724+4+10+2+8+4+9+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Captain Benjamin Sisko 16.7% of decks
Captain Benjamin Sisko 16.7% of decks
Jean-Luc Picard, Luminary 8.3% of decks
Jean-Luc Picard, Luminary 8.3% of decks
Captain Kirk, Boldly Going 3.4% of decks
Captain Kirk, Boldly Going 3.4% of decks
Commander Spock 6.4% of decks
Commander Spock 6.4% of decks
Mr. Spock, Science Officer 14.3% of decks
Mr. Spock, Science Officer 14.3% of decks
Seven of Nine, Unassimilated 16.7% of decks
Seven of Nine, Unassimilated 16.7% of decks
Most Relevant
Lumen-Class Frigate 21.6% of decks
Lumen-Class Frigate 21.6% of decks
The Seriema 27.0% of decks
The Seriema 27.0% of decks
Faerie Mastermind 35.1% of decks
Faerie Mastermind 35.1% of decks
Lotus Petal 37.8% of decks
Lotus Petal 37.8% of decks
Uthros Research Craft 21.6% of decks
Uthros Research Craft 21.6% of decks
Wan Shi Tong, Librarian 24.3% of decks
Wan Shi Tong, Librarian 24.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Captain Benjamin Sisko relevance 3.59 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Jean-Luc Picard, Luminary relevance 2.32 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Captain Kirk, Boldly Going relevance 2.01 · 3.4% (4 of 116 decks)
- Commander Spock relevance 1.89 · 6.4% (3 of 47 decks)
- Mr. Spock, Science Officer relevance 1.73 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Seven of Nine, Unassimilated relevance 1.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.76 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (24)
- Lumen-Class Frigate relevance 1.39 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- The Seriema relevance 1.34 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 1.14 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 1.00 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.97 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.97 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.96 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.94 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.92 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.92 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.91 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.89 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.89 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.88 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.86 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.85 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.85 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.81 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.77 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.75 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.75 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.75 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.74 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 1.14 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.97 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.88 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.74 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All artifacts (10)
- Lumen-Class Frigate relevance 1.39 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- The Seriema relevance 1.34 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 1.00 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.97 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.96 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.94 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.86 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.85 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.85 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.92 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.75 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
All instants (8)
- Force of Will relevance 0.92 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.91 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.89 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.89 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.81 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.77 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.75 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.75 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 1.13 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 1.04 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.98 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Raugrin Triome relevance 0.82 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All lands (9)
- Hallowed Fountain relevance 1.16 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 1.12 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.97 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.97 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.95 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Steam Vents relevance 0.84 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.83 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.82 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.78 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
EDH data for Nyota Uhura, Communications: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 37 real decks.

































