Crucible of Worlds

Played in 117,834 decks

Crucible of Worlds
$33.00 €19.98

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Numot, the Devastator relevance 5.65 · 57.4% (521 of 907 decks)
  2. Verrak, Warped Sengir relevance 5.26 · 44.7% (390 of 873 decks)
  3. Doctor Doom, King of Latveria relevance 4.67 · 37.3% (3,999 of 10,720 decks)
  4. Dakkon Blackblade relevance 4.47 · 37.6% (342 of 910 decks)
  5. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.34 · 39.8% (2,148 of 5,392 decks)
  6. Zell Dincht relevance 3.98 · 56.7% (292 of 515 decks)
  7. Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 3.80 · 51.3% (290 of 565 decks)
  8. Zo-Zu the Punisher relevance 3.67 · 32.7% (453 of 1,386 decks)
  9. Quintorius, History Chaser relevance 3.67 · 18.5% (2,405 of 13,004 decks)
  10. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 3.66 · 33.3% (938 of 2,817 decks)
  11. Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 3.59 · 49.4% (38 of 77 decks)
  12. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.55 · 24.5% (2,866 of 11,715 decks)
  13. Koth, the Geomancer relevance 3.52 · 45.1% (209 of 463 decks)
  14. Nissa, Leyline Tamer relevance 3.44 · 42.3% (1,358 of 3,210 decks)
  15. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.42 · 40.1% (2,382 of 5,945 decks)
  16. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.38 · 33.6% (1,360 of 4,053 decks)
  17. Braids, Cabal Minion relevance 3.30 · 33.5% (262 of 783 decks)
  18. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 3.29 · 11.4% (1,334 of 11,750 decks)
  19. Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 3.28 · 37.9% (33 of 87 decks)
  20. Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 3.27 · 42.3% (156 of 369 decks)
  21. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.24 · 24.0% (878 of 3,654 decks)
  22. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.18 · 24.6% (2,244 of 9,139 decks)
  23. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 3.15 · 44.9% (1,596 of 3,553 decks)
  24. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.15 · 27.3% (1,440 of 5,279 decks)
  25. The Necrobloom relevance 3.10 · 28.7% (3,273 of 11,400 decks)
  26. Tomik, Distinguished Advokist relevance 3.03 · 57.1% (40 of 70 decks)
  27. Ib Halfheart, Goblin Tactician relevance 3.02 · 31.3% (163 of 521 decks)
  28. Terra, Herald of Hope relevance 3.01 · 6.7% (1,041 of 15,619 decks)
  29. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 3.00 · 53.9% (692 of 1,285 decks)
  30. River Song relevance 3.00 · 6.3% (149 of 2,368 decks)

Replaced By

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
All replaced by (5)
  1. Conduit of Worlds 6.2% of swaps out (6 swaps)
  2. Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar 4.1% of swaps out (4 swaps)
  3. Mole Man, Moloid Master 4.1% of swaps out (4 swaps)
  4. Glacierwood Siege 3.1% of swaps out (3 swaps)
  5. Life from the Loam 3.1% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All parallel cards (2)
  1. Conduit of Worlds
  2. Ramunap Excavator

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.58 41.0%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.57 44.2%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Exploration
    1.45 41.7%
    $29.98 €27.12
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.35 39.3%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.30 31.8%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.30 36.1%
    $22.74 €23.91
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.23 32.9%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.19 34.0%
    $9.97 €6.82
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.18 28.5%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Scute Swarm
    1.17 36.0%
    $8.53 €7.58
All most relevant (30)
  1. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.58 · 41.0% (48,323 of 117,834 decks)
  2. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.57 · 44.2% (52,113 of 117,834 decks)
  3. Exploration relevance 1.45 · 41.7% (49,150 of 117,834 decks)
  4. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.35 · 39.3% (46,258 of 117,834 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.30 · 31.8% (37,514 of 117,834 decks)
  6. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.30 · 36.1% (42,592 of 117,834 decks)
  7. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.23 · 32.9% (38,714 of 117,834 decks)
  8. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.19 · 34.0% (40,015 of 117,834 decks)
  9. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.18 · 28.5% (33,531 of 117,834 decks)
  10. Scute Swarm relevance 1.17 · 36.0% (42,399 of 117,834 decks)
  11. Scapeshift relevance 1.17 · 25.8% (30,401 of 117,834 decks)
  12. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.16 · 29.9% (35,253 of 117,834 decks)
  13. Crop Rotation relevance 1.11 · 35.6% (41,891 of 117,834 decks)
  14. Zuran Orb relevance 1.09 · 26.4% (31,054 of 117,834 decks)
  15. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.04 · 33.5% (39,430 of 117,834 decks)
  16. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.02 · 25.6% (30,127 of 117,834 decks)
  17. Harrow relevance 0.95 · 28.7% (33,789 of 117,834 decks)
  18. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.92 · 20.9% (24,679 of 117,834 decks)
  19. Life from the Loam relevance 0.91 · 22.8% (26,832 of 117,834 decks)
  20. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.89 · 21.5% (25,317 of 117,834 decks)
  21. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (26,575 of 117,834 decks)
  22. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.79 · 22.0% (25,917 of 117,834 decks)
  23. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.78 · 22.8% (26,836 of 117,834 decks)
  24. Six relevance 0.76 · 19.4% (22,870 of 117,834 decks)
  25. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (20,363 of 117,834 decks)
  26. Burgeoning relevance 0.74 · 17.6% (20,760 of 117,834 decks)
  27. Spelunking relevance 0.68 · 16.5% (19,427 of 117,834 decks)
  28. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.68 · 15.1% (17,813 of 117,834 decks)
  29. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.66 · 16.1% (18,964 of 117,834 decks)
  30. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.65 · 14.8% (17,472 of 117,834 decks)

Creatures

22

Showing 1-10 of 22

Page size
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.58 41.0%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.57 44.2%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.35 39.3%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.30 31.8%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.30 36.1%
    $22.74 €23.91
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.23 32.9%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.19 34.0%
    $9.97 €6.82
  • Scute Swarm
    1.17 36.0%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.04 33.5%
    $4.15 €3.05
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.02 25.6%
    $7.21 €6.81
All creatures (22)
  1. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.58 · 41.0% (48,323 of 117,834 decks)
  2. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.57 · 44.2% (52,113 of 117,834 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.35 · 39.3% (46,258 of 117,834 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.30 · 31.8% (37,514 of 117,834 decks)
  5. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.30 · 36.1% (42,592 of 117,834 decks)
  6. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.23 · 32.9% (38,714 of 117,834 decks)
  7. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.19 · 34.0% (40,015 of 117,834 decks)
  8. Scute Swarm relevance 1.17 · 36.0% (42,399 of 117,834 decks)
  9. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.04 · 33.5% (39,430 of 117,834 decks)
  10. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.02 · 25.6% (30,127 of 117,834 decks)
  11. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.92 · 20.9% (24,679 of 117,834 decks)
  12. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.89 · 21.5% (25,317 of 117,834 decks)
  13. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (26,575 of 117,834 decks)
  14. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.79 · 22.0% (25,917 of 117,834 decks)
  15. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.78 · 22.8% (26,836 of 117,834 decks)
  16. Six relevance 0.76 · 19.4% (22,870 of 117,834 decks)
  17. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (20,363 of 117,834 decks)
  18. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.66 · 16.1% (18,964 of 117,834 decks)
  19. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.62 · 14.9% (17,569 of 117,834 decks)
  20. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.62 · 14.3% (16,869 of 117,834 decks)
  21. Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.61 · 12.9% (15,185 of 117,834 decks)
  22. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (14,535 of 117,834 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.16 29.9%
    $1.12 €1.38
  • Zuran Orb
    1.09 26.4%
    $3.69 €1.81
  • Amulet of Vigor
    0.68 15.1%
    $50.54 €33.19
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.65 14.8%
    $3.05 €3.24
All artifacts (4)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.16 · 29.9% (35,253 of 117,834 decks)
  2. Zuran Orb relevance 1.09 · 26.4% (31,054 of 117,834 decks)
  3. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.68 · 15.1% (17,813 of 117,834 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.65 · 14.8% (17,472 of 117,834 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.45 41.7%
    $29.98 €27.12
  • Burgeoning
    0.74 17.6%
    $34.04 €23.83
  • Spelunking
    0.68 16.5%
    $3.43 €3.18
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.45 · 41.7% (49,150 of 117,834 decks)
  2. Burgeoning relevance 0.74 · 17.6% (20,760 of 117,834 decks)
  3. Spelunking relevance 0.68 · 16.5% (19,427 of 117,834 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.11 35.6%
    $3.83 €3.52
  • Harrow
    0.95 28.7%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Constant Mists
    0.64 12.6%
    $19.96 €13.83
  • Entish Restoration
    0.61 16.2%
    $2.62 €1.95
  • Beast Within
    0.61 30.1%
    $0.65 €0.84
All instants (5)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.11 · 35.6% (41,891 of 117,834 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 0.95 · 28.7% (33,789 of 117,834 decks)
  3. Constant Mists relevance 0.64 · 12.6% (14,834 of 117,834 decks)
  4. Entish Restoration relevance 0.61 · 16.2% (19,129 of 117,834 decks)
  5. Beast Within relevance 0.61 · 30.1% (35,440 of 117,834 decks)

Sorceries

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.18 28.5%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Scapeshift
    1.17 25.8%
    $41.65 €33.09
  • Life from the Loam
    0.91 22.8%
    $5.21 €5.11
  • Nature's Lore
    0.65 32.9%
    $2.23 €2.81
All sorceries (4)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.18 · 28.5% (33,531 of 117,834 decks)
  2. Scapeshift relevance 1.17 · 25.8% (30,401 of 117,834 decks)
  3. Life from the Loam relevance 0.91 · 22.8% (26,832 of 117,834 decks)
  4. Nature's Lore relevance 0.65 · 32.9% (38,709 of 117,834 decks)

Utility Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    1.03 27.3%
    $28.83 €27.39
  • Strip Mine
    0.90 23.8%
    $10.71 €5.69
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.77 30.3%
    $16.76 €13.00
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.67 26.8%
    $49.49 €39.74
All utility lands (4)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 1.03 · 27.3% (32,201 of 117,834 decks)
  2. Strip Mine relevance 0.90 · 23.8% (28,069 of 117,834 decks)
  3. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.77 · 30.3% (35,682 of 117,834 decks)
  4. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.67 · 26.8% (31,600 of 117,834 decks)

Lands

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    0.89 42.1%
    $0.64 €0.95
  • Verdant Catacombs
    0.80 34.7%
    $29.04 €24.74
  • Lotus Field
    0.75 18.4%
    $2.61 €2.59
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.75 32.7%
    $19.18 €16.84
  • Misty Rainforest
    0.69 30.3%
    $35.75 €26.52
  • Windswept Heath
    0.66 28.9%
    $12.38 €10.50
  • Prismatic Vista
    0.62 20.0%
    $30.56 €32.56
  • Overgrown Tomb
    0.61 25.7%
    $8.77 €8.45
All lands (8)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 0.89 · 42.1% (49,590 of 117,834 decks)
  2. Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.80 · 34.7% (40,888 of 117,834 decks)
  3. Lotus Field relevance 0.75 · 18.4% (21,704 of 117,834 decks)
  4. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.75 · 32.7% (38,499 of 117,834 decks)
  5. Misty Rainforest relevance 0.69 · 30.3% (35,718 of 117,834 decks)
  6. Windswept Heath relevance 0.66 · 28.9% (34,032 of 117,834 decks)
  7. Prismatic Vista relevance 0.62 · 20.0% (23,620 of 117,834 decks)
  8. Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.61 · 25.7% (30,226 of 117,834 decks)

EDH data for Crucible of Worlds: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 117,834 real decks.