Cards like Clone
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
77% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
2.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Clone 75%
- Stunt Double 75%
- Waxen Shapethief 65%
- Sakashima's Protege 46%
- Mirror Image 1%
Cards like Clever Impersonator
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
75% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Clever Impersonator 82%
- Gigantoplasm 70%
- Flesh Duplicate 66%
Cards like Evil Twin
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Evil Twin 74%
- Callidus Assassin 55%
Cards like Sol Ring
6.6× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
92% of decks run one or more
vs. 83% of other Dimir decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 92%
- Mana Vault 32%
- Grim Monolith 22%
- Basalt Monolith 6%
Cards like Essence Flux
11× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Lotus Petal
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Dimir decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 37%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 16%
Cards like Chrome Mox
6.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 32%
- Mox Diamond 18%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
3.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Dimir decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
5.0× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Remora
1.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Dimir decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Dimir decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 29%
- Rhystic Study 18%
Cards like Force of Will
1.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Dimir decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Force of Will 26%
- Force of Negation 15%
Cards like Animate Dead
2.1× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Dimir decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Animate Dead 25%
- Necromancy 14%
- Dance of the Dead 2%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
4.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 16%
- Hedron Archive 6%
Other options: Ring of the Lucii, Ichor Elixir, Sisay's Ring, Ur-Golem's Eye
Cards like Kozilek, Butcher of Truth
12× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Brainstorm
1.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Dimir decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 33%
- Brainsurge 5%
Cards like Mortuary
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Mortuary 23%
- Haunted Crossroads 6%
Cards like Swan Song
1.6× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Dimir decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Swan Song 28%
- Strix Serenade 5%
All top picks (50)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.53 · 79.6% (113 of 142 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.51 · 80.3% (114 of 142 decks)
- Gigantoplasm relevance 0.55 · 70.4% (100 of 142 decks)
- Visage Bandit relevance 0.53 · 72.5% (103 of 142 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.50 · 78.9% (112 of 142 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.51 · 75.4% (107 of 142 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.50 · 73.9% (105 of 142 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.49 · 75.4% (107 of 142 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.51 · 71.1% (101 of 142 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.52 · 64.8% (92 of 142 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.48 · 71.1% (101 of 142 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.43 · 81.7% (116 of 142 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.49 · 66.2% (94 of 142 decks)
- Evil Twin relevance 0.45 · 73.9% (105 of 142 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.45 · 73.2% (104 of 142 decks)
- Callidus Assassin relevance 0.53 · 54.9% (78 of 142 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.54 · 52.8% (75 of 142 decks)
- Deceptive Frostkite relevance 0.51 · 58.5% (83 of 142 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 0.54 · 52.1% (74 of 142 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.47 · 66.9% (95 of 142 decks)
- Heartless Summoning relevance 0.50 · 58.5% (83 of 142 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.45 · 69.0% (98 of 142 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.56 · 46.5% (66 of 142 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.43 · 69.7% (99 of 142 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.41 · 74.6% (106 of 142 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.48 · 55.6% (79 of 142 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.37 · 79.6% (113 of 142 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.49 · 50.0% (71 of 142 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.46 · 52.8% (75 of 142 decks)
- Ardyn, the Usurper relevance 0.45 · 55.6% (79 of 142 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.33 · 82.4% (117 of 142 decks)
- Metamorphosis Fanatic relevance 0.50 · 39.4% (56 of 142 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.43 · 54.9% (78 of 142 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.51 · 35.2% (50 of 142 decks)
- Mortuary relevance 0.56 · 22.5% (32 of 142 decks)
- Superior Spider-Man relevance 0.46 · 42.3% (60 of 142 decks)
- Ruthless Technomancer relevance 0.49 · 33.1% (47 of 142 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.53 · 26.1% (37 of 142 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.45 · 38.7% (55 of 142 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.50 · 21.1% (30 of 142 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.36 · 47.2% (67 of 142 decks)
- Silver Surfer, Cosmic Voyager relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.47 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.37 · 45.1% (64 of 142 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.42 · 31.7% (45 of 142 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.39 · 36.6% (52 of 142 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.42 · 30.3% (43 of 142 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.48 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.41 · 32.4% (46 of 142 decks)
- Razaketh, the Foulblooded relevance 0.48 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.53 · 79.6% (113 of 142 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.51 · 80.3% (114 of 142 decks)
- Gigantoplasm relevance 0.55 · 70.4% (100 of 142 decks)
- Visage Bandit relevance 0.53 · 72.5% (103 of 142 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.50 · 78.9% (112 of 142 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.51 · 75.4% (107 of 142 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.50 · 73.9% (105 of 142 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.49 · 75.4% (107 of 142 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.51 · 71.1% (101 of 142 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.52 · 64.8% (92 of 142 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.48 · 71.1% (101 of 142 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.43 · 81.7% (116 of 142 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.49 · 66.2% (94 of 142 decks)
- Evil Twin relevance 0.45 · 73.9% (105 of 142 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.45 · 73.2% (104 of 142 decks)
- Callidus Assassin relevance 0.53 · 54.9% (78 of 142 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.54 · 52.8% (75 of 142 decks)
- Deceptive Frostkite relevance 0.51 · 58.5% (83 of 142 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 0.54 · 52.1% (74 of 142 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.47 · 66.9% (95 of 142 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.45 · 69.0% (98 of 142 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.56 · 46.5% (66 of 142 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.43 · 69.7% (99 of 142 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.41 · 74.6% (106 of 142 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.48 · 55.6% (79 of 142 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.37 · 79.6% (113 of 142 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.49 · 50.0% (71 of 142 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.46 · 52.8% (75 of 142 decks)
- Ardyn, the Usurper relevance 0.45 · 55.6% (79 of 142 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.33 · 82.4% (117 of 142 decks)
- Metamorphosis Fanatic relevance 0.50 · 39.4% (56 of 142 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.51 · 35.2% (50 of 142 decks)
- Superior Spider-Man relevance 0.46 · 42.3% (60 of 142 decks)
- Ruthless Technomancer relevance 0.49 · 33.1% (47 of 142 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.53 · 26.1% (37 of 142 decks)
- Silver Surfer, Cosmic Voyager relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.42 · 30.3% (43 of 142 decks)
- Razaketh, the Foulblooded relevance 0.48 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Unhallowed relevance 0.42 · 23.2% (33 of 142 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 0.46 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.46 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Nightmare Shepherd relevance 0.38 · 26.8% (38 of 142 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.38 · 25.4% (36 of 142 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 0.36 · 25.4% (36 of 142 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.35 · 26.8% (38 of 142 decks)
- Daring Waverider relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.28 · 46.5% (66 of 142 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Noxious Gearhulk relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.35 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.50 · 21.1% (30 of 142 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.47 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.42 · 31.7% (45 of 142 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.39 · 36.6% (52 of 142 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.48 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.41 · 32.4% (46 of 142 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.36 · 35.2% (50 of 142 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.42 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.41 · 19.7% (28 of 142 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.38 · 17.6% (25 of 142 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.36 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.20 · 64.1% (91 of 142 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.30 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.27 · 26.1% (37 of 142 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.30 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.34 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.29 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.19 · 49.3% (70 of 142 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Mirror Gallery relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.28 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- The Soul Stone relevance 0.26 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.30 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.24 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Stonespeaker Crystal relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.18 · 28.2% (40 of 142 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Jet Medallion relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.33 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.09 · 80.3% (114 of 142 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.09 · 72.5% (103 of 142 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.12 · 32.4% (46 of 142 decks)
- Elixir relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Jeweled Amulet relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
All enchantments (26)
- Heartless Summoning relevance 0.50 · 58.5% (83 of 142 decks)
- Mortuary relevance 0.56 · 22.5% (32 of 142 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.42 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.41 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Haunted Crossroads relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- The Sibsig Ceremony relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 0.30 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.25 · 28.9% (41 of 142 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.21 · 24.6% (35 of 142 decks)
- Oversold Cemetery relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.28 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.18 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Unholy Annex // Ritual Chamber relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.30 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Mirror Mockery relevance 0.29 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Teval's Judgment relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Leyline of the Void relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Dance of the Dead relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.13 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Bloodchief Ascension relevance 0.11 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.12 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Court of Cunning relevance 0.08 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
All instants (50)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.43 · 54.9% (78 of 142 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.45 · 38.7% (55 of 142 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.37 · 45.1% (64 of 142 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.44 · 21.1% (30 of 142 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.38 · 33.1% (47 of 142 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.41 · 19.7% (28 of 142 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.45 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.39 · 22.5% (32 of 142 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.39 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.39 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.33 · 26.1% (37 of 142 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.35 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.33 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.27 · 28.2% (40 of 142 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Eldrazi Confluence relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.30 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.25 · 33.1% (47 of 142 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.32 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.23 · 34.5% (49 of 142 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.16 · 66.9% (95 of 142 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.24 · 28.2% (40 of 142 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.32 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Not Dead After All relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.24 · 22.5% (32 of 142 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Shallow Grave relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.18 · 31.7% (45 of 142 decks)
- Fated Infatuation relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Long Goodbye relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Dread Return relevance 0.36 · 47.2% (67 of 142 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.47 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.39 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.41 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Extinction Event relevance 0.40 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.35 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.35 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.40 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.36 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Cabal Therapy relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.22 · 27.5% (39 of 142 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.17 · 50.7% (72 of 142 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.19 · 28.9% (41 of 142 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.21 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Incarnation Technique relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Self-Reflection relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.22 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 0.32 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Diabolic Vision relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Doomsday relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Raise Dead relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Winternight Stories relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 0.16 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.14 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Foggy Swamp Visions relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.14 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.12 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Pilfered Plans relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Exhume relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.18 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Insatiable Avarice relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- From the Catacombs relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.14 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Amonkhet // Lazotep Convert relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.35 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.33 · 22.5% (32 of 142 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.29 · 28.9% (41 of 142 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.24 · 39.4% (56 of 142 decks)
- Volrath's Stronghold relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Mortuary Mire relevance 0.31 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.27 · 17.6% (25 of 142 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.26 · 20.4% (29 of 142 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.20 · 43.7% (62 of 142 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (28 of 142 decks)
- Witch's Cottage relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.23 · 26.1% (37 of 142 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.22 · 22.5% (32 of 142 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.22 · 20.4% (29 of 142 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 19.0% (27 of 142 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.28 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Port of Karfell relevance 0.22 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.19 · 20.4% (29 of 142 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.19 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.22 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Castle Locthwain relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Agadeem's Awakening // Agadeem, the Undercrypt relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.19 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.12 · 35.2% (50 of 142 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Polluted Mire relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Midgar, City of Mako // Reactor Raid relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Memorial to Folly relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.12 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Restless Reef relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (9 of 142 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Tomb Fortress relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
All lands (50)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.55 · 22.5% (32 of 142 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.51 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.41 · 25.4% (36 of 142 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.49 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.36 · 29.6% (42 of 142 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.33 · 38.0% (54 of 142 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.36 · 31.0% (44 of 142 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.36 · 26.8% (38 of 142 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.38 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.34 · 29.6% (42 of 142 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.35 · 28.9% (41 of 142 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.36 · 25.4% (36 of 142 decks)
- Peat Bog relevance 0.46 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.36 · 23.2% (33 of 142 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.27 · 28.2% (40 of 142 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.29 · 9.2% (13 of 142 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.15 · 60.6% (86 of 142 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.23 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.16 · 52.8% (75 of 142 decks)
- Ice Tunnel relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- River of Tears relevance 0.21 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Svyelunite Temple relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.17 · 31.7% (45 of 142 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.15 · 37.3% (53 of 142 decks)
- Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (10 of 142 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.23 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (4 of 142 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.20 · 9.9% (14 of 142 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.10 · 75.4% (107 of 142 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.22 · 5.6% (8 of 142 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.12 · 54.2% (77 of 142 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.16 · 21.1% (30 of 142 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.18 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.15 · 27.5% (39 of 142 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.18 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (11 of 142 decks)
- Ebon Stronghold relevance 0.29 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Hidden Lair relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Lake of the Dead relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (6 of 142 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.11 · 39.4% (56 of 142 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (12 of 142 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.11 · 32.4% (46 of 142 decks)
- Grixis Panorama relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (5 of 142 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Gyruda, Doom of Depths, from 142 real Commander decks.