Cards like Harrow
12× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Jund decks
83% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Jund decks
2.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Harrow 81%
- Roiling Regrowth 68%
- Scapeshift 33%
- Entish Restoration 25%
- Planar Engineering 19%
- Cycle of Renewal 8%
Cards like Szarel, Genesis Shepherd
Over 20× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Jund decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Jund decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Icetill Explorer
14× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Jund decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Jund decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
13× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Jund decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Jund decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Korvold, Fae-Cursed King
9.5× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other Jund decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Jund decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
2.6× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Jund decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Jund decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.61 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 79%
- Skyshroud Claim 47%
- Three Visits 17%
Other options: Nissa's Pilgrimage, Glimpse the Core, Ranger's Path, Hunting Wilds, Field Trip
Cards like Tannuk, Memorial Ensign
Over 20× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Jund decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Jund decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign 59%
- Sabotender 33%
- Iridescent Vinelasher 16%
- Tunneling Geopede 6%
- Spitfire Lagac 5%
- Koth, the Geomancer 1%
Other options: Akoum Hellkite, Cosi's Ravager
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
11× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Jund decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Jund decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Aftermath Analyst 86%
- World Shaper 22%
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
13× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Jund decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Jund decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Scute Swarm
12× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Jund decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Jund decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Jund decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 50%
- Springheart Nantuko 25%
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
3.8× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Jund decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Jund decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Jund decks
Cards
Other options: Floral Evoker, Undergrowth Champion, Territorial Scythecat, Oran-Rief Hydra, Vinelasher Kudzu, Murasa Ranger, Foe-liage
Cards like Exploration
7.8× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Jund decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Jund decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Mightform Harmonizer
7.4× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Jund decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Jund decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Jund decks
Cards
Cards like Planetary Annihilation
9.8× as likely as other Jund decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Jund decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Jund decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Jund decks
All top picks (50)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 0.54 · 77.2% (19,760 of 25,610 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.50 · 79.5% (20,359 of 25,610 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.45 · 89.1% (22,826 of 25,610 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.47 · 83.2% (21,313 of 25,610 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.48 · 80.6% (20,636 of 25,610 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.48 · 80.1% (20,516 of 25,610 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.53 · 67.3% (17,245 of 25,610 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.52 · 69.5% (17,790 of 25,610 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.43 · 86.3% (22,107 of 25,610 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.42 · 92.1% (23,593 of 25,610 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 0.55 · 62.6% (16,044 of 25,610 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.57 · 59.1% (15,130 of 25,610 decks)
- Planetary Annihilation relevance 0.59 · 54.8% (14,022 of 25,610 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.51 · 67.5% (17,290 of 25,610 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.56 · 58.9% (15,094 of 25,610 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.51 · 65.6% (16,792 of 25,610 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.52 · 64.0% (16,381 of 25,610 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.60 · 50.3% (12,882 of 25,610 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.57 · 53.2% (13,623 of 25,610 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.51 · 63.8% (16,351 of 25,610 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.67 · 35.6% (9,112 of 25,610 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.53 · 59.5% (15,233 of 25,610 decks)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 0.57 · 50.8% (13,011 of 25,610 decks)
- God-Eternal Bontu relevance 0.61 · 44.0% (11,272 of 25,610 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.52 · 60.3% (15,436 of 25,610 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.51 · 60.3% (15,455 of 25,610 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.68 · 32.6% (8,355 of 25,610 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.52 · 57.2% (14,640 of 25,610 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.41 · 81.2% (20,801 of 25,610 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.64 · 36.1% (9,240 of 25,610 decks)
- Sprouting Goblin relevance 0.66 · 32.6% (8,346 of 25,610 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.68 · 29.7% (7,605 of 25,610 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.71 · 25.4% (6,507 of 25,610 decks)
- Eumidian Wastewaker relevance 0.68 · 30.0% (7,674 of 25,610 decks)
- Braids, Arisen Nightmare relevance 0.41 · 77.0% (19,722 of 25,610 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.67 · 29.0% (7,424 of 25,610 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.65 · 32.0% (8,199 of 25,610 decks)
- Groundskeeper relevance 0.75 · 18.0% (4,603 of 25,610 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.46 · 65.0% (16,643 of 25,610 decks)
- Loamcrafter Faun relevance 0.73 · 20.0% (5,133 of 25,610 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 0.76 · 15.8% (4,034 of 25,610 decks)
- Windgrace's Judgment relevance 0.58 · 41.1% (10,533 of 25,610 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.47 · 61.9% (15,844 of 25,610 decks)
- Korvold, Fae-Cursed King relevance 0.38 · 82.1% (21,019 of 25,610 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.63 · 33.9% (8,671 of 25,610 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.54 · 47.6% (12,179 of 25,610 decks)
- Gaze of Granite relevance 0.66 · 29.4% (7,536 of 25,610 decks)
- Uurg, Spawn of Turg relevance 0.72 · 20.4% (5,225 of 25,610 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.65 · 30.0% (7,682 of 25,610 decks)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 0.74 · 17.1% (4,373 of 25,610 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 0.54 · 77.2% (19,760 of 25,610 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.50 · 79.5% (20,359 of 25,610 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.47 · 83.2% (21,313 of 25,610 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.48 · 80.1% (20,516 of 25,610 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.43 · 86.3% (22,107 of 25,610 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.42 · 92.1% (23,593 of 25,610 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 0.55 · 62.6% (16,044 of 25,610 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.57 · 59.1% (15,130 of 25,610 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.56 · 58.9% (15,094 of 25,610 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.51 · 65.6% (16,792 of 25,610 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.52 · 64.0% (16,381 of 25,610 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.60 · 50.3% (12,882 of 25,610 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.57 · 53.2% (13,623 of 25,610 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.51 · 63.8% (16,351 of 25,610 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.67 · 35.6% (9,112 of 25,610 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.53 · 59.5% (15,233 of 25,610 decks)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 0.57 · 50.8% (13,011 of 25,610 decks)
- God-Eternal Bontu relevance 0.61 · 44.0% (11,272 of 25,610 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.52 · 60.3% (15,436 of 25,610 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.51 · 60.3% (15,455 of 25,610 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.68 · 32.6% (8,355 of 25,610 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.52 · 57.2% (14,640 of 25,610 decks)
- Sprouting Goblin relevance 0.66 · 32.6% (8,346 of 25,610 decks)
- Eumidian Wastewaker relevance 0.68 · 30.0% (7,674 of 25,610 decks)
- Braids, Arisen Nightmare relevance 0.41 · 77.0% (19,722 of 25,610 decks)
- Groundskeeper relevance 0.75 · 18.0% (4,603 of 25,610 decks)
- Loamcrafter Faun relevance 0.73 · 20.0% (5,133 of 25,610 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 0.76 · 15.8% (4,034 of 25,610 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.47 · 61.9% (15,844 of 25,610 decks)
- Korvold, Fae-Cursed King relevance 0.38 · 82.1% (21,019 of 25,610 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.63 · 33.9% (8,671 of 25,610 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.54 · 47.6% (12,179 of 25,610 decks)
- Uurg, Spawn of Turg relevance 0.72 · 20.4% (5,225 of 25,610 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.65 · 30.0% (7,682 of 25,610 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.78 · 13.7% (3,509 of 25,610 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.74 · 16.7% (4,268 of 25,610 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.81 · 11.5% (2,957 of 25,610 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.71 · 19.0% (4,857 of 25,610 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.67 · 24.9% (6,369 of 25,610 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.52 · 49.6% (12,695 of 25,610 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.71 · 17.6% (4,502 of 25,610 decks)
- World Breaker relevance 0.77 · 12.9% (3,309 of 25,610 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.58 · 37.4% (9,588 of 25,610 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.77 · 12.5% (3,192 of 25,610 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.69 · 19.8% (5,065 of 25,610 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.66 · 23.1% (5,918 of 25,610 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (4,222 of 25,610 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.67 · 22.1% (5,666 of 25,610 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.63 · 28.6% (7,327 of 25,610 decks)
- Greater Gargadon relevance 0.85 · 7.3% (1,868 of 25,610 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All artifacts (14)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.48 · 80.6% (20,636 of 25,610 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.52 · 69.5% (17,790 of 25,610 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.57 · 41.3% (10,576 of 25,610 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.59 · 38.3% (9,821 of 25,610 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.87 · 8.2% (2,111 of 25,610 decks)
- Hammer of Purphoros relevance 0.68 · 23.4% (5,980 of 25,610 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (4,330 of 25,610 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.84 · 7.2% (1,834 of 25,610 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.80 · 7.8% (2,003 of 25,610 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.59 · 2.9% (747 of 25,610 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (679 of 25,610 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (666 of 25,610 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 54.8% (14,022 of 25,610 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 83.0% (21,263 of 25,610 decks)
All enchantments (21)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.64 · 36.1% (9,240 of 25,610 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.71 · 25.4% (6,507 of 25,610 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.65 · 32.0% (8,199 of 25,610 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.71 · 19.1% (4,882 of 25,610 decks)
- Tectonic Split relevance 0.82 · 10.5% (2,699 of 25,610 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.82 · 9.1% (2,327 of 25,610 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.68 · 19.3% (4,951 of 25,610 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.71 · 15.1% (3,863 of 25,610 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.85 · 6.1% (1,568 of 25,610 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.56 · 32.3% (8,270 of 25,610 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.82 · 5.4% (1,387 of 25,610 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.81 · 4.5% (1,151 of 25,610 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.79 · 4.6% (1,169 of 25,610 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.83 · 4.0% (1,013 of 25,610 decks)
- Binding the Old Gods relevance 0.48 · 26.1% (6,685 of 25,610 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.78 · 4.1% (1,046 of 25,610 decks)
- Need for Speed relevance 0.87 · 3.4% (866 of 25,610 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.54 · 8.9% (2,277 of 25,610 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.84 · 2.5% (643 of 25,610 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.80 · 2.7% (696 of 25,610 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.57 · 2.8% (728 of 25,610 decks)
All instants (35)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.51 · 67.5% (17,290 of 25,610 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.41 · 81.2% (20,801 of 25,610 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.46 · 65.0% (16,643 of 25,610 decks)
- Windgrace's Judgment relevance 0.58 · 41.1% (10,533 of 25,610 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.69 · 21.4% (5,468 of 25,610 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.48 · 49.3% (12,632 of 25,610 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.60 · 24.7% (6,332 of 25,610 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.78 · 8.0% (2,047 of 25,610 decks)
- Rain of Filth relevance 0.75 · 9.4% (2,405 of 25,610 decks)
- Rakdos Charm relevance 0.44 · 51.8% (13,271 of 25,610 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.75 · 6.9% (1,757 of 25,610 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.74 · 5.8% (1,496 of 25,610 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.38 · 51.9% (13,281 of 25,610 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.66 · 5.2% (1,324 of 25,610 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.27 · 73.0% (18,686 of 25,610 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.31 · 56.3% (14,431 of 25,610 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.85 · 2.7% (679 of 25,610 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.54 · 7.2% (1,840 of 25,610 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.49 · 8.8% (2,258 of 25,610 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.47 · 10.4% (2,655 of 25,610 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.44 · 12.3% (3,155 of 25,610 decks)
- Witherbloom Charm relevance 0.75 · 2.6% (666 of 25,610 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (1,915 of 25,610 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (2,979 of 25,610 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.56 · 3.5% (909 of 25,610 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.58 · 3.3% (840 of 25,610 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.32 · 21.3% (5,453 of 25,610 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.54 · 3.3% (846 of 25,610 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.53 · 3.1% (801 of 25,610 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.55 · 2.9% (732 of 25,610 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (1,967 of 25,610 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.44 · 4.0% (1,029 of 25,610 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (1,149 of 25,610 decks)
- Assassin's Trophy relevance 0.18 · 33.2% (8,509 of 25,610 decks)
- Terminate relevance 0.24 · 5.9% (1,507 of 25,610 decks)
All sorceries (42)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.45 · 89.1% (22,826 of 25,610 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.53 · 67.3% (17,245 of 25,610 decks)
- Planetary Annihilation relevance 0.59 · 54.8% (14,022 of 25,610 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.68 · 29.7% (7,605 of 25,610 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.67 · 29.0% (7,424 of 25,610 decks)
- Gaze of Granite relevance 0.66 · 29.4% (7,536 of 25,610 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.62 · 33.4% (8,552 of 25,610 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.79 · 13.0% (3,341 of 25,610 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.72 · 19.0% (4,856 of 25,610 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.72 · 19.2% (4,916 of 25,610 decks)
- Reprocess relevance 0.83 · 10.7% (2,750 of 25,610 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.53 · 47.2% (12,096 of 25,610 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.60 · 33.8% (8,645 of 25,610 decks)
- Pitiless Carnage relevance 0.84 · 5.8% (1,491 of 25,610 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.78 · 6.0% (1,532 of 25,610 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.55 · 27.5% (7,034 of 25,610 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.78 · 4.9% (1,259 of 25,610 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.67 · 10.1% (2,590 of 25,610 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.64 · 8.3% (2,125 of 25,610 decks)
- Hew the Entwood relevance 0.92 · 2.9% (733 of 25,610 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.84 · 3.3% (855 of 25,610 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.40 · 33.0% (8,459 of 25,610 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.85 · 2.9% (751 of 25,610 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.25 · 78.6% (20,123 of 25,610 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.25 · 71.2% (18,247 of 25,610 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.65 · 4.1% (1,057 of 25,610 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.61 · 4.5% (1,141 of 25,610 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.26 · 61.4% (15,716 of 25,610 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.41 · 13.1% (3,343 of 25,610 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.21 · 74.7% (19,122 of 25,610 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.45 · 6.9% (1,777 of 25,610 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.41 · 11.1% (2,836 of 25,610 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.34 · 17.0% (4,349 of 25,610 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.63 · 2.7% (693 of 25,610 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.57 · 3.1% (798 of 25,610 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.58 · 2.9% (753 of 25,610 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.48 · 3.5% (887 of 25,610 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (1,468 of 25,610 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.52 · 2.7% (679 of 25,610 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (1,743 of 25,610 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.44 · 3.1% (804 of 25,610 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.29 · 8.0% (2,039 of 25,610 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 0.74 · 17.1% (4,373 of 25,610 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.71 · 6.8% (1,749 of 25,610 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.89 · 3.5% (899 of 25,610 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.76 · 2.6% (664 of 25,610 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.72 · 2.8% (721 of 25,610 decks)
All utility lands (41)
- Eumidian Hatchery relevance 0.54 · 63.3% (16,210 of 25,610 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.55 · 55.9% (14,316 of 25,610 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.49 · 58.1% (14,872 of 25,610 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.71 · 19.4% (4,979 of 25,610 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.61 · 25.5% (6,523 of 25,610 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.80 · 7.9% (2,017 of 25,610 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.60 · 25.5% (6,540 of 25,610 decks)
- Petrified Field relevance 0.87 · 4.6% (1,188 of 25,610 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.71 · 10.8% (2,758 of 25,610 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.46 · 45.8% (11,722 of 25,610 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.73 · 8.3% (2,116 of 25,610 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.75 · 6.6% (1,686 of 25,610 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.87 · 4.0% (1,028 of 25,610 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.66 · 9.6% (2,459 of 25,610 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.40 · 50.7% (12,992 of 25,610 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.29 · 76.9% (19,688 of 25,610 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.51 · 20.1% (5,154 of 25,610 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.78 · 4.1% (1,041 of 25,610 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.37 · 50.2% (12,851 of 25,610 decks)
- Canyon Slough relevance 0.38 · 47.7% (12,211 of 25,610 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.82 · 3.7% (937 of 25,610 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.61 · 5.3% (1,363 of 25,610 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.73 · 3.9% (989 of 25,610 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.83 · 3.1% (787 of 25,610 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.63 · 4.6% (1,179 of 25,610 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.72 · 3.5% (903 of 25,610 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.81 · 2.7% (694 of 25,610 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.44 · 14.3% (3,666 of 25,610 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.43 · 14.1% (3,608 of 25,610 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.40 · 20.2% (5,186 of 25,610 decks)
- Raucous Theater relevance 0.45 · 11.7% (3,005 of 25,610 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.51 · 6.0% (1,544 of 25,610 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.40 · 17.7% (4,538 of 25,610 decks)
- Twisted Landscape relevance 0.39 · 16.3% (4,167 of 25,610 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.60 · 3.7% (955 of 25,610 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (1,175 of 25,610 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (2,536 of 25,610 decks)
- Susur Secundi, Void Altar relevance 0.59 · 3.0% (757 of 25,610 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.36 · 6.2% (1,585 of 25,610 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (775 of 25,610 decks)
- Ziatora's Proving Ground relevance 0.24 · 26.4% (6,770 of 25,610 decks)
All lands (50)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.54 · 63.8% (16,349 of 25,610 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.54 · 61.5% (15,745 of 25,610 decks)
- Mountain Valley relevance 0.58 · 46.2% (11,834 of 25,610 decks)
- Rocky Tar Pit relevance 0.59 · 43.8% (11,209 of 25,610 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.62 · 33.9% (8,679 of 25,610 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.78 · 13.1% (3,365 of 25,610 decks)
- Kavaron, Memorial World relevance 0.83 · 7.0% (1,800 of 25,610 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.33 · 86.5% (22,147 of 25,610 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.81 · 8.2% (2,090 of 25,610 decks)
- Viridescent Bog relevance 0.52 · 38.6% (9,889 of 25,610 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.76 · 8.2% (2,092 of 25,610 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.82 · 4.9% (1,248 of 25,610 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.72 · 8.8% (2,262 of 25,610 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.43 · 51.5% (13,200 of 25,610 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.76 · 6.2% (1,592 of 25,610 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.68 · 6.1% (1,559 of 25,610 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.67 · 6.4% (1,634 of 25,610 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.67 · 5.9% (1,509 of 25,610 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.71 · 4.8% (1,229 of 25,610 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.57 · 11.9% (3,058 of 25,610 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.29 · 72.1% (18,466 of 25,610 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.51 · 14.6% (3,747 of 25,610 decks)
- Sulfurous Springs relevance 0.33 · 55.9% (14,316 of 25,610 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.32 · 59.1% (15,134 of 25,610 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.28 · 72.8% (18,639 of 25,610 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.29 · 65.6% (16,811 of 25,610 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.52 · 12.3% (3,152 of 25,610 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.53 · 10.6% (2,709 of 25,610 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.55 · 8.1% (2,080 of 25,610 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.53 · 9.1% (2,329 of 25,610 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.29 · 58.9% (15,083 of 25,610 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.52 · 9.8% (2,500 of 25,610 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.26 · 65.1% (16,674 of 25,610 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.53 · 6.0% (1,545 of 25,610 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (2,135 of 25,610 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.45 · 8.4% (2,150 of 25,610 decks)
- Badlands relevance 0.45 · 7.8% (1,986 of 25,610 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.27 · 38.0% (9,734 of 25,610 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.28 · 33.2% (8,515 of 25,610 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.27 · 36.9% (9,454 of 25,610 decks)
- Smoldering Marsh relevance 0.18 · 71.9% (18,425 of 25,610 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.60 · 2.7% (694 of 25,610 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.50 · 3.7% (947 of 25,610 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.17 · 75.3% (19,284 of 25,610 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (1,836 of 25,610 decks)
- Wastewood Verge relevance 0.49 · 3.5% (902 of 25,610 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (1,960 of 25,610 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.38 · 6.2% (1,587 of 25,610 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.53 · 2.9% (731 of 25,610 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.48 · 3.3% (847 of 25,610 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Hearthhull, the Worldseed, from 25,610 real Commander decks.