Cards like Sol Ring
5.8× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 86% of other Esper decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.97 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 93%
- Mana Vault 39%
- Grim Monolith 20%
- Basalt Monolith 15%
Cards like Disciple of the Vault
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
6.5× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Esper decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Trinket Mage
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Trinket Mage 26%
- Sphinx Summoner 25%
- Tribute Mage 16%
- Trophy Mage 7%
- Treasure Mage 5%
- Delivery Moogle 3%
- Transit Mage 3%
Cards like Rhystic Study
2.7× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Esper decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Esper decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.45 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 49%
- Mystic Remora 41%
Cards like Baleful Strix
8.5× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Esper decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Esper decks
Cards like Scrap Trawler
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Magister Sphinx
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Magister Sphinx 33%
- Filigree Angel 16%
Cards like Gifts Ungiven
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Gifts Ungiven 36%
- Intuition 21%
Cards like Entomb
16× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Entomb 49%
- Unmarked Grave 16%
Cards like Lotus Petal
8.9× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Esper decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 36%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 10%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
2.3× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Esper decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Esper decks
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Grand Abolisher
2.8× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Esper decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Grand Abolisher 23%
- Voice of Victory 13%
Cards like Force of Will
2.0× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Esper decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Force of Will 34%
- Force of Negation 16%
Cards like Unwinding Clock
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Tezzeret the Seeker
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Talisman of Dominance
1.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Esper decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. 50% of other Esper decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Conjurer's Closet
8.4× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Dimir Signet
1.2× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Esper decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 26% of other Esper decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.75 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Dimir Signet 33%
- Azorius Signet 30%
- Orzhov Signet 23%
Cards like Chrome Mox
2.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 26%
- Mox Diamond 13%
Cards like Ephemerate
4.0× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Ephemerate 16%
- Momentary Blink 5%
- Cloudshift 3%
- Blur 2%
Other options: Justiciar's Portal, Acrobatic Maneuver, Turn to Mist, Scrollshift, Flicker of Fate, Liberate
Cards like Fabricate
13× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Fabricate 34%
- Scour for Scrap 11%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
12× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 18%
- Hedron Archive 8%
Other options: Ichor Elixir, Sisay's Ring, Sceptre of Eternal Glory, Ring of the Lucii, Ur-Golem's Eye
Cards like Flusterstorm
3.3× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Esper decks
Cards like Swan Song
3.0× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Swan Song 36%
- Strix Serenade 5%
Cards like Krark-Clan Ironworks
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Transmute Artifact
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Transmute Artifact 20%
- Reshape 10%
Cards like Muddle the Mixture
8.5× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Muddle the Mixture 20%
- Perplex 3%
Cards like Demonic Tutor
3.2× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: Razaketh's Rite, Rhystic Tutor, Demonic Collusion, Mastermind's Acquisition, Illicit Shipment, Behold the Beyond, Diabolic Revelation
Cards like Supreme Verdict
1.6× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: Sunscour, Doomskar, End Hostilities, Sublime Exhalation, Winds of Rath, Rout
Cards like Shorikai, Genesis Engine
13× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
9.3× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Thirst for Knowledge
6.0× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: Thirst for Identity, Thirst for Discovery, Thirst for Meaning
Cards like Shimmer Myr
4.0× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Silence
1.6× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Esper decks
All top picks (50)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.44 · 88.5% (54 of 61 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.47 · 42.6% (26 of 61 decks)
- Disciple of the Vault relevance 0.43 · 50.8% (31 of 61 decks)
- Psychomancer relevance 0.48 · 37.7% (23 of 61 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.43 · 39.3% (24 of 61 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.42 · 42.6% (26 of 61 decks)
- Sphinx Summoner relevance 0.46 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.25 · 80.3% (49 of 61 decks)
- Bitter Ordeal relevance 0.46 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Magister Sphinx relevance 0.38 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.35 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Filigree Angel relevance 0.45 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Noxious Gearhulk relevance 0.40 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Sphinx of the Steel Wind relevance 0.43 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.34 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.40 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 54.1% (33 of 61 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.31 · 47.5% (29 of 61 decks)
- Sword of the Meek relevance 0.35 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Ethersworn Canonist relevance 0.35 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.34 · 36.1% (22 of 61 decks)
- Thopter Foundry relevance 0.34 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Scourglass relevance 0.40 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Kuldotha Forgemaster relevance 0.39 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.36 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.35 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.36 · 23.0% (14 of 61 decks)
- Dispatch relevance 0.32 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.32 · 31.1% (19 of 61 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.38 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.33 · 26.2% (16 of 61 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.32 · 29.5% (18 of 61 decks)
- Riptide Gearhulk relevance 0.34 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.34 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.31 · 29.5% (18 of 61 decks)
- Cataclysmic Gearhulk relevance 0.35 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.27 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.34 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Thopter Assembly relevance 0.34 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.35 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Tezzeret, Agent of Bolas relevance 0.36 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Shorikai, Genesis Engine relevance 0.31 · 23.0% (14 of 61 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.24 · 49.2% (30 of 61 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.34 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.32 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Marionette Apprentice relevance 0.30 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.37 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.34 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Unmarked Grave relevance 0.31 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.26 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Disciple of the Vault relevance 0.43 · 50.8% (31 of 61 decks)
- Psychomancer relevance 0.48 · 37.7% (23 of 61 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.42 · 42.6% (26 of 61 decks)
- Sphinx Summoner relevance 0.46 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.25 · 80.3% (49 of 61 decks)
- Magister Sphinx relevance 0.38 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Filigree Angel relevance 0.45 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Noxious Gearhulk relevance 0.40 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Sphinx of the Steel Wind relevance 0.43 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.34 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 54.1% (33 of 61 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.31 · 47.5% (29 of 61 decks)
- Ethersworn Canonist relevance 0.35 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Kuldotha Forgemaster relevance 0.39 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.35 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.32 · 31.1% (19 of 61 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.33 · 26.2% (16 of 61 decks)
- Riptide Gearhulk relevance 0.34 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.34 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Cataclysmic Gearhulk relevance 0.35 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.27 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.34 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Thopter Assembly relevance 0.34 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.32 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Marionette Apprentice relevance 0.30 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.34 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.34 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Glassdust Hulk relevance 0.35 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.27 · 26.2% (16 of 61 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.29 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.35 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Ethersworn Sphinx relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.28 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Sharding Sphinx relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.20 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.25 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Chief Engineer relevance 0.30 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Gandalf the White relevance 0.30 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.30 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Memnarch relevance 0.30 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Tameshi, Reality Architect relevance 0.29 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Blood Artist relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Zulaport Cutthroat relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Synth Infiltrator relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.22 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.44 · 88.5% (54 of 61 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.47 · 42.6% (26 of 61 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.40 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Sword of the Meek relevance 0.35 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.34 · 36.1% (22 of 61 decks)
- Thopter Foundry relevance 0.34 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Scourglass relevance 0.40 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.36 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.36 · 23.0% (14 of 61 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.32 · 29.5% (18 of 61 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.31 · 29.5% (18 of 61 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.35 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Shorikai, Genesis Engine relevance 0.31 · 23.0% (14 of 61 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.37 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.31 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.32 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.29 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.28 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.29 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Demonic Junker relevance 0.32 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.29 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.28 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Time Sieve relevance 0.21 · 37.7% (23 of 61 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Voyager Staff relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.26 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.24 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.23 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Mycosynth Lattice relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.21 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.21 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.24 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.16 · 44.3% (27 of 61 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.24 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Memory Jar relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.17 · 29.5% (18 of 61 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.17 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Salvaging Station relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.17 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Peter Parker's Camera relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Mindslaver relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Tawnos's Coffin relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Blasting Station relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.30 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.30 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- The Meathook Massacre relevance 0.24 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Phyrexian Scriptures relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Ballad of the Black Flag relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.15 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.18 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Tinybones Joins Up relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Out of the Tombs relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Stasis relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.08 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Bastion of Remembrance relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.12 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Necrodominance relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Precognition Field relevance 0.18 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.07 · 49.2% (30 of 61 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.12 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Tamiyo Meets the Story Circle relevance 0.17 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- The Flesh Is Weak relevance 0.17 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Soul Enervation relevance 0.16 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Uncover the Moon-Letters relevance 0.16 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.07 · 36.1% (22 of 61 decks)
- Barren Glory relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Escape Protocol relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Astral Slide relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Astral Drift relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Virtue of Persistence // Locthwain Scorn relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Cemetery Tampering relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Unfulfilled Desires relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Agent of the Iron Throne relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Oblivion Ring relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.08 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Biotransference relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Oversold Cemetery relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
All instants (50)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.43 · 39.3% (24 of 61 decks)
- Dispatch relevance 0.32 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.38 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.24 · 49.2% (30 of 61 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.31 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.23 · 36.1% (22 of 61 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.25 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.26 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.28 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.24 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Stern Lesson relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Sphinx's Revelation relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.17 · 31.1% (19 of 61 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.19 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.18 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.17 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Faithful Mending relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.17 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Esper Charm relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Anguished Unmaking relevance 0.14 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Momentary Blink relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.19 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.15 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.12 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Unexplained Absence relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.11 · 37.7% (23 of 61 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.13 · 26.2% (16 of 61 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Shred Memory relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.15 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Void Rend relevance 0.13 · 23.0% (14 of 61 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.11 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.10 · 39.3% (24 of 61 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.10 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.10 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.09 · 45.9% (28 of 61 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.12 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Bitter Ordeal relevance 0.46 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.34 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Unmarked Grave relevance 0.31 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.26 · 34.4% (21 of 61 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.29 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Ominous Harvest relevance 0.34 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Voyage Home relevance 0.30 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Terisiare's Devastation relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.25 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.21 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Organic Extinction relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.22 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.24 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.19 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Argivian Restoration relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Day of Judgment relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Final Parting relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.20 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.16 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.15 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.15 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.18 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Vindicate relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.17 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Profane Tutor relevance 0.18 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Spectacular Pileup relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Beseech the Queen relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.11 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Open the Vaults relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.13 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.12 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.12 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.08 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.13 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.13 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Bond of Revival relevance 0.18 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Foresight relevance 0.18 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Manipulate Fate relevance 0.18 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Desperate Research relevance 0.18 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Refurbish relevance 0.18 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
All planeswalkers (22)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.35 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Tezzeret, Agent of Bolas relevance 0.36 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Tezzeret, Master of the Bridge relevance 0.30 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.27 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Dakkon, Shadow Slayer relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.25 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.21 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Tezzeret the Schemer relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.12 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.16 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.15 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Sorin Markov relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Vraska, Betrayal's Sting relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.13 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Liliana Vess relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Venser, the Sojourner relevance 0.11 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.07 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.29 · 50.8% (31 of 61 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.35 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.26 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.32 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.29 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.30 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.32 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.27 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Adagia, Windswept Bastion relevance 0.27 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.21 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.20 · 13.1% (8 of 61 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.16 · 31.1% (19 of 61 decks)
- Contaminated Landscape relevance 0.19 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Monumental Henge relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.17 · 23.0% (14 of 61 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.18 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.14 · 36.1% (22 of 61 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.19 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.19 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.16 · 14.8% (9 of 61 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.15 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.13 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.14 · 26.2% (16 of 61 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.15 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Raffine's Tower relevance 0.10 · 52.5% (32 of 61 decks)
- Temple of Silence relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.14 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.10 · 36.1% (22 of 61 decks)
- Castle Locthwain relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Silent Clearing relevance 0.14 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.13 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Agadeem's Awakening // Agadeem, the Undercrypt relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
All lands (50)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.28 · 73.8% (45 of 61 decks)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 0.29 · 65.6% (40 of 61 decks)
- Ancient Den relevance 0.28 · 65.6% (40 of 61 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.33 · 41.0% (25 of 61 decks)
- Mistvault Bridge relevance 0.32 · 31.1% (19 of 61 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.24 · 59.0% (36 of 61 decks)
- Razortide Bridge relevance 0.32 · 31.1% (19 of 61 decks)
- Goldmire Bridge relevance 0.32 · 27.9% (17 of 61 decks)
- Glimmervoid relevance 0.34 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (7 of 61 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.20 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.17 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.12 · 42.6% (26 of 61 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.14 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.12 · 37.7% (23 of 61 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.14 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.13 · 29.5% (18 of 61 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.14 · 19.7% (12 of 61 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.16 · 9.8% (6 of 61 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.11 · 36.1% (22 of 61 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Arcane Sanctum relevance 0.12 · 26.2% (16 of 61 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.13 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Shattered Sanctum relevance 0.13 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 24.6% (15 of 61 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.16 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Thousand Moons Smithy // Barracks of the Thousand relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.11 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 61 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.11 · 31.1% (19 of 61 decks)
- Orzhov Basilica relevance 0.15 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.12 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.16 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.15 · 6.6% (4 of 61 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.14 · 8.2% (5 of 61 decks)
- Isolated Chapel relevance 0.11 · 26.2% (16 of 61 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 18.0% (11 of 61 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.10 · 37.7% (23 of 61 decks)
- Concealed Courtyard relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.11 · 21.3% (13 of 61 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.10 · 32.8% (20 of 61 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.12 · 16.4% (10 of 61 decks)
- Tainted Field relevance 0.14 · 4.9% (3 of 61 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sharuum the Hegemon, from 61 real Commander decks.