Cards like Opt
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Fabricate
5.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 38%
- Scour for Scrap 35%
Cards like Shore Up
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
- Shore Up 29%
- Octopus Form 21%
- Magic Damper 13%
- Mizzium Skin 2%
Other options: Dive Down, Glint, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield, Chase Inspiration
Cards like Vedalken Archmage
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Vedalken Archmage 29%
- Riddlesmith 19%
- Transplant Theorist 13%
- Rook Turret 8%
Other options: Skyswimmer Koi
Cards like Lightning Greaves
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 48%
- Swiftfoot Boots 42%
Cards like Cerulean Wisps
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cerulean Wisps 35%
- Refocus 17%
Cards like Blightsteel Colossus
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 40%
- Foundry Inspector 21%
- Cloud Key 6%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate, Helm of Awakening
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
8.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 31%
- Urza's Bauble 13%
Cards like Cryogen Relic
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 54%
- Commander's Sphere 13%
Cards like Krang, Utrom Warlord
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Master Transmuter
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gilded Lotus
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards like Triplicate Titan
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Preordain
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 27%
- Serum Visions 8%
- Deliberate 4%
- Foresee 2%
Other options: Scour All Possibilities, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Mind Stone
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 38%
- Chromatic Sphere 4%
Cards like Mystic Remora
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 46%
- Rhystic Study 29%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 29%
- Hedron Archive 13%
- Ring of the Lucii 4%
- Sisay's Ring 2%
Other options: Ichor Elixir, Ur-Golem's Eye
Cards like Sculpting Steel
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sculpting Steel 17%
- Mirage Mirror 2%
Cards like Archmage's Charm
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
- Archmage's Charm 25%
- Spellgyre 4%
- You Find the Villains' Lair 2%
- Confusticate and Bebother 2%
- Soul Read 2%
Other options: Runeboggle, Confounding Riddle, Force Void, Supreme Will, Thassa's Intervention, Artistic Refusal
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.47 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.41 · 60.4% (29 of 48 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.46 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.42 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.39 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.46 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.40 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.35 · 47.9% (23 of 48 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.39 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.44 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.44 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.39 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.39 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.35 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.41 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.40 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Iron Man, Bleeding Edge relevance 0.43 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.33 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.39 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Ultron, Artificial Malevolence relevance 0.41 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.38 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.33 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.34 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.37 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.41 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- The Vision relevance 0.39 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.37 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.32 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.28 · 52.1% (25 of 48 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.34 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.40 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.38 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.31 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.31 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.30 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.31 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.37 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Implement of Examination relevance 0.39 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 0.39 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.35 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.38 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.37 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.33 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.31 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.47 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.46 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.39 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.46 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.35 · 47.9% (23 of 48 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.44 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.44 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.39 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.35 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.41 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.40 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Iron Man, Bleeding Edge relevance 0.43 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.33 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.39 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Ultron, Artificial Malevolence relevance 0.41 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.33 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.41 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- The Vision relevance 0.39 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.32 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.28 · 52.1% (25 of 48 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.38 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.31 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.30 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.31 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.37 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 0.39 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.38 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.37 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.31 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Iron Lad, Diverging Destiny relevance 0.35 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 0.33 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.34 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Emissary Escort relevance 0.35 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.32 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Inverted Iceberg // Iceberg Titan relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 0.32 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.23 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Canoptek Spyder relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Cryptothrall relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.29 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Memnarch, the Warden relevance 0.32 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 0.31 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Phyrexian Triniform relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.41 · 60.4% (29 of 48 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.42 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.39 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.39 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.38 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.37 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.37 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.34 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.40 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.31 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Implement of Examination relevance 0.39 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.35 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.33 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.32 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.27 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.30 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.35 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Conjurer's Bauble relevance 0.32 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Kaldra Compleat relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.32 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.25 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.31 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.28 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.30 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Futurist Forge relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.24 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.27 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.29 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Sleeper Dart relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Lembas relevance 0.29 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Golden Egg relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Alchemist's Vial relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.18 · 47.9% (23 of 48 decks)
- Spare Supplies relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Brotherhood Vertibird relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.28 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.25 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.21 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.15 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.21 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Fae Flight relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.12 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Ever-Watching Threshold relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Infinite Coursework relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Ensoul Artifact relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.10 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Aura Flux relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- The Antiquities War relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Rising Waters relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Tamiyo Meets the Story Circle relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Public Enemy relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- In Too Deep relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.10 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.08 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.06 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
All instants (50)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.40 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.34 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.31 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.26 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.27 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.23 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.25 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.22 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.17 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.19 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.13 · 64.6% (31 of 48 decks)
- Cerebral Download relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.23 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.23 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Trickery Charm relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Artificial Evolution relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Tidal Bore relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Mental Modulation relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.21 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Metallic Rebuke relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Wings of Velis Vel relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Stern Lesson relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.19 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Whoosh! relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Pulse of the Grid relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.14 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.08 · 77.1% (37 of 48 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.10 · 56.3% (27 of 48 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.31 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.24 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.26 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.22 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.19 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Traverse Eternity relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.14 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.18 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.19 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.13 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Index relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Asinine Antics relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Sorcerous Sight relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Shifting Grift relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Protege's Awakening relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.09 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.09 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Flux relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.06 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.28 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.05 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.03 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.30 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.32 · 37.5% (18 of 48 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.30 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.33 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.25 · 56.3% (27 of 48 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.31 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.26 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.27 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.30 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.26 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.17 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.16 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.17 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.13 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.12 · 14.6% (7 of 48 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.13 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Gargoyle Castle relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Petrified Field relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- HELIOS One relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Sea Gate Wreckage relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Radiant Fountain relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Tocasia's Dig Site relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Petrified Hamlet relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
All lands (24)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.29 · 58.3% (28 of 48 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.30 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.28 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (4 of 48 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.11 · 10.4% (5 of 48 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.09 · 4.2% (2 of 48 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.07 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 100.0% (48 of 48 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor, from 48 real Commander decks.