Cards like Electroduplicate
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other red decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Seething Song
3.3× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other red decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other red decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.60 in other red decks
Cards
- Seething Song 56%
- Pyretic Ritual 49%
- Desperate Ritual 47%
Cards like Glint-Horn Buccaneer
14× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other red decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Red Elemental Blast
2.9× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other red decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other red decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other red decks
Cards like Lotus Petal
15× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other red decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other red decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 37%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 23%
Cards like Flare of Duplication
13× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other red decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other red decks
Cards
- Flare of Duplication 44%
- Reiterate 25%
- Fork 4%
Cards like Molten Duplication
19× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other red decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Final Fortune
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other red decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other red decks
Cards
- Final Fortune 27%
- Warrior's Oath 17%
- Last Chance 6%
Cards like Chrome Mox
5.9× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other red decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other red decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other red decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 26%
- Mox Diamond 20%
Cards like Demand Answers
2.1× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other red decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other red decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other red decks
Cards
Other options: Dangerous Wager
Cards like Sol Ring
2.8× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 81% of other red decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other red decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.92 in other red decks
Cards like Electro, Assaulting Battery
4.7× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other red decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other red decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Jaxis, the Troublemaker
14× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other red decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Will of the Jeskai
12× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other red decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other red decks
Cards
- Will of the Jeskai 44%
- Snort 26%
Cards like Cool but Rude
16× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other red decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other red decks
Cards
- Cool but Rude 43%
- Artist's Talent 33%
Cards like Past in Flames
5.5× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other red decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other red decks
Cards like Goblin Engineer
13× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other red decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other red decks
Cards
- Goblin Engineer 23%
- Scrap Welder 11%
Cards like Currency Converter
16× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other red decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other red decks
Cards
- Currency Converter 20%
- Bag of Holding 17%
Cards like Phial of Galadriel
Over 20× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other red decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Bolt Bend
1.6× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other red decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other red decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other red decks
Cards
- Bolt Bend 27%
- Redirect Lightning 26%
- Ricochet Trap 2%
Cards like Marauding Mako
15× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Return the Favor
1.4× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other red decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other red decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Change of Fortune
8.7× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Wheel of Fortune
2.2× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other red decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Twinflame
15× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other red decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other red decks
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
14× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Gamble
5.4× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other red decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other red decks
Cards
- Gamble 46%
- Fervent Mastery 3%
Cards like Burning Inquiry
4.8× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other red decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other red decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other red decks
Cards
Cards like Big Score
1.04× as likely as other red decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other red decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 23% of other red decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.75 in other red decks
Cards
- Big Score 38%
- Unexpected Windfall 22%
- Seize the Spoils 17%
- Pirate's Pillage 4%
All top picks (50)
- Bottled Cloister relevance 0.76 · 20.1% (46 of 229 decks)
- Kindle the Inner Flame relevance 0.65 · 34.5% (79 of 229 decks)
- Electroduplicate relevance 0.42 · 68.1% (156 of 229 decks)
- Heat Shimmer relevance 0.45 · 57.2% (131 of 229 decks)
- Jaxis, the Troublemaker relevance 0.43 · 55.5% (127 of 229 decks)
- Rionya, Fire Dancer relevance 0.51 · 37.6% (86 of 229 decks)
- Eldrazi Confluence relevance 0.60 · 17.9% (41 of 229 decks)
- Molten Duplication relevance 0.39 · 52.8% (121 of 229 decks)
- Conspiracy Theorist relevance 0.46 · 34.1% (78 of 229 decks)
- Cool but Rude relevance 0.41 · 42.8% (98 of 229 decks)
- Golden Argosy relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (35 of 229 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.42 · 40.6% (93 of 229 decks)
- Twinflame relevance 0.35 · 57.2% (131 of 229 decks)
- Ivora, Insatiable Heir relevance 0.46 · 28.8% (66 of 229 decks)
- Eon Hub relevance 0.63 · 7.0% (16 of 229 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.45 · 29.3% (67 of 229 decks)
- Bonus Round relevance 0.44 · 31.0% (71 of 229 decks)
- Will of the Jeskai relevance 0.38 · 44.1% (101 of 229 decks)
- Raphael's Technique relevance 0.46 · 25.8% (59 of 229 decks)
- Surly Badgersaur relevance 0.44 · 30.6% (70 of 229 decks)
- Magmakin Artillerist relevance 0.41 · 35.4% (81 of 229 decks)
- Glint-Horn Buccaneer relevance 0.41 · 36.2% (83 of 229 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.38 · 42.4% (97 of 229 decks)
- _____ Goblin relevance 0.44 · 25.8% (59 of 229 decks)
- Warrior's Oath relevance 0.48 · 16.6% (38 of 229 decks)
- Priest of Urabrask relevance 0.45 · 23.6% (54 of 229 decks)
- Infernal Plunge relevance 0.40 · 33.2% (76 of 229 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.47 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.46 · 19.7% (45 of 229 decks)
- Phial of Galadriel relevance 0.47 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Marauding Mako relevance 0.44 · 21.4% (49 of 229 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.43 · 23.1% (53 of 229 decks)
- Brallin, Skyshark Rider relevance 0.43 · 22.3% (51 of 229 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.43 · 20.5% (47 of 229 decks)
- Veronica, Dissident Scribe relevance 0.44 · 17.9% (41 of 229 decks)
- Final Fortune relevance 0.40 · 26.6% (61 of 229 decks)
- Change of Fortune relevance 0.43 · 18.3% (42 of 229 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.42 · 19.7% (45 of 229 decks)
- Snort relevance 0.39 · 26.2% (60 of 229 decks)
- Inti, Seneschal of the Sun relevance 0.35 · 34.9% (80 of 229 decks)
- Urabrask // The Great Work relevance 0.35 · 34.9% (80 of 229 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.39 · 21.4% (49 of 229 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.41 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Devastating Onslaught relevance 0.37 · 27.5% (63 of 229 decks)
- Case of the Crimson Pulse relevance 0.46 · 10.9% (25 of 229 decks)
- Dualcaster Mage relevance 0.31 · 43.2% (99 of 229 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.29 · 50.2% (115 of 229 decks)
- Electro, Assaulting Battery relevance 0.29 · 50.2% (115 of 229 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.29 · 51.1% (117 of 229 decks)
- Fury relevance 0.38 · 22.3% (51 of 229 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Jaxis, the Troublemaker relevance 0.43 · 55.5% (127 of 229 decks)
- Rionya, Fire Dancer relevance 0.51 · 37.6% (86 of 229 decks)
- Conspiracy Theorist relevance 0.46 · 34.1% (78 of 229 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.42 · 40.6% (93 of 229 decks)
- Ivora, Insatiable Heir relevance 0.46 · 28.8% (66 of 229 decks)
- Surly Badgersaur relevance 0.44 · 30.6% (70 of 229 decks)
- Magmakin Artillerist relevance 0.41 · 35.4% (81 of 229 decks)
- Glint-Horn Buccaneer relevance 0.41 · 36.2% (83 of 229 decks)
- _____ Goblin relevance 0.44 · 25.8% (59 of 229 decks)
- Priest of Urabrask relevance 0.45 · 23.6% (54 of 229 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.47 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Marauding Mako relevance 0.44 · 21.4% (49 of 229 decks)
- Brallin, Skyshark Rider relevance 0.43 · 22.3% (51 of 229 decks)
- Veronica, Dissident Scribe relevance 0.44 · 17.9% (41 of 229 decks)
- Inti, Seneschal of the Sun relevance 0.35 · 34.9% (80 of 229 decks)
- Urabrask // The Great Work relevance 0.35 · 34.9% (80 of 229 decks)
- Dualcaster Mage relevance 0.31 · 43.2% (99 of 229 decks)
- Electro, Assaulting Battery relevance 0.29 · 50.2% (115 of 229 decks)
- Fury relevance 0.38 · 22.3% (51 of 229 decks)
- Treasonous Ogre relevance 0.33 · 36.7% (84 of 229 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.39 · 19.2% (44 of 229 decks)
- Birgi, God of Storytelling // Harnfel, Horn of Bounty relevance 0.27 · 51.1% (117 of 229 decks)
- Runaway Steam-Kin relevance 0.25 · 61.1% (140 of 229 decks)
- Fear of Missing Out relevance 0.36 · 23.1% (53 of 229 decks)
- Tersa Lightshatter relevance 0.40 · 13.5% (31 of 229 decks)
- Dragon's Rage Channeler relevance 0.36 · 18.8% (43 of 229 decks)
- Orthion, Hero of Lavabrink relevance 0.36 · 16.6% (38 of 229 decks)
- Daretti, Rocketeer Engineer relevance 0.39 · 12.7% (29 of 229 decks)
- Ruin Grinder relevance 0.36 · 16.2% (37 of 229 decks)
- Scrap Welder relevance 0.39 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 0.26 · 43.7% (100 of 229 decks)
- Technodrome relevance 0.41 · 6.6% (15 of 229 decks)
- Thopter Assembly relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (12 of 229 decks)
- Detective's Phoenix relevance 0.38 · 9.2% (21 of 229 decks)
- Soul of New Phyrexia relevance 0.39 · 7.0% (16 of 229 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.27 · 33.2% (76 of 229 decks)
- Feldon of the Third Path relevance 0.31 · 18.8% (43 of 229 decks)
- Anje's Ravager relevance 0.37 · 8.3% (19 of 229 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.22 · 50.2% (115 of 229 decks)
- Defiler of Instinct relevance 0.30 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Ashling, Flame Dancer relevance 0.28 · 20.1% (46 of 229 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.24 · 36.7% (84 of 229 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.32 · 10.5% (24 of 229 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.25 · 31.4% (72 of 229 decks)
- Metalwork Colossus relevance 0.34 · 7.4% (17 of 229 decks)
- Raphael, the Nightwatcher relevance 0.34 · 7.4% (17 of 229 decks)
- Ox of Agonas relevance 0.34 · 7.0% (16 of 229 decks)
- Delina, Wild Mage relevance 0.32 · 9.6% (22 of 229 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.24 · 28.4% (65 of 229 decks)
- Zookeeper Mechan relevance 0.29 · 13.1% (30 of 229 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Bottled Cloister relevance 0.76 · 20.1% (46 of 229 decks)
- Golden Argosy relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (35 of 229 decks)
- Eon Hub relevance 0.63 · 7.0% (16 of 229 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.45 · 29.3% (67 of 229 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.38 · 42.4% (97 of 229 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.46 · 19.7% (45 of 229 decks)
- Phial of Galadriel relevance 0.47 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.43 · 23.1% (53 of 229 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.43 · 20.5% (47 of 229 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.42 · 19.7% (45 of 229 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.39 · 21.4% (49 of 229 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.41 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.33 · 34.5% (79 of 229 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.36 · 27.9% (64 of 229 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.43 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.33 · 29.3% (67 of 229 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.35 · 19.2% (44 of 229 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.36 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Cursed Mirror relevance 0.21 · 70.7% (162 of 229 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.33 · 19.7% (45 of 229 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.41 · 7.9% (18 of 229 decks)
- Melded Moxite relevance 0.38 · 10.5% (24 of 229 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.28 · 37.1% (85 of 229 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.30 · 24.5% (56 of 229 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.29 · 26.2% (60 of 229 decks)
- Improvised Arsenal relevance 0.35 · 10.5% (24 of 229 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.28 · 24.0% (55 of 229 decks)
- Memory Jar relevance 0.37 · 6.6% (15 of 229 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.27 · 23.1% (53 of 229 decks)
- The Fire Crystal relevance 0.20 · 54.6% (125 of 229 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.35 · 7.0% (16 of 229 decks)
- Nexus of Becoming relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (21 of 229 decks)
- Pumpkin Bombs relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (10 of 229 decks)
- Legion Extruder relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (16 of 229 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (13 of 229 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.29 · 7.4% (17 of 229 decks)
- Kaldra Compleat relevance 0.29 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (12 of 229 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.20 · 23.6% (54 of 229 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.21 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.21 · 14.8% (34 of 229 decks)
- Hazoret's Monument relevance 0.20 · 18.3% (42 of 229 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (13 of 229 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.23 · 5.7% (13 of 229 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (18 of 229 decks)
- Voyager Staff relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (9 of 229 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (6 of 229 decks)
All enchantments (25)
- Cool but Rude relevance 0.41 · 42.8% (98 of 229 decks)
- Case of the Crimson Pulse relevance 0.46 · 10.9% (25 of 229 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.29 · 51.1% (117 of 229 decks)
- Artist's Talent relevance 0.34 · 32.8% (75 of 229 decks)
- Splinter Twin relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (25 of 229 decks)
- Shadow of the Goblin relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (14 of 229 decks)
- Echoing Assault relevance 0.31 · 4.4% (10 of 229 decks)
- The Rollercrusher Ride relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Powerbalance relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (15 of 229 decks)
- Flameshadow Conjuring relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (10 of 229 decks)
- Count on Luck relevance 0.19 · 6.6% (15 of 229 decks)
- Connecting the Dots relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (8 of 229 decks)
- Hoarder's Overflow relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
- Blood Moon relevance 0.15 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
- Fated Firepower relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (9 of 229 decks)
- Spiteful Banditry relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (8 of 229 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Fiery Inscription relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (8 of 229 decks)
- Mechanized Warfare relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (8 of 229 decks)
- Double Vision relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
- Guild Artisan relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.09 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Sticky Fingers relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
All instants (50)
- Eldrazi Confluence relevance 0.60 · 17.9% (41 of 229 decks)
- Raphael's Technique relevance 0.46 · 25.8% (59 of 229 decks)
- Final Fortune relevance 0.40 · 26.6% (61 of 229 decks)
- Flare of Duplication relevance 0.29 · 43.7% (100 of 229 decks)
- The Last Agni Kai relevance 0.34 · 27.5% (63 of 229 decks)
- Pyrokinesis relevance 0.35 · 21.8% (50 of 229 decks)
- Reiterate relevance 0.34 · 24.9% (57 of 229 decks)
- Desperate Ritual relevance 0.26 · 46.7% (107 of 229 decks)
- Pyretic Ritual relevance 0.23 · 49.3% (113 of 229 decks)
- Laughing Mad relevance 0.31 · 11.8% (27 of 229 decks)
- Flashback relevance 0.27 · 15.3% (35 of 229 decks)
- Cathartic Pyre relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (23 of 229 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.21 · 39.7% (91 of 229 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.21 · 36.7% (84 of 229 decks)
- Fiery Temper relevance 0.32 · 5.7% (13 of 229 decks)
- March of Reckless Joy relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (13 of 229 decks)
- Electric Revelation relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (14 of 229 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.19 · 34.5% (79 of 229 decks)
- Seething Song relevance 0.14 · 56.3% (129 of 229 decks)
- Fateful Showdown relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (8 of 229 decks)
- Decaying Time Loop relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (9 of 229 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.14 · 54.6% (125 of 229 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.18 · 25.8% (59 of 229 decks)
- Gut Shot relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (12 of 229 decks)
- Vivi's Persistence relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (9 of 229 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.15 · 43.7% (100 of 229 decks)
- Bolt Bend relevance 0.18 · 26.6% (61 of 229 decks)
- Fork relevance 0.26 · 4.4% (10 of 229 decks)
- Increasing Vengeance relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (12 of 229 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.14 · 38.0% (87 of 229 decks)
- Return the Favor relevance 0.15 · 23.6% (54 of 229 decks)
- Ghostfire Slice relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (10 of 229 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.14 · 30.6% (70 of 229 decks)
- Reverberate relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (19 of 229 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.15 · 22.3% (51 of 229 decks)
- Tibalt's Trickery relevance 0.15 · 15.7% (36 of 229 decks)
- Dual Strike relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Choreographed Sparks relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (53 of 229 decks)
- Opera Love Song relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Thunderclap relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
- Twinferno relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (8 of 229 decks)
- Fireblast relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
- Battle Hymn relevance 0.14 · 7.4% (17 of 229 decks)
- Wild Magic Surge relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Wild Ricochet relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Vision of Love relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (6 of 229 decks)
- Sazacap's Brew relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Invoke Calamity relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (6 of 229 decks)
- Display of Power relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Kindle the Inner Flame relevance 0.65 · 34.5% (79 of 229 decks)
- Electroduplicate relevance 0.42 · 68.1% (156 of 229 decks)
- Heat Shimmer relevance 0.45 · 57.2% (131 of 229 decks)
- Molten Duplication relevance 0.39 · 52.8% (121 of 229 decks)
- Twinflame relevance 0.35 · 57.2% (131 of 229 decks)
- Bonus Round relevance 0.44 · 31.0% (71 of 229 decks)
- Will of the Jeskai relevance 0.38 · 44.1% (101 of 229 decks)
- Warrior's Oath relevance 0.48 · 16.6% (38 of 229 decks)
- Infernal Plunge relevance 0.40 · 33.2% (76 of 229 decks)
- Change of Fortune relevance 0.43 · 18.3% (42 of 229 decks)
- Snort relevance 0.39 · 26.2% (60 of 229 decks)
- Devastating Onslaught relevance 0.37 · 27.5% (63 of 229 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.29 · 50.2% (115 of 229 decks)
- Past in Flames relevance 0.30 · 44.1% (101 of 229 decks)
- Strike It Rich relevance 0.31 · 38.9% (89 of 229 decks)
- Scrap Mastery relevance 0.38 · 14.4% (33 of 229 decks)
- Burning Inquiry relevance 0.37 · 15.3% (35 of 229 decks)
- Trash for Treasure relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (43 of 229 decks)
- Mizzix's Mastery relevance 0.31 · 28.4% (65 of 229 decks)
- Geosurge relevance 0.35 · 17.0% (39 of 229 decks)
- Glimpse the Impossible relevance 0.31 · 25.8% (59 of 229 decks)
- Reckless Handling relevance 0.31 · 24.9% (57 of 229 decks)
- Grapeshot relevance 0.28 · 35.4% (81 of 229 decks)
- Nibelheim Aflame relevance 0.32 · 13.1% (30 of 229 decks)
- Shattered Perception relevance 0.39 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Wheel of Fortune relevance 0.26 · 29.7% (68 of 229 decks)
- Wheel of Misfortune relevance 0.25 · 21.4% (49 of 229 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.14 · 76.9% (176 of 229 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.19 · 45.9% (105 of 229 decks)
- Last Chance relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (14 of 229 decks)
- Storm of Memories relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (9 of 229 decks)
- Grab the Prize relevance 0.24 · 11.8% (27 of 229 decks)
- Reforge the Soul relevance 0.23 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
- Wheel of Fate relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (10 of 229 decks)
- Steal the Show relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (9 of 229 decks)
- Cathartic Reunion relevance 0.22 · 12.7% (29 of 229 decks)
- Path of the Pyromancer relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (10 of 229 decks)
- Highway Robbery relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Wrenn's Resolve relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (22 of 229 decks)
- Winds of Change relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.19 · 16.6% (38 of 229 decks)
- Overmaster relevance 0.23 · 5.7% (13 of 229 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.13 · 48.0% (110 of 229 decks)
- Romantic Rendezvous relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (10 of 229 decks)
- Sorceress's Schemes relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (8 of 229 decks)
- Reckless Impulse relevance 0.21 · 8.3% (19 of 229 decks)
- Shreds of Sanity relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (6 of 229 decks)
- Galvanic Relay relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Anzrag's Rampage relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Alchemist's Greeting relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Daretti, Scrap Savant relevance 0.35 · 22.7% (52 of 229 decks)
- Chandra, Flameshaper relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Kaldheim // Pyre of the World Tree relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (6 of 229 decks)
All utility lands (36)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.39 · 27.5% (63 of 229 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.37 · 21.4% (49 of 229 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.26 · 42.4% (97 of 229 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.33 · 12.2% (28 of 229 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.37 · 7.0% (16 of 229 decks)
- Shatterskull Smashing // Shatterskull, the Hammer Pass relevance 0.26 · 26.2% (60 of 229 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.29 · 7.4% (17 of 229 decks)
- Sundering Eruption // Volcanic Fissure relevance 0.21 · 21.0% (48 of 229 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.22 · 18.3% (42 of 229 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.19 · 28.8% (66 of 229 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.21 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.20 · 15.3% (35 of 229 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (8 of 229 decks)
- Lindblum, Industrial Regency // Mage Siege relevance 0.23 · 5.7% (13 of 229 decks)
- Northampton Farm relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (6 of 229 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.18 · 11.8% (27 of 229 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.19 · 9.6% (22 of 229 decks)
- Fire Nation Palace relevance 0.20 · 8.7% (20 of 229 decks)
- Barbarian Ring relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (10 of 229 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.22 · 3.9% (9 of 229 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
- Mines of Moria relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (19 of 229 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (53 of 229 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (23 of 229 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 0.13 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
- Sokenzan, Crucible of Defiance relevance 0.15 · 3.9% (9 of 229 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.13 · 7.0% (16 of 229 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.12 · 8.3% (19 of 229 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (6 of 229 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.10 · 4.8% (11 of 229 decks)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
- Castle Embereth relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (7 of 229 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (19)
- Sandstone Needle relevance 0.38 · 24.5% (56 of 229 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.36 · 25.3% (58 of 229 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.36 · 19.7% (45 of 229 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.34 · 23.1% (53 of 229 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.34 · 24.0% (55 of 229 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.34 · 22.7% (52 of 229 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.33 · 23.1% (53 of 229 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.35 · 17.9% (41 of 229 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.30 · 27.1% (62 of 229 decks)
- Brass's Tunnel-Grinder // Tecutlan, the Searing Rift relevance 0.29 · 18.3% (42 of 229 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.23 · 28.4% (65 of 229 decks)
- Great Furnace relevance 0.22 · 22.3% (51 of 229 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.25 · 10.9% (25 of 229 decks)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (6 of 229 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (10 of 229 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.15 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (5 of 229 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (6 of 229 decks)
- Mountain relevance 0.01 · 89.1% (204 of 229 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Casey Jones, Vigilante, from 229 real Commander decks.