Cards like Rhystic Study
4.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 74%
- Mystic Remora 74%
Cards like Sol Ring
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
2.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 100%
- Basalt Monolith 59%
- Mana Vault 41%
- Grim Monolith 33%
Cards like Fabricate
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 62%
- Scour for Scrap 62%
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Voltaic Key
7.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Lotus Bloom
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lotus Bloom 44%
- Mox Tantalite 26%
Cards like Mirrormade
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Force of Will
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Will 44%
- Force of Negation 41%
Cards like Commandeer
8.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Commandeer 31%
- Misdirection 21%
- Disrupting Shoal 18%
- Snapback 18%
Cards like Mox Diamond
5.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mox Diamond 36%
- Chrome Mox 31%
Cards like Riddlesmith
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Riddlesmith 36%
- Vedalken Archmage 33%
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
5.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 44%
- Urza's Bauble 26%
Cards like Magic Damper
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
- Magic Damper 28%
- Shore Up 23%
- Octopus Form 21%
Other options: Mizzium Skin, Dive Down, Glint, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield, Chase Inspiration
Cards like Cerulean Wisps
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cerulean Wisps 33%
- Refocus 21%
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 54%
- Foundry Inspector 31%
- Cloud Key 18%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate, Helm of Awakening
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Forge
5.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cryogen Relic
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cryogen Relic 21%
- Sewer-veillance Cam 21%
Cards like Transit Mage
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
- Transit Mage 23%
- Treasure Mage 18%
- Trophy Mage 10%
- Tribute Mage 8%
- Trinket Mage 8%
Cards like Mirran Spy
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Preordain
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 33%
- Serum Visions 13%
- Deliberate 3%
- Scour All Possibilities 3%
Other options: Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Filigree Sages
5.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Filigree Sages 44%
- Thousand-Year Elixir 10%
- Aphetto Alchemist 8%
- Magewright's Stone 3%
- Voltaic Construct 3%
Other options: Jandor's Saddlebags, Synod Artificer, Puppet Strings
Cards like Blightsteel Colossus
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
5.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Opt
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Spine of Ish Sah
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Spine of Ish Sah 15%
- Scrap Trawler 10%
- Myr Retriever 10%
- Junk Diver 5%
- Workshop Assistant 3%
Cards like Mind Stone
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 15%
- Chromatic Sphere 13%
Cards like Staff of Domination
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Krang, Utrom Warlord
9.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Master Transmuter
5.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Flusterstorm
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flusterstorm 41%
- Turn Aside 5%
- Dispel 5%
- Miscast 3%
Cards like Unwinding Clock
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
All top picks (50)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.42 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.42 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.40 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.28 · 74.4% (29 of 39 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.35 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.37 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.38 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Filigree Sages relevance 0.33 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.33 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.30 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.38 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.36 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.20 · 71.8% (28 of 39 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.28 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.29 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.30 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.29 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.26 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.20 · 61.5% (24 of 39 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.26 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.31 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.17 · 76.9% (30 of 39 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.27 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.19 · 61.5% (24 of 39 decks)
- Iron Man, Bleeding Edge relevance 0.32 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.21 · 51.3% (20 of 39 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.26 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.30 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.29 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Treasure Mage relevance 0.28 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.29 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.29 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.27 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.25 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.22 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Sphinx-Bone Wand relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.23 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.18 · 53.8% (21 of 39 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.23 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.24 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.23 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.28 · 74.4% (29 of 39 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.38 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Filigree Sages relevance 0.33 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.30 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.26 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.31 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.17 · 76.9% (30 of 39 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.27 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Iron Man, Bleeding Edge relevance 0.32 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.21 · 51.3% (20 of 39 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.30 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Treasure Mage relevance 0.28 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.29 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.27 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.25 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.23 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.23 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.27 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.23 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.25 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.20 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.25 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.26 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.20 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.19 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.22 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.21 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.20 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Ironheart, Clever Champion relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.16 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.19 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.16 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Kuldotha Forgemaster relevance 0.23 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.14 · 53.8% (21 of 39 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.17 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.19 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Glaring Fleshraker relevance 0.20 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.13 · 53.8% (21 of 39 decks)
- Iron Lad, Diverging Destiny relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.18 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.16 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 0.20 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.42 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.42 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.40 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.35 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.37 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.33 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.30 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.38 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.20 · 71.8% (28 of 39 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.28 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.26 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.26 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.29 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.22 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Sphinx-Bone Wand relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.23 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.18 · 53.8% (21 of 39 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.23 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.18 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.18 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.14 · 61.5% (24 of 39 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.14 · 59.0% (23 of 39 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.17 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.23 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.20 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.16 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.21 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.17 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.14 · 51.3% (20 of 39 decks)
- Alchemist's Vial relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.18 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.18 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Marina Vendrell's Grimoire relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.19 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Chromatic Star relevance 0.18 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Chromatic Sphere relevance 0.18 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
All enchantments (38)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.23 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.25 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.21 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.20 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.21 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.18 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.09 · 74.4% (29 of 39 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.09 · 74.4% (29 of 39 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.16 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.16 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Psychic Possession relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.12 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.10 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.11 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.11 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.10 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.10 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.10 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.09 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.08 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.07 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.06 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.06 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.05 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
All instants (50)
- Refocus relevance 0.36 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.29 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.29 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.20 · 61.5% (24 of 39 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.29 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.24 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.19 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.25 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.24 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.21 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.16 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.23 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 0.20 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.12 · 71.8% (28 of 39 decks)
- Confusticate and Bebother relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.17 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.20 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.15 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 0.19 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Tidal Bore relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.13 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.13 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.15 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.10 · 56.4% (22 of 39 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.14 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.15 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.09 · 64.1% (25 of 39 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.11 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.10 · 51.3% (20 of 39 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.14 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.11 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.10 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.13 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
All sorceries (30)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.19 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.25 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.24 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.18 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.11 · 61.5% (24 of 39 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.12 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Pirate's Prize relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Argivian Restoration relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.09 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.09 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.09 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.08 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.06 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.06 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.19 · 61.5% (24 of 39 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.16 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.23 · 10.3% (4 of 39 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Karn Liberated relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.08 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.07 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.07 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.22 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.15 · 69.2% (27 of 39 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.26 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.21 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.15 · 61.5% (24 of 39 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.13 · 64.1% (25 of 39 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.18 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.16 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.14 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (6 of 39 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Phyrexia's Core relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.10 · 51.3% (20 of 39 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.13 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.10 · 56.4% (22 of 39 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.14 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.10 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.13 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Halls of Mist relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.13 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Hall of Tagsin relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Mystifying Maze relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Petrified Hamlet relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.11 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Beyeen Veil // Beyeen Coast relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.10 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.08 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
All lands (31)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.12 · 71.8% (28 of 39 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.19 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.18 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.15 · 35.9% (14 of 39 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.16 · 17.9% (7 of 39 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.14 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.14 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.13 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.12 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.13 · 12.8% (5 of 39 decks)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (3 of 39 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.08 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.08 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.07 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.07 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.07 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.07 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.06 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 94.9% (37 of 39 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor, from 39 real Commander decks.