Cards like Consecrated Sphinx
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 52%
- Swiftfoot Boots 36%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ichor Elixir, Ring of the Lucii
Cards like Clone
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Clone 26%
- Stunt Double 19%
- Waxen Shapethief 2%
- Mirror Image 2%
Other options: Sakashima's Protege
Cards like Caged Sun
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Caged Sun 43%
- Gauntlet of Power 21%
Other options: Heraldic Banner, Patchwork Banner, Hall of Triumph
Cards like Strionic Resonator
20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sower of Temptation
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sower of Temptation 31%
- Mind Flayer 10%
Cards like High Fae Trickster
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Kozilek, Butcher of Truth
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Dictate of Kruphix
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cryptic Command
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cryptic Command 17%
- Mystic Confluence 17%
- Sublime Epiphany 14%
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 40%
- Pongify 38%
Cards like Thought Vessel
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Blightsteel Colossus
8.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Clever Impersonator
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Throne of Eldraine
9.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Throne of Eldraine 17%
- Nyx Lotus 7%
Cards like Sky Diamond
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 19%
- Star Compass 5%
- Coldsteel Heart 2%
Other options: Corrupted Grafstone, Guardian Idol, Obsidian Obelisk, Prismatic Lens
Cards like Force of Negation
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 19%
- Force of Will 17%
Cards like Howling Mine
3.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 31%
- Mystic Remora 29%
Cards like Gilded Lotus
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards like Tidespout Tyrant
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Aetherize
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards like Sphinx of Uthuun
8.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Rush of Knowledge
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
All top picks (50)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.41 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.48 · 52.4% (22 of 42 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.36 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.43 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.34 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.38 · 45.2% (19 of 42 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.34 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 0.44 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- It That Betrays relevance 0.43 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.31 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.39 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Phyrexian Ingester relevance 0.40 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Sphinx of Uthuun relevance 0.40 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 0.36 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.35 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.35 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.32 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.26 · 59.5% (25 of 42 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.33 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.35 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Vodalian Illusionist relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.29 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Quicksilver Amulet relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.34 · 23.8% (10 of 42 decks)
- Platinum Emperion relevance 0.36 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Gate to the Aether relevance 0.39 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Kira, Great Glass-Spinner relevance 0.32 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.25 · 52.4% (22 of 42 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.30 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.27 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.32 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.28 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.29 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Mocking Doppelganger relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.28 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Quicksilver Gargantuan relevance 0.35 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Pathrazer of Ulamog relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.29 · 23.8% (10 of 42 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Fatespinner relevance 0.29 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 0.32 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.32 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.29 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.41 · 73.8% (31 of 42 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.36 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.34 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.38 · 45.2% (19 of 42 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.34 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 0.44 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- It That Betrays relevance 0.43 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.31 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.39 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Phyrexian Ingester relevance 0.40 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Sphinx of Uthuun relevance 0.40 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 0.36 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.35 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.26 · 59.5% (25 of 42 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.35 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Vodalian Illusionist relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.29 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.34 · 23.8% (10 of 42 decks)
- Platinum Emperion relevance 0.36 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Kira, Great Glass-Spinner relevance 0.32 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.30 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.28 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Mocking Doppelganger relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.28 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Quicksilver Gargantuan relevance 0.35 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Pathrazer of Ulamog relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.29 · 23.8% (10 of 42 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Fatespinner relevance 0.29 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 0.32 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.29 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 0.33 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.26 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.29 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.30 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.28 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Empress Galina relevance 0.29 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Treasure Mage relevance 0.28 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.28 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.20 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.26 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Keiga, the Tide Star relevance 0.28 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.28 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.35 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.32 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.33 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Quicksilver Amulet relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Gate to the Aether relevance 0.39 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.25 · 52.4% (22 of 42 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.27 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.32 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.28 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.32 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.31 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.21 · 35.7% (15 of 42 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.26 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.23 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.26 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.17 · 52.4% (22 of 42 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.25 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Neurok Stealthsuit relevance 0.24 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.23 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.23 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Spectral Searchlight relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.13 · 54.8% (23 of 42 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (15 of 42 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Otherworld Atlas relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.19 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Wizard's Spellbook relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.18 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.09 · 78.6% (33 of 42 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Sisay's Ring relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.14 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.15 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Mindslaver relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.13 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Grafted Skullcap relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Jinxed Idol relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.48 · 52.4% (22 of 42 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.43 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.29 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.29 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.22 · 35.7% (15 of 42 decks)
- Hive Mind relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Followed Footsteps relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (21 of 42 decks)
- Weftwalking relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Mind Control relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Diplomatic Immunity relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.15 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.14 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Insight relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Shared Fate relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Deep Freeze relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.13 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Conjured Currency relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Puca's Mischief relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Quest for Ancient Secrets relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Sunken Hope relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Take Possession relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Infinite Reflection relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.09 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.09 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Abduction relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Persuasion relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Zur's Weirding relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Web of Inertia relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Steal Artifact relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Metamorphic Alteration relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Mana Breach relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All instants (50)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.20 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Reality Ripple relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.21 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.20 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.14 · 52.4% (22 of 42 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.20 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.18 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Domineering Will relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Split Decision relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.18 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.17 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.11 · 47.6% (20 of 42 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.11 · 45.2% (19 of 42 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Mystic Reflection relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.11 · 45.2% (19 of 42 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Supplant Form relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.11 · 40.5% (17 of 42 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.15 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Disperse relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Even the Score relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.10 · 42.9% (18 of 42 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.14 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Commander's Insight relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.14 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Vex relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Metamorphose relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Echoing Truth relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Lazotep Plating relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.09 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.08 · 52.4% (22 of 42 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.10 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Truth or Tale relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.09 · 40.5% (17 of 42 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.32 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.23 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Skyscribing relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.26 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.19 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.21 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.20 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Tales of the Ancestors relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.19 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Prosperity relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Flux relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Modify Memory relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.15 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Churning Eddy relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.11 · 26.2% (11 of 42 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Train of Thought relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Echo Storm relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Research the Deep relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Bilbo's Burglaring relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Legerdemain relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Mentor's Guidance relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Eye of Nowhere relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Saheeli's Artistry relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.12 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Void Snare relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Fascination relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Displacement Wave relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Shifting Grift relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.10 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.09 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (13)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.20 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Jace, Memory Adept relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Jace, the Living Guildpact relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Jace, Cunning Castaway relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.08 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.06 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (12 of 42 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.20 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.21 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (14 of 42 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.11 · 45.2% (19 of 42 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.13 · 19.0% (8 of 42 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.12 · 23.8% (10 of 42 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (7 of 42 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.14 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.10 · 38.1% (16 of 42 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.13 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.06 · 69.0% (29 of 42 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (6 of 42 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Foundry of the Consuls relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Sequestered Stash relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Mishra's Foundry relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.10 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Pit of Offerings relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Magosi, the Waterveil relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Underdark Rift relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Blighted Cataract relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Mishra's Factory relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.09 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
All lands (28)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.16 · 31.0% (13 of 42 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.19 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (9 of 42 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.12 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.13 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.13 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.10 · 9.5% (4 of 42 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.10 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.08 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.07 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.06 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.06 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.05 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 97.6% (41 of 42 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Braids, Conjurer Adept, from 42 real Commander decks.