Scapeshift

Played in 64,906 decks

Scapeshift
$41.33 €33.40

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.77 · 25.8% (3,015 of 11,691 decks)
  2. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.12 · 20.0% (1,075 of 5,380 decks)
  3. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 4.06 · 37.7% (1,601 of 4,246 decks)
  4. The Necrobloom relevance 3.72 · 32.3% (3,666 of 11,361 decks)
  5. Homer, the Hermit relevance 3.66 · 37.1% (1,714 of 4,616 decks)
  6. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.61 · 36.8% (1,483 of 4,035 decks)
  7. Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 3.57 · 20.0% (418 of 2,091 decks)
  8. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.55 · 33.0% (1,738 of 5,263 decks)
  9. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 3.31 · 48.4% (2,955 of 6,110 decks)
  10. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 3.30 · 19.3% (377 of 1,955 decks)
  11. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.24 · 19.3% (1,757 of 9,114 decks)
  12. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.23 · 24.6% (899 of 3,648 decks)
  13. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 3.07 · 9.8% (59 of 599 decks)
  14. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.96 · 48.0% (2,253 of 4,697 decks)
  15. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.96 · 58.7% (752 of 1,281 decks)
  16. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.95 · 33.4% (8,444 of 25,309 decks)
  17. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 2.93 · 27.8% (766 of 2,755 decks)
  18. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.89 · 30.9% (269 of 870 decks)
  19. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.86 · 26.0% (108 of 415 decks)
  20. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.74 · 31.0% (3,049 of 9,833 decks)
  21. Child of Alara relevance 2.68 · 9.6% (562 of 5,841 decks)
  22. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.65 · 15.8% (737 of 4,656 decks)
  23. Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 2.63 · 17.0% (137 of 804 decks)
  24. Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 2.60 · 21.1% (716 of 3,396 decks)
  25. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.58 · 27.3% (2,424 of 8,878 decks)
  26. Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 2.56 · 2.7% (288 of 10,830 decks)
  27. Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 2.39 · 16.9% (727 of 4,300 decks)
  28. Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 2.35 · 20.2% (423 of 2,099 decks)
  29. Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.35 · 6.0% (703 of 11,669 decks)
  30. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 2.32 · 2.7% (91 of 3,410 decks)

Parallel Cards

29

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    2.39 69.5%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Exploration
    2.29 66.0%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    2.29 64.5%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Splendid Reclamation
    2.09 50.5%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Crop Rotation
    2.06 66.2%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Icetill Explorer
    2.06 57.6%
    $23.22 €23.79
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    2.06 50.3%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    2.02 50.5%
    $7.18 €6.81
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.92 50.1%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Zuran Orb
    1.86 45.0%
    $3.56 €1.81
All most relevant (30)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 2.39 · 69.5% (45,101 of 64,906 decks)
  2. Exploration relevance 2.29 · 66.0% (42,825 of 64,906 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.29 · 64.5% (41,842 of 64,906 decks)
  4. Splendid Reclamation relevance 2.09 · 50.5% (32,798 of 64,906 decks)
  5. Crop Rotation relevance 2.06 · 66.2% (42,956 of 64,906 decks)
  6. Icetill Explorer relevance 2.06 · 57.6% (37,379 of 64,906 decks)
  7. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.06 · 50.3% (32,674 of 64,906 decks)
  8. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 2.02 · 50.5% (32,804 of 64,906 decks)
  9. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.92 · 50.1% (32,487 of 64,906 decks)
  10. Zuran Orb relevance 1.86 · 45.0% (29,191 of 64,906 decks)
  11. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.85 · 49.2% (31,930 of 64,906 decks)
  12. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.83 · 46.7% (30,290 of 64,906 decks)
  13. Scute Swarm relevance 1.81 · 55.4% (35,990 of 64,906 decks)
  14. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.76 · 50.1% (32,546 of 64,906 decks)
  15. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.73 · 55.6% (36,065 of 64,906 decks)
  16. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.67 · 43.8% (28,406 of 64,906 decks)
  17. Harrow relevance 1.57 · 47.5% (30,845 of 64,906 decks)
  18. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.49 · 34.0% (22,074 of 64,906 decks)
  19. Spelunking relevance 1.48 · 35.8% (23,265 of 64,906 decks)
  20. Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.45 · 32.4% (21,048 of 64,906 decks)
  21. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.43 · 29.1% (18,893 of 64,906 decks)
  22. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 31.9% (20,678 of 64,906 decks)
  23. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.39 · 35.9% (23,298 of 64,906 decks)
  24. Life from the Loam relevance 1.31 · 32.7% (21,226 of 64,906 decks)
  25. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.29 · 26.0% (16,905 of 64,906 decks)
  26. Burgeoning relevance 1.28 · 30.7% (19,929 of 64,906 decks)
  27. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.28 · 30.7% (19,955 of 64,906 decks)
  28. Six relevance 1.24 · 31.8% (20,669 of 64,906 decks)
  29. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.22 · 30.7% (19,897 of 64,906 decks)
  30. Constant Mists relevance 1.20 · 23.6% (15,315 of 64,906 decks)

Creatures

25

Showing 1-10 of 25

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    2.39 69.5%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    2.29 64.5%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Icetill Explorer
    2.06 57.6%
    $23.22 €23.79
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    2.06 50.3%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    2.02 50.5%
    $7.18 €6.81
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.92 50.1%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.85 49.2%
    $2.01 €2.65
  • Scute Swarm
    1.81 55.4%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.76 50.1%
    $9.94 €6.77
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.73 55.6%
    $4.18 €3.05
All creatures (25)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 2.39 · 69.5% (45,101 of 64,906 decks)
  2. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.29 · 64.5% (41,842 of 64,906 decks)
  3. Icetill Explorer relevance 2.06 · 57.6% (37,379 of 64,906 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.06 · 50.3% (32,674 of 64,906 decks)
  5. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 2.02 · 50.5% (32,804 of 64,906 decks)
  6. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.92 · 50.1% (32,487 of 64,906 decks)
  7. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.85 · 49.2% (31,930 of 64,906 decks)
  8. Scute Swarm relevance 1.81 · 55.4% (35,990 of 64,906 decks)
  9. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.76 · 50.1% (32,546 of 64,906 decks)
  10. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.73 · 55.6% (36,065 of 64,906 decks)
  11. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.67 · 43.8% (28,406 of 64,906 decks)
  12. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.49 · 34.0% (22,074 of 64,906 decks)
  13. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.43 · 29.1% (18,893 of 64,906 decks)
  14. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.40 · 31.9% (20,678 of 64,906 decks)
  15. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.29 · 26.0% (16,905 of 64,906 decks)
  16. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.28 · 30.7% (19,955 of 64,906 decks)
  17. Six relevance 1.24 · 31.8% (20,669 of 64,906 decks)
  18. Springheart Nantuko relevance 1.22 · 30.7% (19,897 of 64,906 decks)
  19. Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.19 · 25.1% (16,309 of 64,906 decks)
  20. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.16 · 34.0% (22,088 of 64,906 decks)
  21. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.11 · 26.7% (17,306 of 64,906 decks)
  22. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.10 · 30.6% (19,849 of 64,906 decks)
  23. Horizon Explorer relevance 1.08 · 24.0% (15,609 of 64,906 decks)
  24. Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.02 · 25.1% (16,265 of 64,906 decks)
  25. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.01 · 21.9% (14,187 of 64,906 decks)

Artifacts

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.86 45.0%
    $3.56 €1.81
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.83 46.7%
    $33.00 €19.76
  • Amulet of Vigor
    1.45 32.4%
    $50.54 €33.19
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.39 35.9%
    $1.14 €1.39
  • Exploration Broodship
    1.00 22.8%
    $3.03 €3.23
All artifacts (5)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.86 · 45.0% (29,191 of 64,906 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.83 · 46.7% (30,290 of 64,906 decks)
  3. Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.45 · 32.4% (21,048 of 64,906 decks)
  4. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.39 · 35.9% (23,298 of 64,906 decks)
  5. Exploration Broodship relevance 1.00 · 22.8% (14,797 of 64,906 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    2.29 66.0%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Spelunking
    1.48 35.8%
    $3.67 €3.18
  • Burgeoning
    1.28 30.7%
    $34.04 €24.59
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 2.29 · 66.0% (42,825 of 64,906 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 1.48 · 35.8% (23,265 of 64,906 decks)
  3. Burgeoning relevance 1.28 · 30.7% (19,929 of 64,906 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    2.06 66.2%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Harrow
    1.57 47.5%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Constant Mists
    1.20 23.6%
    $19.96 €14.29
  • Entish Restoration
    1.14 30.3%
    $2.79 €1.87
  • Roiling Regrowth
    1.05 24.4%
    $0.34 €0.30
All instants (5)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 2.06 · 66.2% (42,956 of 64,906 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 1.57 · 47.5% (30,845 of 64,906 decks)
  3. Constant Mists relevance 1.20 · 23.6% (15,315 of 64,906 decks)
  4. Entish Restoration relevance 1.14 · 30.3% (19,657 of 64,906 decks)
  5. Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.05 · 24.4% (15,860 of 64,906 decks)

Sorceries

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    2.09 50.5%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Life from the Loam
    1.31 32.7%
    $5.30 €5.08
All sorceries (2)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 2.09 · 50.5% (32,798 of 64,906 decks)
  2. Life from the Loam relevance 1.31 · 32.7% (21,226 of 64,906 decks)

Utility Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    1.76 46.6%
    $28.94 €27.39
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    1.26 49.4%
    $17.14 €12.95
  • Strip Mine
    1.22 32.3%
    $10.71 €5.96
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    1.17 46.6%
    $48.89 €39.85
  • Shifting Woodland
    1.14 32.6%
    $6.93 €5.38
All utility lands (5)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 1.76 · 46.6% (30,245 of 64,906 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 1.26 · 49.4% (32,075 of 64,906 decks)
  3. Strip Mine relevance 1.22 · 32.3% (20,942 of 64,906 decks)
  4. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 1.17 · 46.6% (30,257 of 64,906 decks)
  5. Shifting Woodland relevance 1.14 · 32.6% (21,130 of 64,906 decks)

Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Lotus Field
    1.38 33.8%
    $2.56 €2.57
  • Verdant Catacombs
    1.15 50.3%
    $29.23 €24.96
  • Wooded Foothills
    1.14 49.6%
    $19.09 €16.84
  • Fabled Passage
    1.11 52.6%
    $0.62 €0.95
  • Windswept Heath
    1.00 43.8%
    $12.20 €10.50
All lands (5)
  1. Lotus Field relevance 1.38 · 33.8% (21,959 of 64,906 decks)
  2. Verdant Catacombs relevance 1.15 · 50.3% (32,657 of 64,906 decks)
  3. Wooded Foothills relevance 1.14 · 49.6% (32,219 of 64,906 decks)
  4. Fabled Passage relevance 1.11 · 52.6% (34,172 of 64,906 decks)
  5. Windswept Heath relevance 1.00 · 43.8% (28,456 of 64,906 decks)

EDH data for Scapeshift: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 64,906 real decks.