Cards like Opt
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Shore Up
8.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Shore Up 45%
- Magic Damper 38%
- Octopus Form 35%
- Dive Down 12%
- You See a Guard Approach 7%
- Chase Inspiration 5%
- Mizzium Skin 3%
Other options: Glint, Shell Shield
Cards like Enter the Enigma
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Enter the Enigma 39%
- Slip Through Space 34%
- Pym Particles 22%
Other options: Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Preordain
4.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 43%
- Serum Visions 32%
- Deliberate 2%
Other options: Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Muse Seeker, Windrider Wizard, Academy Wall, Lunar Mystic
Cards like Pongify
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 46%
- Rapid Hybridization 44%
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
8.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Traxos, Academy Guardian
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Haughty Djinn
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Stock Up
5.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards like Combat Research
8.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Combat Research 15%
- Curious Obsession 12%
Cards like Swan Song
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 21%
- Strix Serenade 10%
Cards like Aqueous Form
5.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 46%
- Security Bypass 5%
Cards like Murmuring Mystic
3.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sky Diamond
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 30%
- Coldsteel Heart 5%
- Prismatic Lens 5%
- Star Compass 3%
Other options: Guardian Idol, Obsidian Obelisk, Corrupted Grafstone
Cards like Thran Dynamo
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ichor Elixir, Sisay's Ring
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 43%
- Lightning Greaves 22%
Cards like Ponder
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
All top picks (50)
- Triton Wavebreaker relevance 0.62 · 51.5% (67 of 130 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.45 · 77.7% (101 of 130 decks)
- Robe of the Archmagi relevance 0.52 · 47.7% (62 of 130 decks)
- Traxos, Academy Guardian relevance 0.57 · 19.2% (25 of 130 decks)
- Variable Chaser // Arc of Fortune relevance 0.55 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Geist of Saint Thalia relevance 0.43 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.32 · 46.2% (60 of 130 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.41 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.42 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.40 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.34 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.32 · 44.6% (58 of 130 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.40 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.41 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.36 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.34 · 34.6% (45 of 130 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.35 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.33 · 33.8% (44 of 130 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.31 · 39.2% (51 of 130 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.38 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.40 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Auramancer's Guise relevance 0.40 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.32 · 26.9% (35 of 130 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Niblis of Frost relevance 0.37 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.33 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Mana Chains relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.30 · 26.2% (34 of 130 decks)
- Elementalist Adept relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.22 · 55.4% (72 of 130 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.36 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.27 · 33.8% (44 of 130 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Cryotheory Adept relevance 0.41 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Ordeal of Thassa relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Iguana Parrot relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Diviner's Wand relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.29 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.31 · 15.4% (20 of 130 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.26 · 31.5% (41 of 130 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.30 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Vapor Snag relevance 0.33 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.29 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.29 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Stormwing Entity relevance 0.36 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Troop of Ponies relevance 0.33 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.33 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Curious Homunculus // Voracious Reader relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Stormchaser's Talent relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Chilling Trap relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Triton Wavebreaker relevance 0.62 · 51.5% (67 of 130 decks)
- Traxos, Academy Guardian relevance 0.57 · 19.2% (25 of 130 decks)
- Variable Chaser // Arc of Fortune relevance 0.55 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Geist of Saint Thalia relevance 0.43 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.42 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Niblis of Frost relevance 0.37 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.30 · 26.2% (34 of 130 decks)
- Elementalist Adept relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Cryotheory Adept relevance 0.41 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Iguana Parrot relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.29 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.29 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Stormwing Entity relevance 0.36 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Troop of Ponies relevance 0.33 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.33 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Curious Homunculus // Voracious Reader relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Jeskai Elder relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.22 · 35.4% (46 of 130 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.28 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Drake Hatcher relevance 0.32 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (65 of 130 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.26 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Jeskai Sage relevance 0.35 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Jhessian Thief relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Fblthp, Impossibly Lost relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.22 · 27.7% (36 of 130 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.26 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Namor the Sub-Mariner relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.25 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Wing Commando relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.21 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Niblis of Dusk relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Jeskai Windscout relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Mistral Singer relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Diviner of Victory // Unwind History relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Pearl Lake Ancient relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Battlefield Thaumaturge relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.22 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Hydro-Channeler relevance 0.22 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Mocking Sprite relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.19 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Sage-Eye Avengers relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Unblinking Observer relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.18 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.17 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Entity Tracker relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.17 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.45 · 77.7% (101 of 130 decks)
- Robe of the Archmagi relevance 0.52 · 47.7% (62 of 130 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.40 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.40 · 13.1% (17 of 130 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Diviner's Wand relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.29 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Runechanter's Pike relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.27 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.28 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Glamdring relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.20 · 23.8% (31 of 130 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.19 · 24.6% (32 of 130 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.21 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 43.1% (56 of 130 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.23 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.17 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Thran Power Suit relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.17 · 19.2% (25 of 130 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Forger's Foundry relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.16 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.21 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.15 · 21.5% (28 of 130 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.17 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Blitzball relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.12 · 33.8% (44 of 130 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.13 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Bandit's Haul relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Stonespeaker Crystal relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.32 · 46.2% (60 of 130 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.41 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.35 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.38 · 17.7% (23 of 130 decks)
- Auramancer's Guise relevance 0.40 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Mana Chains relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.36 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Ordeal of Thassa relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.31 · 15.4% (20 of 130 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.30 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Stormchaser's Talent relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.23 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Aquitect's Defenses relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.25 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Noggle the Mind relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Infiltrator's Magemark relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.21 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Plan for All Outcomes relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.15 · 16.9% (22 of 130 decks)
- Infinite Coursework relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.15 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Fate Foretold relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Cradle of Safety relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- False Demise relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.11 · 24.6% (32 of 130 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Alexi's Cloak relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Cloak of Mists relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Ever-Watching Threshold relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
All instants (50)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.34 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.32 · 44.6% (58 of 130 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.34 · 34.6% (45 of 130 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.32 · 26.9% (35 of 130 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.33 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.22 · 55.4% (72 of 130 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.27 · 33.8% (44 of 130 decks)
- Vapor Snag relevance 0.33 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Chilling Trap relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.31 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.28 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.18 · 60.0% (78 of 130 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.19 · 52.3% (68 of 130 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.27 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- You See a Guard Approach relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Echoing Truth relevance 0.29 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Perfected Theory relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.25 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Chase Inspiration relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.23 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.23 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.13 · 53.8% (70 of 130 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.22 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.18 · 18.5% (24 of 130 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.21 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.18 · 14.6% (19 of 130 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.15 · 33.1% (43 of 130 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.11 · 61.5% (80 of 130 decks)
- Diminish relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Redirect relevance 0.22 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.20 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Arcane Epiphany relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.18 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.12 · 43.8% (57 of 130 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- You Come to a River relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.10 · 56.2% (73 of 130 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.17 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (15 of 130 decks)
- Icy Reception relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.11 · 46.2% (60 of 130 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.41 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.40 · 22.3% (29 of 130 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.36 · 30.0% (39 of 130 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.33 · 33.8% (44 of 130 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.31 · 39.2% (51 of 130 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.26 · 31.5% (41 of 130 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.23 · 34.6% (45 of 130 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.27 · 13.8% (18 of 130 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.25 · 21.5% (28 of 130 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Otterball Antics relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.21 · 19.2% (25 of 130 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.17 · 43.1% (56 of 130 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.15 · 52.3% (68 of 130 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.20 · 15.4% (20 of 130 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.18 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.15 · 19.2% (25 of 130 decks)
- Mass Diminish relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Gust of Wind relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Winged Words relevance 0.18 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Unending Whisper relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.16 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Protege's Awakening relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Lock and Load relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.10 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Chandra, Chill of Compliance relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.09 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
All utility lands (41)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.37 · 10.0% (13 of 130 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.29 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.20 · 33.1% (43 of 130 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Theorist's Sanctum relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.21 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.18 · 20.8% (27 of 130 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.21 · 9.2% (12 of 130 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 26.2% (34 of 130 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (26 of 130 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.15 · 13.8% (18 of 130 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.17 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.15 · 12.3% (16 of 130 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.16 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Hall of Echoes relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.16 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.15 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 47.7% (62 of 130 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.14 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 16.2% (21 of 130 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (8 of 130 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.12 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.13 · 6.9% (9 of 130 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (10 of 130 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.12 · 8.5% (11 of 130 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.13 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Beyeen Veil // Beyeen Coast relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 37.7% (49 of 130 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.11 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.09 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (9)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.14 · 10.8% (14 of 130 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.14 · 4.6% (6 of 130 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.12 · 5.4% (7 of 130 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (4 of 130 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (3 of 130 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 75.4% (98 of 130 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ruric Thar, Biomagus, from 130 real Commander decks.