Cards like Etherium Sculptor
5.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
92% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
81% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 84%
- Foundry Inspector 65%
- Cloud Key 57%
- Helm of Awakening 8%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Trophy Mage
5.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
- Trophy Mage 32%
- Trinket Mage 30%
- Tribute Mage 24%
- Treasure Mage 22%
- Transit Mage 19%
Cards like Sol Ring
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 95%
- Basalt Monolith 38%
- Mana Vault 22%
- Grim Monolith 14%
Cards like Fabricate
6.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 49%
- Scour for Scrap 41%
Cards like Manifold Key
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Manifold Key 43%
- Voltaic Key 22%
- Filigree Sages 8%
- Galvanic Key 3%
Other options: Synod Artificer, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Spine of Ish Sah
7.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Spine of Ish Sah 19%
- Scrap Trawler 19%
- Myr Retriever 16%
- Junk Diver 8%
- Workshop Assistant 3%
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
4.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Corridor Monitor
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Reshape
6.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Reshape 19%
- Transmute Artifact 16%
Cards like Mox Diamond
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mox Diamond 19%
- Chrome Mox 16%
Cards like Merchant Scroll
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Moonsilver Key
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Armillary Sphere, World Map, Keys to the House, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel, Wanderer's Twig
Cards like Forensic Gadgeteer
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Forensic Gadgeteer 54%
- Heartstone 14%
Cards like Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Vedalken Archmage
4.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Skyswimmer Koi, Rook Turret
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 70%
- Commander's Sphere 11%
Cards like Copy Artifact
3.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Copy Artifact 19%
- Mirrormade 11%
- Copy Enchantment 3%
- Copy Land 3%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 38%
- Hedron Archive 11%
- Sisay's Ring 3%
- Ur-Golem's Eye 3%
Other options: Ichor Elixir, Ring of the Lucii
Cards like Tezzeret the Seeker
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cryogen Relic
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Aether Spellbomb
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Liquimetal Torque
9.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
6.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Unwinding Clock
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gilded Lotus
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards like Mystic Forge
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Artificer Class
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Artificer Class 32%
- Does Machines 3%
Cards like Sculpting Steel
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sculpting Steel 43%
- Mirage Mirror 3%
Cards like Padeem, Consul of Innovation
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like The Reality Chip
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
All top picks (50)
- Ugin's Nexus relevance 0.35 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.23 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.31 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.27 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.30 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.24 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.25 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.23 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.21 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Treasure Mage relevance 0.24 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.21 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.23 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.22 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Esoteric Duplicator relevance 0.24 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.24 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.23 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.22 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.22 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.22 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.20 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Powerstone Shard relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.19 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.21 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.17 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.21 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.15 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.22 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Memnarch relevance 0.21 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Lodestone Needle // Guidestone Compass relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.17 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.22 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Chalice of Life // Chalice of Death relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Mirrorworks relevance 0.21 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.19 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.17 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Tamiyo's Logbook relevance 0.20 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.16 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.11 · 70.3% (26 of 37 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.15 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Metalwork Colossus relevance 0.19 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.19 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.19 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Sicarian Infiltrator relevance 0.21 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.15 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.17 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.20 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.17 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.30 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.24 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Treasure Mage relevance 0.24 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.23 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.22 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.22 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.19 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Memnarch relevance 0.21 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.17 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.16 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.11 · 70.3% (26 of 37 decks)
- Metalwork Colossus relevance 0.19 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Sicarian Infiltrator relevance 0.21 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.17 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.20 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Hurkyl, Master Wizard relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Frogmite relevance 0.20 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Myr Enforcer relevance 0.20 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Bronze Walrus relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.14 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Steelswarm Operator relevance 0.17 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.15 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.11 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Sojourner's Companion relevance 0.19 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Cogwork Assembler relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.14 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Memory Guardian relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Scampering Surveyor relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Dauntless Scrapbot relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.15 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Archaeomender relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Thran Spider relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.12 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Mishra's Self-Replicator relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor relevance 0.16 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.16 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.13 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.14 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Scrapyard Recombiner relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.10 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Karn, Legacy Reforged relevance 0.15 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Mycosynth Golem relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Vedalken Anatomist relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.09 · 64.9% (24 of 37 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.13 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Katsumasa, the Animator relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ugin's Nexus relevance 0.35 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.31 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.27 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.25 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.21 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.21 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Esoteric Duplicator relevance 0.24 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.24 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.23 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.22 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.20 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Powerstone Shard relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.21 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.17 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.21 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.15 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.22 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Lodestone Needle // Guidestone Compass relevance 0.25 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Chalice of Life // Chalice of Death relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Mirrorworks relevance 0.21 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.17 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Tamiyo's Logbook relevance 0.20 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.15 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.19 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.19 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.15 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.17 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.16 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.19 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Braided Net // Braided Quipu relevance 0.21 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.21 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.14 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.18 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Smelting Vat relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Ecologist's Terrarium relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.18 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Disruptor Flute relevance 0.19 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.17 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.13 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Smoke Bomb relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.16 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Eriette's Tempting Apple relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Manhole Cover relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.15 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Mycosynth Wellspring relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.16 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- The Stasis Coffin relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
All enchantments (47)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.23 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.23 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.16 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.14 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.17 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.13 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Thassa's Ire relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.13 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Marit Lage's Slumber relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Collective Restraint relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Words of Wind relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.10 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- The Antiquities War relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Military Intelligence relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Zoetic Glyph relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.10 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Steal Artifact relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.12 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Cryoshatter relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.11 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Trail of Evidence relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Ballad of the Black Flag relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.08 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.09 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.10 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.10 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.10 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.09 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.09 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.09 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.08 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.09 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.08 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.08 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.08 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.06 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
All instants (50)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.22 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.19 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.18 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.14 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.17 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.19 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.14 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.18 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.16 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.11 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.15 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.12 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.17 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.14 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Machine Over Matter relevance 0.17 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.17 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.16 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.13 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.12 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.13 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Deluge relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Stern Lesson relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.11 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.13 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Desculpting Blast relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.10 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.12 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Learn from the Past relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.10 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.13 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.11 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Make Disappear relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.10 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Urza's Command relevance 0.13 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.13 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Eject relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.22 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.17 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.18 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.15 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Echo Storm relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.14 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.12 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.14 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Anchor to Reality relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Drafna's Restoration relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.15 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Seize the Secrets relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Confiscation Coup relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.14 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.15 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Library of Lat-Nam relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.11 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.08 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.13 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Mists of Lórien relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.13 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Splitting the Powerstone relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.12 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Displacement Wave relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.10 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.09 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.10 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.10 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Forging the Anchor relevance 0.10 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.10 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.09 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.09 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.09 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (12)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.12 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.11 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Karn, Living Legacy relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.14 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.13 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.11 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.10 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.09 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.06 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.06 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.05 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Hall of Tagsin relevance 0.24 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.15 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.11 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.16 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.16 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.17 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.13 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.14 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.10 · 59.5% (22 of 37 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.15 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.15 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.13 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.11 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.13 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Great Hall of the Biblioplex relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- The Biblioplex relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.11 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.13 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Urza's Factory relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.09 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.10 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.08 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Mouth of Ronom relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.12 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Encroaching Wastes relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.11 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Tomb of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.13 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.13 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.12 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.12 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.12 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.08 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.10 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.10 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
All lands (29)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.18 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.15 · 13.5% (5 of 37 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Urza's Workshop relevance 0.15 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.12 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.14 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.08 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.11 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.11 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.11 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.11 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.09 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.10 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.09 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.04 · 67.6% (25 of 37 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.09 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.08 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.08 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.08 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.07 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.07 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.06 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.06 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.05 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 89.2% (33 of 37 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam, from 37 real Commander decks.