Cards like Parasitic Impetus
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Underworld Dreams
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Underworld Dreams 31%
- Fate Unraveler 22%
Cards like Revenge of Ravens
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Scrawling Crawler
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Triton Shorestalker
1.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Dimir decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Dimir decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.42 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Triton Shorestalker 18%
- Slither Blade 18%
- Invisible Stalker 17%
- Inkfathom Infiltrator 12%
- Mist-Cloaked Herald 3%
- Tormented Soul 2%
- Gudul Lurker 2%
- Latch Seeker 1%
Other options: Phantom Warrior, Talas Warrior, Hazy Homunculus, Plasma Elemental, Mystic of the Hidden Way, Covert Operative, Phantom Ninja, Tidal Kraken, Metathran Soldier
Cards like Rhystic Study
2.0× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Dimir decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Dimir decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 23%
- Mystic Remora 23%
Cards like Force of Will
2.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Dimir decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Force of Will 16%
- Force of Negation 16%
Cards like Deadly Rollick
1.6× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Dimir decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Dimir decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
2.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Dimir decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Sol Ring
2.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 83% of other Dimir decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Thought Vessel
3.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Dimir decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Windfall
3.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Pongify
1.6× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Dimir decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Dimir decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Pongify 19%
- Rapid Hybridization 17%
Cards like Bident of Thassa
1.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Dimir decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Other options: Sleeper's Robe, Mischievous Catgeist // Catlike Curiosity
Cards like Gray Merchant of Asphodel
5.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Dimir decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Feed the Swarm
1.1× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 45% of other Dimir decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other Dimir decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Feed the Swarm 29%
- Withering Torment 22%
- Infernal Grasp 13%
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
2.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Dimir decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Propaganda
4.5× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Dimir decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Dimir decks
All top picks (50)
- Vile Consumption relevance 0.90 · 28.6% (338 of 1,180 decks)
- Breathstealer's Crypt relevance 0.86 · 25.0% (295 of 1,180 decks)
- Painful Quandary relevance 0.70 · 42.5% (502 of 1,180 decks)
- Loyal Subordinate relevance 0.64 · 48.4% (571 of 1,180 decks)
- True-Name Nemesis relevance 0.80 · 25.7% (303 of 1,180 decks)
- Underworld Dreams relevance 0.74 · 31.4% (371 of 1,180 decks)
- Fate Unraveler relevance 0.78 · 22.3% (263 of 1,180 decks)
- Hissing Miasma relevance 0.85 · 14.5% (171 of 1,180 decks)
- Undermine relevance 0.62 · 43.7% (516 of 1,180 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 0.76 · 23.4% (276 of 1,180 decks)
- Clutch of the Undercity relevance 0.75 · 21.3% (251 of 1,180 decks)
- Ankh of Mishra relevance 0.89 · 10.3% (122 of 1,180 decks)
- Suspended Sentence relevance 0.78 · 15.8% (187 of 1,180 decks)
- Court of Ambition relevance 0.73 · 21.3% (251 of 1,180 decks)
- Polluted Bonds relevance 0.76 · 16.8% (198 of 1,180 decks)
- Rug of Smothering relevance 0.76 · 15.4% (182 of 1,180 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.69 · 24.5% (289 of 1,180 decks)
- Seizan, Perverter of Truth relevance 0.82 · 11.7% (138 of 1,180 decks)
- Coveted Peacock relevance 0.86 · 9.4% (111 of 1,180 decks)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 0.65 · 28.1% (332 of 1,180 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 0.69 · 19.4% (229 of 1,180 decks)
- This Is How It Ends relevance 0.81 · 9.6% (113 of 1,180 decks)
- Bladegriff Prototype relevance 0.80 · 10.1% (119 of 1,180 decks)
- Ghoulish Impetus relevance 0.64 · 23.9% (282 of 1,180 decks)
- Blood Reckoning relevance 0.79 · 9.6% (113 of 1,180 decks)
- Blood Seeker relevance 0.75 · 12.1% (143 of 1,180 decks)
- Eye of Nidhogg relevance 0.68 · 15.7% (185 of 1,180 decks)
- Mai, Scornful Striker relevance 0.69 · 12.3% (145 of 1,180 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.58 · 24.4% (288 of 1,180 decks)
- Gixian Puppeteer relevance 0.70 · 11.4% (135 of 1,180 decks)
- Soul Barrier relevance 0.78 · 5.8% (68 of 1,180 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.60 · 18.9% (223 of 1,180 decks)
- Occult Epiphany relevance 0.74 · 6.7% (79 of 1,180 decks)
- Inkfathom Witch relevance 0.70 · 8.7% (103 of 1,180 decks)
- Killing Wave relevance 0.68 · 9.7% (115 of 1,180 decks)
- South Wind Avatar relevance 0.71 · 7.3% (86 of 1,180 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.60 · 14.7% (173 of 1,180 decks)
- Marchesa's Decree relevance 0.70 · 7.3% (86 of 1,180 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 0.71 · 6.5% (77 of 1,180 decks)
- Sadistic Shell Game relevance 0.71 · 6.6% (78 of 1,180 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.68 · 8.4% (99 of 1,180 decks)
- Loyal Drake relevance 0.69 · 6.6% (78 of 1,180 decks)
- Duskmantle Seer relevance 0.69 · 7.0% (83 of 1,180 decks)
- Inkfathom Infiltrator relevance 0.61 · 11.9% (140 of 1,180 decks)
- Thrumming Stone relevance 0.65 · 9.2% (108 of 1,180 decks)
- Vicious Conquistador relevance 0.81 · 4.2% (49 of 1,180 decks)
- Pulse Tracker relevance 0.76 · 4.5% (53 of 1,180 decks)
- Vraan, Executioner Thane relevance 0.70 · 5.3% (63 of 1,180 decks)
- Twilight Prophet relevance 0.53 · 18.5% (218 of 1,180 decks)
- Mardu Shadowspear relevance 0.80 · 4.1% (48 of 1,180 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Loyal Subordinate relevance 0.64 · 48.4% (571 of 1,180 decks)
- True-Name Nemesis relevance 0.80 · 25.7% (303 of 1,180 decks)
- Fate Unraveler relevance 0.78 · 22.3% (263 of 1,180 decks)
- Rug of Smothering relevance 0.76 · 15.4% (182 of 1,180 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.69 · 24.5% (289 of 1,180 decks)
- Seizan, Perverter of Truth relevance 0.82 · 11.7% (138 of 1,180 decks)
- Coveted Peacock relevance 0.86 · 9.4% (111 of 1,180 decks)
- Bladegriff Prototype relevance 0.80 · 10.1% (119 of 1,180 decks)
- Blood Seeker relevance 0.75 · 12.1% (143 of 1,180 decks)
- Mai, Scornful Striker relevance 0.69 · 12.3% (145 of 1,180 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.58 · 24.4% (288 of 1,180 decks)
- Gixian Puppeteer relevance 0.70 · 11.4% (135 of 1,180 decks)
- Inkfathom Witch relevance 0.70 · 8.7% (103 of 1,180 decks)
- South Wind Avatar relevance 0.71 · 7.3% (86 of 1,180 decks)
- Loyal Drake relevance 0.69 · 6.6% (78 of 1,180 decks)
- Duskmantle Seer relevance 0.69 · 7.0% (83 of 1,180 decks)
- Inkfathom Infiltrator relevance 0.61 · 11.9% (140 of 1,180 decks)
- Vicious Conquistador relevance 0.81 · 4.2% (49 of 1,180 decks)
- Pulse Tracker relevance 0.76 · 4.5% (53 of 1,180 decks)
- Vraan, Executioner Thane relevance 0.70 · 5.3% (63 of 1,180 decks)
- Twilight Prophet relevance 0.53 · 18.5% (218 of 1,180 decks)
- Mardu Shadowspear relevance 0.80 · 4.1% (48 of 1,180 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.67 · 6.7% (79 of 1,180 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.50 · 24.3% (287 of 1,180 decks)
- Summon: Anima relevance 0.65 · 6.6% (78 of 1,180 decks)
- Rat Colony relevance 0.61 · 9.2% (108 of 1,180 decks)
- Anowon, the Ruin Thief relevance 0.59 · 9.4% (111 of 1,180 decks)
- Braids, Cabal Minion relevance 0.62 · 6.8% (80 of 1,180 decks)
- Enduring Tenacity relevance 0.64 · 5.4% (64 of 1,180 decks)
- Keen Duelist relevance 0.58 · 9.6% (113 of 1,180 decks)
- Thieving Skydiver relevance 0.51 · 15.3% (181 of 1,180 decks)
- Nighthawk Scavenger relevance 0.54 · 12.1% (143 of 1,180 decks)
- Raven Eagle relevance 0.60 · 7.5% (88 of 1,180 decks)
- Filth relevance 0.59 · 7.4% (87 of 1,180 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.48 · 16.3% (192 of 1,180 decks)
- Soot Imp relevance 0.69 · 4.2% (50 of 1,180 decks)
- Moseo, Vein's New Dean relevance 0.73 · 3.9% (46 of 1,180 decks)
- Stinkdrinker Bandit relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (118 of 1,180 decks)
- Cryptolith Fragment // Aurora of Emrakul relevance 0.60 · 5.1% (60 of 1,180 decks)
- Vito, Thorn of the Dusk Rose relevance 0.60 · 4.9% (58 of 1,180 decks)
- Stensian Sanguinist // Exsanguinate relevance 0.65 · 4.3% (51 of 1,180 decks)
- Ophiomancer relevance 0.53 · 9.2% (109 of 1,180 decks)
- Zareth San, the Trickster relevance 0.52 · 10.2% (120 of 1,180 decks)
- Shadowmage Infiltrator relevance 0.55 · 7.5% (88 of 1,180 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.43 · 21.9% (259 of 1,180 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 0.56 · 6.4% (76 of 1,180 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 0.48 · 12.6% (149 of 1,180 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (116 of 1,180 decks)
- Viseling relevance 0.76 · 3.1% (37 of 1,180 decks)
- Rankle, Master of Pranks relevance 0.43 · 18.5% (218 of 1,180 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ankh of Mishra relevance 0.89 · 10.3% (122 of 1,180 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.60 · 18.9% (223 of 1,180 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.68 · 8.4% (99 of 1,180 decks)
- Thrumming Stone relevance 0.65 · 9.2% (108 of 1,180 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.71 · 4.7% (55 of 1,180 decks)
- Smuggler's Copter relevance 0.64 · 4.8% (57 of 1,180 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.60 · 6.8% (80 of 1,180 decks)
- Cloak and Dagger relevance 0.56 · 6.4% (76 of 1,180 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.56 · 6.7% (79 of 1,180 decks)
- Isolation Cell relevance 0.73 · 3.4% (40 of 1,180 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.62 · 4.2% (49 of 1,180 decks)
- Iron Maiden relevance 0.67 · 3.5% (41 of 1,180 decks)
- Teferi's Puzzle Box relevance 0.59 · 4.2% (50 of 1,180 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.50 · 7.2% (85 of 1,180 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (84 of 1,180 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (138 of 1,180 decks)
- Vorpal Sword relevance 0.48 · 7.2% (85 of 1,180 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.50 · 5.3% (62 of 1,180 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.62 · 3.4% (40 of 1,180 decks)
- Sword of War and Peace relevance 0.64 · 3.2% (38 of 1,180 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.39 · 13.7% (162 of 1,180 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.40 · 11.7% (138 of 1,180 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.44 · 8.0% (94 of 1,180 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (104 of 1,180 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.35 · 16.4% (194 of 1,180 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.40 · 8.2% (97 of 1,180 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.40 · 7.8% (92 of 1,180 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.36 · 12.0% (142 of 1,180 decks)
- Ghost Vacuum relevance 0.50 · 3.9% (46 of 1,180 decks)
- Geth's Grimoire relevance 0.56 · 3.1% (37 of 1,180 decks)
- Mask of Riddles relevance 0.47 · 4.2% (50 of 1,180 decks)
- Jet Medallion relevance 0.32 · 14.0% (165 of 1,180 decks)
- Bontu's Monument relevance 0.38 · 6.5% (77 of 1,180 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.33 · 10.8% (128 of 1,180 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.55 · 2.6% (31 of 1,180 decks)
- Sword of Light and Shadow relevance 0.53 · 2.8% (33 of 1,180 decks)
- The Darkness Crystal relevance 0.36 · 6.2% (73 of 1,180 decks)
- Sword of Forge and Frontier relevance 0.54 · 2.5% (29 of 1,180 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (83 of 1,180 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.30 · 10.3% (122 of 1,180 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.43 · 3.2% (38 of 1,180 decks)
- Laser Screwdriver relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (31 of 1,180 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.44 · 3.0% (35 of 1,180 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (70 of 1,180 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.27 · 9.9% (117 of 1,180 decks)
- Mindcrank relevance 0.27 · 9.7% (115 of 1,180 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (84 of 1,180 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (40 of 1,180 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.20 · 30.8% (363 of 1,180 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (42 of 1,180 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Vile Consumption relevance 0.90 · 28.6% (338 of 1,180 decks)
- Breathstealer's Crypt relevance 0.86 · 25.0% (295 of 1,180 decks)
- Painful Quandary relevance 0.70 · 42.5% (502 of 1,180 decks)
- Underworld Dreams relevance 0.74 · 31.4% (371 of 1,180 decks)
- Hissing Miasma relevance 0.85 · 14.5% (171 of 1,180 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 0.76 · 23.4% (276 of 1,180 decks)
- Court of Ambition relevance 0.73 · 21.3% (251 of 1,180 decks)
- Polluted Bonds relevance 0.76 · 16.8% (198 of 1,180 decks)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 0.65 · 28.1% (332 of 1,180 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 0.69 · 19.4% (229 of 1,180 decks)
- Ghoulish Impetus relevance 0.64 · 23.9% (282 of 1,180 decks)
- Blood Reckoning relevance 0.79 · 9.6% (113 of 1,180 decks)
- Eye of Nidhogg relevance 0.68 · 15.7% (185 of 1,180 decks)
- Soul Barrier relevance 0.78 · 5.8% (68 of 1,180 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.60 · 14.7% (173 of 1,180 decks)
- Marchesa's Decree relevance 0.70 · 7.3% (86 of 1,180 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 0.71 · 6.5% (77 of 1,180 decks)
- Tainted Remedy relevance 0.72 · 4.7% (56 of 1,180 decks)
- Wound Reflection relevance 0.62 · 8.8% (104 of 1,180 decks)
- Torment of Scarabs relevance 0.71 · 4.6% (54 of 1,180 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.63 · 7.5% (89 of 1,180 decks)
- Bloodchief Ascension relevance 0.42 · 35.5% (419 of 1,180 decks)
- Coercive Impetus relevance 0.60 · 7.0% (83 of 1,180 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.61 · 5.8% (69 of 1,180 decks)
- Protection Racket relevance 0.62 · 4.8% (57 of 1,180 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.47 · 14.7% (173 of 1,180 decks)
- Blessing of Leeches relevance 0.62 · 4.7% (55 of 1,180 decks)
- Liliana's Caress relevance 0.61 · 4.7% (55 of 1,180 decks)
- Megrim relevance 0.62 · 4.5% (53 of 1,180 decks)
- Contaminated Bond relevance 0.73 · 3.4% (40 of 1,180 decks)
- Warlock Class relevance 0.63 · 4.2% (49 of 1,180 decks)
- Exquisite Blood relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (93 of 1,180 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.53 · 5.4% (64 of 1,180 decks)
- Sanguine Bond relevance 0.54 · 4.8% (57 of 1,180 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.45 · 11.6% (137 of 1,180 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.46 · 9.7% (114 of 1,180 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.57 · 4.2% (50 of 1,180 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.64 · 3.5% (41 of 1,180 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (69 of 1,180 decks)
- Price of Knowledge relevance 0.68 · 2.9% (34 of 1,180 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.48 · 5.1% (60 of 1,180 decks)
- Curse of Verbosity relevance 0.47 · 5.6% (66 of 1,180 decks)
- Zur's Weirding relevance 0.58 · 3.6% (42 of 1,180 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.48 · 4.7% (56 of 1,180 decks)
- Waste Not relevance 0.51 · 4.3% (51 of 1,180 decks)
- No Mercy relevance 0.42 · 8.4% (99 of 1,180 decks)
- Military Intelligence relevance 0.46 · 4.7% (55 of 1,180 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.45 · 4.6% (54 of 1,180 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.42 · 5.8% (68 of 1,180 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.43 · 5.0% (59 of 1,180 decks)
All instants (50)
- Undermine relevance 0.62 · 43.7% (516 of 1,180 decks)
- Clutch of the Undercity relevance 0.75 · 21.3% (251 of 1,180 decks)
- Suspended Sentence relevance 0.78 · 15.8% (187 of 1,180 decks)
- This Is How It Ends relevance 0.81 · 9.6% (113 of 1,180 decks)
- Occult Epiphany relevance 0.74 · 6.7% (79 of 1,180 decks)
- Countersquall relevance 0.45 · 34.6% (408 of 1,180 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.54 · 15.1% (178 of 1,180 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.53 · 8.8% (104 of 1,180 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (110 of 1,180 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (98 of 1,180 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.49 · 6.8% (80 of 1,180 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.51 · 4.7% (56 of 1,180 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.41 · 12.7% (150 of 1,180 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.46 · 7.4% (87 of 1,180 decks)
- Perplex relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (101 of 1,180 decks)
- Whirlwind Denial relevance 0.55 · 4.1% (48 of 1,180 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.45 · 6.7% (79 of 1,180 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.41 · 9.5% (112 of 1,180 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (63 of 1,180 decks)
- Darkness relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (63 of 1,180 decks)
- Hellish Rebuke relevance 0.58 · 3.2% (38 of 1,180 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.50 · 4.1% (48 of 1,180 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.32 · 20.9% (247 of 1,180 decks)
- Thieves' Fortune relevance 0.57 · 3.1% (37 of 1,180 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.37 · 11.5% (136 of 1,180 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.40 · 8.1% (96 of 1,180 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.33 · 15.5% (183 of 1,180 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (54 of 1,180 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.32 · 16.4% (193 of 1,180 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.55 · 3.1% (36 of 1,180 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.31 · 17.1% (202 of 1,180 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (92 of 1,180 decks)
- Soul Shatter relevance 0.38 · 7.6% (90 of 1,180 decks)
- Memory Plunder relevance 0.37 · 8.2% (97 of 1,180 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.37 · 7.6% (90 of 1,180 decks)
- Soul Manipulation relevance 0.41 · 4.7% (56 of 1,180 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (90 of 1,180 decks)
- Withering Torment relevance 0.28 · 21.5% (254 of 1,180 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.35 · 8.4% (99 of 1,180 decks)
- Sudden Spoiling relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (53 of 1,180 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (96 of 1,180 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.29 · 15.8% (186 of 1,180 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.27 · 23.7% (280 of 1,180 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.27 · 19.3% (228 of 1,180 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.27 · 16.9% (199 of 1,180 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.24 · 27.3% (322 of 1,180 decks)
- Baleful Mastery relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (56 of 1,180 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (83 of 1,180 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.26 · 19.8% (234 of 1,180 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.24 · 25.8% (304 of 1,180 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Killing Wave relevance 0.68 · 9.7% (115 of 1,180 decks)
- Sadistic Shell Game relevance 0.71 · 6.6% (78 of 1,180 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.51 · 19.8% (234 of 1,180 decks)
- Will of the Abzan relevance 0.55 · 13.1% (154 of 1,180 decks)
- Rush of Dread relevance 0.59 · 6.9% (81 of 1,180 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.55 · 8.6% (102 of 1,180 decks)
- Deadly Tempest relevance 0.56 · 6.1% (72 of 1,180 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.53 · 5.3% (62 of 1,180 decks)
- Echoing Return relevance 0.52 · 5.8% (69 of 1,180 decks)
- Damnable Pact relevance 0.63 · 3.7% (44 of 1,180 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.48 · 8.1% (96 of 1,180 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (75 of 1,180 decks)
- Dark Deal relevance 0.50 · 5.7% (67 of 1,180 decks)
- Knowledge Exploitation relevance 0.52 · 4.5% (53 of 1,180 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.46 · 6.7% (79 of 1,180 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.41 · 10.9% (129 of 1,180 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.45 · 6.4% (75 of 1,180 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.39 · 12.8% (151 of 1,180 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.45 · 5.6% (66 of 1,180 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.39 · 11.0% (130 of 1,180 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.34 · 17.3% (204 of 1,180 decks)
- Whispering Madness relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (77 of 1,180 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.36 · 12.1% (143 of 1,180 decks)
- Decree of Pain relevance 0.42 · 6.0% (71 of 1,180 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.39 · 7.2% (85 of 1,180 decks)
- Profane Command relevance 0.54 · 3.0% (35 of 1,180 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (70 of 1,180 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.29 · 16.2% (191 of 1,180 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (88 of 1,180 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.34 · 7.4% (87 of 1,180 decks)
- Syphon Mind relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (53 of 1,180 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.26 · 21.2% (250 of 1,180 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.22 · 32.8% (387 of 1,180 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.36 · 4.6% (54 of 1,180 decks)
- Dark Petition relevance 0.45 · 3.1% (36 of 1,180 decks)
- Beseech the Queen relevance 0.45 · 3.1% (36 of 1,180 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.31 · 6.7% (79 of 1,180 decks)
- Dream Harvest relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (55 of 1,180 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (52 of 1,180 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.43 · 2.7% (32 of 1,180 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.37 · 3.6% (42 of 1,180 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (52 of 1,180 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.24 · 11.5% (136 of 1,180 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (36 of 1,180 decks)
- Villainous Wrath relevance 0.41 · 2.5% (29 of 1,180 decks)
- Insatiable Avarice relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (38 of 1,180 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.20 · 21.4% (253 of 1,180 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (33 of 1,180 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.25 · 5.8% (69 of 1,180 decks)
- Patriarch's Bidding relevance 0.36 · 2.5% (30 of 1,180 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Ob Nixilis, the Hate-Twisted relevance 0.69 · 5.2% (61 of 1,180 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (34 of 1,180 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Leechridden Swamp relevance 0.65 · 11.3% (133 of 1,180 decks)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.43 · 41.3% (487 of 1,180 decks)
- Zof Consumption // Zof Bloodbog relevance 0.60 · 6.5% (77 of 1,180 decks)
- Volrath's Stronghold relevance 0.55 · 9.3% (110 of 1,180 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.58 · 4.3% (51 of 1,180 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (128 of 1,180 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.38 · 10.2% (120 of 1,180 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.62 · 2.7% (32 of 1,180 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.36 · 11.0% (130 of 1,180 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.28 · 27.8% (328 of 1,180 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.38 · 8.2% (97 of 1,180 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (58 of 1,180 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.30 · 19.2% (227 of 1,180 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.31 · 17.0% (201 of 1,180 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (49 of 1,180 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.34 · 9.7% (115 of 1,180 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.34 · 9.0% (106 of 1,180 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.26 · 27.6% (326 of 1,180 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.26 · 25.8% (305 of 1,180 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.32 · 11.3% (133 of 1,180 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.40 · 4.3% (51 of 1,180 decks)
- Barad-dûr relevance 0.44 · 3.7% (44 of 1,180 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.50 · 2.9% (34 of 1,180 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (53 of 1,180 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (50 of 1,180 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (177 of 1,180 decks)
- Restless Reef relevance 0.33 · 5.4% (64 of 1,180 decks)
- Agadeem's Awakening // Agadeem, the Undercrypt relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (60 of 1,180 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (97 of 1,180 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.25 · 16.6% (196 of 1,180 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.19 · 43.9% (518 of 1,180 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.48 · 2.5% (29 of 1,180 decks)
- Jwar Isle Refuge relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (57 of 1,180 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.23 · 22.2% (262 of 1,180 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (81 of 1,180 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (59 of 1,180 decks)
- Blackbloom Rogue // Blackbloom Bog relevance 0.43 · 2.8% (33 of 1,180 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.38 · 3.3% (39 of 1,180 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.35 · 3.7% (44 of 1,180 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.24 · 12.3% (145 of 1,180 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.26 · 8.1% (95 of 1,180 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (40 of 1,180 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.20 · 17.5% (207 of 1,180 decks)
- Castle Locthwain relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (38 of 1,180 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.16 · 36.4% (430 of 1,180 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.22 · 8.5% (100 of 1,180 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (43 of 1,180 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (37 of 1,180 decks)
- Witch's Cottage relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (33 of 1,180 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.17 · 19.3% (228 of 1,180 decks)
All lands (50)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.39 · 16.4% (193 of 1,180 decks)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (68 of 1,180 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (145 of 1,180 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.36 · 15.1% (178 of 1,180 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.36 · 13.6% (161 of 1,180 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.37 · 12.3% (145 of 1,180 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.38 · 11.2% (132 of 1,180 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.35 · 14.7% (174 of 1,180 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.35 · 13.5% (159 of 1,180 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.38 · 9.7% (114 of 1,180 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.42 · 5.3% (63 of 1,180 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.32 · 15.5% (183 of 1,180 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.30 · 21.5% (254 of 1,180 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.35 · 10.8% (127 of 1,180 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.26 · 33.7% (398 of 1,180 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.29 · 21.7% (256 of 1,180 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.33 · 11.0% (130 of 1,180 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.33 · 10.6% (125 of 1,180 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.32 · 11.4% (135 of 1,180 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.23 · 34.2% (404 of 1,180 decks)
- River of Tears relevance 0.30 · 9.8% (116 of 1,180 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.38 · 4.1% (48 of 1,180 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.29 · 9.0% (106 of 1,180 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.19 · 41.7% (492 of 1,180 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (57 of 1,180 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.21 · 24.2% (286 of 1,180 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.18 · 38.1% (450 of 1,180 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (52 of 1,180 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.15 · 47.3% (558 of 1,180 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (44 of 1,180 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.15 · 38.6% (455 of 1,180 decks)
- Submerged Boneyard relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (41 of 1,180 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.17 · 25.7% (303 of 1,180 decks)
- Soured Springs relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (32 of 1,180 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (86 of 1,180 decks)
- Hidden Lair relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (36 of 1,180 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.22 · 6.6% (78 of 1,180 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.12 · 54.7% (646 of 1,180 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.16 · 30.6% (361 of 1,180 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.17 · 21.1% (249 of 1,180 decks)
- Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (38 of 1,180 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.14 · 34.5% (407 of 1,180 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.28 · 3.3% (39 of 1,180 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (46 of 1,180 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.11 · 51.5% (608 of 1,180 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (32 of 1,180 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.12 · 29.7% (350 of 1,180 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (34 of 1,180 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.08 · 46.9% (554 of 1,180 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 80.7% (952 of 1,180 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sygg, River Cutthroat, from 1,180 real Commander decks.