Cards like Llanowar Elves
4.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Bant decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Bant decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.45 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 54%
- Elvish Mystic 48%
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 46%
- Fyndhorn Elves 37%
- Boreal Druid 6%
- Gyre Engineer 3%
- Druid of the Cowl 1%
Other options: Leaf Gilder, Rootrider Faun, Greenweaver Druid, Fyndhorn Elder, Goobbue Gardener, Golden Hind, Woodland Mystic, Steward of Valeron, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Orochi Sustainer, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Skyshroud Troopers
Cards like Shrieking Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Bant decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Shrieking Drake 52%
- Whitemane Lion 42%
- Dream Stalker 16%
- Kor Skyfisher 12%
- Stonecloaker 4%
- Deputy of Acquittals 2%
- Rescuer Chwinga 1%
Other options: Aviary Mechanic, Stickytongue Sentinel, Jeskai Barricade, Mischievous Pup, Flock Impostor, Emancipation Angel, Dust Elemental, Loyal Gryff, Storm Sculptor, Exosuit Savior, Keymaster Rogue, Invasive Species, Yarok's Wavecrasher, Denizen of the Deep, Ambush Krotiq
Cards like Faeburrow Elder
4.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Faeburrow Elder 35%
- Bloom Tender 35%
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
13× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Eladamri's Call
3.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Bant decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 29%
- Worldly Tutor 21%
- Sylvan Tutor 2%
Cards like Frilled Mystic
12× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Frilled Mystic 16%
- Mystic Snake 16%
Other options: Sister of Silence, Voracious Greatshark, Voidmage Husher
Cards like Peregrine Drake
6.9× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Bant decks
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.9× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 23%
- Mystic Remora 21%
Cards like Chord of Calling
2.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Bant decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Grand Abolisher
3.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Arbor Elf
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 20%
- Quirion Ranger 7%
- Scryb Ranger 2%
Cards like Counterspell
1.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Bant decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Counterspell 38%
- Negate 16%
Other options: Essence Scatter, Wash Away, Spell Snare, Wild Unraveling, Disruption Protocol, Flash Counter, Remove Soul, Intervene, Minor Misstep, Nullify, Outwit, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial
Cards like Scute Swarm
13× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Beast Whisperer
17× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Reclamation Sage
4.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Foundation Breaker, Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Rambunctious Mutt, Myconid Spore Tender, Indrik Stomphowler, Conclave Naturalists
Cards like Birds of Paradise
19× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Bant decks
Cards like Paradise Druid
11× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards like Eternal Witness
3.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Greenwarden of Murasa, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Bant decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.77 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Cultivate 29%
- Kodama's Reach 21%
- Rampant Growth 15%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Shared Roots 1%
Other options: Explosive Vegetation, Migration Path, Grow from the Ashes, Reach the Horizon, They Went This Way, Roamer's Routine, Map the Frontier, Path to the Festival, Far Wanderings, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Beneath the Sands, Primal Growth, Terramorph, Deep Reconnaissance, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Verdant Mastery, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Coiling Oracle
4.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Coiling Oracle 31%
- Risen Reef 3%
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
6.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Earthshaker Giant, Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
All top picks (50)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.72 · 45.4% (2,276 of 5,015 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.68 · 51.6% (2,586 of 5,015 decks)
- Mana Breach relevance 0.92 · 19.3% (969 of 5,015 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.94 · 15.5% (779 of 5,015 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.83 · 23.1% (1,159 of 5,015 decks)
- Whitemane Lion relevance 0.66 · 42.3% (2,123 of 5,015 decks)
- Kor Skyfisher relevance 0.94 · 11.6% (580 of 5,015 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (836 of 5,015 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.76 · 19.9% (997 of 5,015 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 0.85 · 12.3% (616 of 5,015 decks)
- Overburden relevance 0.92 · 8.4% (422 of 5,015 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.76 · 16.5% (825 of 5,015 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.86 · 10.3% (518 of 5,015 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.69 · 25.0% (1,255 of 5,015 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.56 · 45.6% (2,289 of 5,015 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.60 · 36.2% (1,813 of 5,015 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.68 · 23.4% (1,175 of 5,015 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 0.70 · 16.6% (834 of 5,015 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.65 · 22.1% (1,110 of 5,015 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.87 · 5.4% (272 of 5,015 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.55 · 36.7% (1,841 of 5,015 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.57 · 33.3% (1,668 of 5,015 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.87 · 5.3% (264 of 5,015 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.71 · 12.8% (641 of 5,015 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.74 · 10.7% (535 of 5,015 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (1,018 of 5,015 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (716 of 5,015 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.81 · 6.9% (345 of 5,015 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.49 · 44.1% (2,210 of 5,015 decks)
- Skyclave Apparition relevance 0.70 · 12.6% (632 of 5,015 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.72 · 11.2% (561 of 5,015 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.65 · 16.2% (811 of 5,015 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.65 · 15.2% (762 of 5,015 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.57 · 27.8% (1,393 of 5,015 decks)
- Lavinia, Azorius Renegade relevance 0.71 · 9.8% (491 of 5,015 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.62 · 15.9% (796 of 5,015 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (806 of 5,015 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.77 · 6.1% (307 of 5,015 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (840 of 5,015 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.45 · 48.3% (2,423 of 5,015 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.44 · 49.7% (2,492 of 5,015 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.78 · 5.3% (264 of 5,015 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.73 · 7.7% (385 of 5,015 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.51 · 31.1% (1,561 of 5,015 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.74 · 6.5% (328 of 5,015 decks)
- God-Eternal Oketra relevance 0.76 · 5.4% (269 of 5,015 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.60 · 15.3% (765 of 5,015 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.73 · 6.3% (315 of 5,015 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.73 · 6.4% (319 of 5,015 decks)
- Knight of Autumn relevance 0.66 · 10.5% (525 of 5,015 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.72 · 45.4% (2,276 of 5,015 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.68 · 51.6% (2,586 of 5,015 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.94 · 15.5% (779 of 5,015 decks)
- Whitemane Lion relevance 0.66 · 42.3% (2,123 of 5,015 decks)
- Kor Skyfisher relevance 0.94 · 11.6% (580 of 5,015 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.76 · 19.9% (997 of 5,015 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 0.85 · 12.3% (616 of 5,015 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.76 · 16.5% (825 of 5,015 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.86 · 10.3% (518 of 5,015 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.69 · 25.0% (1,255 of 5,015 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.56 · 45.6% (2,289 of 5,015 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.60 · 36.2% (1,813 of 5,015 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.68 · 23.4% (1,175 of 5,015 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 0.70 · 16.6% (834 of 5,015 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.65 · 22.1% (1,110 of 5,015 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.87 · 5.4% (272 of 5,015 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.55 · 36.7% (1,841 of 5,015 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.87 · 5.3% (264 of 5,015 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.71 · 12.8% (641 of 5,015 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.74 · 10.7% (535 of 5,015 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (1,018 of 5,015 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (716 of 5,015 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.81 · 6.9% (345 of 5,015 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.49 · 44.1% (2,210 of 5,015 decks)
- Skyclave Apparition relevance 0.70 · 12.6% (632 of 5,015 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.65 · 16.2% (811 of 5,015 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.65 · 15.2% (762 of 5,015 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.57 · 27.8% (1,393 of 5,015 decks)
- Lavinia, Azorius Renegade relevance 0.71 · 9.8% (491 of 5,015 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.62 · 15.9% (796 of 5,015 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (806 of 5,015 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.77 · 6.1% (307 of 5,015 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (840 of 5,015 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.45 · 48.3% (2,423 of 5,015 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.44 · 49.7% (2,492 of 5,015 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.78 · 5.3% (264 of 5,015 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.51 · 31.1% (1,561 of 5,015 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.74 · 6.5% (328 of 5,015 decks)
- God-Eternal Oketra relevance 0.76 · 5.4% (269 of 5,015 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.60 · 15.3% (765 of 5,015 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.73 · 6.3% (315 of 5,015 decks)
- Knight of Autumn relevance 0.66 · 10.5% (525 of 5,015 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.56 · 20.3% (1,016 of 5,015 decks)
- Delney, Streetwise Lookout relevance 0.64 · 11.8% (590 of 5,015 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.74 · 5.0% (252 of 5,015 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.39 · 54.5% (2,732 of 5,015 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.64 · 10.9% (546 of 5,015 decks)
- Sun Titan relevance 0.58 · 14.3% (715 of 5,015 decks)
- Stonecloaker relevance 0.82 · 4.3% (214 of 5,015 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.54 · 19.1% (959 of 5,015 decks)
All artifacts (28)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.83 · 23.1% (1,159 of 5,015 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.70 · 5.9% (296 of 5,015 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (767 of 5,015 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.53 · 6.5% (325 of 5,015 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (349 of 5,015 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (294 of 5,015 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.47 · 6.4% (323 of 5,015 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.57 · 3.9% (197 of 5,015 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.49 · 4.7% (235 of 5,015 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.67 · 2.8% (138 of 5,015 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.45 · 5.4% (273 of 5,015 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (945 of 5,015 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (421 of 5,015 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.46 · 4.4% (219 of 5,015 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.44 · 4.5% (227 of 5,015 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.40 · 5.4% (272 of 5,015 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.37 · 7.5% (378 of 5,015 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.30 · 16.1% (806 of 5,015 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.38 · 5.6% (283 of 5,015 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.36 · 6.1% (307 of 5,015 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.38 · 4.4% (222 of 5,015 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.49 · 2.8% (139 of 5,015 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.41 · 3.4% (170 of 5,015 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (308 of 5,015 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.41 · 3.0% (149 of 5,015 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.23 · 13.4% (674 of 5,015 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 48.7% (2,444 of 5,015 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 69.0% (3,458 of 5,015 decks)
All enchantments (48)
- Mana Breach relevance 0.92 · 19.3% (969 of 5,015 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (836 of 5,015 decks)
- Overburden relevance 0.92 · 8.4% (422 of 5,015 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.57 · 33.3% (1,668 of 5,015 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.72 · 11.2% (561 of 5,015 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.73 · 7.7% (385 of 5,015 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.73 · 6.4% (319 of 5,015 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.72 · 5.6% (283 of 5,015 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.63 · 9.9% (494 of 5,015 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.65 · 8.7% (437 of 5,015 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.83 · 4.0% (199 of 5,015 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.50 · 20.9% (1,049 of 5,015 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (819 of 5,015 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.50 · 15.8% (794 of 5,015 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.52 · 10.1% (505 of 5,015 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.51 · 9.4% (469 of 5,015 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.73 · 3.2% (161 of 5,015 decks)
- Deeproot Waters relevance 0.72 · 3.3% (168 of 5,015 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (552 of 5,015 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.49 · 9.1% (454 of 5,015 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.40 · 20.8% (1,041 of 5,015 decks)
- Deeproot Pilgrimage relevance 0.70 · 3.3% (164 of 5,015 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.51 · 6.4% (322 of 5,015 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.49 · 7.2% (361 of 5,015 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.49 · 6.3% (315 of 5,015 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (213 of 5,015 decks)
- Merrow Commerce relevance 0.71 · 2.6% (129 of 5,015 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.56 · 3.7% (188 of 5,015 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.32 · 23.2% (1,163 of 5,015 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.50 · 4.3% (215 of 5,015 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (281 of 5,015 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.34 · 12.4% (620 of 5,015 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.49 · 3.2% (161 of 5,015 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.55 · 2.5% (125 of 5,015 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (144 of 5,015 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.46 · 2.9% (144 of 5,015 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (143 of 5,015 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (163 of 5,015 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (204 of 5,015 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (169 of 5,015 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (211 of 5,015 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (232 of 5,015 decks)
- Sterling Grove relevance 0.42 · 2.7% (136 of 5,015 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (166 of 5,015 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (159 of 5,015 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (144 of 5,015 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (133 of 5,015 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (134 of 5,015 decks)
All instants (50)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.50 · 15.9% (798 of 5,015 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.42 · 28.8% (1,444 of 5,015 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.53 · 10.0% (502 of 5,015 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.42 · 21.0% (1,051 of 5,015 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (563 of 5,015 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.56 · 5.2% (259 of 5,015 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.47 · 11.9% (599 of 5,015 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.60 · 4.4% (221 of 5,015 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (431 of 5,015 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.46 · 11.1% (559 of 5,015 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (375 of 5,015 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (433 of 5,015 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (260 of 5,015 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.42 · 13.2% (660 of 5,015 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.38 · 19.1% (957 of 5,015 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.49 · 5.1% (256 of 5,015 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.47 · 7.2% (363 of 5,015 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.47 · 6.7% (336 of 5,015 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.37 · 19.2% (961 of 5,015 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.37 · 16.2% (814 of 5,015 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.37 · 15.6% (784 of 5,015 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.34 · 22.7% (1,138 of 5,015 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.34 · 24.1% (1,209 of 5,015 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.37 · 14.2% (711 of 5,015 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.46 · 5.5% (274 of 5,015 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (229 of 5,015 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (263 of 5,015 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.41 · 9.4% (471 of 5,015 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (314 of 5,015 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.32 · 21.1% (1,056 of 5,015 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.64 · 2.5% (125 of 5,015 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.43 · 5.1% (258 of 5,015 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (286 of 5,015 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.32 · 14.8% (740 of 5,015 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.29 · 23.4% (1,172 of 5,015 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.55 · 2.8% (139 of 5,015 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.51 · 3.2% (160 of 5,015 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.54 · 2.8% (139 of 5,015 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.54 · 2.6% (130 of 5,015 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.48 · 3.3% (163 of 5,015 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (248 of 5,015 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.51 · 2.8% (138 of 5,015 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.27 · 15.2% (764 of 5,015 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.44 · 3.3% (167 of 5,015 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.23 · 26.6% (1,332 of 5,015 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (233 of 5,015 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.45 · 3.0% (150 of 5,015 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.20 · 38.0% (1,904 of 5,015 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.21 · 21.7% (1,087 of 5,015 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 0.41 · 2.6% (132 of 5,015 decks)
All sorceries (31)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.47 · 23.4% (1,173 of 5,015 decks)
- Time Wipe relevance 0.60 · 8.5% (426 of 5,015 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.82 · 3.5% (178 of 5,015 decks)
- Wargate relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (481 of 5,015 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.50 · 10.5% (527 of 5,015 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (462 of 5,015 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (404 of 5,015 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (383 of 5,015 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.49 · 7.4% (371 of 5,015 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 21.4% (1,074 of 5,015 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (404 of 5,015 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (385 of 5,015 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 0.45 · 4.9% (247 of 5,015 decks)
- Tragic Arrogance relevance 0.64 · 2.7% (135 of 5,015 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (236 of 5,015 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.53 · 3.4% (169 of 5,015 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.57 · 2.7% (135 of 5,015 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.53 · 3.0% (152 of 5,015 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.49 · 3.4% (170 of 5,015 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.51 · 3.0% (148 of 5,015 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.28 · 14.7% (736 of 5,015 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (896 of 5,015 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.22 · 29.3% (1,471 of 5,015 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (393 of 5,015 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.43 · 2.9% (145 of 5,015 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (148 of 5,015 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.35 · 4.0% (201 of 5,015 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.43 · 2.7% (136 of 5,015 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.23 · 13.6% (684 of 5,015 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (138 of 5,015 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.15 · 21.1% (1,058 of 5,015 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.74 · 4.2% (212 of 5,015 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.64 · 4.7% (237 of 5,015 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.81 · 3.1% (156 of 5,015 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.54 · 6.3% (314 of 5,015 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.47 · 3.5% (175 of 5,015 decks)
- Tamiyo, Field Researcher relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (157 of 5,015 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.58 · 3.2% (161 of 5,015 decks)
All utility lands (40)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.83 · 8.0% (402 of 5,015 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.68 · 6.6% (331 of 5,015 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.50 · 14.8% (743 of 5,015 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.49 · 7.7% (384 of 5,015 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.48 · 6.9% (347 of 5,015 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.47 · 6.5% (328 of 5,015 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.37 · 18.5% (930 of 5,015 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (210 of 5,015 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (270 of 5,015 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (443 of 5,015 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (858 of 5,015 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.40 · 10.0% (504 of 5,015 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.40 · 9.6% (481 of 5,015 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.44 · 5.8% (292 of 5,015 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.32 · 21.4% (1,072 of 5,015 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.47 · 4.5% (224 of 5,015 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.61 · 2.9% (145 of 5,015 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.43 · 4.8% (243 of 5,015 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (305 of 5,015 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.46 · 4.2% (213 of 5,015 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.51 · 3.7% (186 of 5,015 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.51 · 3.7% (185 of 5,015 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (228 of 5,015 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.36 · 9.5% (474 of 5,015 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (225 of 5,015 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (246 of 5,015 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.48 · 3.6% (183 of 5,015 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.42 · 4.4% (222 of 5,015 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.55 · 2.7% (135 of 5,015 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.47 · 3.5% (175 of 5,015 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.20 · 46.4% (2,329 of 5,015 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.22 · 33.5% (1,678 of 5,015 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.27 · 13.3% (668 of 5,015 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.44 · 3.1% (153 of 5,015 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (136 of 5,015 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (483 of 5,015 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.26 · 9.5% (474 of 5,015 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.37 · 3.4% (172 of 5,015 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.23 · 13.9% (696 of 5,015 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (178 of 5,015 decks)
All lands (50)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.44 · 30.2% (1,516 of 5,015 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.43 · 33.0% (1,654 of 5,015 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.43 · 28.7% (1,441 of 5,015 decks)
- Treva's Ruins relevance 0.59 · 5.1% (258 of 5,015 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.49 · 12.6% (634 of 5,015 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.52 · 9.6% (480 of 5,015 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.52 · 9.1% (455 of 5,015 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.46 · 12.7% (637 of 5,015 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.46 · 12.0% (601 of 5,015 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.44 · 13.0% (650 of 5,015 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (509 of 5,015 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (445 of 5,015 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.39 · 21.5% (1,078 of 5,015 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.51 · 6.1% (308 of 5,015 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.43 · 13.3% (668 of 5,015 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (452 of 5,015 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.44 · 11.6% (582 of 5,015 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.41 · 14.6% (731 of 5,015 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.47 · 6.6% (331 of 5,015 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.38 · 17.6% (883 of 5,015 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.38 · 17.0% (855 of 5,015 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.42 · 11.7% (585 of 5,015 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (446 of 5,015 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.38 · 17.6% (881 of 5,015 decks)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.66 · 3.0% (150 of 5,015 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.52 · 4.4% (220 of 5,015 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (314 of 5,015 decks)
- Hengegate Pathway // Mistgate Pathway relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (255 of 5,015 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.45 · 6.4% (322 of 5,015 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.46 · 4.9% (248 of 5,015 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (211 of 5,015 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.44 · 6.8% (341 of 5,015 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (261 of 5,015 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (209 of 5,015 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.41 · 8.7% (436 of 5,015 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (261 of 5,015 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.40 · 8.6% (432 of 5,015 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (247 of 5,015 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.42 · 4.9% (244 of 5,015 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.60 · 2.7% (135 of 5,015 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.26 · 38.9% (1,953 of 5,015 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.53 · 3.4% (171 of 5,015 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.48 · 4.0% (201 of 5,015 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (432 of 5,015 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.33 · 13.6% (681 of 5,015 decks)
- Urban Retreat relevance 0.39 · 6.1% (305 of 5,015 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.44 · 4.3% (218 of 5,015 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.24 · 40.7% (2,042 of 5,015 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.53 · 3.1% (157 of 5,015 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.23 · 41.4% (2,076 of 5,015 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Chulane, Teller of Tales, from 5,015 real Commander decks.