Cards like Etherium Sculptor
5.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
87% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 78%
- Foundry Inspector 70%
- Cloud Key 47%
- Helm of Awakening 3%
Other options: Stone Calendar, Mana Matrix, Planar Gate
Cards like Nettlecyst
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Nettlecyst 44%
- Adaptive Omnitool 39%
Cards like Mystic Forge
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
6.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like One with the Machine
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 53%
- Urza's Bauble 25%
Cards like Memnite
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Memnite 40%
- Phyrexian Walker 23%
Cards like Ornithopter
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Ornithopter 53%
- Memory Guardian 19%
- Utrom Monitor 7%
- Somber Hoverguard 1%
Other options: Qumulox, Lumengrid Gargoyle, Dancing Scimitar, Snare Thopter, Hovermyr, A.I.M. Bot, Gold-Forged Sentinel, Anvilwrought Raptor, Millennial Gargoyle
Cards like Frogmite
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Frogmite 24%
- Myr Enforcer 17%
Cards like Scrap Trawler
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Scrap Trawler 23%
- Myr Retriever 17%
- Junk Diver 9%
- Workshop Assistant 3%
Other options: Spine of Ish Sah
Cards like Lavaspur Boots
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards like Filigree Attendant
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Filigree Attendant 21%
- Broodstar 17%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 36%
- Lightning Greaves 34%
Cards like Welding Jar
7.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Welding Jar 52%
- Herbal Poultice 7%
Cards like Sol Ring
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 84%
- Mana Vault 13%
- Basalt Monolith 11%
- Grim Monolith 5%
Cards like Lotus Petal
5.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter
3.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Manifold Key
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Fabricate
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 32%
- Scour for Scrap 16%
Cards like Cryogen Relic
6.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cryogen Relic 16%
- Sewer-veillance Cam 15%
Cards like Steel Overseer
3.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mind Stone
3.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 56%
- Chromatic Sphere 5%
Cards like Fugitive Droid
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards like Vedalken Archmage
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Vedalken Archmage 24%
- Riddlesmith 10%
Cards like Master of Etherium
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Sisay's Ring, Ichor Elixir, Ur-Golem's Eye
All top picks (50)
- Doc Ock's Tentacles relevance 0.79 · 26.7% (160 of 600 decks)
- Chrome Dome relevance 0.64 · 38.7% (232 of 600 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.63 · 37.7% (226 of 600 decks)
- Sojourner's Companion relevance 0.70 · 26.2% (157 of 600 decks)
- Frogmite relevance 0.71 · 23.7% (142 of 600 decks)
- Fugitive Droid relevance 0.60 · 36.5% (219 of 600 decks)
- Traverse Eternity relevance 0.64 · 28.5% (171 of 600 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.56 · 39.0% (234 of 600 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.53 · 43.5% (261 of 600 decks)
- Valkyrie Aerial Unit relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (115 of 600 decks)
- The Underworld Cookbook relevance 0.71 · 13.8% (83 of 600 decks)
- Myr Enforcer relevance 0.67 · 17.2% (103 of 600 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.53 · 39.5% (237 of 600 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.43 · 59.2% (355 of 600 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.36 · 75.5% (453 of 600 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.45 · 51.8% (311 of 600 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.53 · 35.2% (211 of 600 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.56 · 27.3% (164 of 600 decks)
- Witch's Oven relevance 0.71 · 9.8% (59 of 600 decks)
- Filigree Attendant relevance 0.59 · 21.3% (128 of 600 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.37 · 65.7% (394 of 600 decks)
- Memnite relevance 0.48 · 39.8% (239 of 600 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.39 · 61.7% (370 of 600 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.42 · 52.8% (317 of 600 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.59 · 19.5% (117 of 600 decks)
- Memory Guardian relevance 0.59 · 18.5% (111 of 600 decks)
- Mycosynth Golem relevance 0.58 · 19.3% (116 of 600 decks)
- Skateboard relevance 0.61 · 14.8% (89 of 600 decks)
- Metalwork Colossus relevance 0.55 · 23.8% (143 of 600 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.54 · 24.5% (147 of 600 decks)
- Donatello, Gadget Master relevance 0.57 · 19.0% (114 of 600 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.46 · 38.0% (228 of 600 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.45 · 39.2% (235 of 600 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.39 · 53.0% (318 of 600 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (92 of 600 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.32 · 70.0% (420 of 600 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.34 · 62.0% (372 of 600 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.33 · 64.5% (387 of 600 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.36 · 57.0% (342 of 600 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 78.3% (470 of 600 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.39 · 49.8% (299 of 600 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.39 · 47.3% (284 of 600 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.50 · 24.8% (149 of 600 decks)
- Broodstar relevance 0.53 · 17.0% (102 of 600 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.55 · 14.0% (84 of 600 decks)
- Utrom Monitor relevance 0.66 · 6.5% (39 of 600 decks)
- Donatello, Mutant Mechanic relevance 0.58 · 11.3% (68 of 600 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.36 · 52.5% (315 of 600 decks)
- Technodrome relevance 0.57 · 11.8% (71 of 600 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 0.49 · 22.8% (137 of 600 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Chrome Dome relevance 0.64 · 38.7% (232 of 600 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.63 · 37.7% (226 of 600 decks)
- Sojourner's Companion relevance 0.70 · 26.2% (157 of 600 decks)
- Frogmite relevance 0.71 · 23.7% (142 of 600 decks)
- Fugitive Droid relevance 0.60 · 36.5% (219 of 600 decks)
- Valkyrie Aerial Unit relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (115 of 600 decks)
- Myr Enforcer relevance 0.67 · 17.2% (103 of 600 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.53 · 39.5% (237 of 600 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.36 · 75.5% (453 of 600 decks)
- Filigree Attendant relevance 0.59 · 21.3% (128 of 600 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.37 · 65.7% (394 of 600 decks)
- Memnite relevance 0.48 · 39.8% (239 of 600 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.42 · 52.8% (317 of 600 decks)
- Memory Guardian relevance 0.59 · 18.5% (111 of 600 decks)
- Mycosynth Golem relevance 0.58 · 19.3% (116 of 600 decks)
- Metalwork Colossus relevance 0.55 · 23.8% (143 of 600 decks)
- Donatello, Gadget Master relevance 0.57 · 19.0% (114 of 600 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.46 · 38.0% (228 of 600 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.45 · 39.2% (235 of 600 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.39 · 53.0% (318 of 600 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.32 · 70.0% (420 of 600 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.34 · 62.0% (372 of 600 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.33 · 64.5% (387 of 600 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 78.3% (470 of 600 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.39 · 49.8% (299 of 600 decks)
- Broodstar relevance 0.53 · 17.0% (102 of 600 decks)
- Utrom Monitor relevance 0.66 · 6.5% (39 of 600 decks)
- Donatello, Mutant Mechanic relevance 0.58 · 11.3% (68 of 600 decks)
- Technodrome relevance 0.57 · 11.8% (71 of 600 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 0.49 · 22.8% (137 of 600 decks)
- Patchwork Automaton relevance 0.57 · 10.5% (63 of 600 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.45 · 25.3% (152 of 600 decks)
- Utrom Scientists relevance 0.60 · 6.3% (38 of 600 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.44 · 22.7% (136 of 600 decks)
- Buzz Bots relevance 0.55 · 8.5% (51 of 600 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.34 · 43.0% (258 of 600 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 0.48 · 13.0% (78 of 600 decks)
- Henchbots relevance 0.60 · 4.7% (28 of 600 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.33 · 45.2% (271 of 600 decks)
- Donatello, Way with Machines relevance 0.51 · 8.2% (49 of 600 decks)
- Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor relevance 0.45 · 13.0% (78 of 600 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.40 · 22.7% (136 of 600 decks)
- Arcbound Ravager relevance 0.48 · 10.0% (60 of 600 decks)
- Big Mother Mouser relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (52 of 600 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.38 · 24.3% (146 of 600 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.44 · 12.7% (76 of 600 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.34 · 34.5% (207 of 600 decks)
- Emissary Escort relevance 0.50 · 6.8% (41 of 600 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.32 · 37.8% (227 of 600 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.39 · 17.0% (102 of 600 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Doc Ock's Tentacles relevance 0.79 · 26.7% (160 of 600 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.56 · 39.0% (234 of 600 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.53 · 43.5% (261 of 600 decks)
- The Underworld Cookbook relevance 0.71 · 13.8% (83 of 600 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.43 · 59.2% (355 of 600 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.45 · 51.8% (311 of 600 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.56 · 27.3% (164 of 600 decks)
- Witch's Oven relevance 0.71 · 9.8% (59 of 600 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.59 · 19.5% (117 of 600 decks)
- Skateboard relevance 0.61 · 14.8% (89 of 600 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.54 · 24.5% (147 of 600 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (92 of 600 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.36 · 57.0% (342 of 600 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.39 · 47.3% (284 of 600 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.50 · 24.8% (149 of 600 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.36 · 52.5% (315 of 600 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.43 · 33.8% (203 of 600 decks)
- Gilded Pinions relevance 0.61 · 8.0% (48 of 600 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.41 · 37.3% (224 of 600 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.53 · 12.8% (77 of 600 decks)
- Scale of Chiss-Goria relevance 0.63 · 5.2% (31 of 600 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.43 · 28.8% (173 of 600 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.49 · 15.8% (95 of 600 decks)
- Bone Saw relevance 0.52 · 12.7% (76 of 600 decks)
- Noble's Purse relevance 0.59 · 6.3% (38 of 600 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.37 · 40.2% (241 of 600 decks)
- Tooth of Chiss-Goria relevance 0.61 · 4.8% (29 of 600 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.52 · 11.7% (70 of 600 decks)
- Prized Statue relevance 0.51 · 12.0% (72 of 600 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.53 · 9.7% (58 of 600 decks)
- Bumbleflower's Sharepot relevance 0.59 · 5.0% (30 of 600 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.41 · 25.2% (151 of 600 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.36 · 39.5% (237 of 600 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.45 · 17.2% (103 of 600 decks)
- Cathar's Shield relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (56 of 600 decks)
- Nimblewright Schematic relevance 0.56 · 5.2% (31 of 600 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.45 · 14.8% (89 of 600 decks)
- The Irencrag relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (47 of 600 decks)
- Gold Pan relevance 0.54 · 5.8% (35 of 600 decks)
- Ghost Vacuum relevance 0.51 · 8.7% (52 of 600 decks)
- Cargo Ship relevance 0.52 · 7.3% (44 of 600 decks)
- Accorder's Shield relevance 0.50 · 9.0% (54 of 600 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.37 · 30.2% (181 of 600 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.29 · 52.0% (312 of 600 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.41 · 16.2% (97 of 600 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.50 · 6.7% (40 of 600 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.40 · 17.5% (105 of 600 decks)
- Synthesizer Labship relevance 0.50 · 7.2% (43 of 600 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.41 · 15.3% (92 of 600 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.41 · 16.2% (97 of 600 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (14)
- Does Machines relevance 0.53 · 11.5% (69 of 600 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.40 · 28.3% (170 of 600 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.42 · 19.5% (117 of 600 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.36 · 26.5% (159 of 600 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.33 · 15.0% (90 of 600 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (39 of 600 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (26 of 600 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (17 of 600 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (16 of 600 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (22 of 600 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 13.0% (78 of 600 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (18 of 600 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (50 of 600 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.10 · 3.0% (18 of 600 decks)
All instants (50)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.55 · 14.0% (84 of 600 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 0.58 · 10.5% (63 of 600 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.44 · 28.3% (170 of 600 decks)
- Mind Transfer Protocol relevance 0.57 · 6.5% (39 of 600 decks)
- Metallic Rebuke relevance 0.50 · 11.5% (69 of 600 decks)
- Ooze Spill relevance 0.50 · 5.8% (35 of 600 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.31 · 32.0% (192 of 600 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (46 of 600 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (43 of 600 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (50 of 600 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.31 · 18.8% (113 of 600 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.32 · 16.0% (96 of 600 decks)
- Return to the Sewers relevance 0.51 · 3.2% (19 of 600 decks)
- Blinkmoth Infusion relevance 0.48 · 3.3% (20 of 600 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.30 · 6.5% (39 of 600 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (36 of 600 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (30 of 600 decks)
- Urza's Command relevance 0.39 · 3.2% (19 of 600 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.26 · 7.2% (43 of 600 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (24 of 600 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (21 of 600 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (18 of 600 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.21 · 9.7% (58 of 600 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (21 of 600 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (28 of 600 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (23 of 600 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.15 · 27.0% (162 of 600 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.18 · 13.0% (78 of 600 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.17 · 15.7% (94 of 600 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (53 of 600 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.18 · 13.5% (81 of 600 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (29 of 600 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (31 of 600 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (35 of 600 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.16 · 18.5% (111 of 600 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.19 · 9.5% (57 of 600 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.19 · 8.5% (51 of 600 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (26 of 600 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (41 of 600 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.15 · 17.0% (102 of 600 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.14 · 30.0% (180 of 600 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.14 · 22.7% (136 of 600 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.13 · 26.7% (160 of 600 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (26 of 600 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (19 of 600 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (15 of 600 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.14 · 18.7% (112 of 600 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (18 of 600 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (15 of 600 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (28 of 600 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All sorceries (20)
- Traverse Eternity relevance 0.64 · 28.5% (171 of 600 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.53 · 35.2% (211 of 600 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.39 · 61.7% (370 of 600 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.42 · 13.0% (78 of 600 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.45 · 6.5% (39 of 600 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.46 · 5.3% (32 of 600 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.41 · 9.8% (59 of 600 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.39 · 9.2% (55 of 600 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (34 of 600 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.37 · 6.0% (36 of 600 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.23 · 31.5% (189 of 600 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (22 of 600 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (41 of 600 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (24 of 600 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (46 of 600 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.16 · 9.2% (55 of 600 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (18 of 600 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (19 of 600 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.14 · 8.8% (53 of 600 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (19 of 600 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.37 · 29.7% (178 of 600 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.40 · 5.2% (31 of 600 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (61 of 600 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (22 of 600 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.35 · 4.0% (24 of 600 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (19 of 600 decks)
All utility lands (35)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.52 · 53.7% (322 of 600 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.58 · 24.7% (148 of 600 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.56 · 16.5% (99 of 600 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.37 · 52.8% (317 of 600 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.51 · 15.7% (94 of 600 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.45 · 23.5% (141 of 600 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.34 · 43.7% (262 of 600 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.31 · 40.7% (244 of 600 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.30 · 37.7% (226 of 600 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.37 · 17.8% (107 of 600 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.25 · 48.2% (289 of 600 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.28 · 34.5% (207 of 600 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.26 · 38.3% (230 of 600 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.34 · 9.2% (55 of 600 decks)
- Castle Doom relevance 0.47 · 2.7% (16 of 600 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.24 · 14.2% (85 of 600 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.19 · 25.7% (154 of 600 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.23 · 11.7% (70 of 600 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.19 · 20.5% (123 of 600 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (18 of 600 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (15 of 600 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (53 of 600 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (23 of 600 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (15 of 600 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.18 · 9.2% (55 of 600 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.18 · 5.5% (33 of 600 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (20 of 600 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (22 of 600 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (25 of 600 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (20 of 600 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (18 of 600 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (15 of 600 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 27.8% (167 of 600 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.16 · 3.7% (22 of 600 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (86 of 600 decks)
All lands (21)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.36 · 80.3% (482 of 600 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.27 · 84.7% (508 of 600 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (35 of 600 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.34 · 8.0% (48 of 600 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.34 · 8.0% (48 of 600 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.33 · 8.0% (48 of 600 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (53 of 600 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.28 · 7.8% (47 of 600 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (33 of 600 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (46 of 600 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (47 of 600 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (46 of 600 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.24 · 9.7% (58 of 600 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.26 · 6.7% (40 of 600 decks)
- Urza's Workshop relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (15 of 600 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (20 of 600 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (18 of 600 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (16 of 600 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (18 of 600 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (15 of 600 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 88.0% (528 of 600 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Krang, Master Mind, from 600 real Commander decks.