Cards like Self-Destruct
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Self-Destruct 66%
- Cut Propulsion 65%
Cards like Pyrohemia
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Dark Ritual
3.3× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 45% of other Rakdos decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other Rakdos decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Dark Ritual 66%
- Seething Song 47%
- Pyretic Ritual 23%
- Desperate Ritual 11%
Cards like Big Score
3.3× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Rakdos decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Rakdos decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Big Score 58%
- Unexpected Windfall 44%
- Seize the Spoils 20%
- Pirate's Pillage 7%
Cards like Reckless Fireweaver
13× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Rakdos decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Rakdos decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Marionette Apprentice
5.7× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Rakdos decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Rakdos decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Other options: Psychomancer
Cards like Hellkite Tyrant
16× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Rakdos decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Blazing Sunsteel
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Mayhem Devil
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Rakdos decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Mayhem Devil 76%
- Havoc Jester 15%
Cards like Bolt Bend
3.9× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Rakdos decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Rakdos decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Revel in Riches
17× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Rakdos decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Revel in Riches 45%
- Spiteful Banditry 22%
Cards like Dragonspeaker Shaman
11× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Rakdos decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Professional Face-Breaker
2.6× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Rakdos decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Rakdos decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Rakdos decks
Cards like Goldspan Dragon
3.9× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Rakdos decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Rakdos decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
2.5× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
90% of decks run one or more
vs. 81% of other Rakdos decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Rakdos decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.89 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 90%
- Mana Vault 13%
- Grim Monolith 5%
- Basalt Monolith 2%
Cards like Smaug, Wicked Worm
Over 20× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Rakdos decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Smaug the Magnificent
9.3× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Rakdos decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Ancient Copper Dragon
8.1× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Rakdos decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Deflecting Swat
1.3× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Rakdos decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other Rakdos decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.43 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Deflecting Swat 37%
- Deadly Rollick 22%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
1.5× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Rakdos decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Rakdos decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
- Vampiric Tutor 22%
- Imperial Seal 7%
- Grim Tutor 6%
- Cruel Tutor 1%
Cards like The Reaver Cleaver
2.7× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Rakdos decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Cards like Crackle with Power
2.1× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Rakdos decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Rakdos decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
Other options: Pinnacle of Rage, Furious Reprisal, Cone of Flame, Storm of Steel
Cards like Rain of Riches
14× as likely as other Rakdos decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Rakdos decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Rakdos decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Rakdos decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Cut Propulsion relevance 0.87 · 64.9% (4,337 of 6,679 decks)
- Self-Destruct relevance 0.81 · 66.4% (4,435 of 6,679 decks)
- Pariah's Shield relevance 0.88 · 53.7% (3,589 of 6,679 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 0.77 · 64.3% (4,292 of 6,679 decks)
- Dawnsire, Sunstar Dreadnought relevance 0.87 · 52.0% (3,472 of 6,679 decks)
- Chain Lightning relevance 0.81 · 57.1% (3,816 of 6,679 decks)
- Smaug the Magnificent relevance 0.68 · 73.0% (4,875 of 6,679 decks)
- Pyrohemia relevance 0.73 · 62.6% (4,182 of 6,679 decks)
- Pestilence relevance 0.74 · 60.3% (4,030 of 6,679 decks)
- Star of Extinction relevance 0.80 · 53.0% (3,540 of 6,679 decks)
- Smaug, Wicked Worm relevance 0.70 · 64.3% (4,294 of 6,679 decks)
- Blazing Sunsteel relevance 0.89 · 37.9% (2,531 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragon's Desire relevance 0.84 · 41.2% (2,753 of 6,679 decks)
- Chain Reaction relevance 0.64 · 59.9% (4,002 of 6,679 decks)
- Fiendlash relevance 0.89 · 21.1% (1,409 of 6,679 decks)
- Hellkite Tyrant relevance 0.62 · 55.5% (3,709 of 6,679 decks)
- The Sackville-Bagginses relevance 0.75 · 35.1% (2,342 of 6,679 decks)
- Wrathful Red Dragon relevance 0.78 · 30.6% (2,042 of 6,679 decks)
- Rivaz of the Claw relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (1,671 of 6,679 decks)
- Desolation of Smaug relevance 0.81 · 23.5% (1,569 of 6,679 decks)
- Expedited Inheritance relevance 0.93 · 12.4% (828 of 6,679 decks)
- Goldspan Dragon relevance 0.48 · 74.0% (4,942 of 6,679 decks)
- Dizzying Gaze relevance 0.99 · 9.4% (629 of 6,679 decks)
- Reckless Fireweaver relevance 0.52 · 64.8% (4,331 of 6,679 decks)
- Weftstalker Ardent relevance 0.62 · 47.6% (3,182 of 6,679 decks)
- Flame Slash relevance 0.89 · 13.7% (916 of 6,679 decks)
- Havoc Jester relevance 0.85 · 14.9% (992 of 6,679 decks)
- Requiem Monolith relevance 0.82 · 18.5% (1,233 of 6,679 decks)
- The Misty Mountains Cold relevance 0.77 · 22.9% (1,531 of 6,679 decks)
- Starstorm relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (1,030 of 6,679 decks)
- Ingenious Artillerist relevance 0.68 · 34.5% (2,303 of 6,679 decks)
- Magda, Brazen Outlaw relevance 0.65 · 37.7% (2,521 of 6,679 decks)
- Nadier's Nightblade relevance 0.56 · 50.4% (3,365 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragonspeaker Shaman relevance 0.74 · 23.0% (1,533 of 6,679 decks)
- Smaug, the Great Calamity // Spew Flame relevance 0.87 · 11.0% (738 of 6,679 decks)
- Xorn relevance 0.50 · 60.3% (4,026 of 6,679 decks)
- Last Laugh relevance 0.93 · 8.2% (546 of 6,679 decks)
- Shivan Meteor relevance 0.95 · 6.8% (453 of 6,679 decks)
- Simulacrum relevance 0.93 · 7.5% (501 of 6,679 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.63 · 36.4% (2,433 of 6,679 decks)
- Cavern-Hoard Dragon relevance 0.64 · 34.0% (2,268 of 6,679 decks)
- There and Back Again relevance 0.72 · 23.2% (1,547 of 6,679 decks)
- Exploding Barrel relevance 0.94 · 7.1% (476 of 6,679 decks)
- Mirkwood Bats relevance 0.43 · 71.4% (4,769 of 6,679 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.51 · 53.5% (3,576 of 6,679 decks)
- Alchemist's Talent relevance 0.62 · 34.3% (2,289 of 6,679 decks)
- Revel in Riches relevance 0.55 · 45.3% (3,023 of 6,679 decks)
- Rain of Riches relevance 0.59 · 37.8% (2,526 of 6,679 decks)
- Geosurge relevance 0.90 · 6.8% (452 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragonlord's Servant relevance 0.72 · 17.3% (1,154 of 6,679 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Smaug the Magnificent relevance 0.68 · 73.0% (4,875 of 6,679 decks)
- Smaug, Wicked Worm relevance 0.70 · 64.3% (4,294 of 6,679 decks)
- Hellkite Tyrant relevance 0.62 · 55.5% (3,709 of 6,679 decks)
- The Sackville-Bagginses relevance 0.75 · 35.1% (2,342 of 6,679 decks)
- Wrathful Red Dragon relevance 0.78 · 30.6% (2,042 of 6,679 decks)
- Rivaz of the Claw relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (1,671 of 6,679 decks)
- Goldspan Dragon relevance 0.48 · 74.0% (4,942 of 6,679 decks)
- Reckless Fireweaver relevance 0.52 · 64.8% (4,331 of 6,679 decks)
- Weftstalker Ardent relevance 0.62 · 47.6% (3,182 of 6,679 decks)
- Havoc Jester relevance 0.85 · 14.9% (992 of 6,679 decks)
- Ingenious Artillerist relevance 0.68 · 34.5% (2,303 of 6,679 decks)
- Magda, Brazen Outlaw relevance 0.65 · 37.7% (2,521 of 6,679 decks)
- Nadier's Nightblade relevance 0.56 · 50.4% (3,365 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragonspeaker Shaman relevance 0.74 · 23.0% (1,533 of 6,679 decks)
- Smaug, the Great Calamity // Spew Flame relevance 0.87 · 11.0% (738 of 6,679 decks)
- Xorn relevance 0.50 · 60.3% (4,026 of 6,679 decks)
- Cavern-Hoard Dragon relevance 0.64 · 34.0% (2,268 of 6,679 decks)
- Mirkwood Bats relevance 0.43 · 71.4% (4,769 of 6,679 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.51 · 53.5% (3,576 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragonlord's Servant relevance 0.72 · 17.3% (1,154 of 6,679 decks)
- Disciple of the Vault relevance 0.64 · 27.3% (1,823 of 6,679 decks)
- Ancient Copper Dragon relevance 0.60 · 32.7% (2,187 of 6,679 decks)
- Crime Novelist relevance 0.54 · 42.3% (2,825 of 6,679 decks)
- Draconic Visitor relevance 0.83 · 6.3% (423 of 6,679 decks)
- Knuckles the Echidna relevance 0.60 · 26.3% (1,754 of 6,679 decks)
- Marionette Apprentice relevance 0.49 · 45.9% (3,069 of 6,679 decks)
- Barbed Servitor relevance 0.74 · 11.1% (739 of 6,679 decks)
- Desert Were-Worm relevance 0.79 · 6.0% (404 of 6,679 decks)
- Hellkite Courser relevance 0.80 · 5.4% (361 of 6,679 decks)
- Shadow the Hedgehog relevance 0.71 · 9.3% (618 of 6,679 decks)
- Professional Face-Breaker relevance 0.38 · 61.0% (4,077 of 6,679 decks)
- Mayhem Devil relevance 0.32 · 75.8% (5,065 of 6,679 decks)
- Mastermind Plum relevance 0.68 · 9.2% (613 of 6,679 decks)
- Juri, Master of the Revue relevance 0.54 · 23.4% (1,561 of 6,679 decks)
- Stuffy Doll relevance 0.67 · 8.8% (585 of 6,679 decks)
- Ganax, Astral Hunter relevance 0.65 · 8.8% (588 of 6,679 decks)
- Hedron Detonator relevance 0.73 · 4.9% (326 of 6,679 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.46 · 33.9% (2,265 of 6,679 decks)
- Goldlust Triad relevance 0.60 · 11.9% (797 of 6,679 decks)
- Gadrak, the Crown-Scourge relevance 0.65 · 7.6% (506 of 6,679 decks)
- Magda, the Hoardmaster relevance 0.60 · 10.2% (679 of 6,679 decks)
- Glóin, Dwarf Emissary relevance 0.68 · 5.1% (340 of 6,679 decks)
- Terror of the Peaks relevance 0.55 · 13.8% (923 of 6,679 decks)
- Decadent Dragon // Expensive Taste relevance 0.55 · 13.5% (902 of 6,679 decks)
- Swashbuckler Extraordinaire relevance 0.65 · 5.5% (368 of 6,679 decks)
- Craterclaw Colossus relevance 0.84 · 3.2% (213 of 6,679 decks)
- Twinflame Tyrant relevance 0.53 · 12.3% (819 of 6,679 decks)
- Kalain, Reclusive Painter relevance 0.56 · 9.5% (634 of 6,679 decks)
- Kellogg, Dangerous Mind relevance 0.55 · 10.1% (677 of 6,679 decks)
- Generous Plunderer relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (599 of 6,679 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Pariah's Shield relevance 0.88 · 53.7% (3,589 of 6,679 decks)
- Dawnsire, Sunstar Dreadnought relevance 0.87 · 52.0% (3,472 of 6,679 decks)
- Blazing Sunsteel relevance 0.89 · 37.9% (2,531 of 6,679 decks)
- Fiendlash relevance 0.89 · 21.1% (1,409 of 6,679 decks)
- Requiem Monolith relevance 0.82 · 18.5% (1,233 of 6,679 decks)
- Exploding Barrel relevance 0.94 · 7.1% (476 of 6,679 decks)
- Mjölnir, Hammer of Thor relevance 0.85 · 6.3% (423 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragonspark Reactor relevance 0.85 · 5.9% (392 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragon's Hoard relevance 0.69 · 11.0% (732 of 6,679 decks)
- Mox Jasper relevance 0.77 · 6.1% (410 of 6,679 decks)
- The Reaver Cleaver relevance 0.55 · 25.4% (1,696 of 6,679 decks)
- Long-Lost Lances relevance 0.94 · 3.8% (252 of 6,679 decks)
- My Precious // Allure of Power relevance 0.68 · 10.3% (691 of 6,679 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.51 · 28.4% (1,897 of 6,679 decks)
- Coin of Mastery relevance 0.69 · 6.9% (463 of 6,679 decks)
- Cranial Ram relevance 0.64 · 6.3% (422 of 6,679 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.57 · 11.0% (738 of 6,679 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.56 · 10.6% (711 of 6,679 decks)
- Ruby Medallion relevance 0.42 · 31.4% (2,098 of 6,679 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.51 · 12.6% (843 of 6,679 decks)
- Glittering Stockpile relevance 0.59 · 5.8% (389 of 6,679 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.54 · 9.4% (626 of 6,679 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.83 · 2.9% (194 of 6,679 decks)
- Diamond Pick-Axe relevance 0.58 · 5.3% (351 of 6,679 decks)
- Orcrist, Goblin-cleaver relevance 0.67 · 3.9% (258 of 6,679 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.58 · 4.6% (308 of 6,679 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (623 of 6,679 decks)
- The Soul Stone relevance 0.50 · 7.3% (487 of 6,679 decks)
- Cranial Plating relevance 0.61 · 4.0% (267 of 6,679 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.51 · 5.9% (397 of 6,679 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.51 · 5.8% (387 of 6,679 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.51 · 5.5% (369 of 6,679 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.44 · 11.1% (744 of 6,679 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (528 of 6,679 decks)
- Jet Medallion relevance 0.43 · 9.4% (626 of 6,679 decks)
- Carnelian Orb of Dragonkind relevance 0.62 · 3.2% (213 of 6,679 decks)
- The Fire Crystal relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (505 of 6,679 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.35 · 18.2% (1,218 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragonstorm Globe relevance 0.67 · 2.6% (171 of 6,679 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.50 · 4.3% (286 of 6,679 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.46 · 4.7% (313 of 6,679 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.56 · 3.4% (227 of 6,679 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.26 · 35.6% (2,379 of 6,679 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (523 of 6,679 decks)
- Fire Nation Turret relevance 0.57 · 2.7% (178 of 6,679 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.37 · 6.7% (449 of 6,679 decks)
- Cursed Mirror relevance 0.37 · 6.6% (440 of 6,679 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.51 · 3.0% (203 of 6,679 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.35 · 7.2% (481 of 6,679 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.55 · 2.5% (170 of 6,679 decks)
All enchantments (32)
- Pain for All relevance 0.77 · 64.3% (4,292 of 6,679 decks)
- Pyrohemia relevance 0.73 · 62.6% (4,182 of 6,679 decks)
- Pestilence relevance 0.74 · 60.3% (4,030 of 6,679 decks)
- Expedited Inheritance relevance 0.93 · 12.4% (828 of 6,679 decks)
- Dizzying Gaze relevance 0.99 · 9.4% (629 of 6,679 decks)
- The Misty Mountains Cold relevance 0.77 · 22.9% (1,531 of 6,679 decks)
- Last Laugh relevance 0.93 · 8.2% (546 of 6,679 decks)
- There and Back Again relevance 0.72 · 23.2% (1,547 of 6,679 decks)
- Alchemist's Talent relevance 0.62 · 34.3% (2,289 of 6,679 decks)
- Revel in Riches relevance 0.55 · 45.3% (3,023 of 6,679 decks)
- Rain of Riches relevance 0.59 · 37.8% (2,526 of 6,679 decks)
- Spiteful Banditry relevance 0.67 · 22.4% (1,498 of 6,679 decks)
- Last Light of Durin's Day relevance 0.85 · 6.5% (433 of 6,679 decks)
- Agent of the Iron Throne relevance 0.64 · 14.0% (938 of 6,679 decks)
- Fiery Emancipation relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (916 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragon Tempest relevance 0.60 · 5.7% (381 of 6,679 decks)
- Heroes for Hire relevance 0.83 · 2.9% (193 of 6,679 decks)
- Dracogenesis relevance 0.73 · 3.5% (235 of 6,679 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 0.43 · 14.5% (970 of 6,679 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.34 · 31.8% (2,125 of 6,679 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (601 of 6,679 decks)
- City on Fire relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (467 of 6,679 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.46 · 6.2% (416 of 6,679 decks)
- Aggravated Assault relevance 0.52 · 4.4% (292 of 6,679 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (436 of 6,679 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.47 · 4.4% (291 of 6,679 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.50 · 3.8% (257 of 6,679 decks)
- Kaya's Ghostform relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (297 of 6,679 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.30 · 16.6% (1,112 of 6,679 decks)
- Dictate of the Twin Gods relevance 0.47 · 3.0% (203 of 6,679 decks)
- Fated Firepower relevance 0.46 · 2.7% (181 of 6,679 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (197 of 6,679 decks)
All instants (50)
- Cut Propulsion relevance 0.87 · 64.9% (4,337 of 6,679 decks)
- Self-Destruct relevance 0.81 · 66.4% (4,435 of 6,679 decks)
- Starstorm relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (1,030 of 6,679 decks)
- Simulacrum relevance 0.93 · 7.5% (501 of 6,679 decks)
- Stonesplitter Bolt relevance 0.91 · 5.7% (379 of 6,679 decks)
- Galvanic Blast relevance 0.85 · 7.3% (490 of 6,679 decks)
- Vision of Love relevance 0.76 · 9.2% (615 of 6,679 decks)
- Fire Covenant relevance 0.55 · 33.5% (2,239 of 6,679 decks)
- Arcbond relevance 0.79 · 7.7% (511 of 6,679 decks)
- Smaug's Fury relevance 0.82 · 5.4% (364 of 6,679 decks)
- Stinging Study relevance 0.72 · 6.1% (410 of 6,679 decks)
- Seething Song relevance 0.42 · 46.5% (3,108 of 6,679 decks)
- The Last Agni Kai relevance 0.57 · 15.6% (1,042 of 6,679 decks)
- Soul's Fire relevance 0.70 · 5.5% (365 of 6,679 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.36 · 57.5% (3,843 of 6,679 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.40 · 43.5% (2,906 of 6,679 decks)
- Pyretic Ritual relevance 0.50 · 22.8% (1,524 of 6,679 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.33 · 58.1% (3,878 of 6,679 decks)
- Bolt Bend relevance 0.41 · 35.8% (2,391 of 6,679 decks)
- Comet Storm relevance 0.61 · 7.6% (508 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragon's Fire relevance 0.79 · 3.5% (236 of 6,679 decks)
- Return the Favor relevance 0.45 · 23.0% (1,535 of 6,679 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.42 · 28.4% (1,895 of 6,679 decks)
- Desperate Ritual relevance 0.50 · 10.8% (719 of 6,679 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.55 · 6.1% (407 of 6,679 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.44 · 15.3% (1,025 of 6,679 decks)
- Flashback relevance 0.53 · 7.4% (492 of 6,679 decks)
- Lightning Strike relevance 0.56 · 4.7% (311 of 6,679 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (862 of 6,679 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 0.57 · 4.5% (300 of 6,679 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.40 · 17.3% (1,154 of 6,679 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.43 · 12.1% (809 of 6,679 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.38 · 21.5% (1,436 of 6,679 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.32 · 38.0% (2,535 of 6,679 decks)
- Imp's Mischief relevance 0.42 · 12.2% (817 of 6,679 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.31 · 37.1% (2,477 of 6,679 decks)
- Bilbo's Deadly Slice relevance 0.68 · 2.8% (190 of 6,679 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.27 · 48.5% (3,237 of 6,679 decks)
- Lightning Axe relevance 0.65 · 2.6% (172 of 6,679 decks)
- Tibalt's Trickery relevance 0.37 · 13.0% (865 of 6,679 decks)
- Fire Magic relevance 0.56 · 3.5% (236 of 6,679 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.32 · 20.7% (1,385 of 6,679 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (388 of 6,679 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.29 · 22.4% (1,499 of 6,679 decks)
- Burst Lightning relevance 0.59 · 2.5% (170 of 6,679 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.51 · 3.3% (223 of 6,679 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.18 · 65.9% (4,403 of 6,679 decks)
- Reiterate relevance 0.55 · 2.8% (184 of 6,679 decks)
- Withering Torment relevance 0.29 · 10.4% (697 of 6,679 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (545 of 6,679 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Chain Lightning relevance 0.81 · 57.1% (3,816 of 6,679 decks)
- Star of Extinction relevance 0.80 · 53.0% (3,540 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragon's Desire relevance 0.84 · 41.2% (2,753 of 6,679 decks)
- Chain Reaction relevance 0.64 · 59.9% (4,002 of 6,679 decks)
- Desolation of Smaug relevance 0.81 · 23.5% (1,569 of 6,679 decks)
- Flame Slash relevance 0.89 · 13.7% (916 of 6,679 decks)
- Shivan Meteor relevance 0.95 · 6.8% (453 of 6,679 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.63 · 36.4% (2,433 of 6,679 decks)
- Geosurge relevance 0.90 · 6.8% (452 of 6,679 decks)
- Reckless Endeavor relevance 0.71 · 14.1% (943 of 6,679 decks)
- Inside Information relevance 0.75 · 6.0% (401 of 6,679 decks)
- Anger of the Gods relevance 0.77 · 4.9% (326 of 6,679 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 0.68 · 9.0% (601 of 6,679 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.53 · 23.0% (1,534 of 6,679 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.43 · 40.7% (2,721 of 6,679 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.48 · 20.0% (1,336 of 6,679 decks)
- Mana Geyser relevance 0.40 · 32.5% (2,168 of 6,679 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (580 of 6,679 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.54 · 7.1% (474 of 6,679 decks)
- Pirate's Pillage relevance 0.54 · 6.6% (439 of 6,679 decks)
- Pitiless Carnage relevance 0.72 · 3.4% (225 of 6,679 decks)
- Blood Money relevance 0.51 · 8.8% (586 of 6,679 decks)
- Brotherhood's End relevance 0.69 · 3.4% (225 of 6,679 decks)
- Strike It Rich relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (502 of 6,679 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (591 of 6,679 decks)
- Fireball relevance 0.66 · 3.5% (232 of 6,679 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.50 · 6.9% (459 of 6,679 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.48 · 7.8% (518 of 6,679 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.50 · 5.7% (382 of 6,679 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.35 · 28.6% (1,909 of 6,679 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.31 · 40.6% (2,709 of 6,679 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.47 · 8.2% (547 of 6,679 decks)
- Wheel of Fortune relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (513 of 6,679 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (862 of 6,679 decks)
- Seize the Spotlight relevance 0.49 · 4.9% (329 of 6,679 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 0.57 · 3.9% (262 of 6,679 decks)
- Hex Magic relevance 0.61 · 3.4% (229 of 6,679 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.16 · 87.9% (5,874 of 6,679 decks)
- Crux of Fate relevance 0.55 · 3.5% (236 of 6,679 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.31 · 24.1% (1,608 of 6,679 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.39 · 7.1% (474 of 6,679 decks)
- Insatiable Avarice relevance 0.48 · 4.0% (266 of 6,679 decks)
- Read the Bones relevance 0.37 · 7.5% (501 of 6,679 decks)
- Grapeshot relevance 0.45 · 4.2% (280 of 6,679 decks)
- Past in Flames relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (201 of 6,679 decks)
- Cut // Ribbons relevance 0.52 · 2.5% (170 of 6,679 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.27 · 15.7% (1,046 of 6,679 decks)
- Hit the Mother Lode relevance 0.49 · 2.8% (188 of 6,679 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.26 · 18.0% (1,199 of 6,679 decks)
- Wheel of Misfortune relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (220 of 6,679 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (1)
- Chandra, Torch of Defiance relevance 0.48 · 3.1% (204 of 6,679 decks)
All utility lands (38)
- Dragon-Cursed Halls relevance 0.78 · 55.1% (3,677 of 6,679 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.55 · 34.3% (2,289 of 6,679 decks)
- Mines of Moria relevance 0.58 · 25.7% (1,718 of 6,679 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.65 · 7.3% (488 of 6,679 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.70 · 4.9% (328 of 6,679 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.53 · 16.3% (1,088 of 6,679 decks)
- Haven of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.65 · 5.0% (334 of 6,679 decks)
- Shatterskull Smashing // Shatterskull, the Hammer Pass relevance 0.57 · 8.9% (594 of 6,679 decks)
- Maelstrom of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.68 · 4.3% (289 of 6,679 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.50 · 12.9% (860 of 6,679 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.50 · 11.7% (781 of 6,679 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (808 of 6,679 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.54 · 4.8% (318 of 6,679 decks)
- Mount Doom relevance 0.36 · 22.6% (1,507 of 6,679 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.36 · 21.0% (1,402 of 6,679 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.34 · 23.2% (1,547 of 6,679 decks)
- Goblin-town relevance 0.55 · 3.7% (244 of 6,679 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.41 · 7.1% (475 of 6,679 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.61 · 2.8% (190 of 6,679 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.41 · 6.7% (448 of 6,679 decks)
- Raucous Theater relevance 0.31 · 22.5% (1,501 of 6,679 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (463 of 6,679 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.35 · 10.5% (702 of 6,679 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.32 · 15.2% (1,015 of 6,679 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.59 · 2.5% (170 of 6,679 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.55 · 2.6% (175 of 6,679 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.31 · 11.7% (784 of 6,679 decks)
- Canyon Slough relevance 0.30 · 12.1% (806 of 6,679 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (526 of 6,679 decks)
- Midgar, City of Mako // Reactor Raid relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (253 of 6,679 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.22 · 32.1% (2,145 of 6,679 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (554 of 6,679 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (268 of 6,679 decks)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 0.37 · 4.2% (281 of 6,679 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (175 of 6,679 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (167 of 6,679 decks)
- Temple of Malice relevance 0.23 · 15.1% (1,006 of 6,679 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.35 · 3.6% (239 of 6,679 decks)
All lands (49)
- The Lonely Mountain relevance 0.83 · 4.6% (308 of 6,679 decks)
- Dark Fortress relevance 0.56 · 23.7% (1,585 of 6,679 decks)
- Great Furnace relevance 0.49 · 13.6% (907 of 6,679 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.45 · 18.3% (1,223 of 6,679 decks)
- Treasure Map // Treasure Cove relevance 0.66 · 4.1% (271 of 6,679 decks)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 0.49 · 10.9% (727 of 6,679 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.53 · 6.5% (434 of 6,679 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (524 of 6,679 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.42 · 13.1% (872 of 6,679 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (656 of 6,679 decks)
- Badlands relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (1,115 of 6,679 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (505 of 6,679 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (504 of 6,679 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.42 · 8.5% (566 of 6,679 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (419 of 6,679 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.44 · 7.0% (468 of 6,679 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.43 · 8.1% (540 of 6,679 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.44 · 6.5% (436 of 6,679 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (493 of 6,679 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (390 of 6,679 decks)
- Blightstep Pathway // Searstep Pathway relevance 0.30 · 20.9% (1,396 of 6,679 decks)
- Blazemire Verge relevance 0.25 · 40.4% (2,698 of 6,679 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.44 · 4.1% (275 of 6,679 decks)
- Luxury Suite relevance 0.22 · 46.2% (3,087 of 6,679 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.24 · 38.1% (2,542 of 6,679 decks)
- Blackcleave Cliffs relevance 0.29 · 15.9% (1,060 of 6,679 decks)
- Haunted Ridge relevance 0.22 · 41.1% (2,747 of 6,679 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (480 of 6,679 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.51 · 2.5% (170 of 6,679 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.50 · 2.6% (173 of 6,679 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.24 · 25.9% (1,731 of 6,679 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (667 of 6,679 decks)
- Graven Cairns relevance 0.22 · 30.4% (2,029 of 6,679 decks)
- Rakdos Carnarium relevance 0.25 · 15.6% (1,044 of 6,679 decks)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (499 of 6,679 decks)
- Blood Crypt relevance 0.16 · 57.1% (3,813 of 6,679 decks)
- Tainted Peak relevance 0.19 · 36.9% (2,462 of 6,679 decks)
- Rakdos Guildgate relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (206 of 6,679 decks)
- Shadowblood Ridge relevance 0.21 · 20.4% (1,360 of 6,679 decks)
- Drossforge Bridge relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (177 of 6,679 decks)
- Geothermal Bog relevance 0.37 · 3.3% (220 of 6,679 decks)
- Sulfurous Springs relevance 0.15 · 48.6% (3,244 of 6,679 decks)
- Foreboding Ruins relevance 0.17 · 35.3% (2,358 of 6,679 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (219 of 6,679 decks)
- Dragonskull Summit relevance 0.11 · 67.5% (4,509 of 6,679 decks)
- Smoldering Marsh relevance 0.11 · 58.8% (3,924 of 6,679 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 80.4% (5,372 of 6,679 decks)
- Mountain relevance 0.02 · 91.2% (6,094 of 6,679 decks)
- Swamp relevance 0.02 · 90.1% (6,018 of 6,679 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Smaug the Impenetrable, from 6,679 real Commander decks.