Cards like Beast Whisperer
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Peregrine Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Peregrine Drake 43%
- Cloud of Faeries 23%
- Palinchron 11%
- Great Whale 1%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
3.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Temur decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 36%
- Elvish Mystic 29%
- Fyndhorn Elves 18%
Other options: Wirewood Elf, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Boreal Druid, Fyndhorn Elder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Llanowar Tribe, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Hardened Scales
7.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Temur decks
Cards like Vizier of the Menagerie
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Kozilek, Butcher of Truth
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Benevolent Hydra
5.3× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Reclamation Sage
18× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
11× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
19× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Medusa, Inhuman Queen
Cards like Consecrated Sphinx
15× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Temur decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Shrieking Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Shrieking Drake 18%
- Dream Stalker 6%
Other options: Stickytongue Sentinel, Keymaster Rogue, Yarok's Wavecrasher, Invasive Species, Storm Sculptor, Ambush Krotiq, Denizen of the Deep
Cards like Hydroid Krasis
7.5× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Stratus Dancer
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Silumgar Spell-Eater
Cards like Goldvein Hydra
3.6× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
5.7× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Fierce Empath
15× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards like Worldly Tutor
3.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 22%
- Sylvan Tutor 4%
Cards like Rattleclaw Mystic
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Biophagus
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Biophagus 19%
- Animal Attendant 4%
Cards like Birds of Paradise
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Temur decks
Cards like Mulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards like Kalonian Hydra
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Kalonian Hydra 21%
- Heroes' Bane 2%
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
12× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok, Earthshaker Giant
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
11× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Diligent Farmhand, Embodiment of Spring, Silkwing Scout, Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
1.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other Temur decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 23% of other Temur decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Temur decks
All top picks (50)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.31 · 53.6% (75 of 140 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.27 · 59.3% (83 of 140 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.32 · 44.3% (62 of 140 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.33 · 40.0% (56 of 140 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.32 · 42.9% (60 of 140 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.35 · 31.4% (44 of 140 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.30 · 47.9% (67 of 140 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.32 · 42.1% (59 of 140 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.37 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.35 · 30.0% (42 of 140 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.33 · 34.3% (48 of 140 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.34 · 32.1% (45 of 140 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.30 · 42.9% (60 of 140 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.36 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.36 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.28 · 49.3% (69 of 140 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.36 · 21.4% (30 of 140 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.37 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Stratus Dancer relevance 0.38 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.38 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.35 · 22.9% (32 of 140 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.35 · 24.3% (34 of 140 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.37 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.34 · 27.1% (38 of 140 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.37 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.33 · 28.6% (40 of 140 decks)
- Draining Whelk relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.35 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.20 · 72.9% (102 of 140 decks)
- Tishana, Voice of Thunder relevance 0.37 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.34 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.34 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.37 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.33 · 22.9% (32 of 140 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.30 · 34.3% (48 of 140 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 0.38 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.30 · 31.4% (44 of 140 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 0.33 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 0.27 · 43.6% (61 of 140 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.35 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.35 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- It That Betrays relevance 0.38 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.35 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.34 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.31 · 25.7% (36 of 140 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.36 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Conduit of Ruin relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.33 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Tam, Mindful First-Year relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.31 · 53.6% (75 of 140 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.27 · 59.3% (83 of 140 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.32 · 44.3% (62 of 140 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.33 · 40.0% (56 of 140 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.32 · 42.9% (60 of 140 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.35 · 31.4% (44 of 140 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.30 · 47.9% (67 of 140 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.32 · 42.1% (59 of 140 decks)
- Kozilek, Butcher of Truth relevance 0.37 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.35 · 30.0% (42 of 140 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.33 · 34.3% (48 of 140 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.34 · 32.1% (45 of 140 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.30 · 42.9% (60 of 140 decks)
- Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger relevance 0.36 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.36 · 23.6% (33 of 140 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.28 · 49.3% (69 of 140 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.36 · 21.4% (30 of 140 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.37 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Stratus Dancer relevance 0.38 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Ulamog, the Infinite Gyre relevance 0.38 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.35 · 22.9% (32 of 140 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.37 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.34 · 27.1% (38 of 140 decks)
- Ulamog, the Defiler relevance 0.37 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.33 · 28.6% (40 of 140 decks)
- Draining Whelk relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.35 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.20 · 72.9% (102 of 140 decks)
- Tishana, Voice of Thunder relevance 0.37 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.34 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.37 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.33 · 22.9% (32 of 140 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.30 · 34.3% (48 of 140 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 0.38 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 0.33 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 0.27 · 43.6% (61 of 140 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.35 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.35 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- It That Betrays relevance 0.38 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.35 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.34 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.36 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Conduit of Ruin relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.33 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Tam, Mindful First-Year relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.38 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 0.33 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.36 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Biophagus relevance 0.32 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.33 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
All artifacts (30)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.35 · 24.3% (34 of 140 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.34 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.30 · 31.4% (44 of 140 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.30 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.22 · 25.7% (36 of 140 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.21 · 27.1% (38 of 140 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (8 of 140 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (9 of 140 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.12 · 35.7% (50 of 140 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.16 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- The Fire Crystal relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.07 · 50.7% (71 of 140 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
All enchantments (48)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.31 · 25.7% (36 of 140 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.23 · 47.1% (66 of 140 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.35 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.36 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.28 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.33 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.32 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.27 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (8 of 140 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.27 · 6.4% (9 of 140 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.16 · 35.0% (49 of 140 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 0.26 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Secret Plans relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- The First Tyrannic War relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.10 · 37.9% (53 of 140 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Temur Ascendancy relevance 0.09 · 37.1% (52 of 140 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Sarkhan's Unsealing relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
All instants (50)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.32 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (8 of 140 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.26 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.27 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.30 · 6.4% (9 of 140 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.26 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.22 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.22 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.22 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.19 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.23 · 5.7% (8 of 140 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.15 · 32.9% (46 of 140 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Trap Essence relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Signal the Clans relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Spell Rupture relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.16 · 21.4% (30 of 140 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.17 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.17 · 6.4% (9 of 140 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
All sorceries (35)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.37 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Primal Surge relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.31 · 6.4% (9 of 140 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.29 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.21 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.25 · 5.7% (8 of 140 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.20 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.25 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.17 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.17 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.16 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.14 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Genesis Ultimatum relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.26 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Domri, Anarch of Bolas relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.36 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.30 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.30 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.30 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.33 · 6.4% (9 of 140 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.23 · 27.9% (39 of 140 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.29 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.26 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.24 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.25 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.24 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.22 · 21.4% (30 of 140 decks)
- Zoetic Cavern relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.22 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.20 · 21.4% (30 of 140 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.18 · 29.3% (41 of 140 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.22 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Restless Spire relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.22 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Sundering Eruption // Volcanic Fissure relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.13 · 51.4% (72 of 140 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.18 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.17 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.20 · 5.7% (8 of 140 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Raging Ravine relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Fiery Islet relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (4 of 140 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Shinka, the Bloodsoaked Keep relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 140 decks)
All lands (50)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.31 · 29.3% (41 of 140 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.28 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.28 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.28 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.30 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.26 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.29 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.28 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.28 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.31 · 6.4% (9 of 140 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.26 · 16.4% (23 of 140 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Volcanic Island relevance 0.26 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.27 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 25.7% (36 of 140 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.23 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.28 · 6.4% (9 of 140 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.20 · 31.4% (44 of 140 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.24 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.26 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.24 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.20 · 25.7% (36 of 140 decks)
- Ferrous Lake relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (7 of 140 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.25 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.18 · 31.4% (44 of 140 decks)
- Grove of the Burnwillows relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (6 of 140 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.23 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.15 · 40.0% (56 of 140 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.22 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.15 · 41.4% (58 of 140 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 38.6% (54 of 140 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.23 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.22 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.15 · 37.1% (52 of 140 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.14 · 42.1% (59 of 140 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Animar, Soul of Elements, from 140 real Commander decks.