Change per day
Archetypes
76% of decks lean toward it
45% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Growth Spiral
76% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Baxter Building
45% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 119 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Big Score
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Ink-Treader decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Big Score 37%
- Unexpected Windfall 19%
- Seize the Spoils 12%
- Pirate's Pillage 4%
Cards like Quantum Misalignment
15× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Ink-Treader decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Valeria Richards, Precocious
17× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Ink-Treader decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Bloom Tender
2.2× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Ink-Treader decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Bloom Tender 32%
- Faeburrow Elder 31%
Cards like Whirlwind of Thought
3.1× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other Ink-Treader decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Three Visits
1.4× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Ink-Treader decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 24% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Three Visits 45%
- Nature's Lore 35%
- Skyshroud Claim 13%
Other options: Glimpse the Core, Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Magma Opus
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Magma Opus 29%
- Creative Outburst 9%
Cards like Duelist's Heritage
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Beast Within
1.8× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other Ink-Treader decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Beast Within 24%
- Generous Gift 16%
Cards like Mnemonic Deluge
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards like Seize the Day
16× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Ink-Treader decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Other options: Overpowering Attack, Fury of the Horde
Cards like Heroic Intervention
3.6× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other Ink-Treader decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Faithless Looting
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Ink-Treader decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 52% of other Ink-Treader decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 32% of other Ink-Treader decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Cultivate 42%
- Rampant Growth 19%
- Kodama's Reach 18%
- Reshape the Earth 11%
- Terramorph 9%
- Shared Roots 6%
- Migration Path 3%
- Search for Tomorrow 2%
- Explosive Vegetation 2%
- Boundless Realms 2%
Other options: Traverse the Outlands, Map the Frontier, Far Wanderings, New Generation's Technique, Reach the Horizon, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival, Beneath the Sands, Primal Growth, Nissa's Expedition, Spring // Mind, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Celebrate the Harvest, Harvest Season
Cards like Farseek
11× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other Ink-Treader decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards like Growth Spiral
1.6× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Ink-Treader decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards like Fact or Fiction
17× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Fact or Fiction 24%
- Steam Augury 2%
Other options: Riddles in the Dark, Truth or Tale, Epiphany at the Drownyard, Fortune's Favor
All top picks (50)
- Magma Opus relevance 0.71 · 28.6% (70 of 245 decks)
- Lorehold, the Historian relevance 0.67 · 29.4% (72 of 245 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.69 · 22.4% (55 of 245 decks)
- Call Forth the Tempest relevance 0.57 · 25.3% (62 of 245 decks)
- Kellan, the Kid relevance 0.59 · 21.2% (52 of 245 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.61 · 15.9% (39 of 245 decks)
- Improvisation Capstone relevance 0.50 · 34.3% (84 of 245 decks)
- Storm Herd relevance 0.60 · 14.7% (36 of 245 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.54 · 23.7% (58 of 245 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.59 · 13.9% (34 of 245 decks)
- Hit the Mother Lode relevance 0.60 · 13.1% (32 of 245 decks)
- Restoration Seminar relevance 0.52 · 24.5% (60 of 245 decks)
- Prismari, the Inspiration relevance 0.56 · 15.5% (38 of 245 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.64 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Inspired Ultimatum relevance 0.54 · 17.6% (43 of 245 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.49 · 26.5% (65 of 245 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.57 · 12.7% (31 of 245 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.52 · 18.8% (46 of 245 decks)
- Furygale Flocking relevance 0.62 · 8.2% (20 of 245 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (37 of 245 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (28 of 245 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.58 · 10.2% (25 of 245 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.51 · 15.5% (38 of 245 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.41 · 37.1% (91 of 245 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.54 · 11.8% (29 of 245 decks)
- Surge to Victory relevance 0.57 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.59 · 8.2% (20 of 245 decks)
- Storm, Force of Nature relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (35 of 245 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 0.60 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.52 · 11.8% (29 of 245 decks)
- Abstract Performance relevance 0.59 · 6.9% (17 of 245 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.58 · 6.9% (17 of 245 decks)
- Crystal, Inhuman Princess relevance 0.36 · 43.7% (107 of 245 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.38 · 37.1% (91 of 245 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 0.59 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Delayed Blast Fireball relevance 0.53 · 10.2% (25 of 245 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.52 · 9.8% (24 of 245 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.43 · 23.3% (57 of 245 decks)
- Jeskai Revelation relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (29 of 245 decks)
- Mister Fantastic relevance 0.37 · 36.7% (90 of 245 decks)
- Flaming Fist relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Resonating Lute relevance 0.45 · 16.3% (40 of 245 decks)
- Quintorius, History Chaser relevance 0.57 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Diviner of Mist relevance 0.58 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.56 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.45 · 15.5% (38 of 245 decks)
- Elemental Eruption relevance 0.55 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Multiversal Incursion relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (27 of 245 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (20 of 245 decks)
- Snort relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Lorehold, the Historian relevance 0.67 · 29.4% (72 of 245 decks)
- Kellan, the Kid relevance 0.59 · 21.2% (52 of 245 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.59 · 13.9% (34 of 245 decks)
- Prismari, the Inspiration relevance 0.56 · 15.5% (38 of 245 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (37 of 245 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.58 · 10.2% (25 of 245 decks)
- Storm, Force of Nature relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (35 of 245 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 0.60 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Crystal, Inhuman Princess relevance 0.36 · 43.7% (107 of 245 decks)
- Mister Fantastic relevance 0.37 · 36.7% (90 of 245 decks)
- Diviner of Mist relevance 0.58 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Franklin Richards, Ascendant relevance 0.36 · 33.1% (81 of 245 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.33 · 37.6% (92 of 245 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 0.36 · 26.9% (66 of 245 decks)
- Thought Courier relevance 0.56 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Ethereal Forager relevance 0.56 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- The Dawning Archaic relevance 0.51 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Iron Lad, Young Avenger relevance 0.44 · 10.2% (25 of 245 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (21 of 245 decks)
- The Scarlet Witch relevance 0.43 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Velomachus Lorehold relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Thor, God of Thunder relevance 0.41 · 10.2% (25 of 245 decks)
- Scarlet Witch, Chaotic Avenger relevance 0.44 · 7.3% (18 of 245 decks)
- Skyway Robber relevance 0.54 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Marang River Regent // Coil and Catch relevance 0.46 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (19 of 245 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Scourge of the Throne relevance 0.46 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- H.E.R.B.I.E., Lovable Robot relevance 0.34 · 17.6% (43 of 245 decks)
- Lyse Hext relevance 0.42 · 6.9% (17 of 245 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Sphinx of Forgotten Lore relevance 0.50 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.34 · 13.9% (34 of 245 decks)
- Hammerhead Tyrant relevance 0.50 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Longshot, Rebel Bowman relevance 0.39 · 8.2% (20 of 245 decks)
- Backdraft Hellkite relevance 0.49 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Invisible Woman relevance 0.31 · 20.0% (49 of 245 decks)
- Alicia Masters, Skilled Sculptor relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (40 of 245 decks)
- Gogo, Mysterious Mime relevance 0.43 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.38 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.44 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Human Torch relevance 0.29 · 17.1% (42 of 245 decks)
- Joshua, Phoenix's Dominant // Phoenix, Warden of Fire relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- The Thing relevance 0.29 · 15.9% (39 of 245 decks)
- The Immortal Weapons relevance 0.45 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Monica Rambeau // Photon, Living Light relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
- Speed, Young Avenger relevance 0.45 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Hulkling, Young Avenger relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Ovika, Enigma Goliath relevance 0.39 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
All artifacts (42)
- Key to the City relevance 0.59 · 8.2% (20 of 245 decks)
- Resonating Lute relevance 0.45 · 16.3% (40 of 245 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.56 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
- Doom's Time Platform relevance 0.46 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.48 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.41 · 8.2% (20 of 245 decks)
- Unstable Molecule Suit relevance 0.33 · 15.9% (39 of 245 decks)
- Dragonfire Blade relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (24 of 245 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.28 · 10.6% (26 of 245 decks)
- Daily Bugle Newspaper relevance 0.41 · 2.9% (7 of 245 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.21 · 23.3% (57 of 245 decks)
- The Fantasticar relevance 0.27 · 6.9% (17 of 245 decks)
- Conqueror's Flail relevance 0.33 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.26 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.19 · 24.9% (61 of 245 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.22 · 13.9% (34 of 245 decks)
- Ark of Hunger relevance 0.38 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Negative Zone Portal relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Talisman of Conviction relevance 0.23 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (18 of 245 decks)
- Tablet of Discovery relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Boros Signet relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.14 · 35.1% (86 of 245 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (7 of 245 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (7 of 245 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.06 · 66.5% (163 of 245 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 57.1% (140 of 245 decks)
All enchantments (35)
- Flaming Fist relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.45 · 15.5% (38 of 245 decks)
- Cosmic Crucible relevance 0.34 · 39.2% (96 of 245 decks)
- Double Vision relevance 0.51 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Arcane Bombardment relevance 0.48 · 8.6% (21 of 245 decks)
- Cool but Rude relevance 0.50 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 0.48 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Shadow of the Goblin relevance 0.50 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Whirlwind of Thought relevance 0.26 · 44.9% (110 of 245 decks)
- Finest Hour relevance 0.42 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (19 of 245 decks)
- Avengers Assemble! relevance 0.39 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Thousand-Year Storm relevance 0.38 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Ceta Sanctuary relevance 0.44 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Guild Artisan relevance 0.40 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.31 · 11.4% (28 of 245 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Jeskai Ascendancy relevance 0.26 · 17.1% (42 of 245 decks)
- Annie Joins Up relevance 0.18 · 51.8% (127 of 245 decks)
- Monologue Tax relevance 0.28 · 11.4% (28 of 245 decks)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.38 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.35 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Artist's Talent relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Passionate Archaeologist relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 9.8% (24 of 245 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (7 of 245 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.15 · 7.3% (18 of 245 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (7 of 245 decks)
All instants (50)
- Magma Opus relevance 0.71 · 28.6% (70 of 245 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.54 · 23.7% (58 of 245 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.64 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.52 · 18.8% (46 of 245 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.41 · 37.1% (91 of 245 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.38 · 37.1% (91 of 245 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 0.59 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Delayed Blast Fireball relevance 0.53 · 10.2% (25 of 245 decks)
- Jeskai Revelation relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (29 of 245 decks)
- Laughing Mad relevance 0.53 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (26 of 245 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.46 · 10.2% (25 of 245 decks)
- Fast // Furious relevance 0.55 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- First Family relevance 0.34 · 27.8% (68 of 245 decks)
- Heartwarming Redemption relevance 0.48 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.36 · 14.7% (36 of 245 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.48 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Emergency Eject relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Magmaquake relevance 0.51 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Vivi's Persistence relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Faithful Mending relevance 0.42 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Unexplained Absence relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Invisible Force Field relevance 0.30 · 18.4% (45 of 245 decks)
- Twinferno relevance 0.43 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Elminster's Simulacrum relevance 0.46 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Fall to Earth relevance 0.49 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Marvelous Melee relevance 0.49 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.30 · 15.5% (38 of 245 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Sylvan Reclamation relevance 0.36 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.35 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Klauth's Will relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Psychotic Fury relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (7 of 245 decks)
- Reinterpret relevance 0.37 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Bovine Intervention relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (21 of 245 decks)
- Repudiate // Replicate relevance 0.36 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.36 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (35 of 245 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.28 · 6.9% (17 of 245 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (22 of 245 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.28 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Pull from Eternity relevance 0.39 · 2.9% (7 of 245 decks)
- Blacksmith's Skill relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.22 · 15.1% (37 of 245 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.21 · 15.9% (39 of 245 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.69 · 22.4% (55 of 245 decks)
- Call Forth the Tempest relevance 0.57 · 25.3% (62 of 245 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.61 · 15.9% (39 of 245 decks)
- Improvisation Capstone relevance 0.50 · 34.3% (84 of 245 decks)
- Storm Herd relevance 0.60 · 14.7% (36 of 245 decks)
- Hit the Mother Lode relevance 0.60 · 13.1% (32 of 245 decks)
- Restoration Seminar relevance 0.52 · 24.5% (60 of 245 decks)
- Inspired Ultimatum relevance 0.54 · 17.6% (43 of 245 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.49 · 26.5% (65 of 245 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.57 · 12.7% (31 of 245 decks)
- Furygale Flocking relevance 0.62 · 8.2% (20 of 245 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (28 of 245 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.51 · 15.5% (38 of 245 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.54 · 11.8% (29 of 245 decks)
- Surge to Victory relevance 0.57 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.52 · 11.8% (29 of 245 decks)
- Abstract Performance relevance 0.59 · 6.9% (17 of 245 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.58 · 6.9% (17 of 245 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.52 · 9.8% (24 of 245 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.43 · 23.3% (57 of 245 decks)
- Elemental Eruption relevance 0.55 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Multiversal Incursion relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (27 of 245 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (20 of 245 decks)
- Snort relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
- World at War relevance 0.51 · 8.2% (20 of 245 decks)
- Cathartic Reunion relevance 0.51 · 7.8% (19 of 245 decks)
- Full Throttle relevance 0.49 · 9.0% (22 of 245 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.38 · 26.5% (65 of 245 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (25 of 245 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.33 · 40.8% (100 of 245 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.53 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.44 · 12.7% (31 of 245 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.52 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Genesis Ultimatum relevance 0.35 · 31.4% (77 of 245 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.44 · 12.2% (30 of 245 decks)
- Elemental Masterpiece relevance 0.53 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Steal the Show relevance 0.52 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Mizzix's Mastery relevance 0.45 · 9.8% (24 of 245 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.42 · 11.4% (28 of 245 decks)
- Extract Power relevance 0.51 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Will of the Jeskai relevance 0.46 · 7.3% (18 of 245 decks)
- Sorcerous Squall relevance 0.50 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Seize the Day relevance 0.34 · 25.3% (62 of 245 decks)
- Visionary's Dance relevance 0.53 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.49 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Awaken the Inferno relevance 0.55 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.45 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 0.33 · 21.6% (53 of 245 decks)
- Reforge the Soul relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Quintorius, History Chaser relevance 0.57 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Ral, Crackling Wit relevance 0.36 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
All utility lands (32)
- Baxter Building relevance 0.31 · 29.0% (71 of 245 decks)
- Desolate Lighthouse relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.33 · 14.3% (35 of 245 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.33 · 13.1% (32 of 245 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (35 of 245 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.33 · 10.2% (25 of 245 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.32 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Elegant Parlor relevance 0.33 · 8.6% (21 of 245 decks)
- Avengers Tower relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
- Emeria's Call // Emeria, Shattered Skyclave relevance 0.39 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.31 · 7.8% (19 of 245 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.31 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.26 · 12.2% (30 of 245 decks)
- Sunhome, Fortress of the Legion relevance 0.36 · 2.9% (7 of 245 decks)
- Jetmir's Garden relevance 0.17 · 31.4% (77 of 245 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.16 · 36.3% (89 of 245 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.15 · 40.4% (99 of 245 decks)
- Coastal Peak relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (7 of 245 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.16 · 31.4% (77 of 245 decks)
- Raugrin Triome relevance 0.17 · 24.9% (61 of 245 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.22 · 6.9% (17 of 245 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 10.6% (26 of 245 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.15 · 8.6% (21 of 245 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 13.9% (34 of 245 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (13 of 245 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (6 of 245 decks)
All lands (50)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Scorched Geyser relevance 0.30 · 21.6% (53 of 245 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.28 · 22.9% (56 of 245 decks)
- Radiant Summit relevance 0.29 · 20.0% (49 of 245 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.36 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.33 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Rootbound Crag relevance 0.24 · 28.6% (70 of 245 decks)
- Riverpyre Verge relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.33 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.44 · 2.9% (7 of 245 decks)
- Clifftop Retreat relevance 0.22 · 32.2% (79 of 245 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (16 of 245 decks)
- Sulfur Falls relevance 0.22 · 30.2% (74 of 245 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.22 · 27.8% (68 of 245 decks)
- Spectator Seating relevance 0.23 · 19.6% (48 of 245 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Frostboil Snarl relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (15 of 245 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.20 · 30.2% (74 of 245 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.22 · 19.6% (48 of 245 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.20 · 29.4% (72 of 245 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.22 · 17.1% (42 of 245 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (23 of 245 decks)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.25 · 10.6% (26 of 245 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.21 · 21.2% (52 of 245 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (70 of 245 decks)
- Rugged Prairie relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Sunbillow Verge relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.18 · 34.7% (85 of 245 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (18 of 245 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.18 · 32.2% (79 of 245 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.17 · 36.3% (89 of 245 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (22 of 245 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (14 of 245 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.23 · 10.6% (26 of 245 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.23 · 9.8% (24 of 245 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.23 · 8.6% (21 of 245 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (11 of 245 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Battlefield Forge relevance 0.22 · 10.6% (26 of 245 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (10 of 245 decks)
- Furycalm Snarl relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (12 of 245 decks)
- Training Compound relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (9 of 245 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.20 · 13.1% (32 of 245 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.22 · 8.6% (21 of 245 decks)
- Sundown Pass relevance 0.23 · 6.9% (17 of 245 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.17 · 22.9% (56 of 245 decks)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (8 of 245 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Power Pack, from 245 real Commander decks.