Cards like Opt
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Aetherize
6.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aetherize 44%
- Evacuation 41%
- Perplexing Test 15%
Cards like Enter the Enigma
8.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Proft's Eidetic Memory
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 49%
- Pongify 44%
Cards like Irenicus's Vile Duplication
6.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Academy Wall, Muse Seeker, Windrider Wizard, Lunar Mystic
Cards like Preordain
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 38%
- Serum Visions 21%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Murmuring Mystic
7.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Leap
9.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards like Rewind
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Engulf the Shore
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Engulf the Shore 38%
- Spectral Deluge 12%
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Flow of Knowledge
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Swan Song
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 25%
- Strix Serenade 12%
Cards like Cryptic Command
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Dig Through Time
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Dig Through Time 15%
- Impulse 8%
- Experimental Augury 5%
- Telling Time 2%
- Anticipate 2%
Cards like Bender's Waterskin
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Relic of Legends, Spectral Searchlight, Patriar's Seal, Honor-Worn Shaku
Cards like Stock Up
3.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards like High Fae Trickster
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Scroll of the Masters relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (35 of 225 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.52 · 32.9% (74 of 225 decks)
- Hraesvelgr of the First Brood relevance 0.55 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.45 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.45 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.36 · 48.9% (110 of 225 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.40 · 37.8% (85 of 225 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.50 · 15.6% (35 of 225 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.39 · 31.6% (71 of 225 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.45 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.39 · 29.3% (66 of 225 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.43 · 17.8% (40 of 225 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.34 · 38.2% (86 of 225 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.32 · 42.2% (95 of 225 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.32 · 41.3% (93 of 225 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.37 · 26.2% (59 of 225 decks)
- Maximize Altitude relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Water Wings relevance 0.47 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.38 · 22.2% (50 of 225 decks)
- Rune of Flight relevance 0.48 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Assassin Den relevance 0.49 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Secret Identity relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Triton Wavebreaker relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.30 · 39.6% (89 of 225 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.36 · 19.6% (44 of 225 decks)
- Infiltrate relevance 0.45 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Dreamtail Heron relevance 0.48 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (44 of 225 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.35 · 15.6% (35 of 225 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.39 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.32 · 22.7% (51 of 225 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.24 · 48.4% (109 of 225 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.33 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Wingspan Mentor relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.33 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.32 · 19.6% (44 of 225 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.39 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Defy Gravity relevance 0.37 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.32 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- The Clone Saga relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.33 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.38 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.33 · 14.7% (33 of 225 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.33 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Pouncing Shoreshark relevance 0.44 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.25 · 34.7% (78 of 225 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Hraesvelgr of the First Brood relevance 0.55 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.45 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.50 · 15.6% (35 of 225 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.39 · 31.6% (71 of 225 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.32 · 42.2% (95 of 225 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.37 · 26.2% (59 of 225 decks)
- Assassin Den relevance 0.49 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Triton Wavebreaker relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.36 · 19.6% (44 of 225 decks)
- Dreamtail Heron relevance 0.48 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.35 · 15.6% (35 of 225 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.32 · 22.7% (51 of 225 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.33 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Wingspan Mentor relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.32 · 19.6% (44 of 225 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.39 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.33 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Pouncing Shoreshark relevance 0.44 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.25 · 34.7% (78 of 225 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.33 · 12.0% (27 of 225 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.36 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.27 · 27.1% (61 of 225 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.29 · 18.7% (42 of 225 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.25 · 26.7% (60 of 225 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Drake Hatcher relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.26 · 17.8% (40 of 225 decks)
- Academy Loremaster relevance 0.34 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.27 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.24 · 26.2% (59 of 225 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.20 · 40.4% (91 of 225 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.29 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.26 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.25 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Floodgate relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Archipelagore relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.22 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.26 · 11.6% (26 of 225 decks)
- Souvenir Snatcher relevance 0.42 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Sphinx of Forgotten Lore relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.23 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Defiler of Dreams relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (27 of 225 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.24 · 12.0% (27 of 225 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.24 · 11.6% (26 of 225 decks)
- The Flood of Mars relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Scroll of the Masters relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (35 of 225 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.28 · 21.3% (48 of 225 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.35 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.24 · 35.6% (80 of 225 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.32 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Boompile relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Peter Parker's Camera relevance 0.31 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.21 · 28.0% (63 of 225 decks)
- Forger's Foundry relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Pip-Boy 3000 relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Lost Jitte relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Surveyor's Scope relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Grindclock relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Sword of Forge and Frontier relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Blitzball Stadium relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Bitterthorn, Nissa's Animus relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.16 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.18 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Runechanter's Pike relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Conformer Shuriken relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.08 · 59.6% (134 of 225 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.12 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Crawlspace relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.09 · 30.2% (68 of 225 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
All enchantments (46)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.45 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.45 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Rune of Flight relevance 0.48 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.30 · 39.6% (89 of 225 decks)
- The Clone Saga relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.33 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.38 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Spider-Man No More relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Stormchaser's Talent relevance 0.33 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.21 · 32.9% (74 of 225 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.25 · 12.9% (29 of 225 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.26 · 11.6% (26 of 225 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.25 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.21 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.22 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.22 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.14 · 32.4% (73 of 225 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.17 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 0.30 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.18 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Watery Grasp relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.14 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Arcane Melee relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Scroll of Isildur relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Feywild Visitor relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.12 · 16.9% (38 of 225 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
All instants (50)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.40 · 37.8% (85 of 225 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.39 · 29.3% (66 of 225 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.34 · 38.2% (86 of 225 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.32 · 41.3% (93 of 225 decks)
- Water Wings relevance 0.47 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Secret Identity relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Infiltrate relevance 0.45 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.24 · 48.4% (109 of 225 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.33 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Defy Gravity relevance 0.37 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.33 · 14.7% (33 of 225 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Reset relevance 0.36 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.27 · 23.1% (52 of 225 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.32 · 11.1% (25 of 225 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.31 · 11.6% (26 of 225 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.19 · 52.4% (118 of 225 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.34 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.29 · 12.4% (28 of 225 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.26 · 16.9% (38 of 225 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.24 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.24 · 23.6% (53 of 225 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.25 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.24 · 19.1% (43 of 225 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.23 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.20 · 38.2% (86 of 225 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.30 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.24 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.23 · 19.1% (43 of 225 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.25 · 12.9% (29 of 225 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.29 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.26 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.22 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.25 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Vapor Snag relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.23 · 11.6% (26 of 225 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.15 · 49.8% (112 of 225 decks)
- Aspirant's Ascent relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (52 of 225 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.52 · 32.9% (74 of 225 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.36 · 48.9% (110 of 225 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.43 · 17.8% (40 of 225 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Maximize Altitude relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.38 · 22.2% (50 of 225 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (44 of 225 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.39 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.32 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.28 · 21.8% (49 of 225 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.27 · 20.9% (47 of 225 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.26 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.24 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.18 · 38.2% (86 of 225 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Flood of Recollection relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.22 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.16 · 44.0% (99 of 225 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.26 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.22 · 12.9% (29 of 225 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.22 · 12.0% (27 of 225 decks)
- Memories Returning relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.22 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Hands of Binding relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Last Thoughts relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Arcane Heist relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Jailbreak Scheme relevance 0.29 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.15 · 13.8% (31 of 225 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Voidwalk relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.17 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.16 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.14 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
All utility lands (48)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.43 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Hall of Oracles relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.23 · 35.6% (80 of 225 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.26 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.24 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (28 of 225 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.21 · 24.0% (54 of 225 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.20 · 23.1% (52 of 225 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Cave of Temptation relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.20 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.22 · 11.6% (26 of 225 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.19 · 15.6% (35 of 225 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 20.9% (47 of 225 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.15 · 24.0% (54 of 225 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 55.6% (125 of 225 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 19.1% (43 of 225 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.16 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.17 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.15 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 40.0% (90 of 225 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.10 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.09 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (16)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.18 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.20 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.20 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.20 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 84.0% (189 of 225 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Hydro-Man, Fluid Felon, from 225 real Commander decks.