Cards like Etherium Sculptor
17× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
60% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 67%
- Foundry Inspector 50%
- Cloud Key 35%
- Helm of Awakening 1%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
6.3× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 83% of other Dimir decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 87%
- Basalt Monolith 31%
- Mana Vault 10%
- Grim Monolith 4%
Cards like The Eternity Elevator
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- The Eternity Elevator 35%
- Worn Powerstone 26%
- Gilded Lotus 16%
- Arc Reactor 3%
Cards like Thought Monitor
11× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Dimir decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Thought Monitor 52%
- Baleful Strix 33%
Cards like Krark-Clan Ironworks
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Master of Etherium
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Silver Myr
7.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Thran Dynamo
16× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Other options: Sceptre of Eternal Glory, Ichor Elixir
Cards like Vedalken Engineer
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Vedalken Engineer 22%
- Renowned Weaponsmith 6%
- Steelswarm Operator 4%
- Guidelight Optimizer 2%
- Oaken Siren 2%
- Automated Artificer 2%
Other options: Cargo Ship, Hydraulic Helper, Soldevi Machinist
Cards like Death in Heaven
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Unwinding Clock
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Unwinding Clock 23%
- Clock of Omens 22%
Cards like Crystal Shard
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Crystal Shard 41%
- Erratic Portal 5%
Cards like Steel Overseer
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Transit Mage
6.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Transit Mage 16%
- Trophy Mage 4%
- Tribute Mage 4%
- Trinket Mage 3%
Other options: Sphinx Summoner, Treasure Mage
Cards like Moonsilver Key
5.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Dimir decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Moonsilver Key 22%
- Wayfarer's Bauble 13%
- Expedition Map 8%
- World Map 2%
Other options: Traveler's Amulet, Armillary Sphere, Wanderer's Twig, Keys to the House, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel, Renegade Map
Cards like Padeem, Consul of Innovation
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Fabricate
8.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Fabricate 35%
- Scour for Scrap 9%
Cards like Ashnod's Altar
1.8× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
2.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Thopter Spy Network
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Palladium Myr
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Tezzeret the Seeker
7.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Universal Surveillance
6.6× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Other options: Concentrate, Vivisurgeon's Insight, Tidings, Unexplained Vision, Brilliant Plan, Shared Discovery, Eagle Vision
All top picks (50)
- Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 0.89 · 50.9% (433 of 850 decks)
- Chief Engineer relevance 0.88 · 50.8% (432 of 850 decks)
- Cyberman Patrol relevance 0.84 · 47.5% (404 of 850 decks)
- Death in Heaven relevance 0.83 · 35.1% (298 of 850 decks)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 0.95 · 20.7% (176 of 850 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.72 · 47.4% (403 of 850 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.77 · 40.4% (343 of 850 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.82 · 34.4% (292 of 850 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.77 · 39.3% (334 of 850 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.88 · 25.9% (220 of 850 decks)
- Karn, Legacy Reforged relevance 0.80 · 33.2% (282 of 850 decks)
- Mycosynth Golem relevance 0.81 · 31.5% (268 of 850 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.73 · 40.6% (345 of 850 decks)
- Cybership relevance 0.86 · 23.6% (201 of 850 decks)
- Their Name Is Death relevance 0.68 · 46.1% (392 of 850 decks)
- Ixidor, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.85 · 22.9% (195 of 850 decks)
- Skorpekh Lord relevance 0.78 · 29.5% (251 of 850 decks)
- Vedalken Engineer relevance 0.83 · 21.9% (186 of 850 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.72 · 35.2% (299 of 850 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.52 · 66.7% (567 of 850 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.70 · 36.2% (308 of 850 decks)
- Tezzeret, Master of the Bridge relevance 0.61 · 48.1% (409 of 850 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.71 · 31.2% (265 of 850 decks)
- Chief of the Foundry relevance 0.79 · 20.0% (170 of 850 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.67 · 36.2% (308 of 850 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.77 · 21.8% (185 of 850 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.77 · 19.4% (165 of 850 decks)
- Cut of the Profits relevance 0.84 · 12.6% (107 of 850 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.57 · 46.8% (398 of 850 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.54 · 52.0% (442 of 850 decks)
- Canoptek Spyder relevance 0.76 · 17.4% (148 of 850 decks)
- Terisiare's Devastation relevance 0.71 · 22.8% (194 of 850 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.72 · 21.8% (185 of 850 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.67 · 26.0% (221 of 850 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.71 · 19.9% (169 of 850 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.57 · 42.0% (357 of 850 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.69 · 23.8% (202 of 850 decks)
- Cryptothrall relevance 0.71 · 19.5% (166 of 850 decks)
- Machine Over Matter relevance 0.83 · 10.6% (90 of 850 decks)
- Cybermat relevance 0.81 · 11.3% (96 of 850 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.52 · 49.5% (421 of 850 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.63 · 30.9% (263 of 850 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.71 · 16.4% (139 of 850 decks)
- Phyrexian Scriptures relevance 0.67 · 21.2% (180 of 850 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.56 · 34.6% (294 of 850 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.66 · 18.5% (157 of 850 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.59 · 29.6% (252 of 850 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.64 · 20.1% (171 of 850 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.66 · 17.1% (145 of 850 decks)
- Etrata, Deadly Fugitive relevance 0.67 · 16.5% (140 of 850 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 0.89 · 50.9% (433 of 850 decks)
- Chief Engineer relevance 0.88 · 50.8% (432 of 850 decks)
- Cyberman Patrol relevance 0.84 · 47.5% (404 of 850 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.72 · 47.4% (403 of 850 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.77 · 40.4% (343 of 850 decks)
- Karn, Legacy Reforged relevance 0.80 · 33.2% (282 of 850 decks)
- Mycosynth Golem relevance 0.81 · 31.5% (268 of 850 decks)
- Ixidor, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.85 · 22.9% (195 of 850 decks)
- Skorpekh Lord relevance 0.78 · 29.5% (251 of 850 decks)
- Vedalken Engineer relevance 0.83 · 21.9% (186 of 850 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.52 · 66.7% (567 of 850 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.70 · 36.2% (308 of 850 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.71 · 31.2% (265 of 850 decks)
- Chief of the Foundry relevance 0.79 · 20.0% (170 of 850 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.54 · 52.0% (442 of 850 decks)
- Canoptek Spyder relevance 0.76 · 17.4% (148 of 850 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.67 · 26.0% (221 of 850 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.57 · 42.0% (357 of 850 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.69 · 23.8% (202 of 850 decks)
- Cryptothrall relevance 0.71 · 19.5% (166 of 850 decks)
- Cybermat relevance 0.81 · 11.3% (96 of 850 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.52 · 49.5% (421 of 850 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.71 · 16.4% (139 of 850 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.64 · 20.1% (171 of 850 decks)
- Etrata, Deadly Fugitive relevance 0.67 · 16.5% (140 of 850 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.61 · 17.2% (146 of 850 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.58 · 20.7% (176 of 850 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.54 · 28.1% (239 of 850 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.54 · 26.2% (223 of 850 decks)
- Renowned Weaponsmith relevance 0.74 · 6.2% (53 of 850 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (103 of 850 decks)
- Grand Architect relevance 0.67 · 9.1% (77 of 850 decks)
- Dalek Squadron relevance 0.71 · 6.5% (55 of 850 decks)
- Weeping Angel relevance 0.62 · 10.9% (93 of 850 decks)
- Golbez, Crystal Collector relevance 0.55 · 16.6% (141 of 850 decks)
- Bruvac the Grandiloquent relevance 0.42 · 41.2% (350 of 850 decks)
- Dalek Drone relevance 0.66 · 7.3% (62 of 850 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.48 · 26.1% (222 of 850 decks)
- Scientist Supreme of A.I.M. relevance 0.62 · 8.8% (75 of 850 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.50 · 22.0% (187 of 850 decks)
- Research Thief relevance 0.66 · 5.9% (50 of 850 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.51 · 17.8% (151 of 850 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.57 · 10.7% (91 of 850 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.44 · 29.4% (250 of 850 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.46 · 23.6% (201 of 850 decks)
- Leaden Myr relevance 0.51 · 14.8% (126 of 850 decks)
- Virulent Silencer relevance 0.62 · 5.4% (46 of 850 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.49 · 15.8% (134 of 850 decks)
- Chrome Dome relevance 0.60 · 6.1% (52 of 850 decks)
- Canoptek Scarab Swarm relevance 0.59 · 6.1% (52 of 850 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 0.95 · 20.7% (176 of 850 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.82 · 34.4% (292 of 850 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.88 · 25.9% (220 of 850 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.73 · 40.6% (345 of 850 decks)
- Cybership relevance 0.86 · 23.6% (201 of 850 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.72 · 35.2% (299 of 850 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.67 · 36.2% (308 of 850 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.77 · 21.8% (185 of 850 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.72 · 21.8% (185 of 850 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.71 · 19.9% (169 of 850 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.63 · 30.9% (263 of 850 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.56 · 34.6% (294 of 850 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.66 · 18.5% (157 of 850 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.59 · 29.6% (252 of 850 decks)
- Brass Infiniscope relevance 0.81 · 6.5% (55 of 850 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.46 · 49.6% (422 of 850 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.60 · 22.8% (194 of 850 decks)
- Staff of Eden, Vault's Key relevance 0.62 · 19.3% (164 of 850 decks)
- Time Sieve relevance 0.56 · 28.6% (243 of 850 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.49 · 36.2% (308 of 850 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.40 · 54.2% (461 of 850 decks)
- Blinkmoth Urn relevance 0.72 · 5.5% (47 of 850 decks)
- Demonic Junker relevance 0.57 · 15.4% (131 of 850 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.41 · 46.2% (393 of 850 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.49 · 25.9% (220 of 850 decks)
- Doubling Cube relevance 0.67 · 5.3% (45 of 850 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.52 · 15.1% (128 of 850 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.44 · 32.2% (274 of 850 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.62 · 7.3% (62 of 850 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (123 of 850 decks)
- Portal of Sanctuary relevance 0.62 · 4.8% (41 of 850 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.47 · 16.5% (140 of 850 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.61 · 4.8% (41 of 850 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.56 · 7.3% (62 of 850 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.52 · 10.4% (88 of 850 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.41 · 22.7% (193 of 850 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.43 · 14.6% (124 of 850 decks)
- Slagstone Refinery relevance 0.64 · 3.8% (32 of 850 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.47 · 8.2% (70 of 850 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (54 of 850 decks)
- Skyclave Relic relevance 0.50 · 4.9% (42 of 850 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.45 · 8.4% (71 of 850 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.48 · 5.4% (46 of 850 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.42 · 9.3% (79 of 850 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (92 of 850 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.51 · 4.2% (36 of 850 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.51 · 4.1% (35 of 850 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (59 of 850 decks)
- Cranial Plating relevance 0.44 · 5.6% (48 of 850 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.40 · 8.6% (73 of 850 decks)
All enchantments (30)
- Death in Heaven relevance 0.83 · 35.1% (298 of 850 decks)
- Phyrexian Scriptures relevance 0.67 · 21.2% (180 of 850 decks)
- They Came from the Pipes relevance 0.65 · 14.5% (123 of 850 decks)
- Ugin's Mastery relevance 0.72 · 7.8% (66 of 850 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.54 · 20.5% (174 of 850 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.52 · 20.1% (171 of 850 decks)
- The Clone Saga relevance 0.58 · 8.5% (72 of 850 decks)
- Primordial Mist relevance 0.57 · 5.8% (49 of 850 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.51 · 10.4% (88 of 850 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.56 · 5.1% (43 of 850 decks)
- Biotransference relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (60 of 850 decks)
- Genesis of the Daleks relevance 0.66 · 3.1% (26 of 850 decks)
- Bloodchief Ascension relevance 0.36 · 19.4% (165 of 850 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.54 · 4.0% (34 of 850 decks)
- Blink relevance 0.59 · 3.1% (26 of 850 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.41 · 4.6% (39 of 850 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.28 · 19.8% (168 of 850 decks)
- Black Market relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (38 of 850 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (43 of 850 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.22 · 14.5% (123 of 850 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.21 · 17.1% (145 of 850 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (66 of 850 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.23 · 10.4% (88 of 850 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (63 of 850 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (26 of 850 decks)
- Fraying Sanity relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (25 of 850 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (21 of 850 decks)
- Memory Erosion relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (22 of 850 decks)
- Court of Cunning relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (24 of 850 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (30 of 850 decks)
All instants (50)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.77 · 39.3% (334 of 850 decks)
- Machine Over Matter relevance 0.83 · 10.6% (90 of 850 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.56 · 19.2% (163 of 850 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.60 · 10.2% (87 of 850 decks)
- Geistwave relevance 0.61 · 8.9% (76 of 850 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.53 · 12.4% (105 of 850 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.49 · 14.9% (127 of 850 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 0.65 · 4.5% (38 of 850 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.56 · 4.8% (41 of 850 decks)
- Alchemist's Retrieval relevance 0.54 · 4.9% (42 of 850 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.48 · 8.7% (74 of 850 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.52 · 4.8% (41 of 850 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.50 · 5.9% (50 of 850 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.42 · 11.5% (98 of 850 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.38 · 14.8% (126 of 850 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.33 · 25.6% (218 of 850 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.54 · 3.9% (33 of 850 decks)
- Tyrant's Scorn relevance 0.44 · 5.2% (44 of 850 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (49 of 850 decks)
- Drown in the Loch relevance 0.27 · 33.1% (281 of 850 decks)
- Flatline relevance 0.41 · 4.8% (41 of 850 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.30 · 18.7% (159 of 850 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.40 · 4.6% (39 of 850 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.34 · 8.6% (73 of 850 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.47 · 3.3% (28 of 850 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.52 · 2.6% (22 of 850 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (67 of 850 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.25 · 23.9% (203 of 850 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.30 · 10.2% (87 of 850 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.23 · 27.9% (237 of 850 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.47 · 2.7% (23 of 850 decks)
- Peel from Reality relevance 0.49 · 2.5% (21 of 850 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (34 of 850 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (40 of 850 decks)
- Get Out relevance 0.40 · 3.2% (27 of 850 decks)
- Withering Torment relevance 0.24 · 13.4% (114 of 850 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (36 of 850 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.18 · 40.7% (346 of 850 decks)
- Stern Lesson relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (22 of 850 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (43 of 850 decks)
- Kitsune's Technique relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (32 of 850 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (106 of 850 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.21 · 18.9% (161 of 850 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (34 of 850 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.29 · 4.2% (36 of 850 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (41 of 850 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (53 of 850 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (23 of 850 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.22 · 9.5% (81 of 850 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (58 of 850 decks)
All sorceries (46)
- Their Name Is Death relevance 0.68 · 46.1% (392 of 850 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.77 · 19.4% (165 of 850 decks)
- Cut of the Profits relevance 0.84 · 12.6% (107 of 850 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.57 · 46.8% (398 of 850 decks)
- Terisiare's Devastation relevance 0.71 · 22.8% (194 of 850 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.66 · 17.1% (145 of 850 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.52 · 34.6% (294 of 850 decks)
- Monumental Corruption relevance 0.66 · 10.2% (87 of 850 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.59 · 12.0% (102 of 850 decks)
- Their Number Is Legion relevance 0.61 · 7.2% (61 of 850 decks)
- Doomsday Confluence relevance 0.64 · 4.8% (41 of 850 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (130 of 850 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.31 · 37.3% (317 of 850 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.37 · 19.4% (165 of 850 decks)
- Haunt the Network relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (49 of 850 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.54 · 3.6% (31 of 850 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.57 · 2.5% (21 of 850 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (43 of 850 decks)
- Great Intelligence's Plan relevance 0.42 · 3.8% (32 of 850 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (45 of 850 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 0.27 · 11.9% (101 of 850 decks)
- Mind Grind relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (48 of 850 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.24 · 19.1% (162 of 850 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (36 of 850 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (31 of 850 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.20 · 27.4% (233 of 850 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.26 · 6.6% (56 of 850 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.17 · 38.2% (325 of 850 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.28 · 4.6% (39 of 850 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (58 of 850 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (53 of 850 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (35 of 850 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.23 · 8.0% (68 of 850 decks)
- Nanogene Conversion relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (24 of 850 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.21 · 9.6% (82 of 850 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (29 of 850 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (39 of 850 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (33 of 850 decks)
- Tasha's Hideous Laughter relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (29 of 850 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (37 of 850 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (23 of 850 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (25 of 850 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (23 of 850 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.16 · 9.5% (81 of 850 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (22 of 850 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (22 of 850 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Tezzeret, Master of the Bridge relevance 0.61 · 48.1% (409 of 850 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.64 · 18.9% (161 of 850 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.45 · 5.8% (49 of 850 decks)
- Tezzeret, Agent of Bolas relevance 0.50 · 2.8% (24 of 850 decks)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (36 of 850 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (22 of 850 decks)
All utility lands (41)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.55 · 49.1% (417 of 850 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.58 · 42.4% (360 of 850 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.68 · 15.2% (129 of 850 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.54 · 32.8% (279 of 850 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.63 · 18.1% (154 of 850 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.52 · 34.0% (289 of 850 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.45 · 32.6% (277 of 850 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.46 · 18.4% (156 of 850 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.48 · 6.5% (55 of 850 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.38 · 18.2% (155 of 850 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.35 · 15.6% (133 of 850 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.43 · 5.8% (49 of 850 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.38 · 10.9% (93 of 850 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.42 · 4.5% (38 of 850 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.34 · 7.8% (66 of 850 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.48 · 2.8% (24 of 850 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.25 · 20.9% (178 of 850 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (37 of 850 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.27 · 12.6% (107 of 850 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.25 · 16.4% (139 of 850 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (36 of 850 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.23 · 16.1% (137 of 850 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.22 · 16.4% (139 of 850 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (60 of 850 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.39 · 2.8% (24 of 850 decks)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (48 of 850 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.22 · 12.4% (105 of 850 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.21 · 16.1% (137 of 850 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.22 · 11.2% (95 of 850 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (60 of 850 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.17 · 27.2% (231 of 850 decks)
- Restless Reef relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (32 of 850 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.16 · 19.3% (164 of 850 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (43 of 850 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (21 of 850 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.14 · 25.5% (217 of 850 decks)
- Nephalia Drownyard relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (33 of 850 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (50 of 850 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (72 of 850 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (21 of 850 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 4.6% (39 of 850 decks)
All lands (50)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.45 · 58.2% (495 of 850 decks)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 0.46 · 55.4% (471 of 850 decks)
- Mistvault Bridge relevance 0.46 · 45.6% (388 of 850 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.56 · 26.8% (228 of 850 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.64 · 7.6% (65 of 850 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.64 · 7.5% (64 of 850 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.64 · 7.5% (64 of 850 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.46 · 26.4% (224 of 850 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.37 · 20.1% (171 of 850 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.37 · 19.9% (169 of 850 decks)
- River of Tears relevance 0.33 · 21.4% (182 of 850 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.54 · 3.1% (26 of 850 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.32 · 12.8% (109 of 850 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.25 · 33.1% (281 of 850 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (160 of 850 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.30 · 10.4% (88 of 850 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.21 · 32.6% (277 of 850 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.21 · 30.0% (255 of 850 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (64 of 850 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (98 of 850 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (64 of 850 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.15 · 52.5% (446 of 850 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (56 of 850 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.26 · 7.6% (65 of 850 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.16 · 46.1% (392 of 850 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (48 of 850 decks)
- Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (38 of 850 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (47 of 850 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.25 · 6.5% (55 of 850 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.14 · 49.2% (418 of 850 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (52 of 850 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (37 of 850 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.16 · 31.6% (269 of 850 decks)
- Hidden Lair relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (30 of 850 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.17 · 28.2% (240 of 850 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 8.2% (70 of 850 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.12 · 56.6% (481 of 850 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.16 · 23.4% (199 of 850 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.10 · 60.6% (515 of 850 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.16 · 20.6% (175 of 850 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (32 of 850 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (27 of 850 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (28 of 850 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (28 of 850 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (27 of 850 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (43 of 850 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (26 of 850 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (24 of 850 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.13 · 27.1% (230 of 850 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (25 of 850 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for The Cyber-Controller, from 850 real Commander decks.