Cards like Iron Man, Armored Avenger
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Shore Up
8.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Shore Up 39%
- Magic Damper 35%
- Octopus Form 32%
- Mizzium Skin 15%
- Dive Down 12%
- You See a Guard Approach 7%
- Chase Inspiration 3%
Other options: Glint, Shell Shield
Cards like Thought Vessel
4.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 52%
- Rapid Hybridization 49%
Cards like Wizard Class
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
6.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 49%
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory 15%
- Hedron Archive 12%
- Sisay's Ring 4%
- Ur-Golem's Eye 2%
- Ring of the Lucii 1%
Other options: Ichor Elixir
Cards like Vnwxt, Verbose Host
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Pym Particles
7.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pym Particles 24%
- Enter the Enigma 18%
- Slip Through Space 14%
Other options: Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Swan Song
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 39%
- Strix Serenade 19%
Cards like Worn Powerstone
6.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 78%
- Lightning Greaves 26%
Cards like Trophy Mage
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Trophy Mage 15%
- Tribute Mage 15%
- Trinket Mage 11%
- Transit Mage 5%
- Treasure Mage 4%
Cards like Mithril Coat
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mithril Coat 25%
- Darksteel Plate 22%
Cards like Aetherize
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aetherize 40%
- Evacuation 14%
- Perplexing Test 5%
Cards like Aqueous Form
8.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 46%
- Security Bypass 6%
Cards like Champion's Helm
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Psychic Corrosion
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sword of Feast and Famine
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Body of Knowledge
6.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Body of Knowledge 45%
- Sturmgeist 6%
Cards like Distortion Strike
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Basilisk Collar
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards like Empyrial Plate
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Empyrial Plate 62%
- Bonesplitter 2%
Other options: Golem-Skin Gauntlets, Darksteel Axe, Greataxe, Vibranium Energy Daggers, Torch Gauntlet, Vulshok Morningstar, Bronze Sword, Bone Saw, Trusty Machete, Riot Gear, Cultist's Staff, Silverskin Armor, Marauder's Axe, Shuko, Thinking Cap, Leonin Scimitar, Ogre's Cleaver, Short Sword, Veteran's Sidearm, Murderer's Axe, Honed Khopesh, Vanquisher's Axe
Cards like Sword of the Animist
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Aether Tunnel
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards like Fireshrieker
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fireshrieker 44%
- Rover Blades 1%
All top picks (50)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.55 · 54.7% (93 of 170 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.58 · 50.0% (85 of 170 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.53 · 57.1% (97 of 170 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.44 · 74.7% (127 of 170 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.49 · 62.4% (106 of 170 decks)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.61 · 40.6% (69 of 170 decks)
- Hand of Vecna relevance 0.58 · 37.6% (64 of 170 decks)
- Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan relevance 0.56 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Hulkbuster Armor relevance 0.63 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.40 · 48.2% (82 of 170 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.44 · 30.0% (51 of 170 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.38 · 43.5% (74 of 170 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.45 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.45 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.44 · 24.1% (41 of 170 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.37 · 40.6% (69 of 170 decks)
- Captain America's Shield relevance 0.51 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.34 · 45.9% (78 of 170 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.43 · 22.9% (39 of 170 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.43 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.44 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.45 · 16.5% (28 of 170 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.43 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.39 · 28.2% (48 of 170 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.32 · 45.3% (77 of 170 decks)
- Immortus, Master of Eternity relevance 0.47 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.36 · 34.7% (59 of 170 decks)
- Brass Squire relevance 0.43 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.38 · 28.2% (48 of 170 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.36 · 32.4% (55 of 170 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.31 · 45.3% (77 of 170 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.33 · 38.8% (66 of 170 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.41 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.40 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.24 · 69.4% (118 of 170 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.40 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.37 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.36 · 26.5% (45 of 170 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.36 · 25.9% (44 of 170 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.38 · 19.4% (33 of 170 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.33 · 32.4% (55 of 170 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.36 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.38 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.38 · 18.8% (32 of 170 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.25 · 58.8% (100 of 170 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.35 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.30 · 36.5% (62 of 170 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.27 · 47.1% (80 of 170 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.27 · 46.5% (79 of 170 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.58 · 50.0% (85 of 170 decks)
- Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan relevance 0.56 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.40 · 48.2% (82 of 170 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.45 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.32 · 45.3% (77 of 170 decks)
- Immortus, Master of Eternity relevance 0.47 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Brass Squire relevance 0.43 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.36 · 26.5% (45 of 170 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.36 · 25.9% (44 of 170 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.25 · 58.8% (100 of 170 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.30 · 36.5% (62 of 170 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.22 · 58.2% (99 of 170 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.34 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.32 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.25 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Oneirophage relevance 0.30 · 17.6% (30 of 170 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.30 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.20 · 57.1% (97 of 170 decks)
- Dreamscape Artist relevance 0.31 · 12.9% (22 of 170 decks)
- Clinquant Skymage relevance 0.29 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.24 · 31.8% (54 of 170 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.34 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.28 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
- Hydro-Man, Fluid Felon relevance 0.31 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.31 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Echo, Perceptive Prodigy relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.26 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.28 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- Syr Elenora, the Discerning relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.29 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.25 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Ormos, Archive Keeper relevance 0.30 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Sturmgeist relevance 0.29 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.23 · 17.6% (30 of 170 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 0.26 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.19 · 29.4% (50 of 170 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.26 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.22 · 12.9% (22 of 170 decks)
- Alandra, Sky Dreamer relevance 0.22 · 12.9% (22 of 170 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.24 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Subterfuge relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Minas Tirith Garrison relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.19 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.55 · 54.7% (93 of 170 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.53 · 57.1% (97 of 170 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.49 · 62.4% (106 of 170 decks)
- Hand of Vecna relevance 0.58 · 37.6% (64 of 170 decks)
- Hulkbuster Armor relevance 0.63 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.44 · 30.0% (51 of 170 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.38 · 43.5% (74 of 170 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.45 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.37 · 40.6% (69 of 170 decks)
- Captain America's Shield relevance 0.51 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.43 · 22.9% (39 of 170 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.44 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.45 · 16.5% (28 of 170 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.43 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.41 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.37 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.38 · 19.4% (33 of 170 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.33 · 32.4% (55 of 170 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.36 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.38 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.38 · 18.8% (32 of 170 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.35 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.27 · 47.1% (80 of 170 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.25 · 49.4% (84 of 170 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.36 · 14.7% (25 of 170 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.19 · 77.6% (132 of 170 decks)
- Hero's Blade relevance 0.40 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Doc Ock's Tentacles relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Sword of War and Peace relevance 0.38 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.37 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.31 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.36 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.29 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Prowler's Helm relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.30 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.22 · 36.5% (62 of 170 decks)
- Psychic Paper relevance 0.35 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Silver Shroud Costume relevance 0.31 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.29 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.25 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.21 · 28.8% (49 of 170 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.19 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Strata Scythe relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.23 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
All enchantments (43)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.44 · 74.7% (127 of 170 decks)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.61 · 40.6% (69 of 170 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.34 · 45.9% (78 of 170 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.40 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.24 · 69.4% (118 of 170 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.40 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.27 · 46.5% (79 of 170 decks)
- Cloak of Mists relevance 0.40 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.38 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.35 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.33 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.25 · 27.1% (46 of 170 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.26 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.20 · 37.6% (64 of 170 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.30 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.21 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Invisibility relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.14 · 43.5% (74 of 170 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Fae Flight relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Protective Bubble relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Kang Dynasty relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Dragon Wings relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Arcane Flight relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Starlit Mantle relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.12 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.11 · 12.9% (22 of 170 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
All instants (50)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.39 · 28.2% (48 of 170 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.36 · 34.7% (59 of 170 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.36 · 32.4% (55 of 170 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.31 · 45.3% (77 of 170 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.33 · 38.8% (66 of 170 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.35 · 14.7% (25 of 170 decks)
- Veil of Secrecy relevance 0.41 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.32 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Spell Burst relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- You See a Guard Approach relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.29 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.25 · 19.4% (33 of 170 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Thwart relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Forbid relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.23 · 14.7% (25 of 170 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Glen Elendra's Answer relevance 0.27 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Infiltrate relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.23 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.22 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.24 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.12 · 64.7% (110 of 170 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.13 · 57.1% (97 of 170 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.21 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.17 · 28.2% (48 of 170 decks)
- Psychic Spiral relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.16 · 33.5% (57 of 170 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.21 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.13 · 48.8% (83 of 170 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.14 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.19 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Toils of Night and Day relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.14 · 40.0% (68 of 170 decks)
- Psychic Puppetry relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.12 · 51.8% (88 of 170 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.15 · 28.2% (48 of 170 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.11 · 55.3% (94 of 170 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.20 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.16 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.17 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
All sorceries (46)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.44 · 24.1% (41 of 170 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.43 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.38 · 28.2% (48 of 170 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.33 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.28 · 16.5% (28 of 170 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.27 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Temporal Cascade relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.28 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.29 · 10.6% (18 of 170 decks)
- Jailbreak Scheme relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Taigam's Strike relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Game Plan relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Turtles in Time relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Step Between Worlds relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Time Reversal relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Reminisce relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Anchor to Reality relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.14 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.11 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.12 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.11 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.20 · 24.1% (41 of 170 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.23 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
All utility lands (41)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.49 · 18.8% (32 of 170 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.24 · 60.6% (103 of 170 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.26 · 23.5% (40 of 170 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.22 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.25 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.22 · 18.8% (32 of 170 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.24 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.19 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 24.7% (42 of 170 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.15 · 26.5% (45 of 170 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 75.9% (129 of 170 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.17 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.16 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.15 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 45.3% (77 of 170 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.14 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.13 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (11)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.23 · 14.7% (25 of 170 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.21 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.18 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.16 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.12 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.11 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 81.8% (139 of 170 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Professor Hulk, from 170 real Commander decks.