Explore

Played in 225,553 decks

Explore
$0.19 €0.24

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 3.12 · 49.0% (1,353 of 2,760 decks)
  2. Trostani, Selesnya's Voice relevance 3.04 · 43.5% (4,510 of 10,357 decks)
  3. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 2.99 · 28.2% (3,312 of 11,725 decks)
  4. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.96 · 46.5% (1,698 of 3,649 decks)
  5. The Fourth Doctor // Sarah Jane Smith relevance 2.91 · 56.1% (424 of 756 decks)
  6. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.64 · 36.7% (1,559 of 4,251 decks)
  7. Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 2.62 · 26.5% (1,467 of 5,531 decks)
  8. The Necrobloom relevance 2.56 · 17.2% (1,960 of 11,380 decks)
  9. Pako, Arcane Retriever // Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 2.50 · 55.4% (2,142 of 3,864 decks)
  10. Child of Alara relevance 2.39 · 22.5% (1,317 of 5,852 decks)
  11. The Swarmlord relevance 2.39 · 60.0% (1,173 of 1,956 decks)
  12. Avatar Aang // Aang, Master of Elements relevance 2.36 · 17.8% (2,766 of 15,508 decks)
  13. Yargle and Multani relevance 2.34 · 22.2% (463 of 2,081 decks)
  14. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.34 · 20.6% (969 of 4,704 decks)
  15. Bello, Bard of the Brambles relevance 2.34 · 47.1% (7,913 of 16,808 decks)
  16. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.27 · 54.2% (4,950 of 9,125 decks)
  17. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.12 · 30.3% (2,696 of 8,897 decks)
  18. Jared Carthalion relevance 2.11 · 22.3% (576 of 2,584 decks)
  19. Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 2.10 · 44.3% (6,691 of 15,115 decks)
  20. Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 2.09 · 26.3% (552 of 2,102 decks)
  21. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.05 · 32.5% (422 of 1,298 decks)
  22. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.03 · 49.5% (4,874 of 9,847 decks)
  23. Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 2.01 · 22.0% (748 of 3,402 decks)
  24. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.94 · 43.8% (2,312 of 5,275 decks)
  25. Storm, Force of Nature relevance 1.94 · 34.6% (1,969 of 5,696 decks)
  26. The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.92 · 12.8% (687 of 5,388 decks)
  27. Flubs, the Fool relevance 1.91 · 29.6% (3,466 of 11,696 decks)
  28. Old Man Willow relevance 1.83 · 34.1% (56 of 164 decks)
  29. Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 1.81 · 13.0% (1,412 of 10,844 decks)
  30. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.80 · 43.8% (2,046 of 4,673 decks)

Replaced By

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
All replaced by (4)
  1. Three Visits 2.7% of swaps out (5 swaps)
  2. Planar Genesis 1.6% of swaps out (3 swaps)
  3. Growth Spiral 1.6% of swaps out (3 swaps)
  4. Rampant Growth 1.6% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
All parallel cards (5)
  1. Summer Bloom
  2. Enter the Unknown
  3. Scale the Heights
  4. Journey of Discovery
  5. Contentious Plan

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Rampant Growth
    1.06 51.0%
    $1.25 €0.52
  • Cultivate
    1.01 57.7%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Growth Spiral
    0.98 29.4%
    $0.32 €0.47
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.87 37.1%
    $1.83 €1.50
  • Beast Within
    0.83 41.3%
    $0.68 €0.85
  • Farseek
    0.80 42.8%
    $0.46 €0.81
  • Harrow
    0.79 23.9%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Nature's Lore
    0.76 38.7%
    $2.22 €2.82
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.70 19.4%
    $0.29 €0.31
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.69 20.0%
    $5.92 €6.45
All most relevant (30)
  1. Rampant Growth relevance 1.06 · 51.0% (114,968 of 225,553 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 1.01 · 57.7% (130,214 of 225,553 decks)
  3. Growth Spiral relevance 0.98 · 29.4% (66,398 of 225,553 decks)
  4. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.87 · 37.1% (83,654 of 225,553 decks)
  5. Beast Within relevance 0.83 · 41.3% (93,190 of 225,553 decks)
  6. Farseek relevance 0.80 · 42.8% (96,451 of 225,553 decks)
  7. Harrow relevance 0.79 · 23.9% (54,006 of 225,553 decks)
  8. Nature's Lore relevance 0.76 · 38.7% (87,235 of 225,553 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.70 · 19.4% (43,841 of 225,553 decks)
  10. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (45,153 of 225,553 decks)
  11. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.67 · 19.0% (42,866 of 225,553 decks)
  12. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.66 · 23.7% (53,512 of 225,553 decks)
  13. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.65 · 25.3% (57,149 of 225,553 decks)
  14. Three Visits relevance 0.61 · 27.3% (61,666 of 225,553 decks)
  15. Scute Swarm relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (42,053 of 225,553 decks)
  16. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.60 · 15.6% (35,213 of 225,553 decks)
  17. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.59 · 15.8% (35,653 of 225,553 decks)
  18. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.59 · 25.6% (57,790 of 225,553 decks)
  19. Exploration relevance 0.57 · 16.4% (37,066 of 225,553 decks)
  20. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.56 · 16.5% (37,272 of 225,553 decks)
  21. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.56 · 17.9% (40,358 of 225,553 decks)
  22. Harmonize relevance 0.56 · 16.3% (36,734 of 225,553 decks)
  23. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.55 · 27.7% (62,577 of 225,553 decks)
  24. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.52 · 13.5% (30,466 of 225,553 decks)
  25. Entish Restoration relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (30,859 of 225,553 decks)
  26. Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.51 · 14.7% (33,255 of 225,553 decks)
  27. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.48 · 11.9% (26,730 of 225,553 decks)
  28. Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.48 · 15.6% (35,283 of 225,553 decks)
  29. Crop Rotation relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (34,544 of 225,553 decks)
  30. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.46 · 13.1% (29,591 of 225,553 decks)

Creatures

15

Showing 1-10 of 15

Page size
  • Rampaging Baloths
    0.70 19.4%
    $0.29 €0.31
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.69 20.0%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.67 19.0%
    $12.45 €8.66
  • Sakura-Tribe Elder
    0.66 23.7%
    $0.42 €0.58
  • Scute Swarm
    0.61 18.6%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    0.60 15.6%
    $0.30 €0.14
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    0.59 15.8%
    $2.01 €2.65
  • Llanowar Elves
    0.59 25.6%
    $0.35 €0.21
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    0.56 16.5%
    $0.46 €0.58
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.56 17.9%
    $4.18 €3.05
All creatures (15)
  1. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.70 · 19.4% (43,841 of 225,553 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (45,153 of 225,553 decks)
  3. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.67 · 19.0% (42,866 of 225,553 decks)
  4. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.66 · 23.7% (53,512 of 225,553 decks)
  5. Scute Swarm relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (42,053 of 225,553 decks)
  6. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.60 · 15.6% (35,213 of 225,553 decks)
  7. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.59 · 15.8% (35,653 of 225,553 decks)
  8. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.59 · 25.6% (57,790 of 225,553 decks)
  9. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.56 · 16.5% (37,272 of 225,553 decks)
  10. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.56 · 17.9% (40,358 of 225,553 decks)
  11. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.52 · 13.5% (30,466 of 225,553 decks)
  12. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.48 · 11.9% (26,730 of 225,553 decks)
  13. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.46 · 13.1% (29,591 of 225,553 decks)
  14. Elvish Mystic relevance 0.43 · 16.6% (37,388 of 225,553 decks)
  15. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.42 · 9.7% (21,887 of 225,553 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.65 25.3%
    $0.57 €0.63
  • Exploration
    0.57 16.4%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Unnatural Growth
    0.41 11.2%
    $3.98 €1.64
  • Spelunking
    0.40 9.8%
    $3.67 €3.18
All enchantments (4)
  1. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.65 · 25.3% (57,149 of 225,553 decks)
  2. Exploration relevance 0.57 · 16.4% (37,066 of 225,553 decks)
  3. Unnatural Growth relevance 0.41 · 11.2% (25,226 of 225,553 decks)
  4. Spelunking relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (21,997 of 225,553 decks)

Instants

9

Showing 1-9 of 9

Page size
  • Growth Spiral
    0.98 29.4%
    $0.32 €0.47
  • Beast Within
    0.83 41.3%
    $0.68 €0.85
  • Harrow
    0.79 23.9%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.55 27.7%
    $17.55 €14.17
  • Entish Restoration
    0.51 13.7%
    $2.79 €1.87
  • Return of the Wildspeaker
    0.48 15.6%
    $2.63 €1.18
  • Crop Rotation
    0.48 15.3%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Snakeskin Veil
    0.42 11.6%
    $0.26 €0.11
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.40 9.4%
    $0.34 €0.30
All instants (9)
  1. Growth Spiral relevance 0.98 · 29.4% (66,398 of 225,553 decks)
  2. Beast Within relevance 0.83 · 41.3% (93,190 of 225,553 decks)
  3. Harrow relevance 0.79 · 23.9% (54,006 of 225,553 decks)
  4. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.55 · 27.7% (62,577 of 225,553 decks)
  5. Entish Restoration relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (30,859 of 225,553 decks)
  6. Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.48 · 15.6% (35,283 of 225,553 decks)
  7. Crop Rotation relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (34,544 of 225,553 decks)
  8. Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.42 · 11.6% (26,213 of 225,553 decks)
  9. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.40 · 9.4% (21,217 of 225,553 decks)

Sorceries

9

Showing 1-9 of 9

Page size
  • Rampant Growth
    1.06 51.0%
    $1.25 €0.52
  • Cultivate
    1.01 57.7%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.87 37.1%
    $1.83 €1.50
  • Farseek
    0.80 42.8%
    $0.46 €0.81
  • Nature's Lore
    0.76 38.7%
    $2.22 €2.82
  • Three Visits
    0.61 27.3%
    $5.54 €4.82
  • Harmonize
    0.56 16.3%
    $0.24 €0.26
  • Skyshroud Claim
    0.51 14.7%
    $1.08 €1.14
  • Shared Roots
    0.44 11.5%
    $0.44 €0.68
All sorceries (9)
  1. Rampant Growth relevance 1.06 · 51.0% (114,968 of 225,553 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 1.01 · 57.7% (130,214 of 225,553 decks)
  3. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.87 · 37.1% (83,654 of 225,553 decks)
  4. Farseek relevance 0.80 · 42.8% (96,451 of 225,553 decks)
  5. Nature's Lore relevance 0.76 · 38.7% (87,235 of 225,553 decks)
  6. Three Visits relevance 0.61 · 27.3% (61,666 of 225,553 decks)
  7. Harmonize relevance 0.56 · 16.3% (36,734 of 225,553 decks)
  8. Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.51 · 14.7% (33,255 of 225,553 decks)
  9. Shared Roots relevance 0.44 · 11.5% (25,938 of 225,553 decks)

Utility Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Mosswort Bridge
    0.54 17.2%
    $0.37 €0.40
  • Reliquary Tower
    0.44 32.0%
    $4.19 €3.85
  • Myriad Landscape
    0.43 19.6%
    $0.31 €0.24
All utility lands (3)
  1. Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.54 · 17.2% (38,815 of 225,553 decks)
  2. Reliquary Tower relevance 0.44 · 32.0% (72,136 of 225,553 decks)
  3. Myriad Landscape relevance 0.43 · 19.6% (44,296 of 225,553 decks)

Lands

10

Showing 1-10 of 10

Page size
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.59 34.2%
    $0.29 €0.13
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.57 28.2%
    $0.27 €0.11
  • Simic Growth Chamber
    0.56 15.7%
    $0.37 €0.30
  • Cinder Glade
    0.54 21.0%
    $0.29 €0.26
  • Hinterland Harbor
    0.51 19.7%
    $0.38 €0.39
  • Gruul Turf
    0.44 11.7%
    $0.33 €0.18
  • Rootbound Crag
    0.42 15.4%
    $0.31 €0.41
  • Dreamroot Cascade
    0.41 13.8%
    $1.24 €0.85
  • Fabled Passage
    0.41 19.5%
    $0.62 €0.95
  • Breeding Pool
    0.40 16.6%
    $9.52 €9.22
All lands (10)
  1. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.59 · 34.2% (77,053 of 225,553 decks)
  2. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.57 · 28.2% (63,679 of 225,553 decks)
  3. Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.56 · 15.7% (35,406 of 225,553 decks)
  4. Cinder Glade relevance 0.54 · 21.0% (47,384 of 225,553 decks)
  5. Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.51 · 19.7% (44,542 of 225,553 decks)
  6. Gruul Turf relevance 0.44 · 11.7% (26,440 of 225,553 decks)
  7. Rootbound Crag relevance 0.42 · 15.4% (34,809 of 225,553 decks)
  8. Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.41 · 13.8% (31,156 of 225,553 decks)
  9. Fabled Passage relevance 0.41 · 19.5% (43,896 of 225,553 decks)
  10. Breeding Pool relevance 0.40 · 16.6% (37,445 of 225,553 decks)

EDH data for Explore: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 225,553 real decks.