 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 1.69 · 26.7% (40 of 150 decks)
- Latulla's Orders relevance 1.67 · 19.3% (29 of 150 decks)
- Convenient Target relevance 1.66 · 21.3% (32 of 150 decks)
- Crown of Flames relevance 1.65 · 22.0% (33 of 150 decks)
- Mortal Wound relevance 1.65 · 16.7% (25 of 150 decks)
- Aspect of Mongoose relevance 1.53 · 22.0% (33 of 150 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 1.49 · 21.3% (32 of 150 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 1.48 · 28.0% (42 of 150 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 1.46 · 32.7% (49 of 150 decks)
- Rancor relevance 1.38 · 32.0% (48 of 150 decks)
- Dragon Mantle relevance 1.38 · 22.0% (33 of 150 decks)
- Vow of Lightning relevance 1.36 · 20.7% (31 of 150 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 1.33 · 31.3% (47 of 150 decks)
- The Sound of Drums relevance 1.28 · 22.7% (34 of 150 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 1.28 · 16.7% (25 of 150 decks)
- Fruit of the First Tree relevance 1.28 · 17.3% (26 of 150 decks)
- Audacity relevance 1.24 · 20.7% (31 of 150 decks)
- Incendiary relevance 1.22 · 13.3% (20 of 150 decks)
- Dragon Fangs relevance 1.22 · 14.7% (22 of 150 decks)
- Whip Silk relevance 1.15 · 16.7% (25 of 150 decks)
- Mark of Fury relevance 1.15 · 14.7% (22 of 150 decks)
- Demonic Ruckus relevance 1.15 · 18.0% (27 of 150 decks)
- Fortitude relevance 1.08 · 13.3% (20 of 150 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 1.04 · 20.0% (30 of 150 decks)
- Aggression relevance 1.00 · 10.0% (15 of 150 decks)
- Paroxysm relevance 1.00 · 8.7% (13 of 150 decks)
- Insolence relevance 0.99 · 9.3% (14 of 150 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Smoke Spirits' Aid relevance 2.30 · 33.3% (50 of 150 decks)
EDH data for Consuming Ferocity: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 150 real decks.