Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-25 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Vision Skeins relevance 0.64 · 67.9% (214 of 315 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.55 · 73.3% (231 of 315 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.52 · 77.5% (244 of 315 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.42 · 79.0% (249 of 315 decks)
- Prosperity relevance 0.58 · 46.3% (146 of 315 decks)
- Anvil of Bogardan relevance 0.65 · 34.0% (107 of 315 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.51 · 43.2% (136 of 315 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.56 · 34.3% (108 of 315 decks)
- Lore Broker relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (59 of 315 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.57 · 27.3% (86 of 315 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.40 · 57.8% (182 of 315 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.46 · 43.5% (137 of 315 decks)
- Skyscribing relevance 0.60 · 15.6% (49 of 315 decks)
- Detective of the Month relevance 0.50 · 32.7% (103 of 315 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.50 · 29.5% (93 of 315 decks)
- Fascination relevance 0.55 · 20.3% (64 of 315 decks)
- Minn, Wily Illusionist relevance 0.45 · 41.3% (130 of 315 decks)
- Words of Wisdom relevance 0.52 · 22.5% (71 of 315 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.41 · 45.4% (143 of 315 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.35 · 59.4% (187 of 315 decks)
- Alandra, Sky Dreamer relevance 0.36 · 54.9% (173 of 315 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.42 · 39.4% (124 of 315 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.49 · 24.1% (76 of 315 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.53 · 16.2% (51 of 315 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.44 · 33.0% (104 of 315 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.51 · 18.7% (59 of 315 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 0.48 · 23.8% (75 of 315 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.40 · 38.7% (122 of 315 decks)
- Dakra Mystic relevance 0.52 · 12.7% (40 of 315 decks)
- Mischievous Mystic relevance 0.35 · 47.0% (148 of 315 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.45 · 20.0% (63 of 315 decks)
- Otherworld Atlas relevance 0.53 · 10.5% (33 of 315 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.37 · 39.7% (125 of 315 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.40 · 30.5% (96 of 315 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.42 · 22.9% (72 of 315 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.38 · 31.4% (99 of 315 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.43 · 16.8% (53 of 315 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.42 · 17.5% (55 of 315 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.30 · 46.0% (145 of 315 decks)
- Faerie Vandal relevance 0.43 · 13.7% (43 of 315 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.26 · 62.2% (196 of 315 decks)
- Howling Golem relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (24 of 315 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.34 · 32.7% (103 of 315 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.41 · 13.3% (42 of 315 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.33 · 32.4% (102 of 315 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.30 · 42.2% (133 of 315 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.27 · 49.5% (156 of 315 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.30 · 38.1% (120 of 315 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.31 · 34.3% (108 of 315 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.25 · 54.0% (170 of 315 decks)
Card Stacks
31
Card Stacks
31Showing 1-2 of 31
Cards like Howling Mine
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Howling Mine 79%
- Anvil of Bogardan 34%
- Font of Mythos 24%
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thought Vessel
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Prosperity
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Prosperity 46%
- Fascination 20%
- Skyscribing 16%
- Mathemagics 5%
Other options: Stroke of Genius, Silver Scrutiny, Mind Spring, Braingeyser
Cards like Wizard Class
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Vision Skeins
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Vision Skeins 68%
- Words of Wisdom 23%
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Dictate of Kruphix
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Dictate of Kruphix 77%
- Well of Ideas 19%
Cards like Commandeer
6.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Commandeer 32%
- Misdirection 21%
- Disrupting Shoal 10%
- Snapback 9%
Cards like Oneirophage
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Oneirophage 17%
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant 16%
- Clinquant Skymage 15%
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment 4%
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger 2%
Other options: Ravenhill Flock
Cards like Pongify
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 44%
- Rapid Hybridization 43%
Cards like Lore Broker
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lore Broker 19%
- Dakra Mystic 13%
Cards like Triskaidekaphile
7.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Standstill
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Standstill 27%
- Forced Fruition 17%
Cards like Bender's Waterskin
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Spectral Searchlight, Patriar's Seal
Cards like Ivory Tower
9.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards like Aetherize
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards like Force of Negation
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 22%
- Force of Will 17%
Cards like Psychic Corrosion
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Foil
7.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Teferi's Ageless Insight
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Sisay's Ring, Ring of the Lucii, Ichor Elixir, Ur-Golem's Eye
Cards like Cryptic Command
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sky Diamond
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 22%
- Prismatic Lens 4%
- Coldsteel Heart 3%
Other options: Star Compass, Corrupted Grafstone, Guardian Idol, Obsidian Obelisk
Cards like Kami of the Crescent Moon
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Windfall
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 80%
- Mana Vault 15%
- Grim Monolith 9%
- Basalt Monolith 2%
Cards like Body of Knowledge
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Body of Knowledge 23%
- Sturmgeist 3%
Cards like Swan Song
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 34%
- Strix Serenade 10%
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.55 · 73.3% (231 of 315 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.51 · 43.2% (136 of 315 decks)
- Lore Broker relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (59 of 315 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.40 · 57.8% (182 of 315 decks)
- Detective of the Month relevance 0.50 · 32.7% (103 of 315 decks)
- Minn, Wily Illusionist relevance 0.45 · 41.3% (130 of 315 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.41 · 45.4% (143 of 315 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.35 · 59.4% (187 of 315 decks)
- Alandra, Sky Dreamer relevance 0.36 · 54.9% (173 of 315 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.42 · 39.4% (124 of 315 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 0.48 · 23.8% (75 of 315 decks)
- Dakra Mystic relevance 0.52 · 12.7% (40 of 315 decks)
- Mischievous Mystic relevance 0.35 · 47.0% (148 of 315 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.40 · 30.5% (96 of 315 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.42 · 22.9% (72 of 315 decks)
- Faerie Vandal relevance 0.43 · 13.7% (43 of 315 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.26 · 62.2% (196 of 315 decks)
- Howling Golem relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (24 of 315 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.34 · 32.7% (103 of 315 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.27 · 49.5% (156 of 315 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.30 · 38.1% (120 of 315 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.25 · 54.0% (170 of 315 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.36 · 16.2% (51 of 315 decks)
- Knowledge Seeker relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (26 of 315 decks)
- Jace's Archivist relevance 0.36 · 17.5% (55 of 315 decks)
- Oneirophage relevance 0.35 · 16.5% (52 of 315 decks)
- Clinquant Skymage relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (46 of 315 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.32 · 23.5% (74 of 315 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.33 · 15.9% (50 of 315 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.35 · 12.7% (40 of 315 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 0.36 · 11.4% (36 of 315 decks)
- Viseling relevance 0.39 · 6.0% (19 of 315 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.34 · 12.4% (39 of 315 decks)
- Zenith Chronicler relevance 0.37 · 7.6% (24 of 315 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.30 · 18.7% (59 of 315 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.26 · 27.6% (87 of 315 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.29 · 14.9% (47 of 315 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.21 · 45.1% (142 of 315 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (25 of 315 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.30 · 12.7% (40 of 315 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.31 · 10.5% (33 of 315 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.27 · 13.3% (42 of 315 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.27 · 12.4% (39 of 315 decks)
- Erudite Wizard relevance 0.36 · 4.1% (13 of 315 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.30 · 8.3% (26 of 315 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (30 of 315 decks)
- Thopter Mechanic relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (12 of 315 decks)
- Leveler relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (15 of 315 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.29 · 7.3% (23 of 315 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (21 of 315 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All artifacts (50)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.42 · 79.0% (249 of 315 decks)
- Anvil of Bogardan relevance 0.65 · 34.0% (107 of 315 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.46 · 43.5% (137 of 315 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.50 · 29.5% (93 of 315 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.49 · 24.1% (76 of 315 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.53 · 16.2% (51 of 315 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.45 · 20.0% (63 of 315 decks)
- Otherworld Atlas relevance 0.53 · 10.5% (33 of 315 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.38 · 31.4% (99 of 315 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.43 · 16.8% (53 of 315 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.30 · 42.2% (133 of 315 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.27 · 44.1% (139 of 315 decks)
- Iron Maiden relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (24 of 315 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.41 · 7.0% (22 of 315 decks)
- Ebony Owl Netsuke relevance 0.41 · 5.1% (16 of 315 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (32 of 315 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.34 · 9.5% (30 of 315 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.30 · 12.4% (39 of 315 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (19 of 315 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (15 of 315 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (28 of 315 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (28 of 315 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.30 · 8.9% (28 of 315 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.21 · 34.9% (110 of 315 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.25 · 17.5% (55 of 315 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.24 · 15.2% (48 of 315 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (34 of 315 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.24 · 12.7% (40 of 315 decks)
- Black Vise relevance 0.36 · 3.5% (11 of 315 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.22 · 20.6% (65 of 315 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.26 · 9.2% (29 of 315 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (33 of 315 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (16 of 315 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.22 · 16.2% (51 of 315 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.24 · 10.5% (33 of 315 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (17 of 315 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (25 of 315 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.11 · 80.0% (252 of 315 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.20 · 18.7% (59 of 315 decks)
- Sword of War and Peace relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (10 of 315 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.23 · 10.8% (34 of 315 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.19 · 21.6% (68 of 315 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.23 · 9.5% (30 of 315 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.21 · 12.7% (40 of 315 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.21 · 12.4% (39 of 315 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.26 · 4.4% (14 of 315 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.24 · 7.3% (23 of 315 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (26 of 315 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (13 of 315 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.22 · 9.5% (30 of 315 decks)
Enchantments
41
Enchantments
41 Showing 1-25 of 41
All enchantments (41)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.52 · 77.5% (244 of 315 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.57 · 27.3% (86 of 315 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.51 · 18.7% (59 of 315 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.42 · 17.5% (55 of 315 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.30 · 46.0% (145 of 315 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.31 · 34.3% (108 of 315 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.25 · 51.4% (162 of 315 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.39 · 11.1% (35 of 315 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.37 · 7.9% (25 of 315 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.33 · 11.7% (37 of 315 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.29 · 19.4% (61 of 315 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (45 of 315 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.23 · 36.2% (114 of 315 decks)
- Meishin, the Mind Cage relevance 0.39 · 4.1% (13 of 315 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (26 of 315 decks)
- Curse of Verbosity relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (16 of 315 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.30 · 9.2% (29 of 315 decks)
- Thought Reflection relevance 0.32 · 4.8% (15 of 315 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (26 of 315 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (32 of 315 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (45 of 315 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.28 · 5.7% (18 of 315 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.26 · 8.3% (26 of 315 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (13 of 315 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (16 of 315 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (29 of 315 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.31 · 3.2% (10 of 315 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.15 · 34.0% (107 of 315 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.16 · 25.7% (81 of 315 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (14 of 315 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.14 · 23.2% (73 of 315 decks)
- Kitnap relevance 0.29 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (8 of 315 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (14 of 315 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All instants (50)
- Vision Skeins relevance 0.64 · 67.9% (214 of 315 decks)
- Words of Wisdom relevance 0.52 · 22.5% (71 of 315 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.40 · 38.7% (122 of 315 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.37 · 39.7% (125 of 315 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.41 · 13.3% (42 of 315 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.33 · 32.4% (102 of 315 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.41 · 9.5% (30 of 315 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.37 · 12.1% (38 of 315 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.32 · 20.6% (65 of 315 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.33 · 11.1% (35 of 315 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (28 of 315 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.28 · 19.4% (61 of 315 decks)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (26 of 315 decks)
- Wheel and Deal relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (12 of 315 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (26 of 315 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.27 · 14.0% (44 of 315 decks)
- Forbid relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (16 of 315 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.15 · 65.1% (205 of 315 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.26 · 12.7% (40 of 315 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (21 of 315 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (21 of 315 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.24 · 15.6% (49 of 315 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (27 of 315 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (17 of 315 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.26 · 10.2% (32 of 315 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.21 · 22.2% (70 of 315 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.27 · 7.9% (25 of 315 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.22 · 15.6% (49 of 315 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (32 of 315 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.21 · 21.0% (66 of 315 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.25 · 8.6% (27 of 315 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.23 · 12.7% (40 of 315 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.19 · 25.1% (79 of 315 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.24 · 9.8% (31 of 315 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.18 · 29.8% (94 of 315 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.21 · 16.5% (52 of 315 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.16 · 42.5% (134 of 315 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (22 of 315 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.24 · 7.3% (23 of 315 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.19 · 17.5% (55 of 315 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.15 · 42.9% (135 of 315 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.21 · 12.7% (40 of 315 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (21 of 315 decks)
- It'll Quench Ya! relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (12 of 315 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (35 of 315 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.16 · 33.7% (106 of 315 decks)
- Intellectual Offering relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (12 of 315 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.13 · 49.2% (155 of 315 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (22 of 315 decks)
Sorceries
42
Sorceries
42 Showing 1-25 of 42
All sorceries (42)
- Prosperity relevance 0.58 · 46.3% (146 of 315 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.56 · 34.3% (108 of 315 decks)
- Skyscribing relevance 0.60 · 15.6% (49 of 315 decks)
- Fascination relevance 0.55 · 20.3% (64 of 315 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.44 · 33.0% (104 of 315 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.22 · 41.9% (132 of 315 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (26 of 315 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.30 · 10.2% (32 of 315 decks)
- Flux relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (15 of 315 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.32 · 4.8% (15 of 315 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (19 of 315 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (22 of 315 decks)
- Tales of the Ancestors relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (10 of 315 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.24 · 11.4% (36 of 315 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.24 · 9.5% (30 of 315 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.23 · 10.8% (34 of 315 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.27 · 4.8% (15 of 315 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (14 of 315 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (11 of 315 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (23 of 315 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (15 of 315 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (13 of 315 decks)
- Secret of Bloodbending relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (10 of 315 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (10 of 315 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (8 of 315 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (13 of 315 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
- Waterbending Lesson relevance 0.26 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (14 of 315 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (11 of 315 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.15 · 8.9% (28 of 315 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (12 of 315 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.14 · 9.2% (29 of 315 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (11 of 315 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 10.8% (34 of 315 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (8 of 315 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (8 of 315 decks)
Planeswalkers
5
Planeswalkers
5 Showing 1-5 of 5
All planeswalkers (5)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.35 · 20.3% (64 of 315 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.35 · 12.4% (39 of 315 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.25 · 33.0% (104 of 315 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (24 of 315 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (10 of 315 decks)
Utility Lands
36
Utility Lands
36 Showing 1-25 of 36
All utility lands (36)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.47 · 43.5% (137 of 315 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.47 · 41.9% (132 of 315 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.31 · 24.8% (78 of 315 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.26 · 11.7% (37 of 315 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.22 · 21.9% (69 of 315 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (35 of 315 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.22 · 21.0% (66 of 315 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (105 of 315 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (20 of 315 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (27 of 315 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.19 · 21.9% (69 of 315 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.25 · 5.7% (18 of 315 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.19 · 17.1% (54 of 315 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 78.1% (246 of 315 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (18 of 315 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (18 of 315 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.16 · 24.4% (77 of 315 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (20 of 315 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (11 of 315 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.18 · 9.2% (29 of 315 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.17 · 8.6% (27 of 315 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (17 of 315 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (8 of 315 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (20 of 315 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 40.0% (126 of 315 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.14 · 7.3% (23 of 315 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (12 of 315 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (11 of 315 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (8 of 315 decks)
Lands
16
Lands
16 Showing 1-16 of 16
All lands (16)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (23 of 315 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (21 of 315 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.26 · 11.1% (35 of 315 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.23 · 13.7% (43 of 315 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.20 · 16.5% (52 of 315 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.23 · 8.6% (27 of 315 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 6.7% (21 of 315 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.22 · 6.7% (21 of 315 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (19 of 315 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (20 of 315 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (20 of 315 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (8 of 315 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.14 · 7.6% (24 of 315 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (7 of 315 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 88.9% (280 of 315 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for The Unagi of Kyoshi Island, from 315 real Commander decks.