Azusa, Lost but Seeking

Played in 172,307 decks

Azusa, Lost but Seeking
$12.45 €8.66

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. The Gitrog Monster relevance 4.29 · 42.8% (2,305 of 5,388 decks)
  2. The Wandering Minstrel relevance 4.29 · 38.7% (4,543 of 11,725 decks)
  3. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 4.13 · 61.9% (2,633 of 4,251 decks)
  4. Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 3.79 · 39.5% (1,108 of 2,807 decks)
  5. The Necrobloom relevance 3.69 · 54.6% (6,219 of 11,380 decks)
  6. Child of Alara relevance 3.68 · 33.7% (1,971 of 5,852 decks)
  7. Flubs, the Fool relevance 3.62 · 57.0% (6,667 of 11,696 decks)
  8. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.30 · 58.4% (2,362 of 4,045 decks)
  9. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.26 · 39.8% (1,452 of 3,649 decks)
  10. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.25 · 65.3% (5,960 of 9,125 decks)
  11. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.24 · 52.9% (2,788 of 5,275 decks)
  12. Isu the Abominable relevance 3.00 · 32.6% (394 of 1,209 decks)
  13. Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 2.98 · 61.4% (974 of 1,587 decks)
  14. Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 2.96 · 47.5% (12,050 of 25,354 decks)
  15. Lord Windgrace relevance 2.87 · 63.0% (2,962 of 4,704 decks)
  16. Zask, Skittering Swarmlord relevance 2.86 · 23.5% (580 of 2,470 decks)
  17. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.85 · 37.7% (674 of 1,786 decks)
  18. Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 2.83 · 38.8% (2,302 of 5,938 decks)
  19. Sergeant John Benton relevance 2.81 · 27.3% (638 of 2,337 decks)
  20. Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.81 · 66.1% (6,504 of 9,847 decks)
  21. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.72 · 64.1% (5,707 of 8,897 decks)
  22. Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 2.67 · 35.5% (4,836 of 13,608 decks)
  23. Homer, the Hermit relevance 2.63 · 43.3% (2,008 of 4,636 decks)
  24. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.62 · 51.5% (2,406 of 4,673 decks)
  25. Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 2.54 · 34.6% (207 of 599 decks)
  26. Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 2.45 · 12.4% (1,343 of 10,844 decks)
  27. Loot, the Key to Everything relevance 2.44 · 43.5% (778 of 1,788 decks)
  28. Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 2.42 · 45.3% (2,605 of 5,755 decks)
  29. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 2.39 · 41.5% (1,145 of 2,760 decks)
  30. Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 2.30 · 38.5% (753 of 1,956 decks)

Replaced By

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All replaced by (2)
  1. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 4.1% of swaps out (4 swaps)
  2. Exploration 3.1% of swaps out (3 swaps)

Parallel Cards

6

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.78 51.6%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Exploration
    1.75 50.4%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.63 43.5%
    $2.01 €2.65
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.60 41.5%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.58 45.2%
    $9.94 €6.77
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.58 38.7%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Scute Swarm
    1.56 47.7%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.40 38.9%
    $23.22 €23.79
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.35 43.4%
    $4.18 €3.05
  • Crop Rotation
    1.28 40.9%
    $3.88 €3.54
All most relevant (30)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.78 · 51.6% (88,946 of 172,307 decks)
  2. Exploration relevance 1.75 · 50.4% (86,800 of 172,307 decks)
  3. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.63 · 43.5% (74,934 of 172,307 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.60 · 41.5% (71,540 of 172,307 decks)
  5. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.58 · 45.2% (77,837 of 172,307 decks)
  6. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.58 · 38.7% (66,626 of 172,307 decks)
  7. Scute Swarm relevance 1.56 · 47.7% (82,267 of 172,307 decks)
  8. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.40 · 38.9% (67,113 of 172,307 decks)
  9. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.35 · 43.4% (74,698 of 172,307 decks)
  10. Crop Rotation relevance 1.28 · 40.9% (70,555 of 172,307 decks)
  11. Harrow relevance 1.19 · 36.2% (62,346 of 172,307 decks)
  12. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.19 · 30.2% (52,018 of 172,307 decks)
  13. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.18 · 28.6% (49,338 of 172,307 decks)
  14. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.16 · 30.0% (51,613 of 172,307 decks)
  15. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.15 · 31.8% (54,760 of 172,307 decks)
  16. Scapeshift relevance 1.10 · 24.3% (41,932 of 172,307 decks)
  17. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.10 · 32.1% (55,388 of 172,307 decks)
  18. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.05 · 26.3% (45,258 of 172,307 decks)
  19. Zuran Orb relevance 1.05 · 25.2% (43,464 of 172,307 decks)
  20. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.03 · 23.9% (41,211 of 172,307 decks)
  21. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.94 · 24.5% (42,271 of 172,307 decks)
  22. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.93 · 22.9% (39,492 of 172,307 decks)
  23. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.91 · 20.8% (35,848 of 172,307 decks)
  24. Spelunking relevance 0.91 · 22.1% (38,082 of 172,307 decks)
  25. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.90 · 23.6% (40,652 of 172,307 decks)
  26. Nature's Lore relevance 0.89 · 45.2% (77,812 of 172,307 decks)
  27. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.89 · 21.3% (36,690 of 172,307 decks)
  28. Burgeoning relevance 0.88 · 21.1% (36,376 of 172,307 decks)
  29. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.86 · 20.6% (35,571 of 172,307 decks)
  30. Beast Within relevance 0.85 · 42.3% (72,941 of 172,307 decks)

Creatures

25

Showing 1-10 of 25

Page size
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.78 51.6%
    $5.92 €6.45
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.63 43.5%
    $2.01 €2.65
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.60 41.5%
    $4.84 €3.71
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.58 45.2%
    $9.94 €6.77
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.58 38.7%
    $13.07 €10.04
  • Scute Swarm
    1.56 47.7%
    $8.64 €7.74
  • Icetill Explorer
    1.40 38.9%
    $23.22 €23.79
  • Tireless Provisioner
    1.35 43.4%
    $4.18 €3.05
  • Rampaging Baloths
    1.15 31.8%
    $0.29 €0.31
  • Avenger of Zendikar
    1.10 32.1%
    $0.46 €0.58
All creatures (25)
  1. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.78 · 51.6% (88,946 of 172,307 decks)
  2. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.63 · 43.5% (74,934 of 172,307 decks)
  3. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.60 · 41.5% (71,540 of 172,307 decks)
  4. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.58 · 45.2% (77,837 of 172,307 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.58 · 38.7% (66,626 of 172,307 decks)
  6. Scute Swarm relevance 1.56 · 47.7% (82,267 of 172,307 decks)
  7. Icetill Explorer relevance 1.40 · 38.9% (67,113 of 172,307 decks)
  8. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.35 · 43.4% (74,698 of 172,307 decks)
  9. Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.15 · 31.8% (54,760 of 172,307 decks)
  10. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.10 · 32.1% (55,388 of 172,307 decks)
  11. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.05 · 26.3% (45,258 of 172,307 decks)
  12. Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.03 · 23.9% (41,211 of 172,307 decks)
  13. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.94 · 24.5% (42,271 of 172,307 decks)
  14. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.93 · 22.9% (39,492 of 172,307 decks)
  15. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.91 · 20.8% (35,848 of 172,307 decks)
  16. Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.90 · 23.6% (40,652 of 172,307 decks)
  17. The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.89 · 21.3% (36,690 of 172,307 decks)
  18. Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.86 · 20.6% (35,571 of 172,307 decks)
  19. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.81 · 18.7% (32,184 of 172,307 decks)
  20. Six relevance 0.81 · 20.7% (35,672 of 172,307 decks)
  21. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.81 · 18.5% (31,796 of 172,307 decks)
  22. Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.81 · 17.1% (29,443 of 172,307 decks)
  23. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.75 · 19.0% (32,689 of 172,307 decks)
  24. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.70 · 17.1% (29,426 of 172,307 decks)
  25. Eternal Witness relevance 0.69 · 24.9% (42,943 of 172,307 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.19 30.2%
    $33.00 €19.76
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.16 30.0%
    $1.14 €1.39
  • Zuran Orb
    1.05 25.2%
    $3.56 €1.81
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.77 17.5%
    $3.03 €3.23
All artifacts (4)
  1. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.19 · 30.2% (52,018 of 172,307 decks)
  2. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.16 · 30.0% (51,613 of 172,307 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 1.05 · 25.2% (43,464 of 172,307 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.77 · 17.5% (30,207 of 172,307 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Exploration
    1.75 50.4%
    $30.54 €26.79
  • Spelunking
    0.91 22.1%
    $3.67 €3.18
  • Burgeoning
    0.88 21.1%
    $34.04 €24.59
All enchantments (3)
  1. Exploration relevance 1.75 · 50.4% (86,800 of 172,307 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 0.91 · 22.1% (38,082 of 172,307 decks)
  3. Burgeoning relevance 0.88 · 21.1% (36,376 of 172,307 decks)

Instants

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.28 40.9%
    $3.88 €3.54
  • Harrow
    1.19 36.2%
    $0.31 €0.38
  • Beast Within
    0.85 42.3%
    $0.68 €0.85
  • Entish Restoration
    0.85 22.6%
    $2.79 €1.87
  • Heroic Intervention
    0.77 38.9%
    $17.55 €14.17
  • Roiling Regrowth
    0.74 17.3%
    $0.34 €0.30
All instants (6)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.28 · 40.9% (70,555 of 172,307 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 1.19 · 36.2% (62,346 of 172,307 decks)
  3. Beast Within relevance 0.85 · 42.3% (72,941 of 172,307 decks)
  4. Entish Restoration relevance 0.85 · 22.6% (39,022 of 172,307 decks)
  5. Heroic Intervention relevance 0.77 · 38.9% (67,023 of 172,307 decks)
  6. Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.74 · 17.3% (29,766 of 172,307 decks)

Sorceries

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Splendid Reclamation
    1.18 28.6%
    $0.33 €0.75
  • Scapeshift
    1.10 24.3%
    $41.33 €33.40
  • Nature's Lore
    0.89 45.2%
    $2.22 €2.82
  • Explore
    0.82 24.9%
    $0.19 €0.24
  • Life from the Loam
    0.79 19.6%
    $5.30 €5.08
  • Cultivate
    0.79 44.9%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Three Visits
    0.76 34.0%
    $5.54 €4.82
All sorceries (7)
  1. Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.18 · 28.6% (49,338 of 172,307 decks)
  2. Scapeshift relevance 1.10 · 24.3% (41,932 of 172,307 decks)
  3. Nature's Lore relevance 0.89 · 45.2% (77,812 of 172,307 decks)
  4. Explore relevance 0.82 · 24.9% (42,866 of 172,307 decks)
  5. Life from the Loam relevance 0.79 · 19.6% (33,821 of 172,307 decks)
  6. Cultivate relevance 0.79 · 44.9% (77,300 of 172,307 decks)
  7. Three Visits relevance 0.76 · 34.0% (58,511 of 172,307 decks)

Utility Lands

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Field of the Dead
    0.94 24.9%
    $28.94 €27.39
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.85 33.6%
    $17.14 €12.95
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.71 28.4%
    $48.89 €39.85
All utility lands (3)
  1. Field of the Dead relevance 0.94 · 24.9% (42,902 of 172,307 decks)
  2. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.85 · 33.6% (57,843 of 172,307 decks)
  3. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.71 · 28.4% (48,964 of 172,307 decks)

Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Fabled Passage
    0.87 41.3%
    $0.62 €0.95
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.70 30.4%
    $19.09 €16.84
All lands (2)
  1. Fabled Passage relevance 0.87 · 41.3% (71,174 of 172,307 decks)
  2. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.70 · 30.4% (52,430 of 172,307 decks)

EDH data for Azusa, Lost but Seeking: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 172,307 real decks.