Cards like Ramunap Excavator
10× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Abzan decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Abzan decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
8.6× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Abzan decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
6.8× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Harrow 25%
- Entish Restoration 19%
- Scapeshift 16%
- Roiling Regrowth 9%
- Planar Engineering 5%
- Cycle of Renewal 2%
Cards like Scute Swarm
5.9× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Abzan decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 52%
- Springheart Nantuko 20%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.6× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Abzan decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Abzan decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 40%
- Three Visits 31%
- Skyshroud Claim 5%
Other options: Glimpse the Core, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Ranger's Path, Hunting Wilds, Field Trip
Cards like Avacyn's Pilgrim
1.8× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Abzan decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 23%
- Llanowar Elves 19%
- Elvish Mystic 12%
- Fyndhorn Elves 7%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Dead, Druid of the Cowl, Steward of Valeron, Nantuko Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Rootrider Faun, Wirewood Elf, Golden Hind, Orochi Sustainer, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Skyshroud Troopers
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
8.9× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 18%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 6%
- Scythecat Cub 4%
- Sazh's Chocobo 2%
- Undergrowth Champion 1%
Other options: Oran-Rief Hydra, Territorial Scythecat, Floral Evoker, Prowling Felidar, Vinelasher Kudzu, Seedship Agrarian, Foe-liage, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Knight of the Reliquary
4.2× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Abzan decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Eladamri's Call
2.9× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Abzan decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 17%
- Worldly Tutor 14%
- Sylvan Tutor 1%
Cards like Cultivate
1.2× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other Abzan decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 24% of other Abzan decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.82 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Cultivate 33%
- Rampant Growth 26%
- Kodama's Reach 20%
- Shared Roots 4%
- Explosive Vegetation 1%
- Migration Path 1%
- Search for Tomorrow 1%
Other options: Grow from the Ashes, Far Wanderings, Verdant Mastery, Viewpoint Synchronization, Map the Frontier, Roamer's Routine, Reach the Horizon, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
2.5× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Aftermath Analyst 20%
- World Shaper 19%
Cards like Beast Within
1.7× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Abzan decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Beast Within 23%
- Generous Gift 14%
Cards like Grand Abolisher
3.5× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
2.5× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Exploration
6.2× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Abzan decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 20%
- Swiftfoot Boots 17%
Cards like Path to Exile
3.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 45% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.46 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Assassin's Trophy
2.5× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Assassin's Trophy 48%
- Erode 4%
- Deathsprout 1%
Cards like Drana and Linvala
14× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- The Necrobloom relevance 0.67 · 47.2% (2,821 of 5,977 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.66 · 45.0% (2,687 of 5,977 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.57 · 56.5% (3,377 of 5,977 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 48.6% (2,907 of 5,977 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.65 · 40.1% (2,398 of 5,977 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.73 · 26.9% (1,606 of 5,977 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.53 · 57.3% (3,422 of 5,977 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.71 · 29.0% (1,732 of 5,977 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.65 · 36.2% (2,163 of 5,977 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.75 · 20.7% (1,239 of 5,977 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.81 · 14.0% (838 of 5,977 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.54 · 52.4% (3,134 of 5,977 decks)
- Drana and Linvala relevance 0.72 · 20.5% (1,225 of 5,977 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.56 · 44.3% (2,647 of 5,977 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.77 · 14.1% (843 of 5,977 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.70 · 22.0% (1,315 of 5,977 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.60 · 37.4% (2,236 of 5,977 decks)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.83 · 9.2% (552 of 5,977 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.66 · 24.7% (1,479 of 5,977 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.62 · 29.3% (1,749 of 5,977 decks)
- Thalia, Guardian of Thraben relevance 0.77 · 12.3% (737 of 5,977 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.52 · 47.3% (2,825 of 5,977 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.56 · 38.7% (2,312 of 5,977 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.68 · 19.1% (1,142 of 5,977 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.68 · 18.1% (1,084 of 5,977 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.55 · 37.0% (2,212 of 5,977 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.75 · 11.6% (696 of 5,977 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.77 · 10.4% (624 of 5,977 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 0.71 · 12.7% (760 of 5,977 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.76 · 10.0% (599 of 5,977 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.76 · 10.1% (604 of 5,977 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.77 · 9.5% (568 of 5,977 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (871 of 5,977 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.58 · 27.7% (1,653 of 5,977 decks)
- Retreat to Emeria relevance 0.79 · 7.7% (461 of 5,977 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.80 · 7.0% (418 of 5,977 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.56 · 31.8% (1,898 of 5,977 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.71 · 11.7% (702 of 5,977 decks)
- Doorkeeper Thrull relevance 0.83 · 4.9% (294 of 5,977 decks)
- Thalia, Heretic Cathar relevance 0.76 · 8.3% (499 of 5,977 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.78 · 7.1% (423 of 5,977 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.82 · 5.0% (298 of 5,977 decks)
- Braids, Arisen Nightmare relevance 0.52 · 36.7% (2,196 of 5,977 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.76 · 7.8% (464 of 5,977 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 0.57 · 26.3% (1,573 of 5,977 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.61 · 20.3% (1,214 of 5,977 decks)
- Armageddon relevance 0.77 · 6.9% (413 of 5,977 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.49 · 40.0% (2,390 of 5,977 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.63 · 15.9% (948 of 5,977 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.71 · 9.9% (591 of 5,977 decks)
All creatures (50)
- The Necrobloom relevance 0.67 · 47.2% (2,821 of 5,977 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.66 · 45.0% (2,687 of 5,977 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.57 · 56.5% (3,377 of 5,977 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.73 · 26.9% (1,606 of 5,977 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.53 · 57.3% (3,422 of 5,977 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.71 · 29.0% (1,732 of 5,977 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.65 · 36.2% (2,163 of 5,977 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.75 · 20.7% (1,239 of 5,977 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.81 · 14.0% (838 of 5,977 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.54 · 52.4% (3,134 of 5,977 decks)
- Drana and Linvala relevance 0.72 · 20.5% (1,225 of 5,977 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.56 · 44.3% (2,647 of 5,977 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.77 · 14.1% (843 of 5,977 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.60 · 37.4% (2,236 of 5,977 decks)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.83 · 9.2% (552 of 5,977 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.66 · 24.7% (1,479 of 5,977 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.62 · 29.3% (1,749 of 5,977 decks)
- Thalia, Guardian of Thraben relevance 0.77 · 12.3% (737 of 5,977 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.56 · 38.7% (2,312 of 5,977 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.68 · 18.1% (1,084 of 5,977 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.55 · 37.0% (2,212 of 5,977 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.75 · 11.6% (696 of 5,977 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 0.71 · 12.7% (760 of 5,977 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.76 · 10.0% (599 of 5,977 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (871 of 5,977 decks)
- Doorkeeper Thrull relevance 0.83 · 4.9% (294 of 5,977 decks)
- Thalia, Heretic Cathar relevance 0.76 · 8.3% (499 of 5,977 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.82 · 5.0% (298 of 5,977 decks)
- Braids, Arisen Nightmare relevance 0.52 · 36.7% (2,196 of 5,977 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.76 · 7.8% (464 of 5,977 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 0.57 · 26.3% (1,573 of 5,977 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.49 · 40.0% (2,390 of 5,977 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines relevance 0.63 · 15.1% (905 of 5,977 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.61 · 17.4% (1,042 of 5,977 decks)
- The Gitrog, Ravenous Ride relevance 0.71 · 9.5% (568 of 5,977 decks)
- Bloodghast relevance 0.75 · 7.0% (419 of 5,977 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.71 · 9.1% (543 of 5,977 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.65 · 12.7% (760 of 5,977 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.69 · 9.4% (560 of 5,977 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.58 · 18.7% (1,119 of 5,977 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.53 · 28.4% (1,699 of 5,977 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.56 · 20.3% (1,216 of 5,977 decks)
- Hushbringer relevance 0.80 · 4.7% (279 of 5,977 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.65 · 11.4% (683 of 5,977 decks)
- Dauthi Voidwalker relevance 0.65 · 11.4% (681 of 5,977 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.71 · 7.2% (428 of 5,977 decks)
- Aven Mindcensor relevance 0.65 · 11.0% (657 of 5,977 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 0.59 · 14.1% (840 of 5,977 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.84 · 4.1% (246 of 5,977 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.61 · 11.8% (706 of 5,977 decks)
All artifacts (35)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 48.6% (2,907 of 5,977 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.65 · 40.1% (2,398 of 5,977 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.77 · 9.5% (568 of 5,977 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.80 · 7.0% (418 of 5,977 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.61 · 20.3% (1,214 of 5,977 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.66 · 8.4% (504 of 5,977 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.64 · 5.5% (329 of 5,977 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.77 · 3.2% (190 of 5,977 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.57 · 4.8% (289 of 5,977 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.59 · 4.1% (246 of 5,977 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.40 · 15.0% (894 of 5,977 decks)
- Cauldron of Essence relevance 0.50 · 5.3% (314 of 5,977 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.50 · 5.0% (299 of 5,977 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.37 · 19.9% (1,187 of 5,977 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.67 · 2.9% (175 of 5,977 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.56 · 3.9% (232 of 5,977 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.54 · 4.1% (245 of 5,977 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.59 · 3.1% (185 of 5,977 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (390 of 5,977 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.31 · 17.5% (1,044 of 5,977 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.40 · 4.8% (284 of 5,977 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (271 of 5,977 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (284 of 5,977 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.44 · 3.3% (198 of 5,977 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (230 of 5,977 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (272 of 5,977 decks)
- Talisman of Hierarchy relevance 0.35 · 3.9% (233 of 5,977 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.39 · 2.9% (174 of 5,977 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (191 of 5,977 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (202 of 5,977 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (156 of 5,977 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (169 of 5,977 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (149 of 5,977 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.09 · 44.9% (2,682 of 5,977 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 63.8% (3,812 of 5,977 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.70 · 22.0% (1,315 of 5,977 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.52 · 47.3% (2,825 of 5,977 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.68 · 19.1% (1,142 of 5,977 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.77 · 10.4% (624 of 5,977 decks)
- Retreat to Emeria relevance 0.79 · 7.7% (461 of 5,977 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.56 · 31.8% (1,898 of 5,977 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.78 · 7.1% (423 of 5,977 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.78 · 4.9% (294 of 5,977 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.70 · 9.1% (545 of 5,977 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.76 · 5.3% (314 of 5,977 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.58 · 12.9% (772 of 5,977 decks)
- Stony Silence relevance 0.73 · 4.7% (278 of 5,977 decks)
- Rule of Law relevance 0.70 · 4.9% (291 of 5,977 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.66 · 6.3% (379 of 5,977 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.60 · 10.2% (611 of 5,977 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.61 · 8.7% (519 of 5,977 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.57 · 9.5% (565 of 5,977 decks)
- Grave Pact relevance 0.61 · 4.9% (292 of 5,977 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.72 · 3.7% (221 of 5,977 decks)
- Bastion of Remembrance relevance 0.53 · 6.3% (379 of 5,977 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.58 · 4.6% (276 of 5,977 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.60 · 4.4% (264 of 5,977 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.41 · 20.9% (1,248 of 5,977 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.63 · 4.0% (237 of 5,977 decks)
- Dictate of Erebos relevance 0.63 · 4.0% (238 of 5,977 decks)
- Moldervine Reclamation relevance 0.50 · 7.1% (424 of 5,977 decks)
- Overgrown Estate relevance 0.75 · 2.9% (171 of 5,977 decks)
- The Meathook Massacre relevance 0.51 · 5.9% (355 of 5,977 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.51 · 6.0% (361 of 5,977 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.44 · 11.4% (682 of 5,977 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.47 · 7.6% (452 of 5,977 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.47 · 6.4% (383 of 5,977 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (315 of 5,977 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (449 of 5,977 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.40 · 10.6% (633 of 5,977 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.58 · 3.5% (207 of 5,977 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.37 · 13.7% (821 of 5,977 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.55 · 3.7% (224 of 5,977 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.54 · 3.7% (221 of 5,977 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.54 · 3.6% (217 of 5,977 decks)
- Pattern of Rebirth relevance 0.61 · 2.6% (154 of 5,977 decks)
- Aura of Silence relevance 0.57 · 3.0% (179 of 5,977 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.42 · 4.9% (291 of 5,977 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.52 · 3.1% (184 of 5,977 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.55 · 2.7% (159 of 5,977 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 0.54 · 2.7% (162 of 5,977 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.51 · 2.9% (172 of 5,977 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.35 · 5.9% (350 of 5,977 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (283 of 5,977 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.40 · 4.0% (239 of 5,977 decks)
All instants (47)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.71 · 11.7% (702 of 5,977 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.56 · 24.6% (1,472 of 5,977 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.49 · 38.0% (2,269 of 5,977 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.58 · 19.0% (1,137 of 5,977 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.68 · 8.9% (533 of 5,977 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.65 · 5.9% (351 of 5,977 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.53 · 14.1% (841 of 5,977 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.62 · 7.3% (436 of 5,977 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.49 · 16.5% (988 of 5,977 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.54 · 11.1% (666 of 5,977 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.56 · 8.5% (507 of 5,977 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.55 · 7.6% (457 of 5,977 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.47 · 14.1% (841 of 5,977 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.45 · 15.2% (910 of 5,977 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.45 · 12.5% (750 of 5,977 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.49 · 9.2% (547 of 5,977 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.42 · 14.2% (848 of 5,977 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.55 · 4.7% (282 of 5,977 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.52 · 5.4% (325 of 5,977 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.41 · 15.1% (900 of 5,977 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (594 of 5,977 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (548 of 5,977 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.59 · 3.9% (232 of 5,977 decks)
- Inkshield relevance 0.54 · 4.3% (258 of 5,977 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.43 · 8.8% (525 of 5,977 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.47 · 5.2% (310 of 5,977 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.44 · 7.1% (426 of 5,977 decks)
- Erode relevance 0.56 · 3.7% (223 of 5,977 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.33 · 22.9% (1,367 of 5,977 decks)
- Assassin's Trophy relevance 0.25 · 47.6% (2,843 of 5,977 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.52 · 3.8% (228 of 5,977 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 0.42 · 5.4% (321 of 5,977 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (376 of 5,977 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.40 · 5.4% (324 of 5,977 decks)
- Mythos of Nethroi relevance 0.49 · 3.6% (216 of 5,977 decks)
- Village Rites relevance 0.48 · 3.8% (227 of 5,977 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.49 · 3.5% (209 of 5,977 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.26 · 30.0% (1,793 of 5,977 decks)
- Despark relevance 0.32 · 9.7% (580 of 5,977 decks)
- Dina's Guidance relevance 0.51 · 2.7% (159 of 5,977 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.44 · 3.5% (212 of 5,977 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (170 of 5,977 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.17 · 47.7% (2,850 of 5,977 decks)
- Anguished Unmaking relevance 0.19 · 32.3% (1,928 of 5,977 decks)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (153 of 5,977 decks)
- Mortify relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (233 of 5,977 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.11 · 60.2% (3,601 of 5,977 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.58 · 27.7% (1,653 of 5,977 decks)
- Armageddon relevance 0.77 · 6.9% (413 of 5,977 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.63 · 15.9% (948 of 5,977 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.50 · 28.4% (1,697 of 5,977 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.67 · 6.9% (411 of 5,977 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.69 · 6.0% (358 of 5,977 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.69 · 5.4% (322 of 5,977 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.55 · 15.5% (926 of 5,977 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.64 · 7.4% (442 of 5,977 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.58 · 10.8% (644 of 5,977 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.64 · 6.9% (413 of 5,977 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (801 of 5,977 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.53 · 11.7% (698 of 5,977 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.44 · 22.6% (1,350 of 5,977 decks)
- Chain of Smog relevance 0.71 · 3.7% (224 of 5,977 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.51 · 9.7% (578 of 5,977 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.54 · 6.4% (383 of 5,977 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.42 · 20.5% (1,228 of 5,977 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.66 · 3.9% (234 of 5,977 decks)
- Painful Truths relevance 0.53 · 5.4% (325 of 5,977 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.49 · 8.0% (477 of 5,977 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.62 · 4.0% (239 of 5,977 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (541 of 5,977 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.56 · 4.5% (271 of 5,977 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.60 · 4.1% (246 of 5,977 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.52 · 5.0% (297 of 5,977 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.50 · 5.1% (306 of 5,977 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (508 of 5,977 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.37 · 16.7% (998 of 5,977 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.47 · 5.5% (330 of 5,977 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.32 · 30.5% (1,823 of 5,977 decks)
- Dig Up relevance 0.64 · 3.1% (184 of 5,977 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.59 · 3.6% (213 of 5,977 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (1,195 of 5,977 decks)
- Vindicate relevance 0.56 · 3.6% (215 of 5,977 decks)
- Eerie Ultimatum relevance 0.32 · 24.5% (1,463 of 5,977 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.58 · 3.3% (199 of 5,977 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.27 · 40.0% (2,390 of 5,977 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.57 · 3.2% (191 of 5,977 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.42 · 5.3% (319 of 5,977 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.51 · 3.7% (221 of 5,977 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.29 · 25.8% (1,542 of 5,977 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.61 · 2.5% (151 of 5,977 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (172 of 5,977 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.52 · 3.4% (201 of 5,977 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.53 · 3.2% (190 of 5,977 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.56 · 2.6% (155 of 5,977 decks)
- Insatiable Avarice relevance 0.55 · 2.7% (164 of 5,977 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.51 · 2.9% (176 of 5,977 decks)
- Debt to the Deathless relevance 0.55 · 2.5% (149 of 5,977 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.76 · 10.1% (604 of 5,977 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.71 · 9.9% (591 of 5,977 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.62 · 5.0% (301 of 5,977 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.79 · 2.7% (160 of 5,977 decks)
- Liliana, Dreadhorde General relevance 0.63 · 3.5% (210 of 5,977 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.48 · 3.7% (223 of 5,977 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.70 · 3.6% (218 of 5,977 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.63 · 22.2% (1,329 of 5,977 decks)
- Eumidian Hatchery relevance 0.79 · 7.5% (451 of 5,977 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.71 · 12.3% (733 of 5,977 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.53 · 32.8% (1,959 of 5,977 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.74 · 7.8% (467 of 5,977 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.62 · 14.8% (885 of 5,977 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.70 · 9.0% (536 of 5,977 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (677 of 5,977 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.69 · 5.8% (346 of 5,977 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.60 · 9.6% (571 of 5,977 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.45 · 18.4% (1,097 of 5,977 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.63 · 4.6% (277 of 5,977 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.53 · 8.4% (505 of 5,977 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.54 · 7.5% (446 of 5,977 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.48 · 11.4% (683 of 5,977 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.47 · 12.5% (748 of 5,977 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.54 · 5.9% (355 of 5,977 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.75 · 3.1% (186 of 5,977 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.53 · 6.1% (364 of 5,977 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.43 · 14.2% (850 of 5,977 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.47 · 9.4% (560 of 5,977 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.50 · 6.2% (373 of 5,977 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.37 · 24.6% (1,473 of 5,977 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.35 · 30.1% (1,800 of 5,977 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.52 · 4.8% (288 of 5,977 decks)
- Silent Clearing relevance 0.49 · 6.7% (402 of 5,977 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (613 of 5,977 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.32 · 33.5% (2,004 of 5,977 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.36 · 20.6% (1,234 of 5,977 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.35 · 22.6% (1,348 of 5,977 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.37 · 16.7% (1,000 of 5,977 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.58 · 3.7% (223 of 5,977 decks)
- Agadeem's Awakening // Agadeem, the Undercrypt relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (254 of 5,977 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.44 · 7.4% (445 of 5,977 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (426 of 5,977 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.35 · 15.2% (907 of 5,977 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (387 of 5,977 decks)
- Westvale Abbey // Ormendahl, Profane Prince relevance 0.56 · 3.5% (212 of 5,977 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.63 · 2.7% (161 of 5,977 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.57 · 3.3% (200 of 5,977 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (462 of 5,977 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.42 · 5.0% (300 of 5,977 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.59 · 2.8% (170 of 5,977 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.52 · 3.3% (197 of 5,977 decks)
- Deceptive Landscape relevance 0.30 · 18.8% (1,125 of 5,977 decks)
- Indatha Triome relevance 0.22 · 42.6% (2,545 of 5,977 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.23 · 38.8% (2,320 of 5,977 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.42 · 4.2% (252 of 5,977 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.52 · 2.7% (163 of 5,977 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.48 · 3.2% (194 of 5,977 decks)
All lands (50)
- Flagstones of Trokair relevance 0.69 · 22.7% (1,355 of 5,977 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.65 · 14.1% (841 of 5,977 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.65 · 12.6% (753 of 5,977 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.63 · 9.3% (558 of 5,977 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.68 · 5.1% (304 of 5,977 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.66 · 5.2% (313 of 5,977 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.41 · 34.1% (2,038 of 5,977 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.53 · 12.8% (765 of 5,977 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.53 · 12.2% (727 of 5,977 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.54 · 11.4% (682 of 5,977 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.45 · 24.3% (1,454 of 5,977 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (715 of 5,977 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.43 · 29.3% (1,749 of 5,977 decks)
- Orzhov Basilica relevance 0.46 · 21.1% (1,261 of 5,977 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.49 · 15.1% (902 of 5,977 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.48 · 15.6% (935 of 5,977 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.64 · 4.6% (276 of 5,977 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.50 · 12.5% (749 of 5,977 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.42 · 25.0% (1,497 of 5,977 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.51 · 11.1% (666 of 5,977 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.49 · 12.0% (719 of 5,977 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.47 · 12.8% (768 of 5,977 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.67 · 3.8% (230 of 5,977 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.55 · 5.6% (335 of 5,977 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.41 · 16.3% (977 of 5,977 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.41 · 16.6% (993 of 5,977 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.41 · 15.7% (936 of 5,977 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.49 · 7.4% (441 of 5,977 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.52 · 5.3% (317 of 5,977 decks)
- Darkbore Pathway // Slitherbore Pathway relevance 0.49 · 5.6% (332 of 5,977 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.45 · 8.5% (506 of 5,977 decks)
- Brightclimb Pathway // Grimclimb Pathway relevance 0.48 · 5.4% (321 of 5,977 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.66 · 3.0% (181 of 5,977 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (443 of 5,977 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.47 · 5.6% (332 of 5,977 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.45 · 5.9% (350 of 5,977 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.26 · 46.1% (2,755 of 5,977 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.25 · 47.8% (2,857 of 5,977 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.41 · 9.2% (548 of 5,977 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.61 · 3.0% (177 of 5,977 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.24 · 50.2% (3,002 of 5,977 decks)
- Fetid Heath relevance 0.42 · 6.0% (356 of 5,977 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.33 · 15.8% (947 of 5,977 decks)
- Riftstone Portal relevance 0.61 · 2.7% (161 of 5,977 decks)
- Haunted Mire relevance 0.52 · 3.7% (222 of 5,977 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.50 · 3.9% (232 of 5,977 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (510 of 5,977 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (410 of 5,977 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.29 · 26.4% (1,577 of 5,977 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (446 of 5,977 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Thalia and The Gitrog Monster, from 5,977 real Commander decks.