Cards like Wizard Class
6.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Oneirophage
9.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ravenhill Flock
Cards like Benthic Biomancer
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Brainstorm
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 40% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other blue decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 59%
- Brainsurge 26%
Cards like Walking Ballista
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Rhystic Study
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 46%
- Mystic Remora 40%
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.63 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Curiosity
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Curiosity 37%
- Ophidian Eye 16%
Cards like Consider
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Vnwxt, Verbose Host
7.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Tolarian Winds
6.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Tolarian Winds 23%
- Pull from Tomorrow 17%
Cards like Enter the Enigma
3.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Chrome Mox
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 15%
- Mox Diamond 10%
Cards like Force of Will
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Will 25%
- Force of Negation 17%
Cards like Sol Ring
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 82%
- Mana Vault 18%
- Grim Monolith 10%
- Basalt Monolith 6%
Cards like Bident of Thassa
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Mischievous Catgeist // Catlike Curiosity
Cards like Pollywog Prodigy
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Preordain
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 30%
- Serum Visions 8%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 37%
- Pongify 35%
Cards like Crystalline Crawler
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Windfall
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
All top picks (50)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.61 · 53.0% (107 of 202 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 0.58 · 53.5% (108 of 202 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.60 · 27.7% (56 of 202 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.50 · 43.1% (87 of 202 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.52 · 39.6% (80 of 202 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.54 · 25.7% (52 of 202 decks)
- Triskelion relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.54 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 0.54 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Mindless Automaton relevance 0.54 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.41 · 36.6% (74 of 202 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.41 · 37.1% (75 of 202 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.46 · 24.3% (49 of 202 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.40 · 38.1% (77 of 202 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.45 · 20.8% (42 of 202 decks)
- Oneirophage relevance 0.37 · 34.7% (70 of 202 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 0.44 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.43 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Clinquant Skymage relevance 0.38 · 29.7% (60 of 202 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.43 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.38 · 24.8% (50 of 202 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.24 · 67.3% (136 of 202 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.32 · 37.6% (76 of 202 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.43 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.32 · 38.6% (78 of 202 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.43 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 0.37 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.26 · 55.4% (112 of 202 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.36 · 21.8% (44 of 202 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.29 · 40.6% (82 of 202 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.37 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Loyal Drake relevance 0.35 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.30 · 30.7% (62 of 202 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.32 · 24.3% (49 of 202 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.33 · 23.3% (47 of 202 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 0.36 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.30 · 28.7% (58 of 202 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.23 · 55.0% (111 of 202 decks)
- Skatewing Spy relevance 0.42 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.36 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Jace's Projection relevance 0.37 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.23 · 53.5% (108 of 202 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.32 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Seize the Secrets relevance 0.41 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.29 · 27.2% (55 of 202 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.30 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.31 · 18.3% (37 of 202 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.20 · 56.9% (115 of 202 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.61 · 53.0% (107 of 202 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 0.58 · 53.5% (108 of 202 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.60 · 27.7% (56 of 202 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.50 · 43.1% (87 of 202 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.52 · 39.6% (80 of 202 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.54 · 25.7% (52 of 202 decks)
- Triskelion relevance 0.58 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.54 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Mindless Automaton relevance 0.54 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.41 · 36.6% (74 of 202 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.40 · 38.1% (77 of 202 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.45 · 20.8% (42 of 202 decks)
- Oneirophage relevance 0.37 · 34.7% (70 of 202 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 0.44 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Clinquant Skymage relevance 0.38 · 29.7% (60 of 202 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.38 · 24.8% (50 of 202 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.32 · 37.6% (76 of 202 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.43 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.32 · 38.6% (78 of 202 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.43 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 0.37 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.26 · 55.4% (112 of 202 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.36 · 21.8% (44 of 202 decks)
- Loyal Drake relevance 0.35 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.30 · 30.7% (62 of 202 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 0.36 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.30 · 28.7% (58 of 202 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.23 · 55.0% (111 of 202 decks)
- Skatewing Spy relevance 0.42 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.36 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Jace's Projection relevance 0.37 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.32 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.29 · 27.2% (55 of 202 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.31 · 18.3% (37 of 202 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.20 · 56.9% (115 of 202 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.25 · 35.1% (71 of 202 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.30 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.22 · 46.5% (94 of 202 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.28 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.24 · 31.7% (64 of 202 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.27 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.31 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Loch Mare relevance 0.34 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.26 · 22.3% (45 of 202 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.27 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.31 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.27 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.43 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.43 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.30 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.24 · 25.2% (51 of 202 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.26 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.22 · 17.8% (36 of 202 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.23 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.19 · 32.7% (66 of 202 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.24 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (25 of 202 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.21 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.24 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.19 · 24.3% (49 of 202 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.20 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.23 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.20 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.22 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Aether Syphon relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.23 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.18 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.21 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (38 of 202 decks)
- Mirror of Fate relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.13 · 31.2% (63 of 202 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.10 · 56.4% (114 of 202 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 18.8% (38 of 202 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.16 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.08 · 65.3% (132 of 202 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.15 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.15 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
All enchantments (42)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 0.54 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.41 · 37.1% (75 of 202 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.24 · 67.3% (136 of 202 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.29 · 40.6% (82 of 202 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.23 · 53.5% (108 of 202 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.25 · 29.7% (60 of 202 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.30 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.34 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.29 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Future Flight relevance 0.36 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.24 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 0.27 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.26 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.24 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 46.0% (93 of 202 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.23 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.16 · 40.1% (81 of 202 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.21 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.18 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Ever-Watching Threshold relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Wiretapping relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Curse of Verbosity relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.13 · 25.2% (51 of 202 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Thought Reflection relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
All instants (50)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.37 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.33 · 23.3% (47 of 202 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.32 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (38 of 202 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.26 · 25.7% (52 of 202 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.30 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Nexus Mentality relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.30 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.26 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.22 · 32.2% (65 of 202 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.23 · 24.3% (49 of 202 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.27 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.24 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.23 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.24 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.27 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Whoosh! relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.25 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.23 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.21 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.19 · 24.8% (50 of 202 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Unexpected Assistance relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.22 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.18 · 27.7% (56 of 202 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.23 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.14 · 47.0% (95 of 202 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.17 · 31.2% (63 of 202 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.12 · 58.9% (119 of 202 decks)
- Focus the Mind relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.21 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.17 · 27.2% (55 of 202 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.20 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.22 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.18 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.20 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.15 · 28.7% (58 of 202 decks)
- Majestic Metamorphosis relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.18 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.14 · 34.2% (69 of 202 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.13 · 43.1% (87 of 202 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.46 · 24.3% (49 of 202 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.32 · 24.3% (49 of 202 decks)
- Seize the Secrets relevance 0.41 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.30 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.29 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.20 · 46.0% (93 of 202 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.31 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.31 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.23 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.28 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.24 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.27 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.24 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Step Between Worlds relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Waterbending Lesson relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.17 · 29.7% (60 of 202 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.23 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.22 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.20 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.15 · 31.2% (63 of 202 decks)
- Time Reversal relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Flux relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.19 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.16 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Day's Undoing relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.14 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Winged Words relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.24 · 41.6% (84 of 202 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.28 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.20 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.31 · 20.8% (42 of 202 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.37 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.25 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.27 · 12.4% (25 of 202 decks)
- Blighted Cataract relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.26 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.21 · 26.2% (53 of 202 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.23 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.21 · 23.8% (48 of 202 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.26 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.20 · 24.3% (49 of 202 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.20 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.19 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.23 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.21 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.19 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Memorial to Genius relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.20 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 29.7% (60 of 202 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.17 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.15 · 25.7% (52 of 202 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.17 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 63.9% (129 of 202 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 48.0% (97 of 202 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
All lands (21)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.22 · 18.8% (38 of 202 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.20 · 23.3% (47 of 202 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.22 · 12.4% (25 of 202 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.22 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.23 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.21 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.21 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.15 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 91.1% (184 of 202 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lyla, Holographic Assistant, from 202 real Commander decks.