Cards like Flux Channeler
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
92% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
70% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 88%
- Dreamtide Whale 73%
Cards like Contentious Plan
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
60% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards like Thrummingbird
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Contagion Clasp
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Contagion Clasp 55%
- Contagion Engine 52%
Cards like Reject Imperfection
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Mindstatic, Convolute, Out of Bounds, Frazzle, Thoughtbind
Cards like Lux Cannon
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lux Cannon 39%
- Magistrate's Scepter 32%
- Surge Node 6%
Other options: Tumble Magnet, Necrogen Censer
Cards like Plague Myr
7.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards like Replicating Ring
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Jace Beleren
7.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Teferi, Master of Time
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Astral Cornucopia
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Elementalist's Palette, Kyren Toy, Ventifact Bottle
Cards like Jace, the Mind Sculptor
8.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gitaxian Anatomist
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Jace, Cunning Castaway
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Hangarback Walker
5.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Tezzeret the Seeker
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Walking Ballista
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Experimental Augury
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards like Glistening Sphere
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.61 · 85.2% (941 of 1,104 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.58 · 86.9% (959 of 1,104 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.57 · 85.9% (948 of 1,104 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.56 · 85.8% (947 of 1,104 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.55 · 88.0% (971 of 1,104 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.77 · 54.9% (606 of 1,104 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.59 · 79.5% (878 of 1,104 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.67 · 64.7% (714 of 1,104 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.76 · 51.9% (573 of 1,104 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.63 · 69.7% (770 of 1,104 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.63 · 70.2% (775 of 1,104 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.60 · 73.4% (810 of 1,104 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.63 · 65.2% (720 of 1,104 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.66 · 59.8% (660 of 1,104 decks)
- Viral Drake relevance 0.73 · 49.1% (542 of 1,104 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.64 · 60.0% (662 of 1,104 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.69 · 52.8% (583 of 1,104 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.69 · 51.7% (571 of 1,104 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.70 · 49.8% (550 of 1,104 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.73 · 44.8% (495 of 1,104 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.71 · 47.8% (528 of 1,104 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.67 · 52.5% (580 of 1,104 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.73 · 44.8% (495 of 1,104 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.77 · 39.2% (433 of 1,104 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.67 · 49.4% (545 of 1,104 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.78 · 32.5% (359 of 1,104 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.75 · 33.9% (374 of 1,104 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.75 · 32.2% (356 of 1,104 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.72 · 36.4% (402 of 1,104 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.73 · 34.1% (377 of 1,104 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.67 · 39.3% (434 of 1,104 decks)
- Myojin of Cryptic Dreams relevance 0.73 · 29.8% (329 of 1,104 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.66 · 36.7% (405 of 1,104 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.78 · 18.5% (204 of 1,104 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.68 · 31.0% (342 of 1,104 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.79 · 14.9% (165 of 1,104 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.69 · 27.4% (303 of 1,104 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.62 · 38.5% (425 of 1,104 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 0.70 · 25.6% (283 of 1,104 decks)
- Recon Craft Theta relevance 0.77 · 15.7% (173 of 1,104 decks)
- Mindless Automaton relevance 0.79 · 13.9% (154 of 1,104 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.67 · 27.9% (308 of 1,104 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.72 · 21.0% (232 of 1,104 decks)
- Vexing Radgull relevance 0.75 · 16.3% (180 of 1,104 decks)
- Titan Forge relevance 0.78 · 14.0% (155 of 1,104 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (159 of 1,104 decks)
- Throne of Geth relevance 0.70 · 21.2% (234 of 1,104 decks)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 0.74 · 15.7% (173 of 1,104 decks)
- Core Prowler relevance 0.75 · 14.5% (160 of 1,104 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.57 · 38.7% (427 of 1,104 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.58 · 86.9% (959 of 1,104 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.55 · 88.0% (971 of 1,104 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.60 · 73.4% (810 of 1,104 decks)
- Viral Drake relevance 0.73 · 49.1% (542 of 1,104 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.69 · 52.8% (583 of 1,104 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.71 · 47.8% (528 of 1,104 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.67 · 49.4% (545 of 1,104 decks)
- Myojin of Cryptic Dreams relevance 0.73 · 29.8% (329 of 1,104 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.66 · 36.7% (405 of 1,104 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.78 · 18.5% (204 of 1,104 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.62 · 38.5% (425 of 1,104 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 0.70 · 25.6% (283 of 1,104 decks)
- Mindless Automaton relevance 0.79 · 13.9% (154 of 1,104 decks)
- Vexing Radgull relevance 0.75 · 16.3% (180 of 1,104 decks)
- Core Prowler relevance 0.75 · 14.5% (160 of 1,104 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.76 · 12.3% (136 of 1,104 decks)
- Coretapper relevance 0.71 · 13.3% (147 of 1,104 decks)
- Plague Myr relevance 0.62 · 24.0% (265 of 1,104 decks)
- Ichorclaw Myr relevance 0.67 · 12.5% (138 of 1,104 decks)
- Goldberry, River-Daughter relevance 0.69 · 10.1% (112 of 1,104 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 0.63 · 14.2% (157 of 1,104 decks)
- Myr Convert relevance 0.59 · 18.5% (204 of 1,104 decks)
- Necropede relevance 0.67 · 10.3% (114 of 1,104 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (165 of 1,104 decks)
- Chrome Host Seedshark relevance 0.51 · 25.8% (285 of 1,104 decks)
- Lighthouse Chronologist relevance 0.62 · 10.6% (117 of 1,104 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.66 · 7.8% (86 of 1,104 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.55 · 14.3% (158 of 1,104 decks)
- Corpse Cur relevance 0.67 · 5.9% (65 of 1,104 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 0.58 · 11.3% (125 of 1,104 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.47 · 28.0% (309 of 1,104 decks)
- Kiora's Dambreaker relevance 0.67 · 5.0% (55 of 1,104 decks)
- Virulent Silencer relevance 0.61 · 8.6% (95 of 1,104 decks)
- Dune Mover relevance 0.63 · 7.2% (80 of 1,104 decks)
- Trawler Drake relevance 0.64 · 6.8% (75 of 1,104 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias // The Great Synthesis relevance 0.52 · 14.8% (163 of 1,104 decks)
- Serum Sovereign relevance 0.60 · 8.5% (94 of 1,104 decks)
- Thing in the Ice // Awoken Horror relevance 0.57 · 9.7% (107 of 1,104 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.49 · 17.7% (195 of 1,104 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.49 · 15.3% (169 of 1,104 decks)
- Loch Mare relevance 0.55 · 5.8% (64 of 1,104 decks)
- Myojin of Seeing Winds relevance 0.63 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- Unctus's Retrofitter relevance 0.62 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.35 · 33.6% (371 of 1,104 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.52 · 5.2% (57 of 1,104 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.39 · 17.7% (195 of 1,104 decks)
- Chained Throatseeker relevance 0.63 · 3.4% (38 of 1,104 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.45 · 8.2% (90 of 1,104 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.32 · 33.1% (365 of 1,104 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (52 of 1,104 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.77 · 54.9% (606 of 1,104 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.76 · 51.9% (573 of 1,104 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.63 · 69.7% (770 of 1,104 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.69 · 51.7% (571 of 1,104 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.70 · 49.8% (550 of 1,104 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.77 · 39.2% (433 of 1,104 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.78 · 32.5% (359 of 1,104 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.75 · 32.2% (356 of 1,104 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.72 · 36.4% (402 of 1,104 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.67 · 39.3% (434 of 1,104 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.68 · 31.0% (342 of 1,104 decks)
- Recon Craft Theta relevance 0.77 · 15.7% (173 of 1,104 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.72 · 21.0% (232 of 1,104 decks)
- Titan Forge relevance 0.78 · 14.0% (155 of 1,104 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (159 of 1,104 decks)
- Throne of Geth relevance 0.70 · 21.2% (234 of 1,104 decks)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 0.74 · 15.7% (173 of 1,104 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.69 · 17.5% (193 of 1,104 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.50 · 48.9% (540 of 1,104 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.65 · 19.6% (216 of 1,104 decks)
- Prosthetic Injector relevance 0.70 · 11.3% (125 of 1,104 decks)
- Lux Artillery relevance 0.72 · 9.8% (108 of 1,104 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.34 · 75.6% (835 of 1,104 decks)
- Tablet of Compleation relevance 0.75 · 6.1% (67 of 1,104 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 0.67 · 10.2% (113 of 1,104 decks)
- Pyramid of the Pantheon relevance 0.72 · 6.3% (69 of 1,104 decks)
- Moxite Refinery relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (104 of 1,104 decks)
- Lost Jitte relevance 0.67 · 7.8% (86 of 1,104 decks)
- Surge Node relevance 0.70 · 5.7% (63 of 1,104 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.63 · 7.7% (85 of 1,104 decks)
- Energy Chamber relevance 0.65 · 6.0% (66 of 1,104 decks)
- The Millennium Calendar relevance 0.55 · 12.7% (140 of 1,104 decks)
- Luxior, Giada's Gift relevance 0.67 · 4.8% (53 of 1,104 decks)
- Decimator Web relevance 0.68 · 4.6% (51 of 1,104 decks)
- Golem Foundry relevance 0.59 · 8.1% (89 of 1,104 decks)
- Power Conduit relevance 0.61 · 6.6% (73 of 1,104 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.60 · 7.0% (77 of 1,104 decks)
- Orochi Hatchery relevance 0.61 · 4.9% (54 of 1,104 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.60 · 5.3% (58 of 1,104 decks)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.55 · 7.2% (80 of 1,104 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.47 · 10.9% (120 of 1,104 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.46 · 11.6% (128 of 1,104 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.49 · 5.3% (59 of 1,104 decks)
- Font of Progress relevance 0.65 · 3.2% (35 of 1,104 decks)
- Peter Parker's Camera relevance 0.48 · 4.9% (54 of 1,104 decks)
- Oracle's Vault relevance 0.63 · 3.0% (33 of 1,104 decks)
- The Filigree Sylex relevance 0.63 · 2.7% (30 of 1,104 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.42 · 6.7% (74 of 1,104 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.29 · 31.1% (343 of 1,104 decks)
- Solar Array relevance 0.59 · 2.7% (30 of 1,104 decks)
All enchantments (21)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.61 · 85.2% (941 of 1,104 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.75 · 33.9% (374 of 1,104 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.57 · 38.7% (427 of 1,104 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (165 of 1,104 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.66 · 7.8% (86 of 1,104 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (142 of 1,104 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.54 · 11.1% (123 of 1,104 decks)
- Oath of Jace relevance 0.57 · 6.2% (68 of 1,104 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.35 · 26.9% (297 of 1,104 decks)
- Way of the Cryomancer relevance 0.57 · 3.9% (43 of 1,104 decks)
- Way of the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.54 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.26 · 18.0% (199 of 1,104 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 0.47 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.27 · 8.5% (94 of 1,104 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.19 · 28.6% (316 of 1,104 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (55 of 1,104 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.18 · 20.1% (222 of 1,104 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.19 · 15.6% (172 of 1,104 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (39 of 1,104 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
All instants (50)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.56 · 85.8% (947 of 1,104 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.67 · 64.7% (714 of 1,104 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.63 · 70.2% (775 of 1,104 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.63 · 65.2% (720 of 1,104 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.66 · 59.8% (660 of 1,104 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.64 · 60.0% (662 of 1,104 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.73 · 44.8% (495 of 1,104 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.67 · 52.5% (580 of 1,104 decks)
- Aspirant's Ascent relevance 0.70 · 11.0% (121 of 1,104 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (104 of 1,104 decks)
- Corrupted Resolve relevance 0.68 · 6.1% (67 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace's Machinations relevance 0.56 · 4.5% (50 of 1,104 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.35 · 12.9% (142 of 1,104 decks)
- Nexus Mentality relevance 0.54 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Countersculpt relevance 0.51 · 3.1% (34 of 1,104 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.34 · 7.6% (84 of 1,104 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (98 of 1,104 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.27 · 17.6% (194 of 1,104 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.28 · 11.5% (127 of 1,104 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (76 of 1,104 decks)
- Suspend relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (38 of 1,104 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.23 · 17.4% (192 of 1,104 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.28 · 7.2% (79 of 1,104 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.28 · 7.3% (81 of 1,104 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.22 · 16.9% (187 of 1,104 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.20 · 19.8% (219 of 1,104 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (29 of 1,104 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.24 · 8.7% (96 of 1,104 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.18 · 26.2% (289 of 1,104 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.23 · 9.8% (108 of 1,104 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.19 · 20.3% (224 of 1,104 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.18 · 21.6% (238 of 1,104 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.20 · 13.9% (153 of 1,104 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (38 of 1,104 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Lazotep Plating relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.17 · 24.9% (275 of 1,104 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.22 · 7.5% (83 of 1,104 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 33.4% (369 of 1,104 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.15 · 30.8% (340 of 1,104 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.16 · 24.5% (271 of 1,104 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.16 · 22.1% (244 of 1,104 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (33 of 1,104 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (66 of 1,104 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.14 · 26.6% (294 of 1,104 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (36 of 1,104 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (37 of 1,104 decks)
All sorceries (29)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.57 · 85.9% (948 of 1,104 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.59 · 79.5% (878 of 1,104 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.73 · 44.8% (495 of 1,104 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.73 · 34.1% (377 of 1,104 decks)
- Distorted Curiosity relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (113 of 1,104 decks)
- Impede Momentum relevance 0.55 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (119 of 1,104 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.25 · 27.1% (299 of 1,104 decks)
- Freeze in Place relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (33 of 1,104 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.30 · 12.3% (136 of 1,104 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.45 · 3.1% (34 of 1,104 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (56 of 1,104 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (69 of 1,104 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.31 · 5.8% (64 of 1,104 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.31 · 5.8% (64 of 1,104 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.29 · 6.9% (76 of 1,104 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (33 of 1,104 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (75 of 1,104 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (55 of 1,104 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (35 of 1,104 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (57 of 1,104 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.19 · 19.0% (210 of 1,104 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.20 · 13.0% (144 of 1,104 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (99 of 1,104 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (29 of 1,104 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (42 of 1,104 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (31 of 1,104 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (30 of 1,104 decks)
All planeswalkers (41)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.79 · 14.9% (165 of 1,104 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.69 · 27.4% (303 of 1,104 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.67 · 27.9% (308 of 1,104 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.58 · 32.1% (354 of 1,104 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.64 · 20.8% (230 of 1,104 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.53 · 38.9% (430 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, Cunning Castaway relevance 0.65 · 17.1% (189 of 1,104 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Sky Dancer relevance 0.66 · 15.0% (166 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.64 · 17.0% (188 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.59 · 20.8% (230 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.61 · 15.7% (173 of 1,104 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.63 · 13.1% (145 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.54 · 23.6% (261 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.58 · 14.5% (160 of 1,104 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.48 · 29.3% (324 of 1,104 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.68 · 6.3% (69 of 1,104 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.61 · 8.9% (98 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.50 · 17.6% (194 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, the Perfected Mind relevance 0.50 · 15.7% (173 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, the Living Guildpact relevance 0.60 · 7.5% (83 of 1,104 decks)
- Mu Yanling relevance 0.63 · 5.2% (57 of 1,104 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.52 · 12.7% (140 of 1,104 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (133 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.55 · 9.3% (103 of 1,104 decks)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.59 · 5.8% (64 of 1,104 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.39 · 32.0% (353 of 1,104 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.53 · 9.7% (107 of 1,104 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.39 · 27.0% (298 of 1,104 decks)
- Karn Liberated relevance 0.62 · 4.3% (48 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.55 · 4.9% (54 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.51 · 6.5% (72 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, Ingenious Mind-Mage relevance 0.52 · 5.3% (58 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, Memory Adept relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (88 of 1,104 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (58 of 1,104 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (70 of 1,104 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.47 · 4.2% (46 of 1,104 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.28 · 16.8% (186 of 1,104 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (94 of 1,104 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (38 of 1,104 decks)
- Karn, Living Legacy relevance 0.46 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
All utility lands (48)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.56 · 81.1% (895 of 1,104 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.66 · 47.1% (520 of 1,104 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.58 · 21.3% (235 of 1,104 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.57 · 13.8% (152 of 1,104 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.59 · 11.6% (128 of 1,104 decks)
- Diamond City relevance 0.60 · 4.8% (53 of 1,104 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.56 · 5.2% (57 of 1,104 decks)
- Interplanar Beacon relevance 0.62 · 3.8% (42 of 1,104 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (151 of 1,104 decks)
- Theorist's Sanctum relevance 0.52 · 3.8% (42 of 1,104 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.34 · 17.1% (189 of 1,104 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.37 · 10.5% (116 of 1,104 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.55 · 3.1% (34 of 1,104 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (69 of 1,104 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.29 · 16.8% (186 of 1,104 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.44 · 3.6% (40 of 1,104 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.25 · 25.6% (283 of 1,104 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.27 · 15.6% (172 of 1,104 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (59 of 1,104 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.24 · 21.6% (239 of 1,104 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.26 · 14.2% (157 of 1,104 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (55 of 1,104 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (88 of 1,104 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.26 · 13.5% (149 of 1,104 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.26 · 13.6% (150 of 1,104 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (33 of 1,104 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.26 · 13.2% (146 of 1,104 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.27 · 10.9% (120 of 1,104 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.24 · 13.0% (144 of 1,104 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.27 · 7.4% (82 of 1,104 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (55 of 1,104 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.21 · 22.0% (243 of 1,104 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (221 of 1,104 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (47 of 1,104 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (56 of 1,104 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.39 · 2.6% (29 of 1,104 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (39 of 1,104 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (76 of 1,104 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (65 of 1,104 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (47 of 1,104 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (42 of 1,104 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.13 · 47.9% (529 of 1,104 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (34 of 1,104 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (38 of 1,104 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 46.5% (513 of 1,104 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (37 of 1,104 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
All lands (22)
- Mage-Ring Network relevance 0.78 · 35.2% (389 of 1,104 decks)
- Saprazzan Cove relevance 0.74 · 9.7% (107 of 1,104 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.55 · 30.5% (337 of 1,104 decks)
- Sand Silos relevance 0.64 · 4.3% (48 of 1,104 decks)
- Tendo Ice Bridge relevance 0.65 · 2.4% (27 of 1,104 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.28 · 21.6% (239 of 1,104 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (82 of 1,104 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.43 · 3.2% (35 of 1,104 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.23 · 19.5% (215 of 1,104 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.27 · 7.8% (86 of 1,104 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (55 of 1,104 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (50 of 1,104 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (50 of 1,104 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (48 of 1,104 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (66 of 1,104 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (45 of 1,104 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (30 of 1,104 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (32 of 1,104 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (33 of 1,104 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (28 of 1,104 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (30 of 1,104 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 91.0% (1,005 of 1,104 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus, from 1,104 real Commander decks.