Color Identity Spread
1130+23+1+2+4+4+2+10+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (11)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 3.96 · 18.6% (247 of 1,331 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.48 · 4.9% (180 of 3,702 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.40 · 5.9% (108 of 1,821 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.32 · 1.7% (74 of 4,337 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.82 · 1.1% (28 of 2,545 decks)
- Eivor, Wolf-Kissed relevance 0.66 · 1.3% (11 of 848 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.27 · 1.1% (2 of 176 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.18 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.17 · 1.1% (1 of 88 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.43 · 51.1% (524 of 1,026 decks)
- Six relevance 1.36 · 32.5% (333 of 1,026 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.32 · 40.9% (420 of 1,026 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.28 · 39.4% (404 of 1,026 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.19 · 33.5% (344 of 1,026 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.18 · 44.6% (458 of 1,026 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 1.15 · 25.0% (257 of 1,026 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.11 · 27.2% (279 of 1,026 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.10 · 29.8% (306 of 1,026 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.09 · 34.0% (349 of 1,026 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 1.08 · 25.7% (264 of 1,026 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 1.07 · 21.9% (225 of 1,026 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.04 · 31.7% (325 of 1,026 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.03 · 34.4% (353 of 1,026 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.01 · 25.4% (261 of 1,026 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 0.97 · 22.3% (229 of 1,026 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.93 · 28.1% (288 of 1,026 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.91 · 24.1% (247 of 1,026 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.90 · 29.4% (302 of 1,026 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.89 · 38.3% (393 of 1,026 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.87 · 19.0% (195 of 1,026 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.86 · 21.2% (218 of 1,026 decks)
- Willow Geist relevance 0.85 · 14.5% (149 of 1,026 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.82 · 27.7% (284 of 1,026 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.80 · 14.7% (151 of 1,026 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.80 · 17.6% (181 of 1,026 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.79 · 23.6% (242 of 1,026 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.78 · 21.6% (222 of 1,026 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.77 · 21.8% (224 of 1,026 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.77 · 13.7% (141 of 1,026 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.43 · 51.1% (524 of 1,026 decks)
- Six relevance 1.36 · 32.5% (333 of 1,026 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.32 · 40.9% (420 of 1,026 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.28 · 39.4% (404 of 1,026 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.19 · 33.5% (344 of 1,026 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 1.15 · 25.0% (257 of 1,026 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.11 · 27.2% (279 of 1,026 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.09 · 34.0% (349 of 1,026 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 1.08 · 25.7% (264 of 1,026 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 1.07 · 21.9% (225 of 1,026 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.04 · 31.7% (325 of 1,026 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.03 · 34.4% (353 of 1,026 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.93 · 28.1% (288 of 1,026 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.90 · 29.4% (302 of 1,026 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.89 · 38.3% (393 of 1,026 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.87 · 19.0% (195 of 1,026 decks)
- Willow Geist relevance 0.85 · 14.5% (149 of 1,026 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.80 · 17.6% (181 of 1,026 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.79 · 23.6% (242 of 1,026 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.78 · 21.6% (222 of 1,026 decks)
- Rampant Rejuvenator relevance 0.77 · 14.3% (147 of 1,026 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.76 · 18.2% (187 of 1,026 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 0.75 · 17.9% (184 of 1,026 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.10 · 29.8% (306 of 1,026 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.86 · 21.2% (218 of 1,026 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.77 · 16.1% (165 of 1,026 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 1.18 · 44.6% (458 of 1,026 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.91 · 24.1% (247 of 1,026 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.82 · 27.7% (284 of 1,026 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.76 · 30.6% (314 of 1,026 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.01 · 25.4% (261 of 1,026 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 0.97 · 22.3% (229 of 1,026 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.77 · 21.8% (224 of 1,026 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.75 · 16.8% (172 of 1,026 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.80 · 14.7% (151 of 1,026 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.77 · 13.7% (141 of 1,026 decks)
All utility lands (10)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.15 · 33.3% (342 of 1,026 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.05 · 31.0% (318 of 1,026 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.01 · 29.9% (307 of 1,026 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.01 · 29.6% (304 of 1,026 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.95 · 28.0% (287 of 1,026 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 0.95 · 27.7% (284 of 1,026 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 0.88 · 25.3% (260 of 1,026 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 0.88 · 25.5% (262 of 1,026 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.85 · 24.3% (249 of 1,026 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.78 · 21.3% (219 of 1,026 decks)
All lands (4)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.98 · 31.1% (319 of 1,026 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.98 · 30.9% (317 of 1,026 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 0.94 · 29.7% (305 of 1,026 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.85 · 24.2% (248 of 1,026 decks)
EDH data for Wrenn and Seven: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,026 real decks.




























































