Cards like Reckless Fireweaver
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Izzet Signet
5.8× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Temur decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Izzet Signet 38%
- Simic Signet 38%
- Gruul Signet 29%
Cards like Xorn
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Xorn 44%
- Jolene, the Plunder Queen 29%
Cards like Talisman of Creativity
2.2× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Temur decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other Temur decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.43 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Big Score
5.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Memory Lapse
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards like Crack Open
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Crack Open 20%
- Root Out 8%
Cards like Strionic Resonator
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Crime Novelist
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Crime Novelist 19%
- Gleaming Geardrake 13%
Cards like Parallel Lives
2.9× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Parallel Lives 22%
- Doubling Season 11%
- Primal Vigor 2%
Cards like Reverse Engineer
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Tidings, Unexplained Vision, Concentrate, Vivisurgeon's Insight, Brilliant Plan, Shared Discovery, Eagle Vision
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.8× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.73 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards like Shimmer Dragon
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Hellkite Tyrant
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Goldspan Dragon
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Temur decks
Cards like Kappa Cannoneer
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Machinesmith Automaton
Cards like Fabricate
15× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Fabricate 17%
- Scour for Scrap 10%
Cards like Old Gnawbone
1.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Swan Song
2.8× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Swan Song 17%
- Strix Serenade 3%
All top picks (50)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.42 · 56.4% (75 of 133 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.44 · 39.1% (52 of 133 decks)
- Expel from Orazca relevance 0.45 · 32.3% (43 of 133 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.42 · 35.3% (47 of 133 decks)
- Alchemist's Talent relevance 0.44 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Xorn relevance 0.34 · 43.6% (58 of 133 decks)
- Magda, the Hoardmaster relevance 0.42 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Goldspan Dragon relevance 0.35 · 37.6% (50 of 133 decks)
- Wizened Snitches relevance 0.44 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Field of Dreams relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.31 · 45.1% (60 of 133 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.36 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Hellkite Tyrant relevance 0.34 · 34.6% (46 of 133 decks)
- Rain of Riches relevance 0.39 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.33 · 32.3% (43 of 133 decks)
- Professional Face-Breaker relevance 0.31 · 39.1% (52 of 133 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.25 · 60.2% (80 of 133 decks)
- Wand of Denial relevance 0.43 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Gimbal, Gremlin Prodigy relevance 0.38 · 16.5% (22 of 133 decks)
- Ingenious Artillerist relevance 0.32 · 33.1% (44 of 133 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.26 · 53.4% (71 of 133 decks)
- Jolene, the Plunder Queen relevance 0.33 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Hedron Detonator relevance 0.33 · 30.1% (40 of 133 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.40 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Smaug the Magnificent relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Old Gnawbone relevance 0.36 · 18.8% (25 of 133 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.24 · 57.1% (76 of 133 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.34 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Plargg and Nassari relevance 0.41 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.36 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.25 · 51.9% (69 of 133 decks)
- Wild-Magic Sorcerer relevance 0.40 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.28 · 40.6% (54 of 133 decks)
- Magda, Brazen Outlaw relevance 0.38 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.18 · 83.5% (111 of 133 decks)
- Hinder relevance 0.42 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.28 · 37.6% (50 of 133 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.28 · 37.6% (50 of 133 decks)
- Invert Polarity relevance 0.39 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.27 · 38.3% (51 of 133 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.41 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.34 · 17.3% (23 of 133 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.32 · 21.1% (28 of 133 decks)
- Breeches, the Blastmaker relevance 0.39 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.23 · 53.4% (71 of 133 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.27 · 38.3% (51 of 133 decks)
- Vedalken Humiliator relevance 0.32 · 18.8% (25 of 133 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.35 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.21 · 63.2% (84 of 133 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.29 · 27.8% (37 of 133 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.42 · 35.3% (47 of 133 decks)
- Xorn relevance 0.34 · 43.6% (58 of 133 decks)
- Magda, the Hoardmaster relevance 0.42 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Goldspan Dragon relevance 0.35 · 37.6% (50 of 133 decks)
- Wizened Snitches relevance 0.44 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Hellkite Tyrant relevance 0.34 · 34.6% (46 of 133 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.33 · 32.3% (43 of 133 decks)
- Professional Face-Breaker relevance 0.31 · 39.1% (52 of 133 decks)
- Gimbal, Gremlin Prodigy relevance 0.38 · 16.5% (22 of 133 decks)
- Ingenious Artillerist relevance 0.32 · 33.1% (44 of 133 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.26 · 53.4% (71 of 133 decks)
- Jolene, the Plunder Queen relevance 0.33 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Hedron Detonator relevance 0.33 · 30.1% (40 of 133 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.40 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Smaug the Magnificent relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Old Gnawbone relevance 0.36 · 18.8% (25 of 133 decks)
- Plargg and Nassari relevance 0.41 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
- Wild-Magic Sorcerer relevance 0.40 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Magda, Brazen Outlaw relevance 0.38 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.18 · 83.5% (111 of 133 decks)
- Breeches, the Blastmaker relevance 0.39 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.23 · 53.4% (71 of 133 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.27 · 38.3% (51 of 133 decks)
- Vedalken Humiliator relevance 0.32 · 18.8% (25 of 133 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.21 · 63.2% (84 of 133 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.35 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.24 · 45.9% (61 of 133 decks)
- Generous Plunderer relevance 0.38 · 9.0% (12 of 133 decks)
- Ancient Copper Dragon relevance 0.36 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Crime Novelist relevance 0.31 · 18.8% (25 of 133 decks)
- Pain Distributor relevance 0.34 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Biotech Specialist relevance 0.28 · 27.8% (37 of 133 decks)
- Displaced Dinosaurs relevance 0.30 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Roxanne, Starfall Savant relevance 0.26 · 31.6% (42 of 133 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.22 · 47.4% (63 of 133 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.22 · 45.9% (61 of 133 decks)
- Draconic Visitor relevance 0.36 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Treasure Nabber relevance 0.36 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.34 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Weftstalker Ardent relevance 0.28 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.22 · 39.8% (53 of 133 decks)
- Shao Jun relevance 0.33 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Cutthroat Negotiator relevance 0.33 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 0.27 · 17.3% (23 of 133 decks)
- Gilded Goose relevance 0.24 · 30.8% (41 of 133 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.22 · 39.1% (52 of 133 decks)
- Hellkite Igniter relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.26 · 19.5% (26 of 133 decks)
- Haywire Mite relevance 0.28 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.42 · 56.4% (75 of 133 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.31 · 45.1% (60 of 133 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.36 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.25 · 60.2% (80 of 133 decks)
- Wand of Denial relevance 0.43 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.24 · 57.1% (76 of 133 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.28 · 37.6% (50 of 133 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.28 · 37.6% (50 of 133 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.35 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.29 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.32 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.26 · 32.3% (43 of 133 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.30 · 15.0% (20 of 133 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.31 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.33 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
- Pyxis of Pandemonium relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.30 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.30 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.29 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 0.35 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.24 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.22 · 36.1% (48 of 133 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.29 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Skyclave Relic relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.30 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.25 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.25 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.21 · 30.1% (40 of 133 decks)
- Chaos Wand relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.28 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Diamond Pick-Axe relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Dragonspark Reactor relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Cursed Mirror relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.21 · 20.3% (27 of 133 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Mycosynth Lattice relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.21 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.17 · 31.6% (42 of 133 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.17 · 27.1% (36 of 133 decks)
All enchantments (46)
- Alchemist's Talent relevance 0.44 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Field of Dreams relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Rain of Riches relevance 0.39 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.28 · 40.6% (54 of 133 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.33 · 12.0% (16 of 133 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.33 · 12.0% (16 of 133 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 0.26 · 27.8% (37 of 133 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Ghirapur Aether Grid relevance 0.29 · 17.3% (23 of 133 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.28 · 21.8% (29 of 133 decks)
- Spiteful Banditry relevance 0.34 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Aid from the Cowl relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Stolen Strategy relevance 0.35 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.32 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.30 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.25 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Armor Wars relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.18 · 46.6% (62 of 133 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.26 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Fae Offering relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Passionate Archaeologist relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Spider-Verse relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.22 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Powerbalance relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Weapons Manufacturing relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Charred Foyer // Warped Space relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Weirding Wood relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- City of Death relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Ninja Pizza relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Psychic Surgery relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Ongoing Investigation relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Heaven Sent relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
All instants (50)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.44 · 39.1% (52 of 133 decks)
- Expel from Orazca relevance 0.45 · 32.3% (43 of 133 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.34 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Hinder relevance 0.42 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Invert Polarity relevance 0.39 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.41 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.34 · 17.3% (23 of 133 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.29 · 27.8% (37 of 133 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.32 · 16.5% (22 of 133 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.30 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.26 · 16.5% (22 of 133 decks)
- Cerebral Download relevance 0.33 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.20 · 42.1% (56 of 133 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.29 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.28 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.27 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.26 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.19 · 39.1% (52 of 133 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.25 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Shellshock relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Bottle-Cap Blast relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (12 of 133 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.20 · 33.8% (45 of 133 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.28 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Metallic Rebuke relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.26 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.23 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.33 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.23 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Gold Rush relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.26 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.19 · 24.1% (32 of 133 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.36 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.25 · 51.9% (69 of 133 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.27 · 38.3% (51 of 133 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.32 · 21.1% (28 of 133 decks)
- Crack Open relevance 0.32 · 19.5% (26 of 133 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.34 · 12.0% (16 of 133 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.36 · 9.0% (12 of 133 decks)
- Inspired Tinkering relevance 0.38 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.31 · 16.5% (22 of 133 decks)
- Hit the Mother Lode relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Pirate's Pillage relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Saheeli's Artistry relevance 0.28 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Seize the Spotlight relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.29 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.35 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.30 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.24 · 17.3% (23 of 133 decks)
- Root Out relevance 0.28 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.26 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Strike It Rich relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Ensnared by the Mara relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.21 · 13.5% (18 of 133 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.19 · 20.3% (27 of 133 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.14 · 45.1% (60 of 133 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.19 · 9.0% (12 of 133 decks)
- Indomitable Creativity relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Dance with Calamity relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Planetary Annihilation relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Fiery Confluence relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Many Partings relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Insurrection relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Chain Reaction relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (16)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.32 · 16.5% (22 of 133 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.31 · 12.0% (16 of 133 decks)
- Saheeli, the Gifted relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Saheeli, Filigree Master relevance 0.26 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
- Saheeli, Sublime Artificer relevance 0.21 · 21.8% (29 of 133 decks)
- Daretti, Scrap Savant relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Karn, Living Legacy relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Chandra, Spark Hunter relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Oko, the Ringleader relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Saheeli Rai relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Kaladesh // Aetherwing, Golden-Scale Flagship relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Moonring Island relevance 0.44 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.23 · 33.1% (44 of 133 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.22 · 36.1% (48 of 133 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.25 · 23.3% (31 of 133 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.29 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.25 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.28 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.25 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.26 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.26 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.20 · 31.6% (42 of 133 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.22 · 17.3% (23 of 133 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Mines of Moria relevance 0.24 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.24 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.24 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.19 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.19 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.21 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.15 · 39.1% (52 of 133 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.19 · 15.0% (20 of 133 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.22 · 9.0% (12 of 133 decks)
- Fiery Islet relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 18.0% (24 of 133 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (3 of 133 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.11 · 26.3% (35 of 133 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (4 of 133 decks)
All lands (50)
- Silverbluff Bridge relevance 0.24 · 62.4% (83 of 133 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.22 · 69.2% (92 of 133 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.20 · 77.4% (103 of 133 decks)
- Great Furnace relevance 0.21 · 69.2% (92 of 133 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.29 · 36.1% (48 of 133 decks)
- Treasure Map // Treasure Cove relevance 0.35 · 11.3% (15 of 133 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.28 · 27.1% (36 of 133 decks)
- Slagwoods Bridge relevance 0.18 · 54.1% (72 of 133 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.17 · 57.1% (76 of 133 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.19 · 43.6% (58 of 133 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.20 · 39.8% (53 of 133 decks)
- Molten Tributary relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.30 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.25 · 15.0% (20 of 133 decks)
- Storm the Vault // Vault of Catlacan relevance 0.23 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.20 · 35.3% (47 of 133 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (19 of 133 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.24 · 15.8% (21 of 133 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.24 · 15.0% (20 of 133 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.21 · 26.3% (35 of 133 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 12.8% (17 of 133 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (8 of 133 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.18 · 33.1% (44 of 133 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.19 · 31.6% (42 of 133 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (12 of 133 decks)
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.18 · 30.1% (40 of 133 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.23 · 10.5% (14 of 133 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Riverpyre Verge relevance 0.24 · 9.8% (13 of 133 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (10 of 133 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.18 · 30.8% (41 of 133 decks)
- Spirebluff Canal relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
- Frostboil Snarl relevance 0.19 · 26.3% (35 of 133 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.18 · 30.8% (41 of 133 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.19 · 21.8% (29 of 133 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.24 · 8.3% (11 of 133 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.18 · 21.8% (29 of 133 decks)
- Steam Vents relevance 0.13 · 52.6% (70 of 133 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (6 of 133 decks)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (5 of 133 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.18 · 22.6% (30 of 133 decks)
- Volcanic Island relevance 0.22 · 9.0% (12 of 133 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.22 · 9.0% (12 of 133 decks)
- Ferrous Lake relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (7 of 133 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Rashmi and Ragavan, from 133 real Commander decks.