Tip: use − and + on any card to filter by it

Exploration

Played in 185,755 decks

Exploration
$29.98 €27.12

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 3.82 · 34.3% (4,029 of 11,750 decks)
  2. The Gitrog Monster relevance 3.75 · 38.6% (2,081 of 5,392 decks)
  3. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.47 · 44.7% (1,903 of 4,259 decks)
  4. Sythis, Harvest's Hand relevance 3.41 · 43.6% (3,020 of 6,931 decks)
  5. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 3.36 · 36.9% (1,040 of 2,817 decks)
  6. The Necrobloom relevance 3.33 · 43.5% (4,959 of 11,400 decks)
  7. Zask, Skittering Swarmlord relevance 3.25 · 35.8% (887 of 2,475 decks)
  8. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.10 · 47.2% (5,525 of 11,715 decks)
  9. Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 2.84 · 59.6% (948 of 1,590 decks)
  10. Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 2.79 · 41.3% (5,630 of 13,632 decks)
  11. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.72 · 41.4% (2,186 of 5,279 decks)
  12. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.70 · 47.8% (4,373 of 9,139 decks)
  13. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.70 · 49.3% (2,325 of 4,714 decks)
  14. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.70 · 43.2% (1,750 of 4,053 decks)
  15. Homer, the Hermit relevance 2.63 · 46.6% (2,167 of 4,654 decks)
  16. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.57 · 31.8% (1,888 of 5,945 decks)
  17. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 2.56 · 64.2% (3,931 of 6,122 decks)
  18. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.55 · 32.3% (8,199 of 25,395 decks)
  19. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.48 · 49.7% (4,426 of 8,908 decks)
  20. Tuvasa the Sunlit relevance 2.40 · 21.5% (819 of 3,807 decks)
  21. Sergeant John Benton relevance 2.36 · 29.5% (691 of 2,342 decks)
  22. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.26 · 21.6% (788 of 3,654 decks)
  23. Loot, the Key to Everything relevance 2.26 · 41.9% (750 of 1,789 decks)
  24. Child of Alara relevance 2.25 · 15.5% (909 of 5,857 decks)
  25. Isu the Abominable relevance 2.25 · 26.2% (317 of 1,210 decks)
  26. Hazezon Tamar relevance 2.21 · 40.8% (146 of 358 decks)
  27. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.15 · 38.1% (1,781 of 4,680 decks)
  28. Pako, Arcane Retriever // Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 2.14 · 32.1% (1,240 of 3,867 decks)
  29. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.08 · 22.7% (406 of 1,789 decks)
  30. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.08 · 42.4% (4,187 of 9,866 decks)

Replaced By

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
All replaced by (3)
  1. Burgeoning 8.7% of swaps out (10 swaps)
  2. Exploration Broodship 3.5% of swaps out (4 swaps)
  3. Wild Growth 2.6% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

4

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.66 46.8%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.42 41.1%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.30 37.1%
    $9.97 €6.82
  • Burgeoning
    1.22 29.3%
    $34.04 €23.83
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.22 34.0%
    $22.74 €23.91
  • Crop Rotation
    1.20 38.4%
    $3.83 €3.52
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.16 30.7%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.12 29.1%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.12 27.3%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Scute Swarm
    1.08 33.3%
    $8.53 €7.58
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.66 · 46.8% (86,948 of 185,755 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.42 · 41.1% (76,398 of 185,755 decks)
  3. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.30 · 37.1% (68,879 of 185,755 decks)
  4. Burgeoning relevance 1.22 · 29.3% (54,390 of 185,755 decks)
  5. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.22 · 34.0% (63,141 of 185,755 decks)
  6. Crop Rotation relevance 1.20 · 38.4% (71,288 of 185,755 decks)
  7. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.16 · 30.7% (57,105 of 185,755 decks)
  8. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.12 · 29.1% (54,045 of 185,755 decks)
  9. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.12 · 27.3% (50,707 of 185,755 decks)
  10. Scute Swarm relevance 1.08 · 33.3% (61,820 of 185,755 decks)
  11. Scapeshift relevance 1.05 · 23.1% (42,988 of 185,755 decks)
  12. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.04 · 33.4% (61,969 of 185,755 decks)
  13. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.04 · 26.5% (49,150 of 185,755 decks)
  14. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.94 · 23.6% (43,826 of 185,755 decks)
  15. Nature's Lore relevance 0.87 · 44.4% (82,452 of 185,755 decks)
  16. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.85 · 20.6% (38,354 of 185,755 decks)
  17. Zuran Orb relevance 0.85 · 20.5% (37,987 of 185,755 decks)
  18. Three Visits relevance 0.84 · 37.7% (69,986 of 185,755 decks)
  19. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.84 · 42.3% (78,653 of 185,755 decks)
  20. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 21.5% (39,991 of 185,755 decks)
  21. Harrow relevance 0.82 · 24.9% (46,306 of 185,755 decks)
  22. Birds of Paradise relevance 0.81 · 39.4% (73,239 of 185,755 decks)
  23. Sylvan Library relevance 0.76 · 23.9% (44,416 of 185,755 decks)
  24. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.76 · 19.8% (36,780 of 185,755 decks)
  25. Spelunking relevance 0.75 · 18.2% (33,794 of 185,755 decks)
  26. Six relevance 0.74 · 19.0% (35,350 of 185,755 decks)
  27. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.74 · 21.8% (40,497 of 185,755 decks)
  28. Beast Within relevance 0.74 · 36.8% (68,433 of 185,755 decks)
  29. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.73 · 16.7% (30,977 of 185,755 decks)
  30. Life from the Loam relevance 0.70 · 17.5% (32,422 of 185,755 decks)

Creatures

21

Showing 1-10 of 21

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.66 46.8%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.42 41.1%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.30 37.1%
    $9.97 €6.82
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.22 34.0%
    $22.74 €23.91
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.16 30.7%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.12 29.1%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.12 27.3%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Scute Swarm
    1.08 33.3%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.04 33.4%
    $4.15 €3.05
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    0.94 23.6%
    $7.21 €6.81
All creatures (21)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.66 · 46.8% (86,948 of 185,755 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.42 · 41.1% (76,398 of 185,755 decks)
  3. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.30 · 37.1% (68,879 of 185,755 decks)
  4. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.22 · 34.0% (63,141 of 185,755 decks)
  5. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.16 · 30.7% (57,105 of 185,755 decks)
  6. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.12 · 29.1% (54,045 of 185,755 decks)
  7. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.12 · 27.3% (50,707 of 185,755 decks)
  8. Scute Swarm relevance 1.08 · 33.3% (61,820 of 185,755 decks)
  9. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.04 · 33.4% (61,969 of 185,755 decks)
  10. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.94 · 23.6% (43,826 of 185,755 decks)
  11. Birds of Paradise relevance 0.81 · 39.4% (73,239 of 185,755 decks)
  12. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.76 · 19.8% (36,780 of 185,755 decks)
  13. Six relevance 0.74 · 19.0% (35,350 of 185,755 decks)
  14. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.74 · 21.8% (40,497 of 185,755 decks)
  15. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.73 · 16.7% (30,977 of 185,755 decks)
  16. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.70 · 16.8% (31,168 of 185,755 decks)
  17. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.70 · 19.3% (35,841 of 185,755 decks)
  18. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.69 · 17.3% (32,110 of 185,755 decks)
  19. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.68 · 15.7% (29,122 of 185,755 decks)
  20. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.67 · 17.5% (32,548 of 185,755 decks)
  21. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.66 · 16.2% (30,031 of 185,755 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.04 26.5%
    $33.00 €19.98
  • Zuran Orb
    0.85 20.5%
    $3.69 €1.81
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.83 21.5%
    $1.12 €1.38
  • Amulet of Vigor
    0.66 14.7%
    $50.54 €33.19
All artifacts (4)
  1. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.04 · 26.5% (49,150 of 185,755 decks)
  2. Zuran Orb relevance 0.85 · 20.5% (37,987 of 185,755 decks)
  3. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 21.5% (39,991 of 185,755 decks)
  4. Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.66 · 14.7% (27,366 of 185,755 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Burgeoning
    1.22 29.3%
    $34.04 €23.83
  • Sylvan Library
    0.76 23.9%
    $28.89 €24.53
  • Spelunking
    0.75 18.2%
    $3.43 €3.18
All enchantments (3)
  1. Burgeoning relevance 1.22 · 29.3% (54,390 of 185,755 decks)
  2. Sylvan Library relevance 0.76 · 23.9% (44,416 of 185,755 decks)
  3. Spelunking relevance 0.75 · 18.2% (33,794 of 185,755 decks)

Instants

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.20 38.4%
    $3.83 €3.52
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.84 42.3%
    $17.60 €14.04
  • Harrow
    0.82 24.9%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Beast Within
    0.74 36.8%
    $0.65 €0.84
  • Worldly Tutor
    0.65 21.9%
    $30.65 €23.08
All instants (5)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.20 · 38.4% (71,288 of 185,755 decks)
  2. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.84 · 42.3% (78,653 of 185,755 decks)
  3. Harrow relevance 0.82 · 24.9% (46,306 of 185,755 decks)
  4. Beast Within relevance 0.74 · 36.8% (68,433 of 185,755 decks)
  5. Worldly Tutor relevance 0.65 · 21.9% (40,671 of 185,755 decks)

Sorceries

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Scapeshift
    1.05 23.1%
    $41.65 €33.09
  • Nature's Lore
    0.87 44.4%
    $2.23 €2.81
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.85 20.6%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Three Visits
    0.84 37.7%
    $5.55 €4.84
  • Life from the Loam
    0.70 17.5%
    $5.21 €5.11
  • Explore
    0.66 20.0%
    $0.19 €0.27
All sorceries (6)
  1. Scapeshift relevance 1.05 · 23.1% (42,988 of 185,755 decks)
  2. Nature's Lore relevance 0.87 · 44.4% (82,452 of 185,755 decks)
  3. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.85 · 20.6% (38,354 of 185,755 decks)
  4. Three Visits relevance 0.84 · 37.7% (69,986 of 185,755 decks)
  5. Life from the Loam relevance 0.70 · 17.5% (32,422 of 185,755 decks)
  6. Explore relevance 0.66 · 20.0% (37,133 of 185,755 decks)

Utility Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    1.04 40.9%
    $16.76 €13.00
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    1.03 41.0%
    $49.49 €39.74
  • Field of the Dead
    0.88 23.1%
    $28.83 €27.39
  • Shifting Woodland
    0.77 21.9%
    $7.08 €5.35
All utility lands (4)
  1. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 1.04 · 40.9% (75,998 of 185,755 decks)
  2. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 1.03 · 41.0% (76,226 of 185,755 decks)
  3. Field of the Dead relevance 0.88 · 23.1% (42,986 of 185,755 decks)
  4. Shifting Woodland relevance 0.77 · 21.9% (40,767 of 185,755 decks)

Lands

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Misty Rainforest
    0.93 40.9%
    $35.75 €26.52
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.89 38.5%
    $19.18 €16.84
  • Verdant Catacombs
    0.87 37.8%
    $29.04 €24.74
  • Windswept Heath
    0.84 36.8%
    $12.38 €10.50
  • Breeding Pool
    0.75 31.5%
    $9.57 €9.23
  • Fabled Passage
    0.71 33.8%
    $0.64 €0.95
  • Stomping Ground
    0.66 27.0%
    $7.00 €7.20
All lands (7)
  1. Misty Rainforest relevance 0.93 · 40.9% (76,041 of 185,755 decks)
  2. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.89 · 38.5% (71,495 of 185,755 decks)
  3. Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.87 · 37.8% (70,170 of 185,755 decks)
  4. Windswept Heath relevance 0.84 · 36.8% (68,449 of 185,755 decks)
  5. Breeding Pool relevance 0.75 · 31.5% (58,535 of 185,755 decks)
  6. Fabled Passage relevance 0.71 · 33.8% (62,723 of 185,755 decks)
  7. Stomping Ground relevance 0.66 · 27.0% (50,242 of 185,755 decks)

EDH data for Exploration: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 185,755 real decks.