Gravetiller Wurm
Played in 560 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
560 decks
-
Green 400 · 71.4%
-
Naya 52 · 9.3%
-
Golgari 34 · 6.1%
-
Selesnya 16 · 2.9%
-
Gruul 14 · 2.5%
-
Jund 13 · 2.3%
- Other (6) 31 · 5.5%
930+543+3+3+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 4.64 · 14.0% (334 of 2,389 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.17 · 1.6% (16 of 977 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Flaming Fist relevance 0.97 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.81 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.73 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.59 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.29 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.26 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.26 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All parallel cards (5)
All most relevant (30)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 5.24 · 74.6% (418 of 560 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 4.92 · 72.9% (408 of 560 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 4.87 · 63.2% (354 of 560 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 4.70 · 59.3% (332 of 560 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 4.69 · 54.1% (303 of 560 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 4.68 · 60.9% (341 of 560 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 4.50 · 72.5% (406 of 560 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 4.45 · 60.2% (337 of 560 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 4.38 · 58.2% (326 of 560 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 4.04 · 54.8% (307 of 560 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 3.92 · 66.8% (374 of 560 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 3.89 · 53.6% (300 of 560 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 3.69 · 72.0% (403 of 560 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 3.55 · 44.1% (247 of 560 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 3.49 · 54.5% (305 of 560 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 3.49 · 66.3% (371 of 560 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 3.43 · 53.0% (297 of 560 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 3.40 · 46.4% (260 of 560 decks)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 3.37 · 40.2% (225 of 560 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 3.30 · 44.3% (248 of 560 decks)
- Soul Swallower relevance 2.97 · 36.1% (202 of 560 decks)
- Ravenous Lindwurm relevance 2.91 · 32.9% (184 of 560 decks)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 2.90 · 37.0% (207 of 560 decks)
- Roar of the Wurm relevance 2.79 · 32.7% (183 of 560 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 2.72 · 52.1% (292 of 560 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 2.71 · 34.1% (191 of 560 decks)
- Duskdale Wurm relevance 2.63 · 29.3% (164 of 560 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 2.62 · 37.3% (209 of 560 decks)
- Pouncing Wurm relevance 2.62 · 27.7% (155 of 560 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 2.57 · 53.0% (297 of 560 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 5.24 · 74.6% (418 of 560 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 4.92 · 72.9% (408 of 560 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 4.87 · 63.2% (354 of 560 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 4.70 · 59.3% (332 of 560 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 4.69 · 54.1% (303 of 560 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 4.68 · 60.9% (341 of 560 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 4.50 · 72.5% (406 of 560 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 4.45 · 60.2% (337 of 560 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 4.38 · 58.2% (326 of 560 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 4.04 · 54.8% (307 of 560 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 3.92 · 66.8% (374 of 560 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 3.89 · 53.6% (300 of 560 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 3.69 · 72.0% (403 of 560 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 3.55 · 44.1% (247 of 560 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 3.49 · 54.5% (305 of 560 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 3.43 · 53.0% (297 of 560 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 3.40 · 46.4% (260 of 560 decks)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 3.37 · 40.2% (225 of 560 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 3.30 · 44.3% (248 of 560 decks)
- Soul Swallower relevance 2.97 · 36.1% (202 of 560 decks)
- Ravenous Lindwurm relevance 2.91 · 32.9% (184 of 560 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 2.72 · 52.1% (292 of 560 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 2.71 · 34.1% (191 of 560 decks)
- Duskdale Wurm relevance 2.63 · 29.3% (164 of 560 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 2.62 · 37.3% (209 of 560 decks)
- Pouncing Wurm relevance 2.62 · 27.7% (155 of 560 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 2.57 · 53.0% (297 of 560 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 2.47 · 39.3% (220 of 560 decks)
- Witherscale Wurm relevance 2.45 · 27.9% (156 of 560 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 2.44 · 29.6% (166 of 560 decks)
- Boneyard Wurm relevance 2.41 · 31.6% (177 of 560 decks)
- Siege Wurm relevance 2.37 · 27.7% (155 of 560 decks)
- Pathbreaker Wurm relevance 2.31 · 25.5% (143 of 560 decks)
- Phantom Wurm relevance 2.29 · 24.5% (137 of 560 decks)
- Deathcoil Wurm relevance 2.25 · 25.2% (141 of 560 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 2.18 · 49.5% (277 of 560 decks)
- Voracious Wurm relevance 2.17 · 24.3% (136 of 560 decks)
- Vigorspore Wurm relevance 2.14 · 23.8% (133 of 560 decks)
- Germinating Wurm relevance 2.13 · 27.5% (154 of 560 decks)
- Roaring Slagwurm relevance 2.11 · 22.7% (127 of 560 decks)
- Iron-Craw Crusher relevance 1.74 · 20.7% (116 of 560 decks)
- Argothian Wurm relevance 1.54 · 17.1% (96 of 560 decks)
- Havenwood Wurm relevance 1.52 · 15.2% (85 of 560 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 3.49 · 66.3% (371 of 560 decks)
- Wurmweaver Coil relevance 1.68 · 18.9% (106 of 560 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.53 · 59.5% (333 of 560 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 2.90 · 37.0% (207 of 560 decks)
- Roar of the Wurm relevance 2.79 · 32.7% (183 of 560 decks)
- Wurmcalling relevance 1.68 · 22.9% (128 of 560 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 1.80 · 35.4% (198 of 560 decks)
EDH data for Gravetiller Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 560 real decks.











































