Wrenn and Seven

Played in 30,857 decks

Wrenn and Seven
$2.96 €1.27

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Winter, Cynical Opportunist relevance 5.22 · 62.5% (2,132 of 3,411 decks)
  2. Carth the Lion relevance 4.05 · 39.2% (893 of 2,279 decks)
  3. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 3.95 · 18.7% (243 of 1,300 decks)
  4. Borborygmos Enraged relevance 3.80 · 27.5% (381 of 1,386 decks)
  5. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 3.44 · 21.5% (595 of 2,762 decks)
  6. Six relevance 3.29 · 39.0% (720 of 1,845 decks)
  7. Lord Windgrace relevance 3.26 · 18.0% (850 of 4,714 decks)
  8. Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 3.24 · 14.5% (117 of 809 decks)
  9. Captain Sisay relevance 3.15 · 9.8% (173 of 1,763 decks)
  10. Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 2.98 · 37.2% (428 of 1,152 decks)
  11. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 2.93 · 5.1% (596 of 11,750 decks)
  12. Sasaya, Orochi Ascendant // Sasaya's Essence relevance 2.92 · 41.9% (295 of 704 decks)
  13. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.63 · 9.8% (898 of 9,139 decks)
  14. The Necrobloom relevance 2.51 · 9.4% (1,073 of 11,400 decks)
  15. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.48 · 4.9% (179 of 3,654 decks)
  16. Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.45 · 29.5% (228 of 774 decks)
  17. Child of Alara relevance 2.40 · 4.4% (256 of 5,857 decks)
  18. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.40 · 6.0% (107 of 1,789 decks)
  19. Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 2.36 · 12.7% (242 of 1,903 decks)
  20. Winter, Misanthropic Guide relevance 2.32 · 10.6% (366 of 3,439 decks)
  21. Tam, the Possibility relevance 2.31 · 3.9% (259 of 6,564 decks)
  22. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.30 · 13.0% (1,155 of 8,908 decks)
  23. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.30 · 6.7% (353 of 5,279 decks)
  24. Soul of Windgrace relevance 2.21 · 14.2% (149 of 1,046 decks)
  25. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.14 · 6.4% (261 of 4,053 decks)
  26. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.09 · 8.0% (374 of 4,680 decks)
  27. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 2.07 · 4.3% (85 of 1,960 decks)
  28. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.06 · 13.1% (114 of 871 decks)
  29. Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 2.05 · 8.1% (128 of 1,590 decks)
  30. Doran, the Siege Tower relevance 2.04 · 10.7% (212 of 1,975 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.20 33.7%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Harrow
    1.14 34.6%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Scute Swarm
    1.12 34.4%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.08 28.1%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.05 28.1%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.05 30.8%
    $0.44 €0.61
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.03 29.9%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.03 25.1%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.00 27.6%
    $0.27 €0.31
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.97 23.4%
    $0.33 €0.75
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.20 · 33.7% (10,407 of 30,857 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 1.14 · 34.6% (10,689 of 30,857 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 1.12 · 34.4% (10,630 of 30,857 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.08 · 28.1% (8,663 of 30,857 decks)
  5. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.05 · 28.1% (8,660 of 30,857 decks)
  6. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.05 · 30.8% (9,511 of 30,857 decks)
  7. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.03 · 29.9% (9,241 of 30,857 decks)
  8. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.03 · 25.1% (7,743 of 30,857 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.00 · 27.6% (8,523 of 30,857 decks)
  10. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.97 · 23.4% (7,233 of 30,857 decks)
  11. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.94 · 24.3% (7,512 of 30,857 decks)
  12. Six relevance 0.92 · 23.6% (7,294 of 30,857 decks)
  13. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.91 · 25.4% (7,848 of 30,857 decks)
  14. Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.89 · 18.4% (5,665 of 30,857 decks)
  15. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.88 · 25.1% (7,731 of 30,857 decks)
  16. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.87 · 28.0% (8,642 of 30,857 decks)
  17. Exploration relevance 0.85 · 24.6% (7,586 of 30,857 decks)
  18. Life from the Loam relevance 0.84 · 21.0% (6,478 of 30,857 decks)
  19. Crop Rotation relevance 0.82 · 26.2% (8,089 of 30,857 decks)
  20. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.81 · 29.1% (8,990 of 30,857 decks)
  21. Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.79 · 13.6% (4,193 of 30,857 decks)
  22. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.78 · 20.3% (6,259 of 30,857 decks)
  23. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (5,244 of 30,857 decks)
  24. Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.74 · 14.2% (4,372 of 30,857 decks)
  25. Rampant Growth relevance 0.74 · 35.6% (10,993 of 30,857 decks)
  26. Cultivate relevance 0.73 · 41.8% (12,907 of 30,857 decks)
  27. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.71 · 18.7% (5,760 of 30,857 decks)
  28. Explore relevance 0.71 · 21.7% (6,698 of 30,857 decks)
  29. Entish Restoration relevance 0.71 · 18.9% (5,825 of 30,857 decks)
  30. Spelunking relevance 0.71 · 17.2% (5,298 of 30,857 decks)

Creatures

24

Showing 1-10 of 24

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.20 33.7%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Scute Swarm
    1.12 34.4%
    $8.53 €7.58
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.08 28.1%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.05 28.1%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.05 30.8%
    $0.44 €0.61
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.03 29.9%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.03 25.1%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.00 27.6%
    $0.27 €0.31
  • Six
    0.92 23.6%
    $5.58 €5.11
  • Icetill Explorer
    0.91 25.4%
    $22.74 €23.91
All creatures (24)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.20 · 33.7% (10,407 of 30,857 decks)
  2. Scute Swarm relevance 1.12 · 34.4% (10,630 of 30,857 decks)
  3. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.08 · 28.1% (8,663 of 30,857 decks)
  4. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.05 · 28.1% (8,660 of 30,857 decks)
  5. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.05 · 30.8% (9,511 of 30,857 decks)
  6. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.03 · 29.9% (9,241 of 30,857 decks)
  7. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.03 · 25.1% (7,743 of 30,857 decks)
  8. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.00 · 27.6% (8,523 of 30,857 decks)
  9. Six relevance 0.92 · 23.6% (7,294 of 30,857 decks)
  10. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.91 · 25.4% (7,848 of 30,857 decks)
  11. Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.89 · 18.4% (5,665 of 30,857 decks)
  12. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.88 · 25.1% (7,731 of 30,857 decks)
  13. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.87 · 28.0% (8,642 of 30,857 decks)
  14. Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.81 · 29.1% (8,990 of 30,857 decks)
  15. Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.79 · 13.6% (4,193 of 30,857 decks)
  16. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.78 · 20.3% (6,259 of 30,857 decks)
  17. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (5,244 of 30,857 decks)
  18. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.71 · 18.7% (5,760 of 30,857 decks)
  19. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.70 · 16.3% (5,022 of 30,857 decks)
  20. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.68 · 16.4% (5,065 of 30,857 decks)
  21. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.68 · 16.6% (5,133 of 30,857 decks)
  22. Eternal Witness relevance 0.67 · 24.2% (7,470 of 30,857 decks)
  23. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.62 · 14.1% (4,366 of 30,857 decks)
  24. Dryad Arbor relevance 0.61 · 15.1% (4,668 of 30,857 decks)

Artifacts

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Conduit of Worlds
    0.94 24.3%
    $1.12 €1.38
  • Crucible of Worlds
    0.70 17.8%
    $33.00 €19.98
  • Zuran Orb
    0.63 15.2%
    $3.69 €1.81
All artifacts (3)
  1. Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.94 · 24.3% (7,512 of 30,857 decks)
  2. Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.70 · 17.8% (5,505 of 30,857 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 0.63 · 15.2% (4,680 of 30,857 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.85 24.6%
    $29.98 €27.12
  • Spelunking
    0.71 17.2%
    $3.43 €3.18
  • Druid Class
    0.61 12.5%
    $1.25 €1.84
  • Burgeoning
    0.60 14.5%
    $34.04 €23.83
All enchantments (4)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.85 · 24.6% (7,586 of 30,857 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.71 · 17.2% (5,298 of 30,857 decks)
  3. Druid Class relevance 0.61 · 12.5% (3,848 of 30,857 decks)
  4. Burgeoning relevance 0.60 · 14.5% (4,473 of 30,857 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Harrow
    1.14 34.6%
    $0.32 €0.37
  • Crop Rotation
    0.82 26.2%
    $3.83 €3.52
  • Entish Restoration
    0.71 18.9%
    $2.62 €1.95
  • Beast Within
    0.67 33.2%
    $0.65 €0.84
All instants (4)
  1. Harrow relevance 1.14 · 34.6% (10,689 of 30,857 decks)
  2. Crop Rotation relevance 0.82 · 26.2% (8,089 of 30,857 decks)
  3. Entish Restoration relevance 0.71 · 18.9% (5,825 of 30,857 decks)
  4. Beast Within relevance 0.67 · 33.2% (10,245 of 30,857 decks)

Sorceries

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.97 23.4%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Life from the Loam
    0.84 21.0%
    $5.21 €5.11
  • Rampant Growth
    0.74 35.6%
    $1.28 €0.51
  • Cultivate
    0.73 41.8%
    $0.41 €0.48
  • Explore
    0.71 21.7%
    $0.19 €0.27
  • Scapeshift
    0.66 14.6%
    $41.65 €33.09
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.65 28.0%
    $1.77 €1.50
  • Mulch
    0.63 10.7%
    $0.30 €0.11
All sorceries (8)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.97 · 23.4% (7,233 of 30,857 decks)
  2. Life from the Loam relevance 0.84 · 21.0% (6,478 of 30,857 decks)
  3. Rampant Growth relevance 0.74 · 35.6% (10,993 of 30,857 decks)
  4. Cultivate relevance 0.73 · 41.8% (12,907 of 30,857 decks)
  5. Explore relevance 0.71 · 21.7% (6,698 of 30,857 decks)
  6. Scapeshift relevance 0.66 · 14.6% (4,492 of 30,857 decks)
  7. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.65 · 28.0% (8,627 of 30,857 decks)
  8. Mulch relevance 0.63 · 10.7% (3,300 of 30,857 decks)

Planeswalkers

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Wrenn and Realmbreaker
    0.74 14.2%
    $6.79 €3.25
  • Nissa, Who Shakes the World
    0.69 14.1%
    $3.42 €1.95
All planeswalkers (2)
  1. Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.74 · 14.2% (4,372 of 30,857 decks)
  2. Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.69 · 14.1% (4,363 of 30,857 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.63 24.8%
    $16.76 €13.00
All utility lands (1)
  1. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.63 · 24.8% (7,661 of 30,857 decks)

Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Terramorphic Expanse
    0.70 34.5%
    $0.26 €0.11
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.68 39.5%
    $0.29 €0.14
  • Golgari Rot Farm
    0.64 18.6%
    $0.33 €0.35
  • Fabled Passage
    0.60 28.8%
    $0.64 €0.95
All lands (4)
  1. Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.70 · 34.5% (10,639 of 30,857 decks)
  2. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.68 · 39.5% (12,195 of 30,857 decks)
  3. Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.64 · 18.6% (5,735 of 30,857 decks)
  4. Fabled Passage relevance 0.60 · 28.8% (8,872 of 30,857 decks)

EDH data for Wrenn and Seven: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 30,857 real decks.