Cards like Llanowar Elves
4.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Bant decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Bant decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.45 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 54%
- Elvish Mystic 48%
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 46%
- Fyndhorn Elves 37%
- Boreal Druid 6%
- Gyre Engineer 3%
- Druid of the Cowl 1%
Other options: Leaf Gilder, Rootrider Faun, Greenweaver Druid, Fyndhorn Elder, Goobbue Gardener, Golden Hind, Woodland Mystic, Steward of Valeron, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Orochi Sustainer, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Skyshroud Troopers
Cards like Shrieking Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Bant decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Shrieking Drake 52%
- Whitemane Lion 42%
- Dream Stalker 16%
- Kor Skyfisher 11%
- Stonecloaker 4%
- Deputy of Acquittals 2%
- Rescuer Chwinga 1%
Other options: Aviary Mechanic, Jeskai Barricade, Stickytongue Sentinel, Mischievous Pup, Flock Impostor, Emancipation Angel, Dust Elemental, Loyal Gryff, Storm Sculptor, Exosuit Savior, Keymaster Rogue, Invasive Species, Yarok's Wavecrasher, Denizen of the Deep, Ambush Krotiq
Cards like Faeburrow Elder
4.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Faeburrow Elder 35%
- Bloom Tender 35%
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
13× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Eladamri's Call
3.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Bant decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 29%
- Worldly Tutor 21%
- Sylvan Tutor 2%
Cards like Frilled Mystic
12× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Frilled Mystic 16%
- Mystic Snake 16%
Other options: Sister of Silence, Voracious Greatshark, Voidmage Husher
Cards like Peregrine Drake
6.9× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Bant decks
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.9× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 23%
- Mystic Remora 21%
Cards like Chord of Calling
2.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Bant decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Arbor Elf
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 20%
- Quirion Ranger 7%
- Scryb Ranger 2%
Cards like Grand Abolisher
3.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Bant decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Counterspell 38%
- Negate 16%
Other options: Essence Scatter, Wash Away, Spell Snare, Wild Unraveling, Disruption Protocol, Flash Counter, Remove Soul, Intervene, Minor Misstep, Nullify, Outwit, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial
Cards like Scute Swarm
13× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Beast Whisperer
17× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Reclamation Sage
4.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Foundation Breaker, Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Rambunctious Mutt, Myconid Spore Tender, Indrik Stomphowler, Conclave Naturalists
Cards like Birds of Paradise
20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Bant decks
Cards like Paradise Druid
11× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards like Eternal Witness
3.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Greenwarden of Murasa, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Bant decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.78 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Cultivate 29%
- Kodama's Reach 21%
- Rampant Growth 15%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Shared Roots 1%
Other options: Explosive Vegetation, Migration Path, Grow from the Ashes, Reach the Horizon, Roamer's Routine, Map the Frontier, They Went This Way, Path to the Festival, Far Wanderings, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Primal Growth, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Deep Reconnaissance, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Verdant Mastery, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Coiling Oracle
4.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Coiling Oracle 31%
- Risen Reef 3%
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
6.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Earthshaker Giant, Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
All top picks (50)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.72 · 45.5% (2,262 of 4,973 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.68 · 51.5% (2,562 of 4,973 decks)
- Mana Breach relevance 0.92 · 19.3% (958 of 4,973 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.94 · 15.5% (771 of 4,973 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.83 · 23.1% (1,151 of 4,973 decks)
- Whitemane Lion relevance 0.66 · 42.4% (2,110 of 4,973 decks)
- Kor Skyfisher relevance 0.94 · 11.5% (571 of 4,973 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (829 of 4,973 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.76 · 19.9% (988 of 4,973 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 0.85 · 12.2% (608 of 4,973 decks)
- Overburden relevance 0.92 · 8.4% (418 of 4,973 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.76 · 16.5% (820 of 4,973 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.86 · 10.4% (516 of 4,973 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.56 · 45.7% (2,272 of 4,973 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.69 · 25.1% (1,246 of 4,973 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.60 · 36.2% (1,802 of 4,973 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.67 · 23.4% (1,166 of 4,973 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 0.70 · 16.6% (828 of 4,973 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.65 · 22.1% (1,099 of 4,973 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.87 · 5.5% (272 of 4,973 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.55 · 36.7% (1,825 of 4,973 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.57 · 33.3% (1,657 of 4,973 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.87 · 5.3% (264 of 4,973 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.71 · 12.8% (635 of 4,973 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (1,011 of 4,973 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.74 · 10.7% (530 of 4,973 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.81 · 6.9% (343 of 4,973 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (712 of 4,973 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.49 · 44.0% (2,189 of 4,973 decks)
- Skyclave Apparition relevance 0.69 · 12.6% (626 of 4,973 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.72 · 11.2% (558 of 4,973 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.65 · 16.1% (801 of 4,973 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.65 · 15.2% (754 of 4,973 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.57 · 27.8% (1,382 of 4,973 decks)
- Lavinia, Azorius Renegade relevance 0.71 · 9.8% (485 of 4,973 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.62 · 15.8% (787 of 4,973 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (800 of 4,973 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.77 · 6.1% (304 of 4,973 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.45 · 48.3% (2,401 of 4,973 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.62 · 16.6% (828 of 4,973 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.43 · 49.8% (2,475 of 4,973 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.78 · 5.3% (263 of 4,973 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.73 · 7.7% (382 of 4,973 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.74 · 6.6% (327 of 4,973 decks)
- God-Eternal Oketra relevance 0.76 · 5.4% (269 of 4,973 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.51 · 31.1% (1,546 of 4,973 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.60 · 15.2% (758 of 4,973 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.73 · 6.3% (315 of 4,973 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.73 · 6.4% (317 of 4,973 decks)
- Knight of Autumn relevance 0.66 · 10.5% (520 of 4,973 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.72 · 45.5% (2,262 of 4,973 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.68 · 51.5% (2,562 of 4,973 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.94 · 15.5% (771 of 4,973 decks)
- Whitemane Lion relevance 0.66 · 42.4% (2,110 of 4,973 decks)
- Kor Skyfisher relevance 0.94 · 11.5% (571 of 4,973 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.76 · 19.9% (988 of 4,973 decks)
- Village Bell-Ringer relevance 0.85 · 12.2% (608 of 4,973 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.76 · 16.5% (820 of 4,973 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.86 · 10.4% (516 of 4,973 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.56 · 45.7% (2,272 of 4,973 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.69 · 25.1% (1,246 of 4,973 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.60 · 36.2% (1,802 of 4,973 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.67 · 23.4% (1,166 of 4,973 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 0.70 · 16.6% (828 of 4,973 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.65 · 22.1% (1,099 of 4,973 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.87 · 5.5% (272 of 4,973 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.55 · 36.7% (1,825 of 4,973 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.87 · 5.3% (264 of 4,973 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.71 · 12.8% (635 of 4,973 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (1,011 of 4,973 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.74 · 10.7% (530 of 4,973 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.81 · 6.9% (343 of 4,973 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (712 of 4,973 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.49 · 44.0% (2,189 of 4,973 decks)
- Skyclave Apparition relevance 0.69 · 12.6% (626 of 4,973 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.65 · 16.1% (801 of 4,973 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.65 · 15.2% (754 of 4,973 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.57 · 27.8% (1,382 of 4,973 decks)
- Lavinia, Azorius Renegade relevance 0.71 · 9.8% (485 of 4,973 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.62 · 15.8% (787 of 4,973 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (800 of 4,973 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.77 · 6.1% (304 of 4,973 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.45 · 48.3% (2,401 of 4,973 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.62 · 16.6% (828 of 4,973 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.43 · 49.8% (2,475 of 4,973 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.78 · 5.3% (263 of 4,973 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.74 · 6.6% (327 of 4,973 decks)
- God-Eternal Oketra relevance 0.76 · 5.4% (269 of 4,973 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.51 · 31.1% (1,546 of 4,973 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.60 · 15.2% (758 of 4,973 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.73 · 6.3% (315 of 4,973 decks)
- Knight of Autumn relevance 0.66 · 10.5% (520 of 4,973 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.56 · 20.2% (1,006 of 4,973 decks)
- Delney, Streetwise Lookout relevance 0.64 · 11.7% (584 of 4,973 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.74 · 5.1% (252 of 4,973 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.39 · 54.5% (2,708 of 4,973 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.64 · 10.9% (541 of 4,973 decks)
- Sun Titan relevance 0.58 · 14.3% (713 of 4,973 decks)
- Stonecloaker relevance 0.82 · 4.3% (213 of 4,973 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.69 · 6.5% (322 of 4,973 decks)
All artifacts (28)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.83 · 23.1% (1,151 of 4,973 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.70 · 5.9% (293 of 4,973 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (760 of 4,973 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.53 · 6.5% (324 of 4,973 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (346 of 4,973 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (289 of 4,973 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.57 · 3.9% (196 of 4,973 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.47 · 6.5% (321 of 4,973 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.67 · 2.8% (138 of 4,973 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.49 · 4.7% (232 of 4,973 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.45 · 5.4% (271 of 4,973 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.33 · 18.9% (939 of 4,973 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (420 of 4,973 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.46 · 4.4% (217 of 4,973 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.44 · 4.5% (225 of 4,973 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.40 · 5.4% (270 of 4,973 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.37 · 7.5% (375 of 4,973 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.30 · 16.1% (799 of 4,973 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.38 · 5.7% (282 of 4,973 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.36 · 6.2% (306 of 4,973 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.38 · 4.4% (220 of 4,973 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.49 · 2.8% (138 of 4,973 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.41 · 3.4% (170 of 4,973 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.41 · 3.0% (149 of 4,973 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (304 of 4,973 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.23 · 13.5% (671 of 4,973 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 48.7% (2,421 of 4,973 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 68.9% (3,427 of 4,973 decks)
All enchantments (48)
- Mana Breach relevance 0.92 · 19.3% (958 of 4,973 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (829 of 4,973 decks)
- Overburden relevance 0.92 · 8.4% (418 of 4,973 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.57 · 33.3% (1,657 of 4,973 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.72 · 11.2% (558 of 4,973 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.73 · 7.7% (382 of 4,973 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.73 · 6.4% (317 of 4,973 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.72 · 5.7% (282 of 4,973 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.63 · 9.9% (490 of 4,973 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.65 · 8.7% (432 of 4,973 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.83 · 4.0% (197 of 4,973 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.50 · 21.0% (1,043 of 4,973 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (810 of 4,973 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.50 · 15.9% (790 of 4,973 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.52 · 10.1% (502 of 4,973 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.51 · 9.3% (464 of 4,973 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.73 · 3.2% (160 of 4,973 decks)
- Deeproot Waters relevance 0.71 · 3.4% (167 of 4,973 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.47 · 11.0% (547 of 4,973 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.49 · 9.0% (450 of 4,973 decks)
- Deeproot Pilgrimage relevance 0.70 · 3.3% (164 of 4,973 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.40 · 20.8% (1,033 of 4,973 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.50 · 6.4% (318 of 4,973 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.49 · 7.2% (358 of 4,973 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.49 · 6.3% (315 of 4,973 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.55 · 4.3% (213 of 4,973 decks)
- Merrow Commerce relevance 0.71 · 2.6% (128 of 4,973 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.56 · 3.7% (184 of 4,973 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.32 · 23.1% (1,151 of 4,973 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.50 · 4.3% (212 of 4,973 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (277 of 4,973 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.34 · 12.4% (618 of 4,973 decks)
- Retreat to Emeria relevance 0.59 · 2.5% (124 of 4,973 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.49 · 3.2% (158 of 4,973 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (142 of 4,973 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.46 · 2.9% (143 of 4,973 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (143 of 4,973 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.42 · 3.2% (161 of 4,973 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (199 of 4,973 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (166 of 4,973 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (232 of 4,973 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (209 of 4,973 decks)
- Sterling Grove relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (132 of 4,973 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (166 of 4,973 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (155 of 4,973 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (143 of 4,973 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (132 of 4,973 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (134 of 4,973 decks)
All instants (50)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.50 · 16.0% (795 of 4,973 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.42 · 28.8% (1,431 of 4,973 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.53 · 10.1% (500 of 4,973 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.42 · 20.9% (1,038 of 4,973 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (559 of 4,973 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.56 · 5.2% (257 of 4,973 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.47 · 11.9% (593 of 4,973 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.60 · 4.4% (220 of 4,973 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (428 of 4,973 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.46 · 11.1% (554 of 4,973 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (371 of 4,973 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (429 of 4,973 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (257 of 4,973 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.42 · 13.2% (654 of 4,973 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.38 · 19.0% (947 of 4,973 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.49 · 5.1% (254 of 4,973 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.47 · 7.2% (359 of 4,973 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.47 · 6.7% (335 of 4,973 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.37 · 19.1% (951 of 4,973 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.37 · 16.3% (809 of 4,973 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.37 · 15.7% (781 of 4,973 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.34 · 22.7% (1,129 of 4,973 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.34 · 24.1% (1,198 of 4,973 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.37 · 14.3% (711 of 4,973 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.45 · 5.4% (271 of 4,973 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (229 of 4,973 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (261 of 4,973 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.41 · 9.4% (467 of 4,973 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (311 of 4,973 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (258 of 4,973 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.32 · 21.1% (1,047 of 4,973 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.64 · 2.5% (124 of 4,973 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (286 of 4,973 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.32 · 14.7% (732 of 4,973 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.29 · 23.4% (1,164 of 4,973 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.55 · 2.8% (138 of 4,973 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.51 · 3.2% (158 of 4,973 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.54 · 2.8% (138 of 4,973 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.54 · 2.6% (131 of 4,973 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.48 · 3.3% (163 of 4,973 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.36 · 5.0% (247 of 4,973 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.51 · 2.7% (136 of 4,973 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.27 · 15.3% (762 of 4,973 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.44 · 3.3% (165 of 4,973 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.23 · 26.6% (1,323 of 4,973 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (233 of 4,973 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.45 · 3.0% (149 of 4,973 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.20 · 37.9% (1,883 of 4,973 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (134 of 4,973 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.21 · 21.7% (1,079 of 4,973 decks)
All sorceries (31)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.47 · 23.4% (1,162 of 4,973 decks)
- Time Wipe relevance 0.60 · 8.5% (425 of 4,973 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.82 · 3.6% (177 of 4,973 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.50 · 10.6% (527 of 4,973 decks)
- Wargate relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (475 of 4,973 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (460 of 4,973 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (403 of 4,973 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (377 of 4,973 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.48 · 7.4% (366 of 4,973 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 21.5% (1,068 of 4,973 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (401 of 4,973 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (384 of 4,973 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 0.45 · 4.9% (246 of 4,973 decks)
- Tragic Arrogance relevance 0.64 · 2.7% (134 of 4,973 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (235 of 4,973 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.53 · 3.4% (168 of 4,973 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.57 · 2.7% (134 of 4,973 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.54 · 3.1% (152 of 4,973 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.49 · 3.4% (170 of 4,973 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.51 · 3.0% (148 of 4,973 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.28 · 14.7% (733 of 4,973 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (891 of 4,973 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.22 · 29.4% (1,461 of 4,973 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (392 of 4,973 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.43 · 2.9% (145 of 4,973 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (145 of 4,973 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.35 · 4.0% (201 of 4,973 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.43 · 2.7% (136 of 4,973 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.23 · 13.7% (680 of 4,973 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (138 of 4,973 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.15 · 21.0% (1,046 of 4,973 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.74 · 4.2% (211 of 4,973 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.64 · 4.7% (234 of 4,973 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.81 · 3.1% (156 of 4,973 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.54 · 6.3% (312 of 4,973 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.47 · 3.5% (174 of 4,973 decks)
- Tamiyo, Field Researcher relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (156 of 4,973 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.58 · 3.3% (162 of 4,973 decks)
All utility lands (40)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.83 · 8.0% (400 of 4,973 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.68 · 6.6% (330 of 4,973 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.50 · 14.8% (736 of 4,973 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.49 · 7.7% (382 of 4,973 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.47 · 6.9% (342 of 4,973 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (209 of 4,973 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.37 · 18.6% (925 of 4,973 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.46 · 6.5% (323 of 4,973 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (270 of 4,973 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (440 of 4,973 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (849 of 4,973 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.40 · 10.1% (500 of 4,973 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.40 · 9.6% (477 of 4,973 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.44 · 5.9% (292 of 4,973 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.32 · 21.4% (1,064 of 4,973 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.47 · 4.5% (223 of 4,973 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.61 · 2.9% (144 of 4,973 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (243 of 4,973 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.41 · 6.0% (299 of 4,973 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.51 · 3.7% (186 of 4,973 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.50 · 3.7% (182 of 4,973 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.46 · 4.2% (207 of 4,973 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.43 · 4.6% (227 of 4,973 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (224 of 4,973 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.36 · 9.4% (469 of 4,973 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.48 · 3.7% (182 of 4,973 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (242 of 4,973 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.42 · 4.4% (219 of 4,973 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.55 · 2.7% (134 of 4,973 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.47 · 3.5% (174 of 4,973 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.20 · 46.5% (2,312 of 4,973 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.22 · 33.5% (1,665 of 4,973 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.27 · 13.4% (666 of 4,973 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.44 · 3.1% (154 of 4,973 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (136 of 4,973 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.26 · 9.7% (482 of 4,973 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.26 · 9.5% (473 of 4,973 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.37 · 3.4% (169 of 4,973 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.23 · 13.9% (693 of 4,973 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (177 of 4,973 decks)
All lands (50)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.44 · 30.3% (1,507 of 4,973 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.43 · 33.1% (1,645 of 4,973 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.43 · 28.8% (1,434 of 4,973 decks)
- Treva's Ruins relevance 0.59 · 5.2% (257 of 4,973 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.49 · 12.6% (629 of 4,973 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.52 · 9.6% (477 of 4,973 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.52 · 9.1% (454 of 4,973 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.46 · 12.7% (633 of 4,973 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.46 · 12.0% (599 of 4,973 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.44 · 13.0% (645 of 4,973 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.47 · 10.2% (506 of 4,973 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (444 of 4,973 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.39 · 21.5% (1,069 of 4,973 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.51 · 6.1% (305 of 4,973 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.43 · 13.4% (664 of 4,973 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (450 of 4,973 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.44 · 11.6% (579 of 4,973 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.41 · 14.6% (726 of 4,973 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.42 · 11.7% (584 of 4,973 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.38 · 17.7% (878 of 4,973 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.47 · 6.6% (328 of 4,973 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.38 · 17.1% (850 of 4,973 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (443 of 4,973 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.38 · 17.6% (876 of 4,973 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.52 · 4.4% (220 of 4,973 decks)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.66 · 3.0% (148 of 4,973 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (312 of 4,973 decks)
- Hengegate Pathway // Mistgate Pathway relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (251 of 4,973 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.45 · 6.4% (319 of 4,973 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (211 of 4,973 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (247 of 4,973 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.44 · 6.8% (340 of 4,973 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (209 of 4,973 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (259 of 4,973 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.41 · 8.7% (434 of 4,973 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (260 of 4,973 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (247 of 4,973 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.40 · 8.6% (427 of 4,973 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.60 · 2.7% (135 of 4,973 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.42 · 4.9% (242 of 4,973 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.53 · 3.4% (171 of 4,973 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.26 · 39.0% (1,940 of 4,973 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.48 · 4.0% (201 of 4,973 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (427 of 4,973 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.33 · 13.7% (680 of 4,973 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (217 of 4,973 decks)
- Urban Retreat relevance 0.39 · 6.1% (301 of 4,973 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.24 · 40.8% (2,030 of 4,973 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.53 · 3.1% (156 of 4,973 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.23 · 41.5% (2,062 of 4,973 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Chulane, Teller of Tales, from 4,973 real Commander decks.