Cards like Stunt Double
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
58% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Stunt Double 53%
- Clone 49%
- Mirror Image 32%
- Sakashima's Protege 28%
- Waxen Shapethief 17%
Cards like Rite of Replication
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Clever Impersonator
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Clever Impersonator 66%
- Gigantoplasm 29%
- Flesh Duplicate 25%
Cards like Mirrormade
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mirrormade 54%
- Copy Enchantment 33%
- Copy Artifact 19%
- Copy Land 16%
Cards like Narset's Reversal
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
- Narset's Reversal 30%
- Twincast 22%
- Insidious Will 6%
Cards like Mirage Mirror
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mirage Mirror 29%
- Sculpting Steel 27%
Cards like Relm's Sketching
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: March of Progress
Cards like Cryptoplasm
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Clone Legion
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Irenicus's Vile Duplication
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Multiversal Recruitment
Cards like Body Double
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 39%
- Mystic Remora 29%
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
4.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Followed Footsteps
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sublime Epiphany
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Will
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Will 22%
- Force of Negation 17%
Cards like Undercover Operative
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sakashima's Will
6.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Body Double relevance 0.52 · 41.9% (70 of 167 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.46 · 52.7% (88 of 167 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 0.54 · 35.9% (60 of 167 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.52 · 40.1% (67 of 167 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.56 · 28.1% (47 of 167 decks)
- Malleable Impostor relevance 0.53 · 30.5% (51 of 167 decks)
- Pirated Copy relevance 0.53 · 29.3% (49 of 167 decks)
- Mocking Doppelganger relevance 0.50 · 34.7% (58 of 167 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.46 · 43.1% (72 of 167 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.42 · 49.1% (82 of 167 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.35 · 65.9% (110 of 167 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.42 · 47.3% (79 of 167 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.45 · 37.1% (62 of 167 decks)
- Gigantoplasm relevance 0.48 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.49 · 26.9% (45 of 167 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.45 · 34.1% (57 of 167 decks)
- Followed Footsteps relevance 0.51 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.42 · 38.9% (65 of 167 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 0.47 · 25.7% (43 of 167 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.63 · 7.2% (12 of 167 decks)
- Vesuvan Shapeshifter relevance 0.48 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Vesuvan Doppelganger relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (25 of 167 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.34 · 53.9% (90 of 167 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.40 · 38.9% (65 of 167 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.46 · 25.1% (42 of 167 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.42 · 32.9% (55 of 167 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.35 · 47.3% (79 of 167 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.41 · 31.7% (53 of 167 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.57 · 7.8% (13 of 167 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.39 · 36.5% (61 of 167 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.44 · 24.0% (40 of 167 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.59 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.58 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.40 · 30.5% (51 of 167 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.56 · 7.8% (13 of 167 decks)
- Quicksilver Gargantuan relevance 0.49 · 13.2% (22 of 167 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.57 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.32 · 52.1% (87 of 167 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.39 · 32.3% (54 of 167 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.56 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Birgi, God of Storytelling // Harnfel, Horn of Bounty relevance 0.57 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Twincast relevance 0.42 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Identity Thief relevance 0.48 · 12.6% (21 of 167 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.41 · 24.6% (41 of 167 decks)
- Elminster's Simulacrum relevance 0.43 · 20.4% (34 of 167 decks)
- Tavern Scoundrel relevance 0.55 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.37 · 33.5% (56 of 167 decks)
- Overmaster relevance 0.56 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Twinflame relevance 0.55 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.40 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Body Double relevance 0.52 · 41.9% (70 of 167 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.46 · 52.7% (88 of 167 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 0.54 · 35.9% (60 of 167 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.52 · 40.1% (67 of 167 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.56 · 28.1% (47 of 167 decks)
- Malleable Impostor relevance 0.53 · 30.5% (51 of 167 decks)
- Pirated Copy relevance 0.53 · 29.3% (49 of 167 decks)
- Mocking Doppelganger relevance 0.50 · 34.7% (58 of 167 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.46 · 43.1% (72 of 167 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.42 · 49.1% (82 of 167 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.35 · 65.9% (110 of 167 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.42 · 47.3% (79 of 167 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.45 · 37.1% (62 of 167 decks)
- Gigantoplasm relevance 0.48 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.45 · 34.1% (57 of 167 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.42 · 38.9% (65 of 167 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 0.47 · 25.7% (43 of 167 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.63 · 7.2% (12 of 167 decks)
- Vesuvan Shapeshifter relevance 0.48 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Vesuvan Doppelganger relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (25 of 167 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.35 · 47.3% (79 of 167 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.41 · 31.7% (53 of 167 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.59 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Quicksilver Gargantuan relevance 0.49 · 13.2% (22 of 167 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.57 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Birgi, God of Storytelling // Harnfel, Horn of Bounty relevance 0.57 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Identity Thief relevance 0.48 · 12.6% (21 of 167 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.41 · 24.6% (41 of 167 decks)
- Tavern Scoundrel relevance 0.55 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.40 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.35 · 30.5% (51 of 167 decks)
- Electro, Assaulting Battery relevance 0.54 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.41 · 13.2% (22 of 167 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.26 · 53.9% (90 of 167 decks)
- Dualcaster Mage relevance 0.51 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.38 · 16.8% (28 of 167 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.32 · 31.7% (53 of 167 decks)
- Orvar, the All-Form relevance 0.39 · 13.8% (23 of 167 decks)
- Vivi Ornitier relevance 0.50 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Nascent Metamorph relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Mercurial Pretender relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (13 of 167 decks)
- Treasonous Ogre relevance 0.52 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.21 · 67.1% (112 of 167 decks)
- Omni-Changeling relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (25 of 167 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.49 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Visage Bandit relevance 0.36 · 10.8% (18 of 167 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.31 · 18.6% (31 of 167 decks)
- Ashling, Flame Dancer relevance 0.48 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Faerie Artisans relevance 0.33 · 9.6% (16 of 167 decks)
- Deceptive Frostkite relevance 0.36 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.39 · 32.3% (54 of 167 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.36 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.36 · 26.3% (44 of 167 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.48 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.34 · 25.1% (42 of 167 decks)
- Mimic Vat relevance 0.41 · 10.8% (18 of 167 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.27 · 26.9% (45 of 167 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.30 · 15.0% (25 of 167 decks)
- Mirror Gallery relevance 0.36 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Krark's Thumb relevance 0.42 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.31 · 9.6% (16 of 167 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.27 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.21 · 13.8% (23 of 167 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.21 · 12.0% (20 of 167 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (18 of 167 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (15 of 167 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.21 · 7.2% (12 of 167 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Blade of Shared Souls relevance 0.25 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.20 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.17 · 16.8% (28 of 167 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.16 · 20.4% (34 of 167 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.18 · 12.6% (21 of 167 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.15 · 18.6% (31 of 167 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.19 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.18 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Dino DNA relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Masterwork of Ingenuity relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.13 · 17.4% (29 of 167 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.16 · 7.2% (12 of 167 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.15 · 7.8% (13 of 167 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.15 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.15 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.11 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.14 · 7.8% (13 of 167 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.14 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.12 · 12.6% (21 of 167 decks)
All enchantments (44)
- Followed Footsteps relevance 0.51 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.34 · 53.9% (90 of 167 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.42 · 32.9% (55 of 167 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.44 · 24.0% (40 of 167 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.58 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.37 · 33.5% (56 of 167 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.38 · 19.2% (32 of 167 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.37 · 15.6% (26 of 167 decks)
- Infinite Reflection relevance 0.43 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Mirror Mockery relevance 0.40 · 9.6% (16 of 167 decks)
- Estrid's Invocation relevance 0.38 · 9.6% (16 of 167 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.31 · 18.6% (31 of 167 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.31 · 13.8% (23 of 167 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.32 · 10.2% (17 of 167 decks)
- Metamorphic Alteration relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Hive Mind relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Endless Evil relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- The Clone Saga relevance 0.30 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.23 · 13.8% (23 of 167 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (15 of 167 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.22 · 12.6% (21 of 167 decks)
- Case of the Shifting Visage relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.14 · 38.9% (65 of 167 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.18 · 12.6% (21 of 167 decks)
- Exchange of Words relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.14 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Steal Artifact relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Leyline of Singularity relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.12 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Feywild Visitor relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.13 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.13 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
All instants (50)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.49 · 26.9% (45 of 167 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.40 · 38.9% (65 of 167 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.57 · 7.8% (13 of 167 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.39 · 36.5% (61 of 167 decks)
- Twincast relevance 0.42 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Elminster's Simulacrum relevance 0.43 · 20.4% (34 of 167 decks)
- Desperate Ritual relevance 0.53 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Mogg Salvage relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.50 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Fated Infatuation relevance 0.38 · 19.8% (33 of 167 decks)
- Gut Shot relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Mirror Match relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (15 of 167 decks)
- Supplant Form relevance 0.41 · 10.2% (17 of 167 decks)
- Pyretic Ritual relevance 0.47 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.33 · 18.6% (31 of 167 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.48 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Mystic Reflection relevance 0.33 · 12.0% (20 of 167 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.27 · 21.0% (35 of 167 decks)
- Flare of Duplication relevance 0.45 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.22 · 29.9% (50 of 167 decks)
- Fleeting Reflection relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.22 · 22.8% (38 of 167 decks)
- Crimson Wisps relevance 0.43 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Might of the Meek relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.36 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Reenact the Crime relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.38 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.18 · 22.2% (37 of 167 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (15 of 167 decks)
- True Polymorph relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.18 · 13.2% (22 of 167 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.17 · 16.8% (28 of 167 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.15 · 29.3% (49 of 167 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.20 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (17 of 167 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.17 · 12.0% (20 of 167 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.19 · 7.2% (12 of 167 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.15 · 21.6% (36 of 167 decks)
- Aethersnatch relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.13 · 30.5% (51 of 167 decks)
- Split Decision relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.46 · 25.1% (42 of 167 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.40 · 30.5% (51 of 167 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.56 · 7.8% (13 of 167 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.32 · 52.1% (87 of 167 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.56 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Overmaster relevance 0.56 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Twinflame relevance 0.55 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Strike It Rich relevance 0.53 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Molten Duplication relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.38 · 21.6% (36 of 167 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.37 · 24.0% (40 of 167 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.49 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.34 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.42 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.29 · 32.3% (54 of 167 decks)
- Saheeli's Artistry relevance 0.37 · 10.2% (17 of 167 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.31 · 17.4% (29 of 167 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.30 · 13.8% (23 of 167 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.40 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Grapeshot relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Echo Storm relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- End the Festivities relevance 0.45 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (23 of 167 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.30 · 7.2% (12 of 167 decks)
- Light Up the Stage relevance 0.43 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.27 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Wheel of Misfortune relevance 0.40 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Self-Reflection relevance 0.30 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (13 of 167 decks)
- Kefnet's Last Word relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Nanogene Conversion relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Hunted by The Family relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.18 · 11.4% (19 of 167 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.18 · 10.8% (18 of 167 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.15 · 18.6% (31 of 167 decks)
- Stolen Goods relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.15 · 20.4% (34 of 167 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Here Comes a New Hero! relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Haunting Imitation relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Eternal Dominion relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 23.4% (39 of 167 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Ral, Monsoon Mage // Ral, Leyline Prodigy relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
All utility lands (45)
- Fiery Islet relevance 0.60 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.46 · 18.6% (31 of 167 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.32 · 49.1% (82 of 167 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.37 · 28.7% (48 of 167 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.49 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Xander's Lounge relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.22 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.18 · 15.0% (25 of 167 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.17 · 15.6% (26 of 167 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 27.5% (46 of 167 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.18 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.16 · 12.0% (20 of 167 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 15.6% (26 of 167 decks)
- Hall of Echoes relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.14 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.12 · 13.2% (22 of 167 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 37.7% (63 of 167 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.12 · 9.0% (15 of 167 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.12 · 7.2% (12 of 167 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.12 · 6.0% (10 of 167 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 40.1% (67 of 167 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.11 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.10 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
All lands (35)
- Steam Vents relevance 0.59 · 9.0% (15 of 167 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.41 · 32.3% (54 of 167 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.56 · 7.2% (12 of 167 decks)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.53 · 7.2% (12 of 167 decks)
- Mountain relevance 0.48 · 9.0% (15 of 167 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.47 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.43 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.46 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.42 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.36 · 10.8% (18 of 167 decks)
- Sulfur Falls relevance 0.43 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Volcanic Island relevance 0.46 · 3.6% (6 of 167 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.39 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.36 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Spirebluff Canal relevance 0.44 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.27 · 15.0% (25 of 167 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway relevance 0.40 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.18 · 21.6% (36 of 167 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.19 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.18 · 7.2% (12 of 167 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (13 of 167 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.16 · 8.4% (14 of 167 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.17 · 6.6% (11 of 167 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (7 of 167 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (9 of 167 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (8 of 167 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.12 · 9.0% (15 of 167 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (4 of 167 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.13 · 3.0% (5 of 167 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 77.8% (130 of 167 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sakashima of a Thousand Faces, from 167 real Commander decks.