Cards like Peregrine Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Peregrine Drake 64%
- Cloud of Faeries 51%
- Palinchron 17%
- Great Whale 3%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
5.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Temur decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 51%
- Elvish Mystic 47%
- Fyndhorn Elves 36%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Leaf Gilder, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Llanowar Tribe, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Beast Whisperer
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
87% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Beast Whisperer 80%
- Primordial Sage 29%
- Glimpse of Nature 15%
Cards like Elvish Spirit Guide
8.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
3.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Temur decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Temur decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Eldritch Evolution
14× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Eldritch Evolution 36%
- Neoform 32%
Cards like Rhystic Study
3.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Temur decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Temur decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 40%
- Mystic Remora 35%
Cards like Fierce Empath
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards like Kozilek, Butcher of Truth
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Consecrated Sphinx
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Temur decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Vizier of the Menagerie
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Realmwalker
Cards like Chord of Calling
2.6× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Temur decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Worldly Tutor
8.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Temur decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 58%
- Sylvan Tutor 10%
Cards like Fauna Shaman
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Shrieking Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Shrieking Drake 35%
- Dream Stalker 8%
Other options: Stickytongue Sentinel, Yarok's Wavecrasher, Invasive Species, Keymaster Rogue, Storm Sculptor, Ambush Krotiq, Denizen of the Deep
Cards like Force of Will
2.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Force of Will 25%
- Force of Negation 14%
Cards like Chrome Mox
2.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Temur decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 27%
- Mox Diamond 15%
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
9.6× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Flusterstorm
2.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Flusterstorm 17%
- Mental Misstep 14%
- Dispel 3%
Other options: Miscast, Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills
Cards like Hardened Scales
2.9× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Temur decks
Cards like Reclamation Sage
12× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards like Glen Elendra Archmage
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards like Transit Mage
19× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Temur decks
Cards like Eternal Witness
4.3× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Elvish Regrower, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
4.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Mulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards like Purphoros, God of the Forge
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.41 · 90.7% (235 of 259 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.39 · 79.9% (207 of 259 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.48 · 41.3% (107 of 259 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.47 · 41.7% (108 of 259 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.47 · 40.5% (105 of 259 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.44 · 43.6% (113 of 259 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.50 · 29.3% (76 of 259 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.34 · 66.8% (173 of 259 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.49 · 30.5% (79 of 259 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.50 · 27.4% (71 of 259 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.34 · 64.5% (167 of 259 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.46 · 34.7% (90 of 259 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 0.42 · 43.2% (112 of 259 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.43 · 39.4% (102 of 259 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.49 · 27.0% (70 of 259 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.44 · 37.5% (97 of 259 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.45 · 34.4% (89 of 259 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.39 · 49.0% (127 of 259 decks)
- Myr Scrapling relevance 0.51 · 21.2% (55 of 259 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.45 · 34.7% (90 of 259 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.50 · 22.4% (58 of 259 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.41 · 37.5% (97 of 259 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.49 · 20.1% (52 of 259 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.45 · 28.2% (73 of 259 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.50 · 17.0% (44 of 259 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.39 · 41.7% (108 of 259 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.40 · 39.8% (103 of 259 decks)
- Haywire Mite relevance 0.44 · 29.3% (76 of 259 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.51 · 14.7% (38 of 259 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.44 · 27.0% (70 of 259 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.47 · 20.8% (54 of 259 decks)
- Painter's Servant relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (37 of 259 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.30 · 61.8% (160 of 259 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.50 · 13.9% (36 of 259 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.45 · 22.0% (57 of 259 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.41 · 32.0% (83 of 259 decks)
- Weird Harvest relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (34 of 259 decks)
- Purphoros, God of the Forge relevance 0.39 · 36.7% (95 of 259 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.45 · 20.8% (54 of 259 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.44 · 23.9% (62 of 259 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.51 · 12.0% (31 of 259 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 0.45 · 19.7% (51 of 259 decks)
- Stratus Dancer relevance 0.51 · 11.2% (29 of 259 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.42 · 25.1% (65 of 259 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 0.48 · 13.9% (36 of 259 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.46 · 15.4% (40 of 259 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.45 · 17.8% (46 of 259 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.51 · 10.4% (27 of 259 decks)
- Sicarian Infiltrator relevance 0.51 · 10.0% (26 of 259 decks)
- Biophagus relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (40 of 259 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.41 · 90.7% (235 of 259 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.39 · 79.9% (207 of 259 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.48 · 41.3% (107 of 259 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.47 · 41.7% (108 of 259 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.47 · 40.5% (105 of 259 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.44 · 43.6% (113 of 259 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.50 · 29.3% (76 of 259 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.34 · 66.8% (173 of 259 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.49 · 30.5% (79 of 259 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.50 · 27.4% (71 of 259 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.34 · 64.5% (167 of 259 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.46 · 34.7% (90 of 259 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 0.42 · 43.2% (112 of 259 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.43 · 39.4% (102 of 259 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.49 · 27.0% (70 of 259 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.44 · 37.5% (97 of 259 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.45 · 34.4% (89 of 259 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.39 · 49.0% (127 of 259 decks)
- Myr Scrapling relevance 0.51 · 21.2% (55 of 259 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.45 · 34.7% (90 of 259 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.50 · 22.4% (58 of 259 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.49 · 20.1% (52 of 259 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.45 · 28.2% (73 of 259 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.50 · 17.0% (44 of 259 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.40 · 39.8% (103 of 259 decks)
- Haywire Mite relevance 0.44 · 29.3% (76 of 259 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.44 · 27.0% (70 of 259 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.47 · 20.8% (54 of 259 decks)
- Painter's Servant relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (37 of 259 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.30 · 61.8% (160 of 259 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.50 · 13.9% (36 of 259 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.45 · 22.0% (57 of 259 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.41 · 32.0% (83 of 259 decks)
- Purphoros, God of the Forge relevance 0.39 · 36.7% (95 of 259 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.44 · 23.9% (62 of 259 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.51 · 12.0% (31 of 259 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 0.45 · 19.7% (51 of 259 decks)
- Stratus Dancer relevance 0.51 · 11.2% (29 of 259 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.42 · 25.1% (65 of 259 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 0.48 · 13.9% (36 of 259 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.46 · 15.4% (40 of 259 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.51 · 10.4% (27 of 259 decks)
- Sicarian Infiltrator relevance 0.51 · 10.0% (26 of 259 decks)
- Biophagus relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (40 of 259 decks)
- Void Winnower relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (25 of 259 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.45 · 13.5% (35 of 259 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.30 · 52.1% (135 of 259 decks)
- Bond Beetle relevance 0.50 · 8.9% (23 of 259 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.49 · 9.7% (25 of 259 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.39 · 26.3% (68 of 259 decks)
All artifacts (33)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.39 · 41.7% (108 of 259 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.45 · 17.8% (46 of 259 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.45 · 13.9% (36 of 259 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.38 · 23.2% (60 of 259 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.26 · 24.7% (64 of 259 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.31 · 8.1% (21 of 259 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.26 · 15.1% (39 of 259 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (17 of 259 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.24 · 13.5% (35 of 259 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (12 of 259 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (11 of 259 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (10 of 259 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (8 of 259 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.16 · 27.4% (71 of 259 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.15 · 31.3% (81 of 259 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (20 of 259 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.16 · 14.7% (38 of 259 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.16 · 13.9% (36 of 259 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (13 of 259 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (18 of 259 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (8 of 259 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 47.9% (124 of 259 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.16 · 3.9% (10 of 259 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (20 of 259 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 60.6% (157 of 259 decks)
All enchantments (35)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.41 · 37.5% (97 of 259 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.45 · 20.8% (54 of 259 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.41 · 19.7% (51 of 259 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (20 of 259 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.31 · 35.1% (91 of 259 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.41 · 9.7% (25 of 259 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.35 · 15.4% (40 of 259 decks)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (20 of 259 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.42 · 4.6% (12 of 259 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.30 · 22.0% (57 of 259 decks)
- Temur Ascendancy relevance 0.27 · 29.3% (76 of 259 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (13 of 259 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.27 · 24.7% (64 of 259 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.30 · 12.4% (32 of 259 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.34 · 5.4% (14 of 259 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.37 · 4.2% (11 of 259 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.32 · 6.9% (18 of 259 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (11 of 259 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (8 of 259 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.27 · 10.8% (28 of 259 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (12 of 259 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (8 of 259 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.23 · 8.5% (22 of 259 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 39.8% (103 of 259 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.15 · 35.1% (91 of 259 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (37 of 259 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Frostcliff Siege relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (8 of 259 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
All instants (50)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (35 of 259 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.44 · 12.4% (32 of 259 decks)
- Signal the Clans relevance 0.43 · 6.2% (16 of 259 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.45 · 4.2% (11 of 259 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (22 of 259 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (11 of 259 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.38 · 5.4% (14 of 259 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.23 · 37.8% (98 of 259 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.31 · 12.0% (31 of 259 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.31 · 12.7% (33 of 259 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.18 · 57.5% (149 of 259 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.28 · 11.6% (30 of 259 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.22 · 21.6% (56 of 259 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.25 · 12.7% (33 of 259 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.27 · 8.5% (22 of 259 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.27 · 8.1% (21 of 259 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (19 of 259 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (14 of 259 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.36 · 3.1% (8 of 259 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.21 · 20.5% (53 of 259 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (18 of 259 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (13 of 259 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (16 of 259 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.15 · 50.2% (130 of 259 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.18 · 29.3% (76 of 259 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.18 · 29.0% (75 of 259 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (26 of 259 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.23 · 11.6% (30 of 259 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.17 · 34.7% (90 of 259 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.19 · 23.6% (61 of 259 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (13 of 259 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (20 of 259 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.18 · 25.5% (66 of 259 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (13 of 259 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (14 of 259 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.18 · 23.6% (61 of 259 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.18 · 25.5% (66 of 259 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.20 · 13.5% (35 of 259 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.15 · 42.5% (110 of 259 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (13 of 259 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (37 of 259 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.18 · 13.5% (35 of 259 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.17 · 17.0% (44 of 259 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.16 · 13.9% (36 of 259 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.15 · 13.1% (34 of 259 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (11 of 259 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (11 of 259 decks)
All sorceries (28)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.51 · 14.7% (38 of 259 decks)
- Weird Harvest relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (34 of 259 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.31 · 32.0% (83 of 259 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.34 · 9.7% (25 of 259 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.24 · 35.5% (92 of 259 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.32 · 9.3% (24 of 259 decks)
- Primal Surge relevance 0.40 · 3.9% (10 of 259 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.31 · 6.9% (18 of 259 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (24 of 259 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.20 · 15.1% (39 of 259 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.21 · 11.6% (30 of 259 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.36 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (10 of 259 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.19 · 13.5% (35 of 259 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.16 · 21.2% (55 of 259 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (16 of 259 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.17 · 16.2% (42 of 259 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.19 · 9.7% (25 of 259 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 15.1% (39 of 259 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.16 · 12.0% (31 of 259 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.16 · 11.6% (30 of 259 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (8 of 259 decks)
- Grapeshot relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (16 of 259 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (13 of 259 decks)
All utility lands (45)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.47 · 12.7% (33 of 259 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.42 · 19.7% (51 of 259 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.47 · 10.0% (26 of 259 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (13 of 259 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.31 · 20.1% (52 of 259 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (24 of 259 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (20 of 259 decks)
- Fiery Islet relevance 0.30 · 12.4% (32 of 259 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.30 · 12.4% (32 of 259 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.32 · 9.3% (24 of 259 decks)
- Zoetic Cavern relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (26 of 259 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (13 of 259 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.25 · 20.1% (52 of 259 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (11 of 259 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.28 · 6.9% (18 of 259 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.26 · 10.0% (26 of 259 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.25 · 11.2% (29 of 259 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (16 of 259 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.23 · 13.5% (35 of 259 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (16 of 259 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (14 of 259 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.16 · 44.0% (114 of 259 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.25 · 9.7% (25 of 259 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (10 of 259 decks)
- Branch of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.25 · 7.3% (19 of 259 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (18 of 259 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.18 · 18.5% (48 of 259 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (10 of 259 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (8 of 259 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 4.6% (12 of 259 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 31.7% (82 of 259 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 40.9% (106 of 259 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (8 of 259 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (13 of 259 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.13 · 4.6% (12 of 259 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (6 of 259 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (9 of 259 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (7 of 259 decks)
All lands (50)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.50 · 22.8% (59 of 259 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.35 · 13.5% (35 of 259 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.37 · 9.7% (25 of 259 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.35 · 12.0% (31 of 259 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.31 · 20.1% (52 of 259 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.29 · 25.5% (66 of 259 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.37 · 7.3% (19 of 259 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.31 · 16.2% (42 of 259 decks)
- Grove of the Burnwillows relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (18 of 259 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (23 of 259 decks)
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway relevance 0.34 · 9.7% (25 of 259 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (26 of 259 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.19 · 55.2% (143 of 259 decks)
- Thran Quarry relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (10 of 259 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.35 · 6.2% (16 of 259 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (22 of 259 decks)
- Spirebluff Canal relevance 0.35 · 6.2% (16 of 259 decks)
- Rootbound Crag relevance 0.21 · 44.8% (116 of 259 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.22 · 41.3% (107 of 259 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (23 of 259 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.24 · 28.6% (74 of 259 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.20 · 47.1% (122 of 259 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.30 · 11.6% (30 of 259 decks)
- Frostboil Snarl relevance 0.32 · 7.3% (19 of 259 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.23 · 30.5% (79 of 259 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.31 · 6.9% (18 of 259 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.29 · 10.8% (28 of 259 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.29 · 10.4% (27 of 259 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.24 · 21.2% (55 of 259 decks)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.20 · 39.0% (101 of 259 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (53 of 259 decks)
- Frontier Bivouac relevance 0.22 · 27.0% (70 of 259 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.26 · 12.4% (32 of 259 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.17 · 54.8% (142 of 259 decks)
- Riverpyre Verge relevance 0.29 · 8.5% (22 of 259 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.27 · 11.6% (30 of 259 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (26 of 259 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.23 · 21.2% (55 of 259 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.19 · 41.7% (108 of 259 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (16 of 259 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.23 · 22.8% (59 of 259 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.18 · 41.3% (107 of 259 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.23 · 17.8% (46 of 259 decks)
- Sulfur Falls relevance 0.20 · 32.8% (85 of 259 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (20 of 259 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (15 of 259 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (22 of 259 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.17 · 39.8% (103 of 259 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.16 · 39.8% (103 of 259 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.28 · 4.2% (11 of 259 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Animar, Soul of Elements, from 259 real Commander decks.