Cards like Sol Ring
13× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 86% of other Esper decks
96% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
2.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.96 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 100%
- Mana Vault 96%
- Grim Monolith 76%
- Basalt Monolith 2%
Cards like Rhystic Study
8.2× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
97% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Esper decks
95% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Esper decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 96%
- Mystic Remora 96%
Cards like Force of Will
13× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Esper decks
90% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Force of Will 94%
- Force of Negation 90%
Cards like Chrome Mox
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
86% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 94%
- Mox Diamond 87%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
15× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
96% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Esper decks
87% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Esper decks
Cards like Tainted Pact
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
84% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Tainted Pact 90%
- Demonic Consultation 89%
Cards like Grand Abolisher
19× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Esper decks
68% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Grand Abolisher 90%
- Voice of Victory 72%
Cards like Silence
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Esper decks
Cards like Talisman of Progress
1.7× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
90% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Esper decks
82% of decks run two or more
vs. 49% of other Esper decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Smothering Tithe
16× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Esper decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Flusterstorm
17× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Esper decks
Cards like Commandeer
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Commandeer 34%
- Misdirection 27%
- Snapback 7%
- Disrupting Shoal 4%
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
10× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Esper decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: The Unagi of Kyoshi Island
Cards like Swan Song
11× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Esper decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Swan Song 92%
- Strix Serenade 18%
Cards like Mirrormade
3.0× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Esper decks
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Transmute Artifact
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Transmute Artifact 68%
- Reshape 5%
Cards like Gilded Drake
15× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Lotus Petal
3.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
8.3× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Esper decks
All top picks (50)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.34 · 72.3% (167 of 231 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.31 · 68.4% (158 of 231 decks)
- Time Sieve relevance 0.24 · 98.7% (228 of 231 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.30 · 62.8% (145 of 231 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.25 · 77.9% (180 of 231 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.32 · 51.9% (120 of 231 decks)
- Delivery Moogle relevance 0.44 · 17.7% (41 of 231 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.44 · 17.3% (40 of 231 decks)
- Grand Arbiter Augustin IV relevance 0.34 · 40.3% (93 of 231 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.24 · 71.0% (164 of 231 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.38 · 26.0% (60 of 231 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.32 · 39.4% (91 of 231 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.20 · 78.4% (181 of 231 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.27 · 49.8% (115 of 231 decks)
- Damping Sphere relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (30 of 231 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.36 · 15.6% (36 of 231 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.37 · 13.0% (30 of 231 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.19 · 77.9% (180 of 231 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.29 · 31.6% (73 of 231 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.33 · 20.3% (47 of 231 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.21 · 62.3% (144 of 231 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.42 · 6.5% (15 of 231 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (12 of 231 decks)
- Jolted Awake relevance 0.42 · 6.1% (14 of 231 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (16 of 231 decks)
- King T'Challa // Black Panther, Hope Enduring relevance 0.31 · 23.8% (55 of 231 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.19 · 71.4% (165 of 231 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.37 · 10.0% (23 of 231 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.19 · 68.4% (158 of 231 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.17 · 76.2% (176 of 231 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.30 · 17.7% (41 of 231 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.19 · 62.8% (145 of 231 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.35 · 9.5% (22 of 231 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.30 · 16.5% (38 of 231 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.23 · 39.0% (90 of 231 decks)
- Containment Priest relevance 0.36 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.27 · 19.9% (46 of 231 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (11 of 231 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.21 · 40.7% (94 of 231 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.26 · 20.8% (48 of 231 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.27 · 16.9% (39 of 231 decks)
- Vanishing Verse relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (9 of 231 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.31 · 9.5% (22 of 231 decks)
- Dauthi Voidwalker relevance 0.26 · 20.3% (47 of 231 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.30 · 10.8% (25 of 231 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.22 · 34.2% (79 of 231 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.24 · 27.3% (63 of 231 decks)
- Myrel, Shield of Argive relevance 0.38 · 3.9% (9 of 231 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Delivery Moogle relevance 0.44 · 17.7% (41 of 231 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.44 · 17.3% (40 of 231 decks)
- Grand Arbiter Augustin IV relevance 0.34 · 40.3% (93 of 231 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.38 · 26.0% (60 of 231 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.20 · 78.4% (181 of 231 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.21 · 62.3% (144 of 231 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.42 · 6.5% (15 of 231 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (12 of 231 decks)
- King T'Challa // Black Panther, Hope Enduring relevance 0.31 · 23.8% (55 of 231 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.30 · 16.5% (38 of 231 decks)
- Containment Priest relevance 0.36 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.27 · 16.9% (39 of 231 decks)
- Dauthi Voidwalker relevance 0.26 · 20.3% (47 of 231 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.30 · 10.8% (25 of 231 decks)
- Myrel, Shield of Argive relevance 0.38 · 3.9% (9 of 231 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.30 · 9.1% (21 of 231 decks)
- Archivist of Oghma relevance 0.19 · 48.1% (111 of 231 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.27 · 9.1% (21 of 231 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.14 · 66.2% (153 of 231 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.23 · 16.9% (39 of 231 decks)
- Soulherder relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Drannith Magistrate relevance 0.11 · 81.4% (188 of 231 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 0.13 · 68.4% (158 of 231 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (12 of 231 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.11 · 82.7% (191 of 231 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (11 of 231 decks)
- Mirkwood Bats relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Lurrus of the Dream-Den relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Skycoach Conductor // All Aboard relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Lavinia, Azorius Renegade relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.11 · 72.3% (167 of 231 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Solitude relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
- Ballot Broker relevance 0.35 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Brago's Representative relevance 0.35 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Marionette Master relevance 0.34 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.34 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Dauntless Dismantler relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Aven Interrupter relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.11 · 58.4% (135 of 231 decks)
- The Queen of Dale relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (14 of 231 decks)
- Oswald Fiddlebender relevance 0.31 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.20 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
- Voice of Victory relevance 0.08 · 72.3% (167 of 231 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.15 · 13.9% (32 of 231 decks)
- Rev, Tithe Extractor relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines relevance 0.26 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
All artifacts (34)
- Time Sieve relevance 0.24 · 98.7% (228 of 231 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.25 · 77.9% (180 of 231 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.24 · 71.0% (164 of 231 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.27 · 49.8% (115 of 231 decks)
- Damping Sphere relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (30 of 231 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.37 · 10.0% (23 of 231 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.17 · 76.2% (176 of 231 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.27 · 19.9% (46 of 231 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (12 of 231 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (12 of 231 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.22 · 19.9% (46 of 231 decks)
- Talisman of Hierarchy relevance 0.19 · 34.2% (79 of 231 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.11 · 84.8% (196 of 231 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.12 · 72.3% (167 of 231 decks)
- Disruptor Flute relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.09 · 84.8% (196 of 231 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.09 · 82.7% (191 of 231 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.07 · 84.8% (196 of 231 decks)
- Jeweled Amulet relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.05 · 89.6% (207 of 231 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.05 · 87.0% (201 of 231 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.10 · 9.1% (21 of 231 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.04 · 96.1% (222 of 231 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.03 · 93.9% (217 of 231 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.02 · 93.1% (215 of 231 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.01 · 97.0% (224 of 231 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.00 · 100.0% (231 of 231 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (20)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.32 · 51.9% (120 of 231 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.33 · 20.3% (47 of 231 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.24 · 27.3% (63 of 231 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.23 · 31.2% (72 of 231 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (14 of 231 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.22 · 32.5% (75 of 231 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.29 · 6.5% (15 of 231 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (12 of 231 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.25 · 6.5% (15 of 231 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.20 · 13.0% (30 of 231 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.18 · 20.8% (48 of 231 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.12 · 13.0% (30 of 231 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.04 · 94.8% (219 of 231 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.02 · 95.7% (221 of 231 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.02 · 95.7% (221 of 231 decks)
All instants (50)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.34 · 72.3% (167 of 231 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.30 · 62.8% (145 of 231 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.36 · 15.6% (36 of 231 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.19 · 77.9% (180 of 231 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.29 · 31.6% (73 of 231 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (16 of 231 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.30 · 17.7% (41 of 231 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.23 · 39.0% (90 of 231 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.21 · 40.7% (94 of 231 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.26 · 20.8% (48 of 231 decks)
- Vanishing Verse relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (9 of 231 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.22 · 34.2% (79 of 231 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (23 of 231 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.25 · 17.7% (41 of 231 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.40 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.25 · 16.9% (39 of 231 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.24 · 13.9% (32 of 231 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.20 · 27.3% (63 of 231 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (9 of 231 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.24 · 10.8% (25 of 231 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (16 of 231 decks)
- Void Rend relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (12 of 231 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.17 · 35.5% (82 of 231 decks)
- Split Decision relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.11 · 78.4% (181 of 231 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (17 of 231 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (12 of 231 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Permission Denied relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (9 of 231 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.21 · 10.4% (24 of 231 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 0.35 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Get Lost relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.13 · 46.3% (107 of 231 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.15 · 17.3% (40 of 231 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (18 of 231 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Bilbo's Gambit relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.07 · 81.8% (189 of 231 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.16 · 7.4% (17 of 231 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.10 · 33.8% (78 of 231 decks)
All sorceries (26)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.31 · 68.4% (158 of 231 decks)
- Jolted Awake relevance 0.42 · 6.1% (14 of 231 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.19 · 68.4% (158 of 231 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.19 · 62.8% (145 of 231 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.35 · 9.5% (22 of 231 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (11 of 231 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.31 · 9.5% (22 of 231 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (11 of 231 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.24 · 12.1% (28 of 231 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.20 · 26.4% (61 of 231 decks)
- Council's Judgment relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.25 · 6.5% (15 of 231 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.15 · 39.4% (91 of 231 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.23 · 6.5% (15 of 231 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.23 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (11 of 231 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.16 · 10.4% (24 of 231 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.18 · 6.5% (15 of 231 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.14 · 7.4% (17 of 231 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.06 · 84.0% (194 of 231 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.12 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.02 · 93.1% (215 of 231 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.32 · 39.4% (91 of 231 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.37 · 13.0% (30 of 231 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.19 · 71.4% (165 of 231 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
All utility lands (27)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.43 · 10.8% (25 of 231 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.19 · 71.9% (166 of 231 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.28 · 26.0% (60 of 231 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.26 · 24.2% (56 of 231 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.31 · 10.0% (23 of 231 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.18 · 50.6% (117 of 231 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.14 · 76.6% (177 of 231 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
- Raffine's Tower relevance 0.24 · 9.5% (22 of 231 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (9 of 231 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.24 · 6.5% (15 of 231 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.18 · 21.2% (49 of 231 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (11 of 231 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (8 of 231 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.33 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.32 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Silent Clearing relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.05 · 87.4% (202 of 231 decks)
All lands (50)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.26 · 46.3% (107 of 231 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.31 · 17.7% (41 of 231 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.28 · 15.2% (35 of 231 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (19 of 231 decks)
- Ancient Den relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (14 of 231 decks)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (12 of 231 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.27 · 10.8% (25 of 231 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (12 of 231 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (14 of 231 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (13 of 231 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.21 · 21.6% (50 of 231 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.18 · 31.6% (73 of 231 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.21 · 13.9% (32 of 231 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.23 · 8.7% (20 of 231 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.22 · 9.5% (22 of 231 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (10 of 231 decks)
- Vault of Champions relevance 0.16 · 28.6% (66 of 231 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.11 · 69.7% (161 of 231 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (9 of 231 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.17 · 19.9% (46 of 231 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.10 · 63.6% (147 of 231 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.09 · 75.8% (175 of 231 decks)
- Swamp relevance 0.16 · 19.0% (44 of 231 decks)
- Island relevance 0.14 · 28.6% (66 of 231 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.10 · 62.3% (144 of 231 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.08 · 71.4% (165 of 231 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.08 · 68.0% (157 of 231 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.26 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (6 of 231 decks)
- Arcane Sanctum relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (7 of 231 decks)
- Bleachbone Verge relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.07 · 70.6% (163 of 231 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.06 · 81.8% (189 of 231 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.06 · 80.5% (186 of 231 decks)
- Isolated Chapel relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (5 of 231 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.04 · 84.8% (196 of 231 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.04 · 89.2% (206 of 231 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.04 · 84.8% (196 of 231 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.04 · 84.4% (195 of 231 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.04 · 89.2% (206 of 231 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.03 · 92.6% (214 of 231 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.03 · 91.8% (212 of 231 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.02 · 94.4% (218 of 231 decks)
- Godless Shrine relevance 0.02 · 90.0% (208 of 231 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.02 · 95.7% (221 of 231 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.02 · 95.2% (220 of 231 decks)
- Hallowed Fountain relevance 0.01 · 95.7% (221 of 231 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Tivit, Seller of Secrets, from 231 real Commander decks.