Cards like Incubation Druid
8.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Incubation Druid 36%
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 36%
- Gyre Sage 34%
Cards like Hardened Scales
4.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
6.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Evolution Witness
8.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Aerith Gainsborough
5.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Terrasymbiosis
16× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Inspiring Call
6.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Inspiring Call 51%
- Duty Beyond Death 11%
Cards like Envoy of the Ancestors
6.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Bristly Bill, Spine Sower
4.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Ouroboroid
9.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Loxodon Battle Priest
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
3.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Crowned Ceratok, Trollbred Guardian, Baloth Pup
Cards like Botanical Brawler
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
2.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Medusa, Inhuman Queen, Steelburr Champion
Cards like Soul Warden
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other Selesnya decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.64 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Soul Warden 20%
- Soul's Attendant 14%
- Essence Warden 11%
- Suture Priest 5%
- Prosperous Innkeeper 5%
- Virulent Emissary 4%
- Distinguished Conjurer 3%
- Impassioned Orator 3%
- Hinterland Sanctifier 3%
- Auriok Champion 2%
- Lifecreed Duo 2%
- Kor Celebrant 1%
- Social Climber 1%
Other options: Dazzling Angel, Greenhouse Propagator, Anointer Priest, Healer of the Pride
Cards like Cathars' Crusade
15× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Oath of the Ancient Wood, Durable Handicraft
Cards like Arwen, Weaver of Hope
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Good-Fortune Unicorn
1.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Mikaeus, the Lunarch
9.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Sol Ring
1.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 73% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.75 in other Selesnya decks
All top picks (50)
- Supply Drop relevance 0.61 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Void Attendant relevance 0.59 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Juniper Order Advocate relevance 0.58 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Reckless Amplimancer relevance 0.57 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Mana Prism relevance 0.57 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Kumena's Speaker relevance 0.59 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Prized Griffin relevance 0.58 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Steel Exemplar relevance 0.56 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Bronze Sword relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Unsettling Twins relevance 0.54 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Splinterfright relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Haazda Snare Squad relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Waker of the Wilds relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Trusty Boomerang relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Blade Instructor relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.35 · 36.5% (54 of 148 decks)
- Kjeldoran Escort relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.41 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Dispense Justice relevance 0.53 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Teremko Griffin relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Axebane Beast relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Rosemane Centaur relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Chocobo Knights relevance 0.41 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Noble Elephant relevance 0.49 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Safehold Elite relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.32 · 39.2% (58 of 148 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.28 · 52.7% (78 of 148 decks)
- Jolly Gerbils relevance 0.48 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.50 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.41 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Lesser Masticore relevance 0.50 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Signal Pest relevance 0.48 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.34 · 32.4% (48 of 148 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 0.40 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Air Response Unit relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Metastatic Evangel relevance 0.35 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Vastwood Gorger relevance 0.46 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Blightwidow relevance 0.46 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.34 · 27.7% (41 of 148 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.38 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.32 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Rocksteady, Mutant Marauder relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Wakka, Devoted Guardian relevance 0.37 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.34 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- Fell the Pheasant relevance 0.46 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.26 · 49.3% (73 of 148 decks)
- Vernadi Shieldmate relevance 0.44 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.32 · 27.7% (41 of 148 decks)
- Dyadrine, Synthesis Amalgam relevance 0.35 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Armored Warhorse relevance 0.43 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Void Attendant relevance 0.59 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Juniper Order Advocate relevance 0.58 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Reckless Amplimancer relevance 0.57 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Kumena's Speaker relevance 0.59 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Prized Griffin relevance 0.58 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Steel Exemplar relevance 0.56 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Unsettling Twins relevance 0.54 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Splinterfright relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Haazda Snare Squad relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Waker of the Wilds relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Blade Instructor relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.35 · 36.5% (54 of 148 decks)
- Kjeldoran Escort relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.41 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Teremko Griffin relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Axebane Beast relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Rosemane Centaur relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Chocobo Knights relevance 0.41 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Noble Elephant relevance 0.49 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Safehold Elite relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.32 · 39.2% (58 of 148 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.28 · 52.7% (78 of 148 decks)
- Jolly Gerbils relevance 0.48 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Lesser Masticore relevance 0.50 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Signal Pest relevance 0.48 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 0.40 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Metastatic Evangel relevance 0.35 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Vastwood Gorger relevance 0.46 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Blightwidow relevance 0.46 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.34 · 27.7% (41 of 148 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.38 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.32 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Rocksteady, Mutant Marauder relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Wakka, Devoted Guardian relevance 0.37 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.34 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.26 · 49.3% (73 of 148 decks)
- Vernadi Shieldmate relevance 0.44 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.32 · 27.7% (41 of 148 decks)
- Dyadrine, Synthesis Amalgam relevance 0.35 · 18.9% (28 of 148 decks)
- Armored Warhorse relevance 0.43 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Botanical Brawler relevance 0.32 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Borderland Ranger relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Kitchen Finks relevance 0.41 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Parhelion Patrol relevance 0.44 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- High-Flying Ace relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.33 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.31 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Mikey & Leo, Chaos & Order relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Supply Drop relevance 0.61 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Mana Prism relevance 0.57 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Bronze Sword relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Trusty Boomerang relevance 0.52 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.50 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Air Response Unit relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.28 · 27.0% (40 of 148 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.33 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.26 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- Blasting Station relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Barbed Spike relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.24 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Animation Module relevance 0.29 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.21 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Andúril, Narsil Reforged relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.23 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- The Wind Crystal relevance 0.19 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.16 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Costume Closet relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Pearl Medallion relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Well of Lost Dreams relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.14 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Horn of Gondor relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Excalibur II relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.12 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.13 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Archaeomancer's Map relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.11 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 43.9% (65 of 148 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.11 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.41 · 14.9% (22 of 148 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.34 · 32.4% (48 of 148 decks)
- Bonds of Faith relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.27 · 34.5% (51 of 148 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.22 · 55.4% (82 of 148 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.30 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.31 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.30 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.24 · 30.4% (45 of 148 decks)
- Trapped in the Screen relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.25 · 27.7% (41 of 148 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.26 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.31 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.20 · 23.6% (35 of 148 decks)
- SOLDIER Military Program relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Tale of Katara and Toph relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Master's Guidance relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Champions from Beyond relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.19 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.17 · 21.6% (32 of 148 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.21 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Gideon's Resolve relevance 0.33 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Due Diligence relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.17 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Sigarda's Summons relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Tocasia's Welcome relevance 0.20 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.16 · 16.9% (25 of 148 decks)
- Laid to Rest relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Leader's Talent relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Endless Foot Assault relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Comforting Counsel relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.25 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
All instants (50)
- Dispense Justice relevance 0.53 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Fell the Pheasant relevance 0.46 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Demystify relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Luminous Rebuke relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Not on My Watch relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.22 · 51.4% (76 of 148 decks)
- Ray of Revelation relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Fleeting Flight relevance 0.35 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Crumb and Get It relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Duty Beyond Death relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Moogles' Valor relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Triumphant Surge relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Efflorescence relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.18 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Restoration Magic relevance 0.19 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Aura Mutation relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.18 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Encircling Fissure relevance 0.28 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Blade Banish relevance 0.28 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Protection Magic relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.17 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.16 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Scale Blessing relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.17 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Hindervines relevance 0.25 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Bind relevance 0.25 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- March of the Multitudes relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Get Lost relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.12 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Call the Coppercoats relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Secure the Wastes relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 22.3% (33 of 148 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.13 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Rocky Rebuke relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.10 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.13 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.13 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Erode relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.29 · 33.1% (49 of 148 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.34 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.30 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.24 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Collective Effort relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.19 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Follow the Lumarets relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Yuna's Decision relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Honor relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 17.6% (26 of 148 decks)
- Recommission relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.15 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.13 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- No Witnesses relevance 0.25 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.15 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Fumigate relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Basri's Solidarity relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Expand the Sphere relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Commune with Nature relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Helping Hand relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- The Crystal's Chosen relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Hop to It relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Join the Dance relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.12 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Camaraderie relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Martial Coup relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.10 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.12 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.09 · 21.6% (32 of 148 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Practiced Offense relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Finale of Glory relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.19 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Ajani, Caller of the Pride relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Nissa, Nature's Artisan relevance 0.27 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Gideon, Martial Paragon relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Basri Ket relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Huatli, Radiant Champion relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.27 · 23.0% (34 of 148 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.23 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Lupinflower Village relevance 0.29 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.24 · 11.5% (17 of 148 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.27 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.15 · 30.4% (45 of 148 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.16 · 19.6% (29 of 148 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Kyoshi Village relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.19 · 7.4% (11 of 148 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.15 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.13 · 29.1% (43 of 148 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.16 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.16 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 20.9% (31 of 148 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.15 · 13.5% (20 of 148 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Radiant Fountain relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.13 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Stirring Wildwood relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.13 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Bretagard Stronghold relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.12 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Idyllic Grange relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Adagia, Windswept Bastion relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.11 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
All lands (50)
- Shimmering Grotto relevance 0.47 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Etched Cornfield relevance 0.31 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.23 · 15.5% (23 of 148 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (14 of 148 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.18 · 16.2% (24 of 148 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.21 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.20 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (18 of 148 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.18 · 10.1% (15 of 148 decks)
- Birnin Zana Plaza relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (10 of 148 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.14 · 18.2% (27 of 148 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.14 · 20.3% (30 of 148 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.12 · 29.7% (44 of 148 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.13 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (8 of 148 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (7 of 148 decks)
- Tranquil Expanse relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.11 · 35.8% (53 of 148 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.11 · 30.4% (45 of 148 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (13 of 148 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.10 · 39.2% (58 of 148 decks)
- Windurst, Federation Center relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (5 of 148 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.13 · 12.8% (19 of 148 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.13 · 10.8% (16 of 148 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.14 · 6.1% (9 of 148 decks)
- Sidequest: Catch a Fish // Cooking Campsite relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 148 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.09 · 33.8% (50 of 148 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.11 · 14.2% (21 of 148 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.09 · 26.4% (39 of 148 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.08 · 36.5% (54 of 148 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Shelinda, Yevon Acolyte, from 148 real Commander decks.