Cards like Fabricate
7.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 48%
- Scour for Scrap 39%
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 52%
- Foundry Inspector 34%
- Cloud Key 15%
Other options: Helm of Awakening, Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Opt
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Vedalken Archmage
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Vedalken Archmage 35%
- Riddlesmith 28%
Cards like Magic Damper
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
- Magic Damper 22%
- Shore Up 22%
- Octopus Form 19%
Other options: Mizzium Skin, Dive Down, Glint, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield, Chase Inspiration
Cards like Mystic Remora
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 46%
- Rhystic Study 38%
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
3.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 31%
- Urza's Bauble 15%
Cards like Blightsteel Colossus
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
3.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cerulean Wisps
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cerulean Wisps 25%
- Refocus 17%
Cards like Manifold Key
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
6.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cryogen Relic
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cryogen Relic 31%
- Sewer-veillance Cam 15%
Cards like Master Transmuter
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 85%
- Basalt Monolith 16%
- Mana Vault 13%
- Grim Monolith 12%
Cards like Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade
6.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mirran Spy
8.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Krang, Utrom Warlord
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Forge
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Preordain
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 26%
- Serum Visions 8%
- Deliberate 4%
Other options: Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Introduction to Prophecy, Tamiyo's Epiphany
Cards like Thran Dynamo
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Sisay's Ring, Ichor Elixir, Ur-Golem's Eye
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 57%
- Commander's Sphere 11%
Cards like Mind Stone
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 36%
- Chromatic Sphere 8%
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 35%
- Swiftfoot Boots 31%
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gilded Lotus
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Triplicate Titan
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Patriar's Seal
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Patriar's Seal 16%
- Bender's Waterskin 13%
Other options: Relic of Legends, Victory Chimes, Spectral Searchlight, Honor-Worn Shaku
Cards like The Reality Chip
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards like Unwinding Clock
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.53 · 25.5% (53 of 208 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.54 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.42 · 40.9% (85 of 208 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.49 · 25.0% (52 of 208 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.38 · 45.7% (95 of 208 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.50 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.43 · 30.8% (64 of 208 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.42 · 33.7% (70 of 208 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.42 · 33.7% (70 of 208 decks)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.33 · 55.8% (116 of 208 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.49 · 17.3% (36 of 208 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.53 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.46 · 18.8% (39 of 208 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.44 · 20.7% (43 of 208 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.43 · 22.1% (46 of 208 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.45 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.50 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.46 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.40 · 25.5% (53 of 208 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (39 of 208 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.40 · 21.6% (45 of 208 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.42 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.40 · 21.2% (44 of 208 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.36 · 29.8% (62 of 208 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.30 · 44.7% (93 of 208 decks)
- Iron Lad, Diverging Destiny relevance 0.44 · 11.5% (24 of 208 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.33 · 34.1% (71 of 208 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.40 · 16.3% (34 of 208 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.37 · 23.1% (48 of 208 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.35 · 28.4% (59 of 208 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.33 · 33.7% (70 of 208 decks)
- Iron Man, Bleeding Edge relevance 0.41 · 13.0% (27 of 208 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.47 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.34 · 28.8% (60 of 208 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.37 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.33 · 29.8% (62 of 208 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.23 · 67.3% (140 of 208 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.38 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.34 · 27.9% (58 of 208 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.30 · 38.9% (81 of 208 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.30 · 34.6% (72 of 208 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (24 of 208 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.31 · 31.3% (65 of 208 decks)
- Ultron, Artificial Malevolence relevance 0.38 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.40 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.37 · 14.4% (30 of 208 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.33 · 25.5% (53 of 208 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (39 of 208 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.42 · 40.9% (85 of 208 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.50 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.42 · 33.7% (70 of 208 decks)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.33 · 55.8% (116 of 208 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.44 · 20.7% (43 of 208 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.50 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.40 · 25.5% (53 of 208 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (39 of 208 decks)
- Iron Lad, Diverging Destiny relevance 0.44 · 11.5% (24 of 208 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.35 · 28.4% (59 of 208 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.33 · 33.7% (70 of 208 decks)
- Iron Man, Bleeding Edge relevance 0.41 · 13.0% (27 of 208 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.34 · 28.8% (60 of 208 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.37 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.33 · 29.8% (62 of 208 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.34 · 27.9% (58 of 208 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.30 · 38.9% (81 of 208 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (24 of 208 decks)
- Ultron, Artificial Malevolence relevance 0.38 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.40 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (39 of 208 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 0.45 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.39 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.34 · 19.2% (40 of 208 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.35 · 15.9% (33 of 208 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.31 · 27.9% (58 of 208 decks)
- Inverted Iceberg // Iceberg Titan relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (13 of 208 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 0.35 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- The Vision relevance 0.41 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.23 · 49.5% (103 of 208 decks)
- Relentless X-ATM092 relevance 0.44 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 0.41 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (19 of 208 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.46 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.35 · 10.1% (21 of 208 decks)
- Canoptek Spyder relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (12 of 208 decks)
- Emissary Escort relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (16 of 208 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.26 · 30.8% (64 of 208 decks)
- Zenith Chronicler relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (12 of 208 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.31 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.30 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- Treasure Mage relevance 0.33 · 10.1% (21 of 208 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.24 · 35.1% (73 of 208 decks)
- Ironheart, Clever Champion relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.34 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
- Filigree Sages relevance 0.33 · 9.1% (19 of 208 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.38 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.49 · 25.0% (52 of 208 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.43 · 30.8% (64 of 208 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.49 · 17.3% (36 of 208 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.46 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.42 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.40 · 21.2% (44 of 208 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.36 · 29.8% (62 of 208 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.33 · 34.1% (71 of 208 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.40 · 16.3% (34 of 208 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.37 · 23.1% (48 of 208 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.30 · 34.6% (72 of 208 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.31 · 31.3% (65 of 208 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (16 of 208 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.41 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Implement of Examination relevance 0.45 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.35 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.23 · 51.9% (108 of 208 decks)
- Lembas relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (12 of 208 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.35 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.34 · 12.0% (25 of 208 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.39 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.32 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.36 · 8.2% (17 of 208 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.37 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Futurist Forge relevance 0.38 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.36 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.34 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.26 · 27.4% (57 of 208 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.27 · 22.6% (47 of 208 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.23 · 38.0% (79 of 208 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.33 · 8.2% (17 of 208 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.29 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.32 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
- Sleeper Dart relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.30 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.26 · 19.7% (41 of 208 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.32 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.30 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.26 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.25 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Golden Egg relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.29 · 9.1% (19 of 208 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.28 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
All enchantments (32)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.38 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.35 · 8.2% (17 of 208 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.31 · 9.1% (19 of 208 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.18 · 46.2% (96 of 208 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.27 · 12.0% (25 of 208 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.30 · 5.8% (12 of 208 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.30 · 5.8% (12 of 208 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (16 of 208 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.21 · 18.3% (38 of 208 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.23 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.17 · 38.0% (79 of 208 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.21 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.24 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.19 · 20.2% (42 of 208 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.18 · 11.5% (24 of 208 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
All instants (50)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.53 · 25.5% (53 of 208 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.54 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.38 · 45.7% (95 of 208 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.42 · 33.7% (70 of 208 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.53 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.46 · 18.8% (39 of 208 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.43 · 22.1% (46 of 208 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.40 · 21.6% (45 of 208 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.30 · 44.7% (93 of 208 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.47 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.23 · 67.3% (140 of 208 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.41 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.42 · 5.8% (12 of 208 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.39 · 9.1% (19 of 208 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.38 · 9.1% (19 of 208 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.23 · 44.7% (93 of 208 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (16 of 208 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.39 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.35 · 8.2% (17 of 208 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.30 · 14.9% (31 of 208 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.33 · 8.2% (17 of 208 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.22 · 39.4% (82 of 208 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Whoosh! relevance 0.41 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.26 · 15.9% (33 of 208 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.28 · 12.0% (25 of 208 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (17 of 208 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.24 · 17.3% (36 of 208 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.29 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.22 · 17.3% (36 of 208 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.29 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.37 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (16 of 208 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (13 of 208 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.18 · 29.3% (61 of 208 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.23 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
All sorceries (26)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.45 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.37 · 14.4% (30 of 208 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.33 · 25.5% (53 of 208 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.28 · 26.4% (55 of 208 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.34 · 8.2% (17 of 208 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (65 of 208 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.24 · 10.1% (21 of 208 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.23 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.17 · 22.6% (47 of 208 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.13 · 48.1% (100 of 208 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Traverse Eternity relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.19 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (11)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (12 of 208 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (17 of 208 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.20 · 26.4% (55 of 208 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.18 · 17.3% (36 of 208 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
All utility lands (47)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.35 · 17.3% (36 of 208 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.32 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.28 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.22 · 37.5% (78 of 208 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.23 · 23.1% (48 of 208 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.28 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.27 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.23 · 14.9% (31 of 208 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.27 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.23 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.18 · 36.5% (76 of 208 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (13 of 208 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.20 · 20.2% (42 of 208 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (13 of 208 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 49.5% (103 of 208 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.18 · 28.4% (59 of 208 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.16 · 36.5% (76 of 208 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.22 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.21 · 10.1% (21 of 208 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.16 · 32.2% (67 of 208 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.14 · 44.2% (92 of 208 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.22 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 27.4% (57 of 208 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.13 · 44.7% (93 of 208 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (12 of 208 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.11 · 51.9% (108 of 208 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (16 of 208 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Phyrexia's Core relevance 0.26 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.13 · 28.8% (60 of 208 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (13 of 208 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
All lands (25)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (14 of 208 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (16 of 208 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (16 of 208 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.23 · 10.1% (21 of 208 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.24 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.22 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (34 of 208 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (10 of 208 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (11 of 208 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (8 of 208 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (12 of 208 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.26 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.12 · 32.2% (67 of 208 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (9 of 208 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.07 · 67.8% (141 of 208 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (7 of 208 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 97.1% (202 of 208 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor, from 208 real Commander decks.