Lowland Tracker
Played in 83 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
83 decks
730+445+2+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- General Jarkeld relevance 2.41 · 8.0% (7 of 88 decks)
- Syr Vondam, the Lucent relevance 1.89 · 1.5% (4 of 260 decks)
- Lieutenant Kirtar relevance 1.33 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Kwende, Pride of Femeref relevance 1.13 · 1.3% (3 of 231 decks)
- Rashka the Slayer relevance 0.90 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Daughter of Autumn relevance 0.79 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Rashida Scalebane relevance 0.61 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All parallel cards (4)
All most relevant (30)
- Deftblade Elite relevance 4.50 · 49.4% (41 of 83 decks)
- Swooping Talon relevance 3.35 · 30.1% (25 of 83 decks)
- Liege of the Axe relevance 3.20 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skyknight relevance 3.15 · 34.9% (29 of 83 decks)
- Icatian Skirmishers relevance 3.01 · 32.5% (27 of 83 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skycaptain relevance 2.88 · 30.1% (25 of 83 decks)
- Icatian Infantry relevance 2.82 · 30.1% (25 of 83 decks)
- Benalish Hero relevance 2.80 · 32.5% (27 of 83 decks)
- Benalish Infantry relevance 2.77 · 30.1% (25 of 83 decks)
- Daru Stinger relevance 2.61 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Helm of Chatzuk relevance 2.60 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Noble Elephant relevance 2.50 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
- Cloudreach Cavalry relevance 2.49 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Mistform Seaswift relevance 2.46 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Loyal Gyrfalcon relevance 2.46 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Wingbeat Warrior relevance 2.44 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Cooperation relevance 2.43 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
- Looming Hoverguard relevance 2.42 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Gempalm Avenger relevance 2.42 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Luminous Guardian relevance 2.41 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Grassland Crusader relevance 2.41 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Kjeldoran Escort relevance 2.41 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Loxodon Anchorite relevance 2.41 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Abu Ja'far relevance 2.41 · 27.7% (23 of 83 decks)
- Dive Bomber relevance 2.40 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Pikemen relevance 2.39 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
- Baton of Morale relevance 2.38 · 28.9% (24 of 83 decks)
- Aven Redeemer relevance 2.37 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Icatian Phalanx relevance 2.35 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Formation relevance 2.33 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Deftblade Elite relevance 4.50 · 49.4% (41 of 83 decks)
- Swooping Talon relevance 3.35 · 30.1% (25 of 83 decks)
- Liege of the Axe relevance 3.20 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skyknight relevance 3.15 · 34.9% (29 of 83 decks)
- Icatian Skirmishers relevance 3.01 · 32.5% (27 of 83 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skycaptain relevance 2.88 · 30.1% (25 of 83 decks)
- Icatian Infantry relevance 2.82 · 30.1% (25 of 83 decks)
- Benalish Hero relevance 2.80 · 32.5% (27 of 83 decks)
- Benalish Infantry relevance 2.77 · 30.1% (25 of 83 decks)
- Daru Stinger relevance 2.61 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Noble Elephant relevance 2.50 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
- Cloudreach Cavalry relevance 2.49 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Mistform Seaswift relevance 2.46 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Loyal Gyrfalcon relevance 2.46 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Wingbeat Warrior relevance 2.44 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Looming Hoverguard relevance 2.42 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Gempalm Avenger relevance 2.42 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Luminous Guardian relevance 2.41 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Grassland Crusader relevance 2.41 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Kjeldoran Escort relevance 2.41 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Loxodon Anchorite relevance 2.41 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Abu Ja'far relevance 2.41 · 27.7% (23 of 83 decks)
- Dive Bomber relevance 2.40 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Pikemen relevance 2.39 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
- Aven Redeemer relevance 2.37 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Icatian Phalanx relevance 2.35 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Defender of the Order relevance 2.32 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Lost Order of Jarkeld relevance 2.32 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Loxodon Convert relevance 2.30 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Kjeldoran Warrior relevance 2.27 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Gravel Slinger relevance 2.23 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Aven Warhawk relevance 2.22 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Mistform Skyreaver relevance 2.21 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Lucent Liminid relevance 2.21 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Graceful Antelope relevance 2.20 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Gustcloak Runner relevance 2.19 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Malach of the Dawn relevance 2.18 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Loxodon Stalwart relevance 2.16 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Miracle Worker relevance 2.15 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Loxodon Partisan relevance 2.14 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- War Elephant relevance 2.14 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Liu Bei, Lord of Shu relevance 2.14 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Heavy Ballista relevance 2.14 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Karona's Zealot relevance 2.13 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Lurking Automaton relevance 2.13 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Helm of Chatzuk relevance 2.60 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Baton of Morale relevance 2.38 · 28.9% (24 of 83 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Cooperation relevance 2.43 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
All instants (2)
- Formation relevance 2.33 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Lithomancer's Focus relevance 2.14 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
EDH data for Lowland Tracker: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 83 real decks.



































