Avenger of Zendikar

Played in 198,099 decks

Avenger of Zendikar
$0.44 €0.61

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Ashling, the Limitless relevance 4.45 · 63.7% (21,200 of 33,266 decks)
  2. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.87 · 74.8% (2,735 of 3,654 decks)
  3. The Necrobloom relevance 3.68 · 55.9% (6,369 of 11,400 decks)
  4. Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 3.53 · 51.2% (1,754 of 3,425 decks)
  5. Lord Windgrace relevance 3.43 · 55.7% (2,628 of 4,714 decks)
  6. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 3.37 · 75.2% (978 of 1,300 decks)
  7. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 3.32 · 58.2% (1,140 of 1,960 decks)
  8. The Gitrog, Ravenous Ride relevance 3.25 · 45.3% (1,523 of 3,359 decks)
  9. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.23 · 51.7% (2,096 of 4,053 decks)
  10. Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 3.22 · 75.3% (745 of 989 decks)
  11. Roon of the Hidden Realm relevance 3.19 · 33.1% (642 of 1,939 decks)
  12. Sméagol, Helpful Guide relevance 3.16 · 40.9% (1,663 of 4,070 decks)
  13. Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 3.06 · 23.5% (1,155 of 4,919 decks)
  14. Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 2.98 · 48.6% (13,130 of 27,029 decks)
  15. Mass of Mysteries relevance 2.95 · 50.6% (1,364 of 2,696 decks)
  16. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.83 · 60.8% (5,554 of 9,139 decks)
  17. Averna, the Chaos Bloom relevance 2.80 · 37.9% (1,131 of 2,986 decks)
  18. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.80 · 37.4% (1,975 of 5,279 decks)
  19. Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 2.78 · 62.3% (4,334 of 6,956 decks)
  20. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.71 · 37.0% (2,201 of 5,945 decks)
  21. Thromok the Insatiable relevance 2.71 · 49.5% (678 of 1,370 decks)
  22. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 2.69 · 52.9% (3,742 of 7,075 decks)
  23. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.67 · 56.5% (5,029 of 8,908 decks)
  24. Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.67 · 25.3% (2,968 of 11,715 decks)
  25. The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.64 · 27.7% (1,492 of 5,392 decks)
  26. Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 2.60 · 75.7% (1,302 of 1,721 decks)
  27. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.43 · 57.2% (2,033 of 3,553 decks)
  28. Horde of Notions relevance 2.41 · 40.7% (650 of 1,597 decks)
  29. Witherbloom, the Balancer relevance 2.39 · 17.5% (3,714 of 21,182 decks)
  30. Zagorka, Mother of Sanctum relevance 2.35 · 38.7% (345 of 892 decks)

Replaced By

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All replaced by (1)
  1. Tendershoot Dryad 2.8% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
All parallel cards (10)
  1. Phylath, World Sculptor
  2. Vinelasher Kudzu
  3. Territorial Scythecat
  4. Seedship Agrarian
  5. Sazh's Chocobo
  6. Khalni Garden
  7. Prowling Felidar
  8. Oran-Rief Hydra
  9. Foe-liage
  10. Scythe Leopard

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Scute Swarm
    1.55 47.6%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.42 39.4%
    $0.27 €0.31
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.14 33.1%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.08 34.5%
    $4.15 €3.05
  • Omnath, Locus of Rage
    1.06 25.9%
    $0.32 €0.40
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.03 25.3%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Harrow
    1.01 30.6%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.99 25.9%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.99 28.0%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Cultivate
    0.93 52.9%
    $0.41 €0.48
All most relevant (30)
  1. Scute Swarm relevance 1.55 · 47.6% (94,305 of 198,099 decks)
  2. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.42 · 39.4% (77,986 of 198,099 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.14 · 33.1% (65,528 of 198,099 decks)
  4. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.08 · 34.5% (68,360 of 198,099 decks)
  5. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.06 · 25.9% (51,222 of 198,099 decks)
  6. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.03 · 25.3% (50,132 of 198,099 decks)
  7. Harrow relevance 1.01 · 30.6% (60,620 of 198,099 decks)
  8. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.99 · 25.9% (51,229 of 198,099 decks)
  9. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.99 · 28.0% (55,473 of 198,099 decks)
  10. Cultivate relevance 0.93 · 52.9% (104,777 of 198,099 decks)
  11. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 24.4% (48,421 of 198,099 decks)
  12. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.87 · 37.1% (73,544 of 198,099 decks)
  13. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.84 · 22.0% (43,574 of 198,099 decks)
  14. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.84 · 21.6% (42,807 of 198,099 decks)
  15. Beast Within relevance 0.84 · 41.5% (82,177 of 198,099 decks)
  16. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.83 · 30.0% (59,481 of 198,099 decks)
  17. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.78 · 22.4% (44,409 of 198,099 decks)
  18. Risen Reef relevance 0.77 · 16.6% (32,801 of 198,099 decks)
  19. Eternal Witness relevance 0.77 · 27.7% (54,807 of 198,099 decks)
  20. Rampant Growth relevance 0.75 · 36.1% (71,534 of 198,099 decks)
  21. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.74 · 18.1% (35,926 of 198,099 decks)
  22. Crop Rotation relevance 0.73 · 23.5% (46,634 of 198,099 decks)
  23. Nature's Lore relevance 0.72 · 36.8% (72,877 of 198,099 decks)
  24. Farseek relevance 0.72 · 38.4% (76,131 of 198,099 decks)
  25. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.71 · 19.8% (39,316 of 198,099 decks)
  26. Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (32,746 of 198,099 decks)
  27. Exploration relevance 0.71 · 20.4% (40,497 of 198,099 decks)
  28. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.71 · 27.6% (54,652 of 198,099 decks)
  29. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.68 · 17.0% (33,696 of 198,099 decks)
  30. Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.68 · 20.5% (40,694 of 198,099 decks)

Creatures

28

Showing 1-10 of 28

Page size
  • Scute Swarm
    1.55 47.6%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.42 39.4%
    $0.27 €0.31
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.14 33.1%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.08 34.5%
    $4.15 €3.05
  • Omnath, Locus of Rage
    1.06 25.9%
    $0.32 €0.40
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.03 25.3%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.99 25.9%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.99 28.0%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.92 24.4%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    0.84 22.0%
    $0.30 €0.14
All creatures (28)
  1. Scute Swarm relevance 1.55 · 47.6% (94,305 of 198,099 decks)
  2. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.42 · 39.4% (77,986 of 198,099 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.14 · 33.1% (65,528 of 198,099 decks)
  4. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.08 · 34.5% (68,360 of 198,099 decks)
  5. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.06 · 25.9% (51,222 of 198,099 decks)
  6. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.03 · 25.3% (50,132 of 198,099 decks)
  7. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.99 · 25.9% (51,229 of 198,099 decks)
  8. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.99 · 28.0% (55,473 of 198,099 decks)
  9. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 24.4% (48,421 of 198,099 decks)
  10. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.84 · 22.0% (43,574 of 198,099 decks)
  11. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.83 · 30.0% (59,481 of 198,099 decks)
  12. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.78 · 22.4% (44,409 of 198,099 decks)
  13. Risen Reef relevance 0.77 · 16.6% (32,801 of 198,099 decks)
  14. Eternal Witness relevance 0.77 · 27.7% (54,807 of 198,099 decks)
  15. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.74 · 18.1% (35,926 of 198,099 decks)
  16. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.71 · 19.8% (39,316 of 198,099 decks)
  17. Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (32,746 of 198,099 decks)
  18. Tireless Tracker relevance 0.68 · 17.0% (33,696 of 198,099 decks)
  19. Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.68 · 20.5% (40,694 of 198,099 decks)
  20. Springbloom Druid relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (33,116 of 198,099 decks)
  21. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.66 · 14.9% (29,607 of 198,099 decks)
  22. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.65 · 12.7% (25,177 of 198,099 decks)
  23. Titan of Industry relevance 0.63 · 13.2% (26,231 of 198,099 decks)
  24. Mulldrifter relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (31,944 of 198,099 decks)
  25. Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.60 · 12.1% (23,905 of 198,099 decks)
  26. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.59 · 12.3% (24,372 of 198,099 decks)
  27. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.59 · 14.9% (29,472 of 198,099 decks)
  28. Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.58 · 12.0% (23,820 of 198,099 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.84 21.6%
    $1.12 €1.38
All artifacts (1)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.84 · 21.6% (42,807 of 198,099 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.71 20.4%
    $29.98 €27.12
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.71 27.6%
    $0.58 €0.61
  • Spelunking
    0.59 14.3%
    $3.43 €3.18
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.71 · 20.4% (40,497 of 198,099 decks)
  2. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.71 · 27.6% (54,652 of 198,099 decks)
  3. Spelunking relevance 0.59 · 14.3% (28,333 of 198,099 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.01 30.6%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Beast Within
    0.84 41.5%
    $0.65 €0.84
  • Crop Rotation
    0.73 23.5%
    $3.83 €3.52
  • Return of the Wildspeaker
    0.63 20.6%
    $2.56 €1.18
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.62 31.3%
    $17.60 €14.04
All instants (5)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.01 · 30.6% (60,620 of 198,099 decks)
  2. Beast Within relevance 0.84 · 41.5% (82,177 of 198,099 decks)
  3. Crop Rotation relevance 0.73 · 23.5% (46,634 of 198,099 decks)
  4. Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.63 · 20.6% (40,852 of 198,099 decks)
  5. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.62 · 31.3% (61,908 of 198,099 decks)

Sorceries

9

Showing 1-9 of 9

Page size
  • Cultivate
    0.93 52.9%
    $0.41 €0.48
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.87 37.1%
    $1.77 €1.50
  • Rampant Growth
    0.75 36.1%
    $1.28 €0.51
  • Nature's Lore
    0.72 36.8%
    $2.23 €2.81
  • Farseek
    0.72 38.4%
    $0.46 €0.82
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.64 15.5%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Life from the Loam
    0.63 15.6%
    $5.21 €5.11
  • Explore
    0.62 18.8%
    $0.19 €0.27
  • Three Visits
    0.61 27.4%
    $5.55 €4.84
All sorceries (9)
  1. Cultivate relevance 0.93 · 52.9% (104,777 of 198,099 decks)
  2. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.87 · 37.1% (73,544 of 198,099 decks)
  3. Rampant Growth relevance 0.75 · 36.1% (71,534 of 198,099 decks)
  4. Nature's Lore relevance 0.72 · 36.8% (72,877 of 198,099 decks)
  5. Farseek relevance 0.72 · 38.4% (76,131 of 198,099 decks)
  6. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.64 · 15.5% (30,696 of 198,099 decks)
  7. Life from the Loam relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (30,961 of 198,099 decks)
  8. Explore relevance 0.62 · 18.8% (37,318 of 198,099 decks)
  9. Three Visits relevance 0.61 · 27.4% (54,329 of 198,099 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    0.65 17.1%
    $28.83 €27.39
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.60 23.7%
    $16.76 €13.00
All utility lands (2)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 0.65 · 17.1% (33,854 of 198,099 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.60 · 23.7% (46,896 of 198,099 decks)

Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.64 31.8%
    $0.26 €0.11
  • Fabled Passage
    0.63 29.9%
    $0.64 €0.95
All lands (2)
  1. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.64 · 31.8% (63,050 of 198,099 decks)
  2. Fabled Passage relevance 0.63 · 29.9% (59,141 of 198,099 decks)

EDH data for Avenger of Zendikar: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 198,099 real decks.