Cards like Rite of Replication
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
3.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rite of Replication 69%
- Quasiduplicate 56%
- Cackling Counterpart 56%
- Repudiate // Replicate 50%
- See Double 38%
- Rally the Galadhrim 25%
- Spitting Image 13%
- Fated Infatuation 6%
Other options: Self-Reflection
Cards like Incubation Druid
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Incubation Druid 63%
- Gyre Sage 63%
Cards like Fathom Mage
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Fathom Mage 81%
- Pensive Professor 38%
Other options: Mister Hyde, Monster Within, The Astonishing Ant-Man
Cards like Dreamtide Whale
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Dreamtide Whale 50%
- Flux Channeler 31%
Cards like Flesh Duplicate
7.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Magistrate's Scepter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Magistrate's Scepter 38%
- Lux Cannon 19%
Other options: Blue Mana Battery, Gemstone Array, Green Mana Battery
Cards like Mirror Image
20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mirror Image 44%
- Clone 19%
- Stunt Double 19%
Other options: Waxen Shapethief, Sakashima's Protege
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 25%
- Pongify 19%
Cards like Evolution Witness
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Myojin of Cryptic Dreams
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thrummingbird
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Pollenbright Druid
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Guardian Gladewalker, Satyr Grovedancer, Ironshell Beetle, Sunshower Druid, Dauntless Survivor, Bond Beetle, Kujar Seedsculptor, Timberland Guide
Cards like Voidslime
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Unnatural Restoration
6.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Auroral Procession, Revive, Nature's Spiral, Dryad's Revival, Elven Cache, Creeping Renaissance, Regrowth
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
3.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards like Elvish Mystic
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 25%
- Llanowar Elves 25%
- Fyndhorn Elves 19%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Boreal Druid, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Tribe, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Astral Cornucopia
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Elementalist's Palette, Ventifact Bottle, Kyren Toy
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Simic decks
All top picks (50)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.42 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.38 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.31 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.33 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Heronblade Elite relevance 0.37 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.31 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Mirror Mockery relevance 0.35 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.33 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.33 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.36 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.36 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.28 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.28 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.35 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.35 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.26 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.28 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.27 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.31 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.25 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.28 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Sharktocrab relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.28 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.21 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.28 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Viral Drake relevance 0.31 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.27 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.21 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.19 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.22 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.23 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.22 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ezuri, Stalker of Spheres relevance 0.42 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.38 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.31 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.33 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Heronblade Elite relevance 0.37 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.33 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.36 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.28 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.28 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.26 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.28 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Sharktocrab relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.28 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.28 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Viral Drake relevance 0.31 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Cankerbloom relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.21 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.19 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.23 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Bioessence Hydra relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.24 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Myojin of Cryptic Dreams relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.19 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.18 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Glistener Elf relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Moritte of the Frost relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Deceptive Frostkite relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Ferrafor, Young Yew relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.18 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.18 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 0.20 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Skatewing Spy relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Rampant Rejuvenator relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.19 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.19 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
All artifacts (42)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.31 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.36 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.35 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.31 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.28 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.22 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Agent's Toolkit relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Grimoire of the Dead relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Rotating Fireplace relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Heart of Kiran relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Prosthetic Injector relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Umezawa's Jitte relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Mirror Shield relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Lost Jitte relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Mask of Avacyn relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.10 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Peter Parker's Camera relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Blade of Shared Souls relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Mimic Vat relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.07 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.07 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.04 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.04 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.02 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
All enchantments (46)
- Mirror Mockery relevance 0.35 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.27 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.20 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Dance of Many relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.18 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.16 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Laid to Rest relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Endless Evil relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.14 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Puca's Covenant relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Paradox Zone relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Confounding Conundrum relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Kasmina's Transmutation relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.11 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Followed Footsteps relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.07 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.05 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.05 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All instants (50)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.25 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.27 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.22 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Repudiate // Replicate relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.17 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.16 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Aspirant's Ascent relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Corrupted Resolve relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Hindervines relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.11 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Whirlwind Denial relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Nexus Mentality relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Lazotep Plating relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.08 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.33 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.35 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.21 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.16 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Planewide Celebration relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.15 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.10 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.12 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Distorted Curiosity relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Malamet Battle Glyph relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Freeze in Place relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Aggressive Instinct relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Spitting Image relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Synchronized Charge relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Recollect relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Cone of Cold relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Give // Take relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Saheeli's Artistry relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.07 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All planeswalkers (27)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.18 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Tamiyo, Compleated Sage relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Oko, the Ringleader relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigma Sage relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Oko, Lorwyn Liege // Oko, Shadowmoor Scion relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.30 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.28 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.14 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.18 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.18 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Drannith Ruins relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.14 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Baxter Building relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.09 · 43.8% (7 of 16 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.08 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.07 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.07 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.07 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.05 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.05 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.05 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.04 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.04 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All lands (44)
- Mage-Ring Network relevance 0.38 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.33 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.33 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.25 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.09 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Mirrodin's Core relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Saprazzan Cove relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Rushwood Grove relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Aether Hub relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (4 of 16 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.06 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.10 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.11 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.08 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.09 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.08 · 31.3% (5 of 16 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.08 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.04 · 87.5% (14 of 16 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.07 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.05 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.07 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.07 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.07 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.04 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.04 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.05 · 18.8% (3 of 16 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.05 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.05 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.05 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.05 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.04 · 37.5% (6 of 16 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.05 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.04 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.01 · 100.0% (16 of 16 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 100.0% (16 of 16 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 100.0% (16 of 16 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Roalesk, Apex Hybrid, from 16 real Commander decks.