Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Dragonologist relevance 0.62 · 34.4% (73 of 212 decks)
- Iymrith, Desert Doom relevance 0.61 · 24.5% (52 of 212 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.52 · 39.2% (83 of 212 decks)
- Roiling Dragonstorm relevance 0.62 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- Dragonstorm Globe relevance 0.64 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Lapis Orb of Dragonkind relevance 0.62 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.46 · 39.6% (84 of 212 decks)
- Hammerhead Tyrant relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (37 of 212 decks)
- Young Blue Dragon // Sand Augury relevance 0.57 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 0.52 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- Renari, Merchant of Marvels relevance 0.58 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- Drake Hatcher relevance 0.51 · 17.9% (38 of 212 decks)
- Icefall Regent relevance 0.57 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 0.51 · 15.6% (33 of 212 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.50 · 16.5% (35 of 212 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.45 · 26.9% (57 of 212 decks)
- Draconic Lore relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Dirgur Island Dragon // Skimming Strike relevance 0.49 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Kairi, the Swirling Sky relevance 0.48 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Silumgar's Scorn relevance 0.57 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Archive Dragon relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Diviner of Mist relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Deceptive Frostkite relevance 0.49 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.40 · 26.4% (56 of 212 decks)
- Blue Dragon relevance 0.53 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.39 · 28.3% (60 of 212 decks)
- Marang River Regent // Coil and Catch relevance 0.41 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Dragon Turtle relevance 0.50 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.43 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Dragonborn Looter relevance 0.51 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Voracious Bibliophile relevance 0.41 · 16.5% (35 of 212 decks)
- Thief's Knife relevance 0.49 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Juvenile Mist Dragon relevance 0.50 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.36 · 27.8% (59 of 212 decks)
- Fear of Failed Tests relevance 0.48 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Blue Mage's Cane relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.41 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- Keiga, the Tide Star relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.42 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Winged Words relevance 0.36 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Murktide Regent relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.38 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.38 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Dragon's Hoard relevance 0.46 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Triton Wavebreaker relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.35 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- April, Reporter of the Weird relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
Card Stacks
17
Card Stacks
17Showing 1-2 of 17
Cards like Consider
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Shore Up
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Shore Up 24%
- Magic Damper 20%
- Dive Down 8%
- Octopus Form 7%
- You See a Guard Approach 3%
- Mizzium Skin 3%
- Chase Inspiration 2%
- Glint 1%
Other options: Shell Shield
Cards like Preordain
3.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 46%
- Serum Visions 23%
- Deliberate 5%
- Scour All Possibilities 2%
Other options: Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Combat Research
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Combat Research 40%
- Curious Obsession 10%
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Muse Seeker, Lunar Mystic, Academy Wall, Windrider Wizard
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 43%
- Pongify 42%
Cards like Bident of Thassa
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards like Hermes, Overseer of Elpis
6.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Ponder
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Winged Words
8.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Winged Words 20%
- Gust of Wind 5%
Cards like Sky Diamond
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 31%
- Prismatic Lens 5%
- Coldsteel Heart 4%
- Star Compass 2%
Other options: Guardian Idol, Obsidian Obelisk, Corrupted Grafstone
Cards like Sword of the Animist
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Sisay's Ring, Ring of the Lucii, Ichor Elixir, Ur-Golem's Eye
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 37%
- Lightning Greaves 19%
Cards like The Key to the Vault
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Haughty Djinn
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Dragonologist relevance 0.62 · 34.4% (73 of 212 decks)
- Iymrith, Desert Doom relevance 0.61 · 24.5% (52 of 212 decks)
- Hammerhead Tyrant relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (37 of 212 decks)
- Young Blue Dragon // Sand Augury relevance 0.57 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 0.52 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- Renari, Merchant of Marvels relevance 0.58 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- Drake Hatcher relevance 0.51 · 17.9% (38 of 212 decks)
- Icefall Regent relevance 0.57 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 0.51 · 15.6% (33 of 212 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.50 · 16.5% (35 of 212 decks)
- Dirgur Island Dragon // Skimming Strike relevance 0.49 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Kairi, the Swirling Sky relevance 0.48 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Archive Dragon relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Diviner of Mist relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Deceptive Frostkite relevance 0.49 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.40 · 26.4% (56 of 212 decks)
- Blue Dragon relevance 0.53 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.39 · 28.3% (60 of 212 decks)
- Marang River Regent // Coil and Catch relevance 0.41 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Dragon Turtle relevance 0.50 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Dragonborn Looter relevance 0.51 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Voracious Bibliophile relevance 0.41 · 16.5% (35 of 212 decks)
- Juvenile Mist Dragon relevance 0.50 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Fear of Failed Tests relevance 0.48 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Keiga, the Tide Star relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Murktide Regent relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Triton Wavebreaker relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- April, Reporter of the Weird relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 0.35 · 15.6% (33 of 212 decks)
- Surrakar Spellblade relevance 0.41 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Jhessian Thief relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Nimbleclaw Adept relevance 0.40 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 0.34 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Sailors' Bane relevance 0.39 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Oceanus Dragon relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Belltoll Dragon relevance 0.44 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.27 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 0.35 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.28 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Quicksilver Dragon relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.30 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Mischievous Catgeist // Catlike Curiosity relevance 0.33 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.23 · 25.9% (55 of 212 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.25 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.24 · 21.2% (45 of 212 decks)
- Boulderborn Dragon relevance 0.38 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.19 · 33.5% (71 of 212 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.52 · 39.2% (83 of 212 decks)
- Dragonstorm Globe relevance 0.64 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Lapis Orb of Dragonkind relevance 0.62 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.45 · 26.9% (57 of 212 decks)
- Thief's Knife relevance 0.49 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.36 · 27.8% (59 of 212 decks)
- Blue Mage's Cane relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.41 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.42 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.38 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
- Dragon's Hoard relevance 0.46 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Mox Jasper relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.39 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.38 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Mask of the Schemer relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.33 · 15.6% (33 of 212 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.32 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.36 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.37 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.37 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.36 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.36 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.24 · 34.9% (74 of 212 decks)
- Blitzball relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.30 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.28 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Scroll of the Masters relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.29 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Hero's Blade relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Masterwork of Ingenuity relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Bitterthorn, Nissa's Animus relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Pip-Boy 3000 relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Thran Power Suit relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.24 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Assassin Gauntlet relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.19 · 30.7% (65 of 212 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.20 · 23.1% (49 of 212 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Cosmic Cube relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Fishing Gear relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Scytheclaw relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.20 · 23.6% (50 of 212 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Roiling Dragonstorm relevance 0.62 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.46 · 39.6% (84 of 212 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.43 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.35 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Feywild Visitor relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.27 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Noggle the Mind relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.26 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Stormchaser's Talent relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.26 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.29 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.22 · 19.3% (41 of 212 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.29 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Quiet Contemplation relevance 0.35 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.19 · 21.7% (46 of 212 decks)
- Blossombind relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Ordeal of Thassa relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Aquitect's Defenses relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.20 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.14 · 34.9% (74 of 212 decks)
- Gravitational Shift relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.19 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Retro-Mutation relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Favorable Winds relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.16 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- The Clone Saga relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Draconic Lore relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Silumgar's Scorn relevance 0.57 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.33 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.29 · 28.3% (60 of 212 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.31 · 23.6% (50 of 212 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.33 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.23 · 42.5% (90 of 212 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.26 · 15.6% (33 of 212 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.27 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.27 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.18 · 42.5% (90 of 212 decks)
- Flatline relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.26 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Blessed Reincarnation relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.25 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.23 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.20 · 21.7% (46 of 212 decks)
- Suspend relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Lazotep Plating relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.28 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.22 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.17 · 32.1% (68 of 212 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.23 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Urza's Command relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.15 · 43.9% (93 of 212 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.19 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Mystic Reflection relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.22 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.14 · 42.9% (91 of 212 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.22 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.20 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.17 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- You See a Guard Approach relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.21 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Winged Words relevance 0.36 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.38 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.27 · 23.1% (49 of 212 decks)
- Eagle Vision relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Gust of Wind relevance 0.35 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.29 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.19 · 45.8% (97 of 212 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.26 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.26 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.24 · 15.6% (33 of 212 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.23 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.24 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.16 · 43.9% (93 of 212 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.25 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Sleep relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.20 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Otterball Antics relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.19 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.15 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Unending Whisper relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.14 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
Planeswalkers
3
Planeswalkers
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All planeswalkers (3)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
Utility Lands
48
Utility Lands
48 Showing 1-10 of 48
Page size
All utility lands (48)
- Haven of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.66 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Maelstrom of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.60 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.29 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.26 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.20 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 18.4% (39 of 212 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 24.1% (51 of 212 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.17 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.19 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.18 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.17 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 17.5% (37 of 212 decks)
- Beyeen Veil // Beyeen Coast relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.17 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.14 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 43.4% (92 of 212 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 40.1% (85 of 212 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.11 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
Lands
11
Lands
11 Showing 1-10 of 11
Page size
All lands (11)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.37 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.24 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.18 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.13 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 91.5% (194 of 212 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Hraesvelgr of the First Brood, from 212 real Commander decks.