Cards like Etherium Sculptor
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
62% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 74%
- Foundry Inspector 61%
- Cloud Key 22%
Other options: Helm of Awakening, Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Myr Retriever
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Myr Retriever 42%
- Junk Diver 30%
- Scrap Trawler 26%
- Workshop Assistant 11%
- Spine of Ish Sah 2%
Cards like Master of Etherium
6.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Synth Infiltrator
8.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards like Padeem, Consul of Innovation
7.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cyberdrive Awakener
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thopter Spy Network
5.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Forge
3.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Nettlecyst
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Nettlecyst 28%
- Adaptive Omnitool 14%
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 38%
- Pongify 37%
Cards like Unctus, Grand Metatect
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Ashnod's Altar
6.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 30%
- Swiftfoot Boots 26%
Cards like Fabricate
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 39%
- Scour for Scrap 17%
Cards like Unwinding Clock
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Unwinding Clock 35%
- Clock of Omens 11%
Cards like Krark-Clan Ironworks
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like James, Wandering Dad // Follow Him
5.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Arcbound Ravager
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards like Steel Overseer
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Tezzeret the Seeker
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like The Reality Chip
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like March of Progress
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Mirage Mockery
All top picks (50)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.63 · 61.1% (88 of 144 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.53 · 70.8% (102 of 144 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.57 · 50.7% (73 of 144 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.52 · 54.2% (78 of 144 decks)
- March of the Machines relevance 0.59 · 38.9% (56 of 144 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.54 · 40.3% (58 of 144 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.57 · 34.0% (49 of 144 decks)
- James, Wandering Dad // Follow Him relevance 0.50 · 40.3% (58 of 144 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (43 of 144 decks)
- Curie, Emergent Intelligence relevance 0.53 · 27.1% (39 of 144 decks)
- Synth Infiltrator relevance 0.48 · 33.3% (48 of 144 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.53 · 23.6% (34 of 144 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.40 · 49.3% (71 of 144 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.41 · 47.9% (69 of 144 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.41 · 44.4% (64 of 144 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.29 · 75.0% (108 of 144 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.51 · 18.8% (27 of 144 decks)
- Syr Ginger, the Meal Ender relevance 0.50 · 18.1% (26 of 144 decks)
- Cyberman Patrol relevance 0.47 · 21.5% (31 of 144 decks)
- Junk Diver relevance 0.43 · 29.9% (43 of 144 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.46 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.32 · 56.9% (82 of 144 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.31 · 59.0% (85 of 144 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.32 · 56.3% (81 of 144 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.39 · 35.4% (51 of 144 decks)
- Clan Crafter relevance 0.47 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Arcbound Ravager relevance 0.42 · 25.7% (37 of 144 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.40 · 31.9% (46 of 144 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.28 · 63.2% (91 of 144 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.35 · 41.7% (60 of 144 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.33 · 46.5% (67 of 144 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 0.45 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.27 · 66.0% (95 of 144 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.36 · 34.0% (49 of 144 decks)
- ED-E, Lonesome Eyebot relevance 0.50 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Burden of Proof relevance 0.50 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.37 · 27.1% (39 of 144 decks)
- Sharding Sphinx relevance 0.36 · 29.2% (42 of 144 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.33 · 38.2% (55 of 144 decks)
- Vedalken Humiliator relevance 0.44 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Selhoff Occultist relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Martha Jones relevance 0.43 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Workshop Elders relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (40 of 144 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.22 · 73.6% (106 of 144 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.32 · 34.0% (49 of 144 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.39 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.37 · 20.1% (29 of 144 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.38 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.63 · 61.1% (88 of 144 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.53 · 70.8% (102 of 144 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.57 · 50.7% (73 of 144 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.57 · 34.0% (49 of 144 decks)
- James, Wandering Dad // Follow Him relevance 0.50 · 40.3% (58 of 144 decks)
- Curie, Emergent Intelligence relevance 0.53 · 27.1% (39 of 144 decks)
- Synth Infiltrator relevance 0.48 · 33.3% (48 of 144 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.53 · 23.6% (34 of 144 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.40 · 49.3% (71 of 144 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.29 · 75.0% (108 of 144 decks)
- Syr Ginger, the Meal Ender relevance 0.50 · 18.1% (26 of 144 decks)
- Cyberman Patrol relevance 0.47 · 21.5% (31 of 144 decks)
- Junk Diver relevance 0.43 · 29.9% (43 of 144 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.32 · 56.3% (81 of 144 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.39 · 35.4% (51 of 144 decks)
- Arcbound Ravager relevance 0.42 · 25.7% (37 of 144 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.28 · 63.2% (91 of 144 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.35 · 41.7% (60 of 144 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 0.45 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.27 · 66.0% (95 of 144 decks)
- ED-E, Lonesome Eyebot relevance 0.50 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.37 · 27.1% (39 of 144 decks)
- Sharding Sphinx relevance 0.36 · 29.2% (42 of 144 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.33 · 38.2% (55 of 144 decks)
- Vedalken Humiliator relevance 0.44 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Selhoff Occultist relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Martha Jones relevance 0.43 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Workshop Elders relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.22 · 73.6% (106 of 144 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.32 · 34.0% (49 of 144 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.24 · 61.1% (88 of 144 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.25 · 56.3% (81 of 144 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.36 · 19.4% (28 of 144 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.27 · 47.2% (68 of 144 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.33 · 26.4% (38 of 144 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.33 · 25.0% (36 of 144 decks)
- Parcel Myr relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (9 of 144 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.33 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.31 · 26.4% (38 of 144 decks)
- Workshop Assistant relevance 0.38 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.27 · 38.2% (55 of 144 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.36 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.32 · 20.1% (29 of 144 decks)
- Robobrain War Mind relevance 0.41 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Chief of the Foundry relevance 0.31 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.24 · 41.0% (59 of 144 decks)
- Fugitive Droid relevance 0.33 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.24 · 39.6% (57 of 144 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.27 · 25.7% (37 of 144 decks)
- Cold Case Cracker relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.52 · 54.2% (78 of 144 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.54 · 40.3% (58 of 144 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.41 · 47.9% (69 of 144 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.51 · 18.8% (27 of 144 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.46 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.36 · 34.0% (49 of 144 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (40 of 144 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Magnifying Glass relevance 0.42 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Trading Post relevance 0.38 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Brotherhood Vertibird relevance 0.39 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Pip-Boy 3000 relevance 0.39 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Intelligence Bobblehead relevance 0.38 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Endurance Bobblehead relevance 0.38 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Strength Bobblehead relevance 0.38 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.25 · 41.0% (59 of 144 decks)
- Perception Bobblehead relevance 0.37 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.33 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Charisma Bobblehead relevance 0.37 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Luck Bobblehead relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.30 · 18.1% (26 of 144 decks)
- C.A.M.P. relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.31 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Agility Bobblehead relevance 0.35 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Esoteric Duplicator relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Summoning Station relevance 0.36 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.23 · 34.7% (50 of 144 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.26 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.24 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.28 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.29 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.26 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.29 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.29 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.23 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.28 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.23 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.25 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Blasting Station relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.24 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Expert-Level Safe relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.22 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Dollhouse of Horrors relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Spawning Pit relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Thinking Cap relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
All enchantments (36)
- March of the Machines relevance 0.59 · 38.9% (56 of 144 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (43 of 144 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.32 · 56.9% (82 of 144 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.31 · 59.0% (85 of 144 decks)
- Clan Crafter relevance 0.47 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.33 · 46.5% (67 of 144 decks)
- Burden of Proof relevance 0.50 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.35 · 18.1% (26 of 144 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.31 · 22.9% (33 of 144 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.31 · 20.8% (30 of 144 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Hold for Questioning relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Case of the Filched Falcon relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Trail of Evidence relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (9 of 144 decks)
- In Too Deep relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- The Antiquities War relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (9 of 144 decks)
- Tamiyo Meets the Story Circle relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.23 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.12 · 26.4% (38 of 144 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.13 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.09 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.09 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.08 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
All instants (50)
- Deduce relevance 0.40 · 31.9% (46 of 144 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.38 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.34 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- Eliminate the Impossible relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.30 · 21.5% (31 of 144 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.27 · 20.1% (29 of 144 decks)
- Secrets of the Key relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (9 of 144 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.22 · 30.6% (44 of 144 decks)
- Urza's Command relevance 0.31 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.22 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.26 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.18 · 20.1% (29 of 144 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.12 · 38.2% (55 of 144 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.17 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.14 · 21.5% (31 of 144 decks)
- Out Cold relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.12 · 30.6% (44 of 144 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.13 · 21.5% (31 of 144 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.11 · 36.8% (53 of 144 decks)
- Machine Over Matter relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.15 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.10 · 36.1% (52 of 144 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.11 · 29.2% (42 of 144 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.16 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Ice Out relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.12 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.11 · 26.4% (38 of 144 decks)
- Blinkmoth Infusion relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Mind Transfer Protocol relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Metallic Rebuke relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.11 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Unauthorized Exit relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Desculpting Blast relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.13 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
All sorceries (31)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.41 · 44.4% (64 of 144 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.39 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.25 · 34.0% (49 of 144 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.33 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.31 · 9.0% (13 of 144 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Press for Answers relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.18 · 38.9% (56 of 144 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.20 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Anchor to Reality relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (9 of 144 decks)
- Gone Missing relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Echo Storm relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Saheeli's Artistry relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.13 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.10 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.07 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.07 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.37 · 20.1% (29 of 144 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.22 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.21 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Machinist relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.45 · 27.1% (39 of 144 decks)
- Diamond City relevance 0.49 · 18.1% (26 of 144 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.38 · 18.1% (26 of 144 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.25 · 59.0% (85 of 144 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.33 · 26.4% (38 of 144 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.25 · 38.2% (55 of 144 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.23 · 39.6% (57 of 144 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.28 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.19 · 46.5% (67 of 144 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (36 of 144 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.29 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.24 · 13.9% (20 of 144 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Sequestered Stash relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 24.3% (35 of 144 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.18 · 27.8% (40 of 144 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.18 · 21.5% (31 of 144 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.20 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Phyrexia's Core relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 25.7% (37 of 144 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Tomb of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Mishra's Factory relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Castle Doom relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- The Gold Saucer relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.13 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 46.5% (67 of 144 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (9 of 144 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (9 of 144 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.10 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (8 of 144 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.11 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.07 · 25.7% (37 of 144 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.12 · 3.5% (5 of 144 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
All lands (21)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.24 · 47.2% (68 of 144 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.20 · 63.2% (91 of 144 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (7 of 144 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.13 · 8.3% (12 of 144 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (6 of 144 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Urza's Workshop relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.11 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 144 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 91.7% (132 of 144 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Nick Valentine, Private Eye, from 144 real Commander decks.