Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.42 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.42 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.35 · 37.3% (28 of 75 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.28 · 49.3% (37 of 75 decks)
- Bramble Sovereign relevance 0.33 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Waiting in the Weeds relevance 0.39 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.25 · 50.7% (38 of 75 decks)
- Mirror of the Forebears relevance 0.39 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Soul Separator relevance 0.41 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.34 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.29 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.27 · 34.7% (26 of 75 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.25 · 42.7% (32 of 75 decks)
- Road of Return relevance 0.32 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 0.34 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.28 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.31 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.33 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Dual Nature relevance 0.36 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.29 · 22.7% (17 of 75 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.28 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.24 · 37.3% (28 of 75 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.28 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.25 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.29 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.27 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.24 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Gift relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.23 · 34.7% (26 of 75 decks)
- Dollhouse of Horrors relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.24 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.25 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.18 · 56.0% (42 of 75 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.22 · 34.7% (26 of 75 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.24 · 26.7% (20 of 75 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.19 · 46.7% (35 of 75 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.26 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.23 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.21 · 36.0% (27 of 75 decks)
- Nexus of Becoming relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.18 · 46.7% (35 of 75 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.25 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.18 · 42.7% (32 of 75 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.18 · 45.3% (34 of 75 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.24 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.24 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.16 · 54.7% (41 of 75 decks)
Card Stacks
25
Card Stacks
25Showing 1-2 of 25
Cards like Harrow
3.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 56%
- Entish Restoration 43%
- Roiling Regrowth 37%
- Scapeshift 24%
- Cycle of Renewal 13%
- Planar Engineering 4%
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
3.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 61%
- Three Visits 53%
- Skyshroud Claim 43%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 15%
- Glimpse the Core 11%
- Hunting Wilds 8%
- Ranger's Path 7%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Boundless Realms
18× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Boundless Realms 37%
- Traverse the Outlands 19%
- Reshape the Earth 9%
- New Frontiers 5%
- Celebrate the Harvest 4%
- Harvest Season 4%
- Nissa's Expedition 3%
Other options: Turtle Tracks, Slimefoot's Survey
Cards like Scute Swarm
4.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 41%
- Springheart Nantuko 35%
Cards like Ancient Greenwarden
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Wood Elves
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards like Eternal Witness
5.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other green decks
Cards like Explore
5.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards like Dungrove Elder
7.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
2.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Farhaven Elf
6.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
- Farhaven Elf 17%
- Primeval Herald 7%
- Ondu Giant 1%
Other options: Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary, Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru, Simulacrum Shaper, Quirion Trailblazer, Yavimaya Granger, Wild Wanderer
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
5.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Arbor Elf
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 20%
- Quirion Ranger 15%
- Scryb Ranger 9%
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
48% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 49%
- Cultivate 48%
- Kodama's Reach 33%
- Migration Path 12%
- Search for Tomorrow 8%
- Explosive Vegetation 8%
- Far Wanderings 5%
- Shared Roots 5%
- Primal Growth 4%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 3%
- Grow from the Ashes 3%
- Map the Frontier 1%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, They Went This Way, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
4.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
17× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Reclamation Sage
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists, Chomping Changeling, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
5.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Flora Colossus, Harmonious Grovestrider, Mirkwood Pathmaker
Cards like Sword of the Animist
5.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
3.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps
5.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards like Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
4.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.17 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Titania, Gaea Incarnate
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Paleoloth relevance 0.42 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Bramble Sovereign relevance 0.33 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.25 · 50.7% (38 of 75 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.29 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.27 · 34.7% (26 of 75 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.25 · 42.7% (32 of 75 decks)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 0.34 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.33 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.28 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.28 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.25 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.27 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.23 · 34.7% (26 of 75 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.24 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.22 · 34.7% (26 of 75 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.24 · 26.7% (20 of 75 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.19 · 46.7% (35 of 75 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.21 · 36.0% (27 of 75 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.18 · 46.7% (35 of 75 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.25 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.18 · 42.7% (32 of 75 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.18 · 45.3% (34 of 75 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.24 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.16 · 54.7% (41 of 75 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.18 · 41.3% (31 of 75 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.21 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.18 · 41.3% (31 of 75 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 0.22 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Deeproot Historian relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.20 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.21 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.19 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Bloomvine Regent // Claim Territory relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Riftsweeper relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Nacatl War-Pride relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Emeritus of Abundance // Regrowth relevance 0.23 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Frontier Guide relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Coiling Woodworm relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Avatar of Growth relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Archdruid relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Flourishing Bloom-Kin relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Timbermaw Larva relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.20 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Primeval Herald relevance 0.23 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Battlewand Oak relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 0.23 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.16 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Genesis relevance 0.22 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All artifacts (50)
- Mirror of the Forebears relevance 0.39 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Soul Separator relevance 0.41 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.34 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.24 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Gift relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Dollhouse of Horrors relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Nexus of Becoming relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.20 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Dermotaxi relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.19 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.19 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Bitterthorn, Nissa's Animus relevance 0.23 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.18 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.16 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.16 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Minion Reflector relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Storm Cauldron relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Mimic Vat relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Assembly Hall relevance 0.21 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Reito Lantern relevance 0.17 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Echo Chamber relevance 0.17 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.08 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Surveyor's Scope relevance 0.16 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- False Floor relevance 0.16 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.09 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Sundial of the Infinite relevance 0.15 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Thran Forge relevance 0.14 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Lodestone Bauble relevance 0.14 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.09 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Darksteel Garrison relevance 0.14 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All enchantments (50)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.28 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Dual Nature relevance 0.36 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.29 · 22.7% (17 of 75 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.26 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.23 · 28.0% (21 of 75 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.23 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.23 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Holistic Wisdom relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.16 · 32.0% (24 of 75 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.17 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Into the Wilds relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.14 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Night Soil relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.13 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.14 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.15 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Point the Way relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Elfhame Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.13 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Snake Pit relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Abzan Runemark relevance 0.20 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- City of Death relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.11 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Gravity Well relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.08 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Druid's Call relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Case of the Shattered Pact relevance 0.16 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.24 · 37.3% (28 of 75 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.18 · 56.0% (42 of 75 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.17 · 42.7% (32 of 75 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Snag relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.21 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.20 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Curious Herd relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.17 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Wildwood Rebirth relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.15 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.17 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.18 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.13 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Crash Landing relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.12 · 32.0% (24 of 75 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.17 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.15 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.14 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.12 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.10 · 34.7% (26 of 75 decks)
- Fungal Rebirth relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.11 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Reap relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.12 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Verdant Rebirth relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.06 · 62.7% (47 of 75 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.11 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Once and Future relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Barrier Breach relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Spore Cloud relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.07 · 40.0% (30 of 75 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Muscle Burst relevance 0.17 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Seedtime relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All sorceries (50)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.42 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.35 · 37.3% (28 of 75 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.28 · 49.3% (37 of 75 decks)
- Waiting in the Weeds relevance 0.39 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Road of Return relevance 0.32 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.31 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.29 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.24 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.22 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.24 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.16 · 42.7% (32 of 75 decks)
- New Frontiers relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.24 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.21 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Nature's Cloak relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.22 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.20 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.19 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 53.3% (40 of 75 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.17 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Bygone Marvels relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.20 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Celebrate the Harvest relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.16 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.10 · 61.3% (46 of 75 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.14 · 29.3% (22 of 75 decks)
- Wurmcalling relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.17 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.18 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.15 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
Planeswalkers
12
Planeswalkers
12 Showing 1-10 of 12
All planeswalkers (12)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.25 · 24.0% (18 of 75 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.24 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (25 of 75 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.11 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.08 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.06 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
Battles
1
Battles
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.08 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All utility lands (50)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.25 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.20 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 48.0% (36 of 75 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.23 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 40.0% (30 of 75 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.18 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.18 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.20 · 8.0% (6 of 75 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 21.3% (16 of 75 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (15 of 75 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.12 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.11 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.09 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.09 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.10 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.08 · 12.0% (9 of 75 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.13 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Zoetic Cavern relevance 0.12 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Centaur Garden relevance 0.10 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.06 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.06 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.08 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.09 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.09 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 0.09 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.09 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.09 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
Lands
42
Lands
42 Showing 1-10 of 42
All lands (42)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.16 · 30.7% (23 of 75 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.16 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.17 · 18.7% (14 of 75 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 25.3% (19 of 75 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.16 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.15 · 16.0% (12 of 75 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.15 · 13.3% (10 of 75 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 10.7% (8 of 75 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.15 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.10 · 14.7% (11 of 75 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (4 of 75 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.10 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.10 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.12 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.11 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.11 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.10 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.08 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.09 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.07 · 2.7% (2 of 75 decks)
- Hobbit Hole relevance 0.08 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.08 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.08 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.08 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.07 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.07 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.07 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.07 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.06 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.06 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.06 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 93.3% (70 of 75 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.04 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Baru, Fist of Krosa, from 75 real Commander decks.